Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary












0















I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.



When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:



.........
Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes


Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b

Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`

Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.


Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
And How can I fix it?
I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'



I use Lenovo ThinkPad.



Thanks for your help.










share|improve this question



























    0















    I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.



    When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:



    .........
    Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
    Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes


    Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
    Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
    Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
    I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
    Disklabel type: dos
    Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b

    Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
    /dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
    /dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
    /dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`

    Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.


    Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
    And How can I fix it?
    I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'



    I use Lenovo ThinkPad.



    Thanks for your help.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.



      When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:



      .........
      Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes


      Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
      Disklabel type: dos
      Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b

      Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
      /dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
      /dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
      /dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`

      Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.


      Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
      And How can I fix it?
      I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'



      I use Lenovo ThinkPad.



      Thanks for your help.










      share|improve this question














      I Installed Ubuntu erasing Windows couple of days ago. Now Ubuntu is using the entire HDD.



      When I run fdisk -l result shows something like:



      .........
      Disk /dev/ram15: 64 MiB, 67108864 bytes, 131072 sectors`
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes


      Disk /dev/sda: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
      Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
      Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
      I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
      Disklabel type: dos
      Disk identifier: 0xa1767c2b

      Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
      /dev/sda1 * 2048 960894975 960892928 458.2G 83 Linux
      /dev/sda2 960897022 976771071 15874050 7.6G 5 Extended
      /dev/sda5 960897024 976771071 15874048 7.6G 82 Linux swap / Solaris`

      Partition 2 does not start on physical sector boundary.


      Does this Extended partition bad for performance or HDD?
      And How can I fix it?
      I read some article but I don't understand what really need to do. If possible please give me some suggestion like on some article I've seen something like that 'Use Gparted to move 512to 4k....' type suggestion. I tried using gparted, I can do anything. There are only two options 'Manage flags and Information'



      I use Lenovo ThinkPad.



      Thanks for your help.







      partitioning hard-drive gparted fdisk






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 5 '17 at 10:47









      alamin72103alamin72103

      29210




      29210






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          sda2 is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5.
          You never read from or write to sda2, you read from or write to sda5 and sda5 appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "89"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f880044%2fpartition-2-does-not-start-on-physical-sector-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            sda2 is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5.
            You never read from or write to sda2, you read from or write to sda5 and sda5 appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.






            share|improve this answer




























              1














              sda2 is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5.
              You never read from or write to sda2, you read from or write to sda5 and sda5 appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.






              share|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1







                sda2 is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5.
                You never read from or write to sda2, you read from or write to sda5 and sda5 appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.






                share|improve this answer













                sda2 is the extended partition which holds the logical partition sda5.
                You never read from or write to sda2, you read from or write to sda5 and sda5 appears perfectly aligned. So there won't be any negative effect for your disc-performance, leave it as it is.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 5 '17 at 18:08









                mook765mook765

                3,96421330




                3,96421330






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f880044%2fpartition-2-does-not-start-on-physical-sector-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Human spaceflight

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                    File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg