Continuity of two variables in toplogical space .
Let $T$ is subset of real numbers .Let $k$ is any number which is not in $T$ .
Define $$kT ={ kt : t in T}. $$
Let $W$ is toplogy(not usual) on $T$ , then can you prove that :
$$H={ kU : U in W }$$ is topology for $kT$ .
And is the function $f:kTtimes kTto kT$ continuous with respect to $H$ if it is defined as
$$f (kt,ks)=k (t+s ),$$ for $t ,s in T$?
Note that it is given : for every $s,t in T $, $s+t$ belongs to $T .$
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces metrizability
New contributor
add a comment |
Let $T$ is subset of real numbers .Let $k$ is any number which is not in $T$ .
Define $$kT ={ kt : t in T}. $$
Let $W$ is toplogy(not usual) on $T$ , then can you prove that :
$$H={ kU : U in W }$$ is topology for $kT$ .
And is the function $f:kTtimes kTto kT$ continuous with respect to $H$ if it is defined as
$$f (kt,ks)=k (t+s ),$$ for $t ,s in T$?
Note that it is given : for every $s,t in T $, $s+t$ belongs to $T .$
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces metrizability
New contributor
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
add a comment |
Let $T$ is subset of real numbers .Let $k$ is any number which is not in $T$ .
Define $$kT ={ kt : t in T}. $$
Let $W$ is toplogy(not usual) on $T$ , then can you prove that :
$$H={ kU : U in W }$$ is topology for $kT$ .
And is the function $f:kTtimes kTto kT$ continuous with respect to $H$ if it is defined as
$$f (kt,ks)=k (t+s ),$$ for $t ,s in T$?
Note that it is given : for every $s,t in T $, $s+t$ belongs to $T .$
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces metrizability
New contributor
Let $T$ is subset of real numbers .Let $k$ is any number which is not in $T$ .
Define $$kT ={ kt : t in T}. $$
Let $W$ is toplogy(not usual) on $T$ , then can you prove that :
$$H={ kU : U in W }$$ is topology for $kT$ .
And is the function $f:kTtimes kTto kT$ continuous with respect to $H$ if it is defined as
$$f (kt,ks)=k (t+s ),$$ for $t ,s in T$?
Note that it is given : for every $s,t in T $, $s+t$ belongs to $T .$
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces metrizability
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces metrizability
New contributor
New contributor
edited Dec 27 '18 at 8:50
MotylaNogaTomkaMazura
6,542917
6,542917
New contributor
asked Dec 27 '18 at 8:12
Guru
63
63
New contributor
New contributor
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
add a comment |
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Thew first part follows from the relations $k(cup U_i)=cup kU_i$, $k(U cap V)=kUcap kV$, $kemptyset =kemptyset$. For the second part, taking $T=(1,infty)$ and $k=1$ you are asking if $(t,s) to t+s$ is continuous for ANY topology on $(1,infty)$. This is not true.
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Guru is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053701%2fcontinuity-of-two-variables-in-toplogical-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thew first part follows from the relations $k(cup U_i)=cup kU_i$, $k(U cap V)=kUcap kV$, $kemptyset =kemptyset$. For the second part, taking $T=(1,infty)$ and $k=1$ you are asking if $(t,s) to t+s$ is continuous for ANY topology on $(1,infty)$. This is not true.
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
add a comment |
Thew first part follows from the relations $k(cup U_i)=cup kU_i$, $k(U cap V)=kUcap kV$, $kemptyset =kemptyset$. For the second part, taking $T=(1,infty)$ and $k=1$ you are asking if $(t,s) to t+s$ is continuous for ANY topology on $(1,infty)$. This is not true.
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
add a comment |
Thew first part follows from the relations $k(cup U_i)=cup kU_i$, $k(U cap V)=kUcap kV$, $kemptyset =kemptyset$. For the second part, taking $T=(1,infty)$ and $k=1$ you are asking if $(t,s) to t+s$ is continuous for ANY topology on $(1,infty)$. This is not true.
Thew first part follows from the relations $k(cup U_i)=cup kU_i$, $k(U cap V)=kUcap kV$, $kemptyset =kemptyset$. For the second part, taking $T=(1,infty)$ and $k=1$ you are asking if $(t,s) to t+s$ is continuous for ANY topology on $(1,infty)$. This is not true.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 9:56
Kavi Rama Murthy
50.5k31854
50.5k31854
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
add a comment |
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
Kavi Rama murthy thanks for your reply .But i am asking how can we check continuity of above function with respect to topology H? Not on arbitrary toplogy .Thanks onece again.
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 11:06
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
@Guru When $k=1$ $kT=T$ and the topology on $kT$ is same as the topology on $T$. The topology yon $T$ is not specified. It can be any topology. So the map $(t,s) to t+s$ need not be continuous.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 11:45
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
Ok... thanks a lot sir , kavi Rama murthy .one last qeustion " which book is the best to understand the concept of " toplogical fields " , homeomorphism between toplogical fields and homeomorphism on field structure together with isomorphisim for beggner"?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 14:58
add a comment |
Guru is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Guru is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Guru is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Guru is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053701%2fcontinuity-of-two-variables-in-toplogical-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The second line is unclear. Can you rephrase it?
– caffeinemachine
Dec 27 '18 at 8:16
Kavi Rama Murthy can you explain it little more. How by definition it will hold?
– Guru
Dec 27 '18 at 9:41
@Guru I had misread the second part. I have posted an answer now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04