How was New Horizons able to direct data so precisely back to Earth?
$begingroup$
The New Horizons space probe is sending back images of Ultima Thule, 6.4 billion kilometres away.
Barring having a very large power to send information back on a very large angle, it seems to me that the level of precision to send this information back so that it can be captured by an antenna on Earth is prohibitively hard to get. How is NASA accomplishing it?
nasa spacecraft new-horizons
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The New Horizons space probe is sending back images of Ultima Thule, 6.4 billion kilometres away.
Barring having a very large power to send information back on a very large angle, it seems to me that the level of precision to send this information back so that it can be captured by an antenna on Earth is prohibitively hard to get. How is NASA accomplishing it?
nasa spacecraft new-horizons
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
$endgroup$
13
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
4
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
5
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The New Horizons space probe is sending back images of Ultima Thule, 6.4 billion kilometres away.
Barring having a very large power to send information back on a very large angle, it seems to me that the level of precision to send this information back so that it can be captured by an antenna on Earth is prohibitively hard to get. How is NASA accomplishing it?
nasa spacecraft new-horizons
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
$endgroup$
The New Horizons space probe is sending back images of Ultima Thule, 6.4 billion kilometres away.
Barring having a very large power to send information back on a very large angle, it seems to me that the level of precision to send this information back so that it can be captured by an antenna on Earth is prohibitively hard to get. How is NASA accomplishing it?
nasa spacecraft new-horizons
nasa spacecraft new-horizons
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
edited Jan 8 at 9:47
Basil Bourque
1725
1725
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
asked Jan 6 at 18:30
useruser
39125
39125
13
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
4
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
5
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22
add a comment |
13
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
4
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
5
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22
13
13
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
4
4
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
5
5
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The high gain antenna of New Horizon as an opening angle of its beam of about 0.6°. That means, it has to be pointed at Earth with an error margin of 0.3°.
As a practical example, this is more like pointing a torch (flashlight) with a (well focused) beam at a far target than aiming with a tiny Laser spot. For comparison, 0.6° is slightly larger than the apparent size of the Moon in our skies which is 0.5° across.
The antenna is fixed to the spacecraft, so that the whole space probe has to rotate (that's the reason there was no direct data download during the encounter with Pluto). Rotating is accomplished by its on-board thrusters that can be used to adjust rotation very precisely.
Now the only remaining point is to figure out were Earth is located. Luckily somebody installed a bright beacon light relatively close to Earth (better known as the Sun) that can be used to find it. From Pluto Earth is at most 1.3° off to either side of the Sun.
New Horizons is equipped with a star tracker - essentially a camera that takes images of the sky and some software that reads the position and brightness of stars and compares them with a map. If, for any reason, pointing the antenna at Earth fails the space probe can switch to its smaller medium gain antenna which can work even when missing Earth by up to 10°. Essentially this allows to operate in a pure Sun-tracking mode without knowing the precise orientation of the probe.
And, as a last backup, there is also an omnidirectional antenna that can receive commands under almost any conditions to help getting the spacecraft operational again. Due to its low gain, this antenna could be used during the initial phase of the flight only - after traveling more than a few AU the signal received is too weak to be useful.
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33381%2fhow-was-new-horizons-able-to-direct-data-so-precisely-back-to-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The high gain antenna of New Horizon as an opening angle of its beam of about 0.6°. That means, it has to be pointed at Earth with an error margin of 0.3°.
As a practical example, this is more like pointing a torch (flashlight) with a (well focused) beam at a far target than aiming with a tiny Laser spot. For comparison, 0.6° is slightly larger than the apparent size of the Moon in our skies which is 0.5° across.
The antenna is fixed to the spacecraft, so that the whole space probe has to rotate (that's the reason there was no direct data download during the encounter with Pluto). Rotating is accomplished by its on-board thrusters that can be used to adjust rotation very precisely.
Now the only remaining point is to figure out were Earth is located. Luckily somebody installed a bright beacon light relatively close to Earth (better known as the Sun) that can be used to find it. From Pluto Earth is at most 1.3° off to either side of the Sun.
New Horizons is equipped with a star tracker - essentially a camera that takes images of the sky and some software that reads the position and brightness of stars and compares them with a map. If, for any reason, pointing the antenna at Earth fails the space probe can switch to its smaller medium gain antenna which can work even when missing Earth by up to 10°. Essentially this allows to operate in a pure Sun-tracking mode without knowing the precise orientation of the probe.
And, as a last backup, there is also an omnidirectional antenna that can receive commands under almost any conditions to help getting the spacecraft operational again. Due to its low gain, this antenna could be used during the initial phase of the flight only - after traveling more than a few AU the signal received is too weak to be useful.
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The high gain antenna of New Horizon as an opening angle of its beam of about 0.6°. That means, it has to be pointed at Earth with an error margin of 0.3°.
As a practical example, this is more like pointing a torch (flashlight) with a (well focused) beam at a far target than aiming with a tiny Laser spot. For comparison, 0.6° is slightly larger than the apparent size of the Moon in our skies which is 0.5° across.
The antenna is fixed to the spacecraft, so that the whole space probe has to rotate (that's the reason there was no direct data download during the encounter with Pluto). Rotating is accomplished by its on-board thrusters that can be used to adjust rotation very precisely.
Now the only remaining point is to figure out were Earth is located. Luckily somebody installed a bright beacon light relatively close to Earth (better known as the Sun) that can be used to find it. From Pluto Earth is at most 1.3° off to either side of the Sun.
New Horizons is equipped with a star tracker - essentially a camera that takes images of the sky and some software that reads the position and brightness of stars and compares them with a map. If, for any reason, pointing the antenna at Earth fails the space probe can switch to its smaller medium gain antenna which can work even when missing Earth by up to 10°. Essentially this allows to operate in a pure Sun-tracking mode without knowing the precise orientation of the probe.
And, as a last backup, there is also an omnidirectional antenna that can receive commands under almost any conditions to help getting the spacecraft operational again. Due to its low gain, this antenna could be used during the initial phase of the flight only - after traveling more than a few AU the signal received is too weak to be useful.
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
The high gain antenna of New Horizon as an opening angle of its beam of about 0.6°. That means, it has to be pointed at Earth with an error margin of 0.3°.
As a practical example, this is more like pointing a torch (flashlight) with a (well focused) beam at a far target than aiming with a tiny Laser spot. For comparison, 0.6° is slightly larger than the apparent size of the Moon in our skies which is 0.5° across.
The antenna is fixed to the spacecraft, so that the whole space probe has to rotate (that's the reason there was no direct data download during the encounter with Pluto). Rotating is accomplished by its on-board thrusters that can be used to adjust rotation very precisely.
Now the only remaining point is to figure out were Earth is located. Luckily somebody installed a bright beacon light relatively close to Earth (better known as the Sun) that can be used to find it. From Pluto Earth is at most 1.3° off to either side of the Sun.
New Horizons is equipped with a star tracker - essentially a camera that takes images of the sky and some software that reads the position and brightness of stars and compares them with a map. If, for any reason, pointing the antenna at Earth fails the space probe can switch to its smaller medium gain antenna which can work even when missing Earth by up to 10°. Essentially this allows to operate in a pure Sun-tracking mode without knowing the precise orientation of the probe.
And, as a last backup, there is also an omnidirectional antenna that can receive commands under almost any conditions to help getting the spacecraft operational again. Due to its low gain, this antenna could be used during the initial phase of the flight only - after traveling more than a few AU the signal received is too weak to be useful.
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
$endgroup$
The high gain antenna of New Horizon as an opening angle of its beam of about 0.6°. That means, it has to be pointed at Earth with an error margin of 0.3°.
As a practical example, this is more like pointing a torch (flashlight) with a (well focused) beam at a far target than aiming with a tiny Laser spot. For comparison, 0.6° is slightly larger than the apparent size of the Moon in our skies which is 0.5° across.
The antenna is fixed to the spacecraft, so that the whole space probe has to rotate (that's the reason there was no direct data download during the encounter with Pluto). Rotating is accomplished by its on-board thrusters that can be used to adjust rotation very precisely.
Now the only remaining point is to figure out were Earth is located. Luckily somebody installed a bright beacon light relatively close to Earth (better known as the Sun) that can be used to find it. From Pluto Earth is at most 1.3° off to either side of the Sun.
New Horizons is equipped with a star tracker - essentially a camera that takes images of the sky and some software that reads the position and brightness of stars and compares them with a map. If, for any reason, pointing the antenna at Earth fails the space probe can switch to its smaller medium gain antenna which can work even when missing Earth by up to 10°. Essentially this allows to operate in a pure Sun-tracking mode without knowing the precise orientation of the probe.
And, as a last backup, there is also an omnidirectional antenna that can receive commands under almost any conditions to help getting the spacecraft operational again. Due to its low gain, this antenna could be used during the initial phase of the flight only - after traveling more than a few AU the signal received is too weak to be useful.
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
edited Jan 8 at 14:39
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
answered Jan 6 at 18:56
asdfexasdfex
5,7441725
5,7441725
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
5
5
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
$begingroup$
In addition to rate gyros and star trackers, New Horizons is also equipped with bright beacon detectors, aka Sun sensors.
$endgroup$
– David Hammen
Jan 6 at 19:51
1
1
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
$begingroup$
I highly doubt the omni is in range anymore.
$endgroup$
– Joshua
Jan 6 at 22:55
3
3
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
$begingroup$
@Joshua it appears not The low gain system was only intended to be used within 1AU. While there probably was some room to push it using a more powerful transmitter at its current distance or ~44AU an increase of ~2000x would be needed vs at 1AU. While Arecibo is a more powerful transmitter than any of NASAs normal radio telescopes, it's not that much more powerful. spaceflight101.com/newhorizons/spacecraft-overview
$endgroup$
– Dan Neely
Jan 6 at 23:51
6
6
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Perhaps, for the benefit of lay readers who are not intimately familiar with angle measures in practice, it should be noted that the 0.6° beam angle is slightly larger in HN's view of the sky than the full moon is in our sky. So it's not like it needs to be aimed with fantastic precision that exceeds what human eyes could do.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Jan 8 at 13:05
4
4
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
$begingroup$
@Old_Fossil Only during a few days per year - most of the time Earth would be outside the beam. With high gain antennas there is almost no signal outside the intended opening angle, the falloff is very steep.
$endgroup$
– asdfex
Jan 8 at 17:44
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33381%2fhow-was-new-horizons-able-to-direct-data-so-precisely-back-to-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
13
$begingroup$
Related: it's standard procedure to supercool the receivers back on Earth, in freezers transparent to the wavelength to be received, to drastically reduce thermal noise. They can discern a very faint arriving signal.
$endgroup$
– Emilio M Bumachar
Jan 7 at 10:35
4
$begingroup$
@EmilioMBumachar one of the biggest things we've done for detection accuracy is figure out how to link many radar dishes together into large arrays in order to increase the functional aperture of the detector. Basic optics dictates how sharply you can focus is dependent on the aperture of your camera. Only then can the sensors clearly "see" the spacecraft transmitting data. Also there is a high degree of redundancy in the data in order to perform error correction.
$endgroup$
– Aaron
Jan 7 at 18:51
5
$begingroup$
Forget New Horizons, we're still getting data from Voyager 2, something like 119AU (~17.8 billion km) away, sent wth 1970s technology... :-)
$endgroup$
– T.J. Crowder
Jan 9 at 8:22