Prove every subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$












0












$begingroup$


In Linear Algebra Done Right, the book proves that every subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$. I generally follow the proof, but do not understand some points.



Suppose $V$ is finite-dimensional and $U$ is a subspace of $V$. Then there is a subspace $W$ of $V$ such that $V = Ubigoplus W$.



Proof
Because $V$ is finite-dimensional, so is $U$ (proved in 2.26. I am OK). Thus there is a basis $u_1,...,u_m$ of $U$. Of course $u_1,...u_m$ is a linearly independent list of vectors in $V$ (I am OK). Hence this list can be extended to a basis $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...,w_n$ of $V$ (I am not OK. Does it mean $w_1,...w_n$ can only be vectors that extend to the basis of $V$? If so, why the title of the proof said EVERY subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$).



To prove $V = Ubigoplus W$, we need only show that $$V = U+W text{ and } U cap W = {0}$$ (I am OK).



To prove the first equation above, suppose $v in V$. Then, because the list $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...w_n$ spans $V$, there exist $a_1,...a_m, b_1,...b_m in mathbb{F}$ such that $$v=a_1u_1+...+a_mu_m+b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$.



In other words, we have $v=u+w$, wheere $u in U$ and $w in W$ are defined as above. Thus $v in U + W$, completing the proof that $V = U + W$. (I am also OK.)



To show that $U cap W = {0}$, suppose $v in U cap W$. Then there exist scalars $a_1,...,a_m,b_1,...b_n in mathbb{F}$ such that



$$v=a_1v_1+...+a_mv_m = b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$. Thus
$$a_1u_ + ...+a_mu_m - b_1w_1-...-b_nw_n = 0$$



Because $u_1,...u_m,w_1,...,w_n$ is linearly independent, this implies that $a_1=...=a_m=b_1=...=b_n = 0$. Thus $v=0$, completing the proof that $U cap W = {0}$.



Is the proof means for every subspace $U$ of finite-dimensional $V$, we can find a $W$ that is the direct sum of $V$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 1 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
    $endgroup$
    – Fortox
    Jan 1 at 23:13


















0












$begingroup$


In Linear Algebra Done Right, the book proves that every subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$. I generally follow the proof, but do not understand some points.



Suppose $V$ is finite-dimensional and $U$ is a subspace of $V$. Then there is a subspace $W$ of $V$ such that $V = Ubigoplus W$.



Proof
Because $V$ is finite-dimensional, so is $U$ (proved in 2.26. I am OK). Thus there is a basis $u_1,...,u_m$ of $U$. Of course $u_1,...u_m$ is a linearly independent list of vectors in $V$ (I am OK). Hence this list can be extended to a basis $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...,w_n$ of $V$ (I am not OK. Does it mean $w_1,...w_n$ can only be vectors that extend to the basis of $V$? If so, why the title of the proof said EVERY subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$).



To prove $V = Ubigoplus W$, we need only show that $$V = U+W text{ and } U cap W = {0}$$ (I am OK).



To prove the first equation above, suppose $v in V$. Then, because the list $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...w_n$ spans $V$, there exist $a_1,...a_m, b_1,...b_m in mathbb{F}$ such that $$v=a_1u_1+...+a_mu_m+b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$.



In other words, we have $v=u+w$, wheere $u in U$ and $w in W$ are defined as above. Thus $v in U + W$, completing the proof that $V = U + W$. (I am also OK.)



To show that $U cap W = {0}$, suppose $v in U cap W$. Then there exist scalars $a_1,...,a_m,b_1,...b_n in mathbb{F}$ such that



$$v=a_1v_1+...+a_mv_m = b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$. Thus
$$a_1u_ + ...+a_mu_m - b_1w_1-...-b_nw_n = 0$$



Because $u_1,...u_m,w_1,...,w_n$ is linearly independent, this implies that $a_1=...=a_m=b_1=...=b_n = 0$. Thus $v=0$, completing the proof that $U cap W = {0}$.



Is the proof means for every subspace $U$ of finite-dimensional $V$, we can find a $W$ that is the direct sum of $V$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 1 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
    $endgroup$
    – Fortox
    Jan 1 at 23:13
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


In Linear Algebra Done Right, the book proves that every subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$. I generally follow the proof, but do not understand some points.



Suppose $V$ is finite-dimensional and $U$ is a subspace of $V$. Then there is a subspace $W$ of $V$ such that $V = Ubigoplus W$.



Proof
Because $V$ is finite-dimensional, so is $U$ (proved in 2.26. I am OK). Thus there is a basis $u_1,...,u_m$ of $U$. Of course $u_1,...u_m$ is a linearly independent list of vectors in $V$ (I am OK). Hence this list can be extended to a basis $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...,w_n$ of $V$ (I am not OK. Does it mean $w_1,...w_n$ can only be vectors that extend to the basis of $V$? If so, why the title of the proof said EVERY subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$).



To prove $V = Ubigoplus W$, we need only show that $$V = U+W text{ and } U cap W = {0}$$ (I am OK).



To prove the first equation above, suppose $v in V$. Then, because the list $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...w_n$ spans $V$, there exist $a_1,...a_m, b_1,...b_m in mathbb{F}$ such that $$v=a_1u_1+...+a_mu_m+b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$.



In other words, we have $v=u+w$, wheere $u in U$ and $w in W$ are defined as above. Thus $v in U + W$, completing the proof that $V = U + W$. (I am also OK.)



To show that $U cap W = {0}$, suppose $v in U cap W$. Then there exist scalars $a_1,...,a_m,b_1,...b_n in mathbb{F}$ such that



$$v=a_1v_1+...+a_mv_m = b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$. Thus
$$a_1u_ + ...+a_mu_m - b_1w_1-...-b_nw_n = 0$$



Because $u_1,...u_m,w_1,...,w_n$ is linearly independent, this implies that $a_1=...=a_m=b_1=...=b_n = 0$. Thus $v=0$, completing the proof that $U cap W = {0}$.



Is the proof means for every subspace $U$ of finite-dimensional $V$, we can find a $W$ that is the direct sum of $V$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




In Linear Algebra Done Right, the book proves that every subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$. I generally follow the proof, but do not understand some points.



Suppose $V$ is finite-dimensional and $U$ is a subspace of $V$. Then there is a subspace $W$ of $V$ such that $V = Ubigoplus W$.



Proof
Because $V$ is finite-dimensional, so is $U$ (proved in 2.26. I am OK). Thus there is a basis $u_1,...,u_m$ of $U$. Of course $u_1,...u_m$ is a linearly independent list of vectors in $V$ (I am OK). Hence this list can be extended to a basis $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...,w_n$ of $V$ (I am not OK. Does it mean $w_1,...w_n$ can only be vectors that extend to the basis of $V$? If so, why the title of the proof said EVERY subspace of $V$ is part of a direct sum equal to $V$).



To prove $V = Ubigoplus W$, we need only show that $$V = U+W text{ and } U cap W = {0}$$ (I am OK).



To prove the first equation above, suppose $v in V$. Then, because the list $u_1,...,u_m, w_1,...w_n$ spans $V$, there exist $a_1,...a_m, b_1,...b_m in mathbb{F}$ such that $$v=a_1u_1+...+a_mu_m+b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$.



In other words, we have $v=u+w$, wheere $u in U$ and $w in W$ are defined as above. Thus $v in U + W$, completing the proof that $V = U + W$. (I am also OK.)



To show that $U cap W = {0}$, suppose $v in U cap W$. Then there exist scalars $a_1,...,a_m,b_1,...b_n in mathbb{F}$ such that



$$v=a_1v_1+...+a_mv_m = b_1w_1+...+b_nw_n$$. Thus
$$a_1u_ + ...+a_mu_m - b_1w_1-...-b_nw_n = 0$$



Because $u_1,...u_m,w_1,...,w_n$ is linearly independent, this implies that $a_1=...=a_m=b_1=...=b_n = 0$. Thus $v=0$, completing the proof that $U cap W = {0}$.



Is the proof means for every subspace $U$ of finite-dimensional $V$, we can find a $W$ that is the direct sum of $V$?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 1 at 23:01









JOHN JOHN

1638




1638












  • $begingroup$
    It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 1 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
    $endgroup$
    – Fortox
    Jan 1 at 23:13




















  • $begingroup$
    It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Jan 1 at 23:09










  • $begingroup$
    I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
    $endgroup$
    – Fortox
    Jan 1 at 23:13


















$begingroup$
It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 1 at 23:09




$begingroup$
It means that every subspace has a complementary subspace.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 1 at 23:09












$begingroup$
I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
$endgroup$
– Fortox
Jan 1 at 23:13






$begingroup$
I'm not entirely sure what you are confused about but it seems like you are under the impression that $V$ only has one basis. Consider for example $mathbb{R} ^2$. We have the standard basis ${(1,0),(0,1)}$ but we can replace $(1,0)$ with $(1,1)$ and it is still a basis. In fact replacing $(1,0)$ with anything in the form $(a,b)$ where $aneq 0$ will result in a basis. ${(1,2),(1,3)}$ is another example of a basis.
$endgroup$
– Fortox
Jan 1 at 23:13












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You have a subspace $U$ with basis $u_1,...,u_m$.



Extend the basis to a basis of $V$ by adding vectors $w_1,...,w_n$. There is some freedom to choose the $w_k$ but they must be linearly indepdendent and the collection must span $V$.



Let $W=operatorname{sp} {w_k}$.



Since the whole collection spans $V$, we must have $V = U +W$. If $uin U, win W$ and
$u+w = 0$, we must have $u=w=0$ since the whole collection is linearly independent.



Note that $W$ is not unique.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058963%2fprove-every-subspace-of-v-is-part-of-a-direct-sum-equal-to-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You have a subspace $U$ with basis $u_1,...,u_m$.



    Extend the basis to a basis of $V$ by adding vectors $w_1,...,w_n$. There is some freedom to choose the $w_k$ but they must be linearly indepdendent and the collection must span $V$.



    Let $W=operatorname{sp} {w_k}$.



    Since the whole collection spans $V$, we must have $V = U +W$. If $uin U, win W$ and
    $u+w = 0$, we must have $u=w=0$ since the whole collection is linearly independent.



    Note that $W$ is not unique.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You have a subspace $U$ with basis $u_1,...,u_m$.



      Extend the basis to a basis of $V$ by adding vectors $w_1,...,w_n$. There is some freedom to choose the $w_k$ but they must be linearly indepdendent and the collection must span $V$.



      Let $W=operatorname{sp} {w_k}$.



      Since the whole collection spans $V$, we must have $V = U +W$. If $uin U, win W$ and
      $u+w = 0$, we must have $u=w=0$ since the whole collection is linearly independent.



      Note that $W$ is not unique.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You have a subspace $U$ with basis $u_1,...,u_m$.



        Extend the basis to a basis of $V$ by adding vectors $w_1,...,w_n$. There is some freedom to choose the $w_k$ but they must be linearly indepdendent and the collection must span $V$.



        Let $W=operatorname{sp} {w_k}$.



        Since the whole collection spans $V$, we must have $V = U +W$. If $uin U, win W$ and
        $u+w = 0$, we must have $u=w=0$ since the whole collection is linearly independent.



        Note that $W$ is not unique.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You have a subspace $U$ with basis $u_1,...,u_m$.



        Extend the basis to a basis of $V$ by adding vectors $w_1,...,w_n$. There is some freedom to choose the $w_k$ but they must be linearly indepdendent and the collection must span $V$.



        Let $W=operatorname{sp} {w_k}$.



        Since the whole collection spans $V$, we must have $V = U +W$. If $uin U, win W$ and
        $u+w = 0$, we must have $u=w=0$ since the whole collection is linearly independent.



        Note that $W$ is not unique.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 1 at 23:09









        copper.hatcopper.hat

        126k559160




        126k559160






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058963%2fprove-every-subspace-of-v-is-part-of-a-direct-sum-equal-to-v%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅