Choosing the vertices of a regular hexagon, how many ways are there to form four triangles such that any two...
$begingroup$
In other words, how many ways are there to choose four $3$-combinations of a $6$-set, such that each two combinations contain exactly one common element, modulo dihedral group $D_6$?
For example, ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ and ${2,3,4}, {2,5,6},{3,5,1}, {4,6,1}$ belong to the same class, but ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,5,6}, {3,4,6}$ does not.
Context: I am considering partitions of a $4$-set and partially ordering them by refinement. The result is a lattice which I am trying to visualize by a $3$D graph. The most interesting part of the graph involves a square and a regular hexagon. For example: ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ leads to this visualization.
Edit: I have categorized all $30$ possibilities into $5$ orbits:
- (three edges of the hexagon missing, $4$ elements) $124.135.256.346, 125.134.246.356, 135.146.236.245, 136.145.235.246.$
(two edges, one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.145.246.356, 124.135.236.456, 125.136.246.345, 126.135.245.346, 134.156.235.246, 135.146.234.256.$
(one edge, two short diagonals missing, $12$ elements) $123.145.256.346, 123.146.245.356, 124.136.235.456, 124.136.256.345, 124.156.235.346, 125.134.236.456, 125.146.234.356, 125.146.236.345, 126.134.245.356, 126.145.235.346, 134.156.236.245, 136.145.234.256.$
(two short and one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.146.256.345, 123.156.245.346, 124.156.236.345, 125.136.234.456, 126.134.235.456, 126.145.234.356.$
(three long diagonals missing, $2$ elements) $123.156.246.345, 126.135.234.456.$
combinatorics graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In other words, how many ways are there to choose four $3$-combinations of a $6$-set, such that each two combinations contain exactly one common element, modulo dihedral group $D_6$?
For example, ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ and ${2,3,4}, {2,5,6},{3,5,1}, {4,6,1}$ belong to the same class, but ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,5,6}, {3,4,6}$ does not.
Context: I am considering partitions of a $4$-set and partially ordering them by refinement. The result is a lattice which I am trying to visualize by a $3$D graph. The most interesting part of the graph involves a square and a regular hexagon. For example: ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ leads to this visualization.
Edit: I have categorized all $30$ possibilities into $5$ orbits:
- (three edges of the hexagon missing, $4$ elements) $124.135.256.346, 125.134.246.356, 135.146.236.245, 136.145.235.246.$
(two edges, one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.145.246.356, 124.135.236.456, 125.136.246.345, 126.135.245.346, 134.156.235.246, 135.146.234.256.$
(one edge, two short diagonals missing, $12$ elements) $123.145.256.346, 123.146.245.356, 124.136.235.456, 124.136.256.345, 124.156.235.346, 125.134.236.456, 125.146.234.356, 125.146.236.345, 126.134.245.356, 126.145.235.346, 134.156.236.245, 136.145.234.256.$
(two short and one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.146.256.345, 123.156.245.346, 124.156.236.345, 125.136.234.456, 126.134.235.456, 126.145.234.356.$
(three long diagonals missing, $2$ elements) $123.156.246.345, 126.135.234.456.$
combinatorics graph-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In other words, how many ways are there to choose four $3$-combinations of a $6$-set, such that each two combinations contain exactly one common element, modulo dihedral group $D_6$?
For example, ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ and ${2,3,4}, {2,5,6},{3,5,1}, {4,6,1}$ belong to the same class, but ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,5,6}, {3,4,6}$ does not.
Context: I am considering partitions of a $4$-set and partially ordering them by refinement. The result is a lattice which I am trying to visualize by a $3$D graph. The most interesting part of the graph involves a square and a regular hexagon. For example: ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ leads to this visualization.
Edit: I have categorized all $30$ possibilities into $5$ orbits:
- (three edges of the hexagon missing, $4$ elements) $124.135.256.346, 125.134.246.356, 135.146.236.245, 136.145.235.246.$
(two edges, one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.145.246.356, 124.135.236.456, 125.136.246.345, 126.135.245.346, 134.156.235.246, 135.146.234.256.$
(one edge, two short diagonals missing, $12$ elements) $123.145.256.346, 123.146.245.356, 124.136.235.456, 124.136.256.345, 124.156.235.346, 125.134.236.456, 125.146.234.356, 125.146.236.345, 126.134.245.356, 126.145.235.346, 134.156.236.245, 136.145.234.256.$
(two short and one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.146.256.345, 123.156.245.346, 124.156.236.345, 125.136.234.456, 126.134.235.456, 126.145.234.356.$
(three long diagonals missing, $2$ elements) $123.156.246.345, 126.135.234.456.$
combinatorics graph-theory
$endgroup$
In other words, how many ways are there to choose four $3$-combinations of a $6$-set, such that each two combinations contain exactly one common element, modulo dihedral group $D_6$?
For example, ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ and ${2,3,4}, {2,5,6},{3,5,1}, {4,6,1}$ belong to the same class, but ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,5,6}, {3,4,6}$ does not.
Context: I am considering partitions of a $4$-set and partially ordering them by refinement. The result is a lattice which I am trying to visualize by a $3$D graph. The most interesting part of the graph involves a square and a regular hexagon. For example: ${1,2,3}, {1,4,5},{2,4,6}, {3,5,6}$ leads to this visualization.
Edit: I have categorized all $30$ possibilities into $5$ orbits:
- (three edges of the hexagon missing, $4$ elements) $124.135.256.346, 125.134.246.356, 135.146.236.245, 136.145.235.246.$
(two edges, one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.145.246.356, 124.135.236.456, 125.136.246.345, 126.135.245.346, 134.156.235.246, 135.146.234.256.$
(one edge, two short diagonals missing, $12$ elements) $123.145.256.346, 123.146.245.356, 124.136.235.456, 124.136.256.345, 124.156.235.346, 125.134.236.456, 125.146.234.356, 125.146.236.345, 126.134.245.356, 126.145.235.346, 134.156.236.245, 136.145.234.256.$
(two short and one long diagonal missing, $6$ elements) $123.146.256.345, 123.156.245.346, 124.156.236.345, 125.136.234.456, 126.134.235.456, 126.145.234.356.$
(three long diagonals missing, $2$ elements) $123.156.246.345, 126.135.234.456.$
combinatorics graph-theory
combinatorics graph-theory
edited Jan 9 at 13:11
David Tarandek
asked Jan 8 at 15:45
David TarandekDavid Tarandek
234
234
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Four triangles means twelve slots to fill. There are six vertices to place in those slots. No vertex can occur three times, because it can't occur twice in a single triangle, and if there are three triangles which share that vertex and no other then there must be six other distinct vertices. In short: by two applications of the pigeonhole principle, each vertex is in precisely two of the triangles.
Therefore each vertex has four neighbours, so is missing precisely one neighbour, and they pair up: the overall graph is $K_6$ from which three non-adjacent edges have been removed.
The possibilities for the missing edges modulo the dihedral group are:
- Three edges of the hexagon (e.g. $0-1, 2-3, 4-5$)
- Two edges of the hexagon and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-1, 2-5, 3-4$)
- One edge of the hexagon and two short diagonals (e.g. $0-1, 2-4, 3-5$)
- Two short diagonals and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-2, 1-4, 3-5$)
- Three long diagonals (e.g. $0-3, 1-4, 2-5$)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I'll define group equivalency such that$${2,3,4},{2,5,6},{3,5,1},{4,6,1}equiv{1,3,5},{1,4,6},{2,3,4},{2,5,6}$$ so that we only need to consider combinations where $1$ is in each of the first two groups.
With that restriction there are $binom{5}{2}=10$ ways to fill the first group and $binom{3}{2}=3$ ways to fill the second. Dividing by $2$ because each is counted twice gives $frac{10*3}{2}=15$ ways to fill the first two groups. Each will have the form ${a,b,c},{a,d,e}$ and there are $2$ ways to fill the other two groups: ${b,d,f},{c,e,f}$ and ${b,e,f},{c,d,f}$. That gives a total of $30$ distinct combinations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066330%2fchoosing-the-vertices-of-a-regular-hexagon-how-many-ways-are-there-to-form-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Four triangles means twelve slots to fill. There are six vertices to place in those slots. No vertex can occur three times, because it can't occur twice in a single triangle, and if there are three triangles which share that vertex and no other then there must be six other distinct vertices. In short: by two applications of the pigeonhole principle, each vertex is in precisely two of the triangles.
Therefore each vertex has four neighbours, so is missing precisely one neighbour, and they pair up: the overall graph is $K_6$ from which three non-adjacent edges have been removed.
The possibilities for the missing edges modulo the dihedral group are:
- Three edges of the hexagon (e.g. $0-1, 2-3, 4-5$)
- Two edges of the hexagon and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-1, 2-5, 3-4$)
- One edge of the hexagon and two short diagonals (e.g. $0-1, 2-4, 3-5$)
- Two short diagonals and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-2, 1-4, 3-5$)
- Three long diagonals (e.g. $0-3, 1-4, 2-5$)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Four triangles means twelve slots to fill. There are six vertices to place in those slots. No vertex can occur three times, because it can't occur twice in a single triangle, and if there are three triangles which share that vertex and no other then there must be six other distinct vertices. In short: by two applications of the pigeonhole principle, each vertex is in precisely two of the triangles.
Therefore each vertex has four neighbours, so is missing precisely one neighbour, and they pair up: the overall graph is $K_6$ from which three non-adjacent edges have been removed.
The possibilities for the missing edges modulo the dihedral group are:
- Three edges of the hexagon (e.g. $0-1, 2-3, 4-5$)
- Two edges of the hexagon and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-1, 2-5, 3-4$)
- One edge of the hexagon and two short diagonals (e.g. $0-1, 2-4, 3-5$)
- Two short diagonals and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-2, 1-4, 3-5$)
- Three long diagonals (e.g. $0-3, 1-4, 2-5$)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Four triangles means twelve slots to fill. There are six vertices to place in those slots. No vertex can occur three times, because it can't occur twice in a single triangle, and if there are three triangles which share that vertex and no other then there must be six other distinct vertices. In short: by two applications of the pigeonhole principle, each vertex is in precisely two of the triangles.
Therefore each vertex has four neighbours, so is missing precisely one neighbour, and they pair up: the overall graph is $K_6$ from which three non-adjacent edges have been removed.
The possibilities for the missing edges modulo the dihedral group are:
- Three edges of the hexagon (e.g. $0-1, 2-3, 4-5$)
- Two edges of the hexagon and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-1, 2-5, 3-4$)
- One edge of the hexagon and two short diagonals (e.g. $0-1, 2-4, 3-5$)
- Two short diagonals and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-2, 1-4, 3-5$)
- Three long diagonals (e.g. $0-3, 1-4, 2-5$)
$endgroup$
Four triangles means twelve slots to fill. There are six vertices to place in those slots. No vertex can occur three times, because it can't occur twice in a single triangle, and if there are three triangles which share that vertex and no other then there must be six other distinct vertices. In short: by two applications of the pigeonhole principle, each vertex is in precisely two of the triangles.
Therefore each vertex has four neighbours, so is missing precisely one neighbour, and they pair up: the overall graph is $K_6$ from which three non-adjacent edges have been removed.
The possibilities for the missing edges modulo the dihedral group are:
- Three edges of the hexagon (e.g. $0-1, 2-3, 4-5$)
- Two edges of the hexagon and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-1, 2-5, 3-4$)
- One edge of the hexagon and two short diagonals (e.g. $0-1, 2-4, 3-5$)
- Two short diagonals and one long diagonal (e.g. $0-2, 1-4, 3-5$)
- Three long diagonals (e.g. $0-3, 1-4, 2-5$)
answered Jan 9 at 9:24
Peter TaylorPeter Taylor
9,03212342
9,03212342
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Very observant. The missing edges approach also reveals the solution with the most symmetries - number $5$, so this one will be the most suited for visualization. In hindsight, this should have been obvious. These pairs represent disjunct partitions such as ${{1,2},{3},{4}}$ and ${{3,4},{1},{2}}$, whose common predecessor is a $2+2$ partition ${{1,2},{3,4}}$. It is only natural to place these pairs on the ends of the long diagonals.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I'll define group equivalency such that$${2,3,4},{2,5,6},{3,5,1},{4,6,1}equiv{1,3,5},{1,4,6},{2,3,4},{2,5,6}$$ so that we only need to consider combinations where $1$ is in each of the first two groups.
With that restriction there are $binom{5}{2}=10$ ways to fill the first group and $binom{3}{2}=3$ ways to fill the second. Dividing by $2$ because each is counted twice gives $frac{10*3}{2}=15$ ways to fill the first two groups. Each will have the form ${a,b,c},{a,d,e}$ and there are $2$ ways to fill the other two groups: ${b,d,f},{c,e,f}$ and ${b,e,f},{c,d,f}$. That gives a total of $30$ distinct combinations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I'll define group equivalency such that$${2,3,4},{2,5,6},{3,5,1},{4,6,1}equiv{1,3,5},{1,4,6},{2,3,4},{2,5,6}$$ so that we only need to consider combinations where $1$ is in each of the first two groups.
With that restriction there are $binom{5}{2}=10$ ways to fill the first group and $binom{3}{2}=3$ ways to fill the second. Dividing by $2$ because each is counted twice gives $frac{10*3}{2}=15$ ways to fill the first two groups. Each will have the form ${a,b,c},{a,d,e}$ and there are $2$ ways to fill the other two groups: ${b,d,f},{c,e,f}$ and ${b,e,f},{c,d,f}$. That gives a total of $30$ distinct combinations.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, I'll define group equivalency such that$${2,3,4},{2,5,6},{3,5,1},{4,6,1}equiv{1,3,5},{1,4,6},{2,3,4},{2,5,6}$$ so that we only need to consider combinations where $1$ is in each of the first two groups.
With that restriction there are $binom{5}{2}=10$ ways to fill the first group and $binom{3}{2}=3$ ways to fill the second. Dividing by $2$ because each is counted twice gives $frac{10*3}{2}=15$ ways to fill the first two groups. Each will have the form ${a,b,c},{a,d,e}$ and there are $2$ ways to fill the other two groups: ${b,d,f},{c,e,f}$ and ${b,e,f},{c,d,f}$. That gives a total of $30$ distinct combinations.
$endgroup$
First, I'll define group equivalency such that$${2,3,4},{2,5,6},{3,5,1},{4,6,1}equiv{1,3,5},{1,4,6},{2,3,4},{2,5,6}$$ so that we only need to consider combinations where $1$ is in each of the first two groups.
With that restriction there are $binom{5}{2}=10$ ways to fill the first group and $binom{3}{2}=3$ ways to fill the second. Dividing by $2$ because each is counted twice gives $frac{10*3}{2}=15$ ways to fill the first two groups. Each will have the form ${a,b,c},{a,d,e}$ and there are $2$ ways to fill the other two groups: ${b,d,f},{c,e,f}$ and ${b,e,f},{c,d,f}$. That gives a total of $30$ distinct combinations.
answered Jan 8 at 18:34
Daniel MathiasDaniel Mathias
1,29018
1,29018
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
1
1
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
This is fine as far as it goes, but since OP asks "modulo dihedral group $D_6$" I think you're using too loose a group equivalency.
$endgroup$
– Peter Taylor
Jan 9 at 9:00
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
$begingroup$
@PeterTaylor true. However, this answer is useful: I put these $30$ choices under the action of $D_6$ and came up with $5$ orbits. They consist of $12, 6, 6, 4, 2$ elements respectively. I will edit my question and classify them according to your $5$ possibilities.
$endgroup$
– David Tarandek
Jan 9 at 12:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066330%2fchoosing-the-vertices-of-a-regular-hexagon-how-many-ways-are-there-to-form-four%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown