Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary
I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.
When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:
.........
Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`
Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
And How can I fix it?
I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'
I use Lenovo ThinkPad.
Thanks for your help.
partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk
add a comment |
I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.
When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:
.........
Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`
Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
And How can I fix it?
I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'
I use Lenovo ThinkPad.
Thanks for your help.
partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk
add a comment |
I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.
When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:
.........
Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`
Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
And How can I fix it?
I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'
I use Lenovo ThinkPad.
Thanks for your help.
partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk
I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.
When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:
.........
Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`
Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.
Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
And How can I fix it?
I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'
I use Lenovo ThinkPad.
Thanks for your help.
partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk
partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk
asked Feb 5 '17 at 10:47
alamin72103alamin72103
29210
29210
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
sda2
is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5
.
You never read from or write to sda2
, you read from or write to sda5
and sda5
appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f880044%2fpartition-2-does-not-start-on-physical-sector-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
sda2
is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5
.
You never read from or write to sda2
, you read from or write to sda5
and sda5
appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.
add a comment |
sda2
is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5
.
You never read from or write to sda2
, you read from or write to sda5
and sda5
appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.
add a comment |
sda2
is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5
.
You never read from or write to sda2
, you read from or write to sda5
and sda5
appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.
sda2
is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5
.
You never read from or write to sda2
, you read from or write to sda5
and sda5
appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.
answered Feb 5 '17 at 18:08
mook765mook765
3,96421330
3,96421330
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f880044%2fpartition-2-does-not-start-on-physical-sector-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown