Why is $mathscr{A}_{infty}=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n$ never a $sigma$-algebra?












2












$begingroup$



Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that



$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$



is never a $sigma$-algebra.




This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.



Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:21










  • $begingroup$
    I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your editing.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 30 '18 at 19:16












  • $begingroup$
    To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – dpb492
    Jan 3 at 1:59
















2












$begingroup$



Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that



$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$



is never a $sigma$-algebra.




This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.



Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:21










  • $begingroup$
    I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your editing.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 30 '18 at 19:16












  • $begingroup$
    To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – dpb492
    Jan 3 at 1:59














2












2








2


2



$begingroup$



Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that



$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$



is never a $sigma$-algebra.




This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.



Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that



$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$



is never a $sigma$-algebra.




This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.



Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]







measure-theory elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 3 at 0:08









Davide Giraudo

125k16150261




125k16150261










asked Dec 30 '18 at 11:16









takutaku

111




111












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:21










  • $begingroup$
    I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your editing.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 30 '18 at 19:16












  • $begingroup$
    To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – dpb492
    Jan 3 at 1:59


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:21










  • $begingroup$
    I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
    $endgroup$
    – Sangchul Lee
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:28










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your editing.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Dec 30 '18 at 11:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
    $endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Dec 30 '18 at 19:16












  • $begingroup$
    To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – dpb492
    Jan 3 at 1:59
















$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21




$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21












$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28




$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28












$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51




$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51




1




1




$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16






$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16














$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59




$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The problem reduces to the following.




Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.




Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$

For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$

Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$

Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 0:07










  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 9:59










  • $begingroup$
    I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 14:09










  • $begingroup$
    We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 16:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056729%2fwhy-is-mathscra-infty-bigcup-n-in-mathbbn-mathscra-n-never-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The problem reduces to the following.




Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.




Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$

For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$

Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$

Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 0:07










  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 9:59










  • $begingroup$
    I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 14:09










  • $begingroup$
    We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 16:16
















1












$begingroup$

The problem reduces to the following.




Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.




Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$

For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$

Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$

Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 0:07










  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 9:59










  • $begingroup$
    I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 14:09










  • $begingroup$
    We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 16:16














1












1








1





$begingroup$

The problem reduces to the following.




Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.




Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$

For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$

Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$

Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The problem reduces to the following.




Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.




Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$

For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$

Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$

Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 3 at 15:04









Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo

125k16150261




125k16150261












  • $begingroup$
    I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 0:07










  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 9:59










  • $begingroup$
    I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 14:09










  • $begingroup$
    We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 16:16


















  • $begingroup$
    I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 0:07










  • $begingroup$
    Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 9:59










  • $begingroup$
    I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 14:09










  • $begingroup$
    We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
    $endgroup$
    – Davide Giraudo
    Jan 4 at 14:12










  • $begingroup$
    I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – taku
    Jan 4 at 16:16
















$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07




$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07












$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59




$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59












$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09




$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09












$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12




$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12












$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16




$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056729%2fwhy-is-mathscra-infty-bigcup-n-in-mathbbn-mathscra-n-never-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

張江高科駅