Why is $mathscr{A}_{infty}=bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n$ never a $sigma$-algebra?
$begingroup$
Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that
$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$
is never a $sigma$-algebra.
This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.
Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]
measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that
$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$
is never a $sigma$-algebra.
This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.
Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]
measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
1
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that
$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$
is never a $sigma$-algebra.
This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.
Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]
measure-theory elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
Problem: Let $(X, mathscr{A})$ be a measurable space and $(mathscr{A}_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ be a strictly increasing sequence of $sigma$-algebras. Show that
$$ mathscr{A}_{infty} := bigcup_{ninmathbb{N}} mathscr{A}_n $$
is never a $sigma$-algebra.
This is a problem of a book of Rene Schilling. He shows an answer of this problem on his homepage. However I don't understand the last part, Step 5. I don't know there always exists the smallest set $B_n$.
Here is his solutions. This problem is Problem 3.8. [pp.24-26]
measure-theory elementary-set-theory
measure-theory elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 3 at 0:08
Davide Giraudo
125k16150261
125k16150261
asked Dec 30 '18 at 11:16
takutaku
111
111
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
1
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
1
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
1
1
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem reduces to the following.
Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.
Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$
For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$
Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$
Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056729%2fwhy-is-mathscra-infty-bigcup-n-in-mathbbn-mathscra-n-never-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The problem reduces to the following.
Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.
Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$
For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$
Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$
Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem reduces to the following.
Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.
Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$
For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$
Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$
Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The problem reduces to the following.
Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.
Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$
For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$
Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$
Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.
$endgroup$
The problem reduces to the following.
Let $mathcal A$ be a $sigma$-algebra on $mathbb N$. For all $kinmathbb N$, there exists a minimal element (for the inclusion) $E_k$ of $mathcal A$ containing $k$.
Indeed, define
$$
I:=left{iinmathbb Nmid exists A_iinmathcal A,kin A_i,inotin A_iright}.
$$
For each $iin I$, choose $A_iinmathcal A$ such that $kin A_i$ and $inotin A_i$. Define
$$
E_k:= bigcap_{iin I}A_i.
$$
Then $E_kinmathcal A$ and $kin E_k$. Let $Binmathcal A$ be such that $kin B$. We have to check that $E_ksubset B$. Observe that $inotin A_i$ hence
$$
E_k= bigcap_{iin I}A_isetminus {i}=bigcap_{iin I}A_icap left(mathbb Nsetminus {i}right)=E_ksetminus I.
$$
Let $jin E_k=E_ksetminus I$. We know that for all $Sinmathcal A$, we either have $knotin S$ or $jin S$. Apply this to $B$ to get that $knotin B$ or $jin B$. Since $kin B$, the only possibility is that $jin B$, which proves that $E_ksubset B$.
answered Jan 3 at 15:04
Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo
125k16150261
125k16150261
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
I think the cardinality of σ-algebra is’t necessarily countable.So,I think “I” may be not well-defined.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 0:07
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Actually, a $sigma$-algebra is either finite or uncountable but why would this be a problem in the definition of $I$?
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 9:59
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
I see there is no problem,Sorry,but I don’t understand why for all S∈A k is not an element of S or j∈S.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 14:09
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
We know that $j$ is not an element of $I$: this means that for each element $S$ of $mathcal A$, the assertion ($kin S$ and $jnotin S$) is not true.
$endgroup$
– Davide Giraudo
Jan 4 at 14:12
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
$begingroup$
I have completely understood! Thank you for your answer.
$endgroup$
– taku
Jan 4 at 16:16
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3056729%2fwhy-is-mathscra-infty-bigcup-n-in-mathbbn-mathscra-n-never-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Welcome to MSE! Please take time to read how to format your question using MathJax, see this for instance.
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:21
$begingroup$
I also slightly changed the title and the formatting of the question. Hope this is to your liking!
$endgroup$
– Sangchul Lee
Dec 30 '18 at 11:28
$begingroup$
Thank you for your editing.
$endgroup$
– taku
Dec 30 '18 at 11:51
1
$begingroup$
$nin mathbb{N}in mathscr{A}_n$
$endgroup$
– d.k.o.
Dec 30 '18 at 19:16
$begingroup$
To echo what user d.k.o mentioned, I think there is an implicit use of the well-ordering theorem.
$endgroup$
– dpb492
Jan 3 at 1:59