The normalizer of a $p$ sylow subgroup is itself












0












$begingroup$


By the orbit-stabilizer theorem since the action is transitive then an orbit ${gPg^{-1}: gin G} =n_p$ is equal to the number of $p$ sylow subgroups in a group $|G|=p^{alpha}s$ with $(p^alpha,s)=1$ and we get that $$|G/Stab_G(P)|=|G/{gin G: gPg^{-1}=P}|=frac{p^alpha s}{|N_G(P)|}=n_p text{ with } begin{cases} n_pequiv 1mod{p} \ n_pmid s end{cases}$$



The second condition on $n_p$ implies that $|N_G(P)|=p^beta$ for some $betalealpha$



The first condition seems imply that $|N_G(P)|=p^alphaimpliesbeta=alpha$



I'm not sure where I'm going with this but I'd like to know what characterizes a group that acts transitively/not transitively...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 11:01












  • $begingroup$
    The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
    $endgroup$
    – P Vanchinathan
    Jan 7 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 7 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 12:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Jan 7 at 12:50
















0












$begingroup$


By the orbit-stabilizer theorem since the action is transitive then an orbit ${gPg^{-1}: gin G} =n_p$ is equal to the number of $p$ sylow subgroups in a group $|G|=p^{alpha}s$ with $(p^alpha,s)=1$ and we get that $$|G/Stab_G(P)|=|G/{gin G: gPg^{-1}=P}|=frac{p^alpha s}{|N_G(P)|}=n_p text{ with } begin{cases} n_pequiv 1mod{p} \ n_pmid s end{cases}$$



The second condition on $n_p$ implies that $|N_G(P)|=p^beta$ for some $betalealpha$



The first condition seems imply that $|N_G(P)|=p^alphaimpliesbeta=alpha$



I'm not sure where I'm going with this but I'd like to know what characterizes a group that acts transitively/not transitively...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 11:01












  • $begingroup$
    The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
    $endgroup$
    – P Vanchinathan
    Jan 7 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 7 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 12:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Jan 7 at 12:50














0












0








0





$begingroup$


By the orbit-stabilizer theorem since the action is transitive then an orbit ${gPg^{-1}: gin G} =n_p$ is equal to the number of $p$ sylow subgroups in a group $|G|=p^{alpha}s$ with $(p^alpha,s)=1$ and we get that $$|G/Stab_G(P)|=|G/{gin G: gPg^{-1}=P}|=frac{p^alpha s}{|N_G(P)|}=n_p text{ with } begin{cases} n_pequiv 1mod{p} \ n_pmid s end{cases}$$



The second condition on $n_p$ implies that $|N_G(P)|=p^beta$ for some $betalealpha$



The first condition seems imply that $|N_G(P)|=p^alphaimpliesbeta=alpha$



I'm not sure where I'm going with this but I'd like to know what characterizes a group that acts transitively/not transitively...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




By the orbit-stabilizer theorem since the action is transitive then an orbit ${gPg^{-1}: gin G} =n_p$ is equal to the number of $p$ sylow subgroups in a group $|G|=p^{alpha}s$ with $(p^alpha,s)=1$ and we get that $$|G/Stab_G(P)|=|G/{gin G: gPg^{-1}=P}|=frac{p^alpha s}{|N_G(P)|}=n_p text{ with } begin{cases} n_pequiv 1mod{p} \ n_pmid s end{cases}$$



The second condition on $n_p$ implies that $|N_G(P)|=p^beta$ for some $betalealpha$



The first condition seems imply that $|N_G(P)|=p^alphaimpliesbeta=alpha$



I'm not sure where I'm going with this but I'd like to know what characterizes a group that acts transitively/not transitively...







group-theory sylow-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 11:50







John Cataldo

















asked Jan 7 at 10:58









John CataldoJohn Cataldo

1,1831316




1,1831316












  • $begingroup$
    The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 11:01












  • $begingroup$
    The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
    $endgroup$
    – P Vanchinathan
    Jan 7 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 7 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 12:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Jan 7 at 12:50


















  • $begingroup$
    The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 11:01












  • $begingroup$
    The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
    $endgroup$
    – P Vanchinathan
    Jan 7 at 11:04










  • $begingroup$
    Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
    $endgroup$
    – John Cataldo
    Jan 7 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
    $endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Jan 7 at 12:06






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
    $endgroup$
    – the_fox
    Jan 7 at 12:50
















$begingroup$
The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 11:01






$begingroup$
The statement that any two Sylow $p$-subgroups of $G$ are conjugate in $G$ is logically equivalent to the statement that the conjugation action of $G$ on its set of Sylow $p$-subgroups is transitive.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 11:01














$begingroup$
The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
$endgroup$
– P Vanchinathan
Jan 7 at 11:04




$begingroup$
The transitivity of action on p-Sylow subgroups is one part of Sylow's theorem. As the action is by conjugation, this means any two p-Sylow subgroups are conjugate.
$endgroup$
– P Vanchinathan
Jan 7 at 11:04












$begingroup$
Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
$endgroup$
– John Cataldo
Jan 7 at 11:49




$begingroup$
Ok but do you agree that the normalizer of a $p$-sylow subgroup is always itself? Because $|N_G(P)|=p^alpha$ and $Psubset N_G(P)$
$endgroup$
– John Cataldo
Jan 7 at 11:49












$begingroup$
No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 12:06




$begingroup$
No, that is nonsense. The cyclic group of order $6$ is a counterexample.
$endgroup$
– Derek Holt
Jan 7 at 12:06




1




1




$begingroup$
How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Jan 7 at 12:50




$begingroup$
How do you get that the order of $N_G(P)$ must be a power of $p$?
$endgroup$
– the_fox
Jan 7 at 12:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The second condition implies that $lvert N_G (P) rvert = p^alphaleft(dfrac{s}{n_p}right)$.
This does not imply that $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is a power of the prime $p$.
What it does imply, however (since $gcd (p^alpha, s) = 1$), is that the highest power of $p$ that divides the integer $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is $p^alpha$.



P.S. The correct relationship between a $p$-Sylow subgroup $P$ of $G$ and its normaliser is that $[G:N_G (P)] = n_p$.
There is a bijection between all conjugates of $P$ (i.e. all the $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$) and the left cosets of $N_G (P)$.
The bijection is $gPg^{-1} mapsto gN_G (P)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064878%2fthe-normalizer-of-a-p-sylow-subgroup-is-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The second condition implies that $lvert N_G (P) rvert = p^alphaleft(dfrac{s}{n_p}right)$.
    This does not imply that $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is a power of the prime $p$.
    What it does imply, however (since $gcd (p^alpha, s) = 1$), is that the highest power of $p$ that divides the integer $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is $p^alpha$.



    P.S. The correct relationship between a $p$-Sylow subgroup $P$ of $G$ and its normaliser is that $[G:N_G (P)] = n_p$.
    There is a bijection between all conjugates of $P$ (i.e. all the $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$) and the left cosets of $N_G (P)$.
    The bijection is $gPg^{-1} mapsto gN_G (P)$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The second condition implies that $lvert N_G (P) rvert = p^alphaleft(dfrac{s}{n_p}right)$.
      This does not imply that $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is a power of the prime $p$.
      What it does imply, however (since $gcd (p^alpha, s) = 1$), is that the highest power of $p$ that divides the integer $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is $p^alpha$.



      P.S. The correct relationship between a $p$-Sylow subgroup $P$ of $G$ and its normaliser is that $[G:N_G (P)] = n_p$.
      There is a bijection between all conjugates of $P$ (i.e. all the $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$) and the left cosets of $N_G (P)$.
      The bijection is $gPg^{-1} mapsto gN_G (P)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The second condition implies that $lvert N_G (P) rvert = p^alphaleft(dfrac{s}{n_p}right)$.
        This does not imply that $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is a power of the prime $p$.
        What it does imply, however (since $gcd (p^alpha, s) = 1$), is that the highest power of $p$ that divides the integer $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is $p^alpha$.



        P.S. The correct relationship between a $p$-Sylow subgroup $P$ of $G$ and its normaliser is that $[G:N_G (P)] = n_p$.
        There is a bijection between all conjugates of $P$ (i.e. all the $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$) and the left cosets of $N_G (P)$.
        The bijection is $gPg^{-1} mapsto gN_G (P)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The second condition implies that $lvert N_G (P) rvert = p^alphaleft(dfrac{s}{n_p}right)$.
        This does not imply that $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is a power of the prime $p$.
        What it does imply, however (since $gcd (p^alpha, s) = 1$), is that the highest power of $p$ that divides the integer $lvert N_G (P) rvert$ is $p^alpha$.



        P.S. The correct relationship between a $p$-Sylow subgroup $P$ of $G$ and its normaliser is that $[G:N_G (P)] = n_p$.
        There is a bijection between all conjugates of $P$ (i.e. all the $p$-Sylow subgroups of $G$) and the left cosets of $N_G (P)$.
        The bijection is $gPg^{-1} mapsto gN_G (P)$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 7 at 13:13









        Chaitanya TappuChaitanya Tappu

        595214




        595214






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064878%2fthe-normalizer-of-a-p-sylow-subgroup-is-itself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg