Finding an algorithm for all combinations [on hold]












1














I need an answer on a question Im confronted writing a program. So I recently askend on Stackoverflow but I hope to get some better results from the mathematics site.



I need to go through an array of objects with n entries. I need to check almost every combination. Lets say the lists contains $lbrace 0,1,2,3 rbrace$ (Im matching the objects values to their index here for explenation). We fix the first one. This is the start value for all combinations. From 0 we choose one of the three objects left. This gives $n! = 4!$ combinations but we consider the combinations $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ to be the same because their last $(n-1)$ digits are the same in reverse order. With that the combination $0 - 2 - 1 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 1 - 2$ give the same result and I dont have to look at both of them.



Do you know an effective way of getting an algorithm which gives me the $j$-th combination for j out of $1,...,dfrac{(n-1)!}{2}$ ?



It seems to be pretty similiar to the travelling salesman problem where you have a starting point $0$ and have to visit all the other places. This way you might understand a little bit better how $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ are giving the same result. Its just like going around the other way.










share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
    – hardmath
    2 days ago
















1














I need an answer on a question Im confronted writing a program. So I recently askend on Stackoverflow but I hope to get some better results from the mathematics site.



I need to go through an array of objects with n entries. I need to check almost every combination. Lets say the lists contains $lbrace 0,1,2,3 rbrace$ (Im matching the objects values to their index here for explenation). We fix the first one. This is the start value for all combinations. From 0 we choose one of the three objects left. This gives $n! = 4!$ combinations but we consider the combinations $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ to be the same because their last $(n-1)$ digits are the same in reverse order. With that the combination $0 - 2 - 1 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 1 - 2$ give the same result and I dont have to look at both of them.



Do you know an effective way of getting an algorithm which gives me the $j$-th combination for j out of $1,...,dfrac{(n-1)!}{2}$ ?



It seems to be pretty similiar to the travelling salesman problem where you have a starting point $0$ and have to visit all the other places. This way you might understand a little bit better how $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ are giving the same result. Its just like going around the other way.










share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
    – hardmath
    2 days ago














1












1








1


1





I need an answer on a question Im confronted writing a program. So I recently askend on Stackoverflow but I hope to get some better results from the mathematics site.



I need to go through an array of objects with n entries. I need to check almost every combination. Lets say the lists contains $lbrace 0,1,2,3 rbrace$ (Im matching the objects values to their index here for explenation). We fix the first one. This is the start value for all combinations. From 0 we choose one of the three objects left. This gives $n! = 4!$ combinations but we consider the combinations $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ to be the same because their last $(n-1)$ digits are the same in reverse order. With that the combination $0 - 2 - 1 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 1 - 2$ give the same result and I dont have to look at both of them.



Do you know an effective way of getting an algorithm which gives me the $j$-th combination for j out of $1,...,dfrac{(n-1)!}{2}$ ?



It seems to be pretty similiar to the travelling salesman problem where you have a starting point $0$ and have to visit all the other places. This way you might understand a little bit better how $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ are giving the same result. Its just like going around the other way.










share|cite|improve this question













I need an answer on a question Im confronted writing a program. So I recently askend on Stackoverflow but I hope to get some better results from the mathematics site.



I need to go through an array of objects with n entries. I need to check almost every combination. Lets say the lists contains $lbrace 0,1,2,3 rbrace$ (Im matching the objects values to their index here for explenation). We fix the first one. This is the start value for all combinations. From 0 we choose one of the three objects left. This gives $n! = 4!$ combinations but we consider the combinations $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ to be the same because their last $(n-1)$ digits are the same in reverse order. With that the combination $0 - 2 - 1 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 1 - 2$ give the same result and I dont have to look at both of them.



Do you know an effective way of getting an algorithm which gives me the $j$-th combination for j out of $1,...,dfrac{(n-1)!}{2}$ ?



It seems to be pretty similiar to the travelling salesman problem where you have a starting point $0$ and have to visit all the other places. This way you might understand a little bit better how $0 - 1 - 2 - 3$ and $0 - 3 - 2 - 1$ are giving the same result. Its just like going around the other way.







combinatorics graph-theory combinations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









Arjihad

383111




383111




put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – amWhy, Don Thousand, KReiser, Eevee Trainer, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
    – hardmath
    2 days ago


















  • It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
    – hardmath
    2 days ago
















It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
– hardmath
2 days ago




It might help to link to your SO Question and explain what lack there is in the Answers provided there. Selecting a "combination" means not only from a set of size $n$ but also specifying the size $k$ of a subset to be selected.
– hardmath
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I am interpreting your question to indicate that you want a math algorithm that you can code into a computer program. I would do this as follows:

1. construing the element-0 as home base, you have (n-1) choices for the element-1. Once element-1 has been chosen, you then have (n-2) choices for element-2. Continuing, you will generate (n-1)! candidate sequences.

2. every time that you generate a candidate sequence you check whether the reverse of that sequence has already been added to your list of sequences. If so, discard the candidate sequence. If not, add the candidate sequence to your list of sequences.



This will result in your list having (n-1)!/2 rather than (n-1)! sequences.



Please provide comment if I have misunderstood your question.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    If I understand your question correctly, it seems you want to generate all Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph with $n$ vertices. The number of different cycles is, as you say, $frac{(n-1)!}{2}$.



    An efficient way to do this is described in the answer here.



    First, find an algorithm which generates permutations sequentially. An example is algorithm $2$ here.



    Second, starting with the list ${2,3,ldots , n }$ (the first element $1$ is fixed) generate permutations of this list. If the first element of that permutation is larger than the last element, discard it, otherwise keep it.



    And you're done.



    This algorithm will check less than $(n-1)!$ permutations.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      I am interpreting your question to indicate that you want a math algorithm that you can code into a computer program. I would do this as follows:

      1. construing the element-0 as home base, you have (n-1) choices for the element-1. Once element-1 has been chosen, you then have (n-2) choices for element-2. Continuing, you will generate (n-1)! candidate sequences.

      2. every time that you generate a candidate sequence you check whether the reverse of that sequence has already been added to your list of sequences. If so, discard the candidate sequence. If not, add the candidate sequence to your list of sequences.



      This will result in your list having (n-1)!/2 rather than (n-1)! sequences.



      Please provide comment if I have misunderstood your question.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1














        I am interpreting your question to indicate that you want a math algorithm that you can code into a computer program. I would do this as follows:

        1. construing the element-0 as home base, you have (n-1) choices for the element-1. Once element-1 has been chosen, you then have (n-2) choices for element-2. Continuing, you will generate (n-1)! candidate sequences.

        2. every time that you generate a candidate sequence you check whether the reverse of that sequence has already been added to your list of sequences. If so, discard the candidate sequence. If not, add the candidate sequence to your list of sequences.



        This will result in your list having (n-1)!/2 rather than (n-1)! sequences.



        Please provide comment if I have misunderstood your question.






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          I am interpreting your question to indicate that you want a math algorithm that you can code into a computer program. I would do this as follows:

          1. construing the element-0 as home base, you have (n-1) choices for the element-1. Once element-1 has been chosen, you then have (n-2) choices for element-2. Continuing, you will generate (n-1)! candidate sequences.

          2. every time that you generate a candidate sequence you check whether the reverse of that sequence has already been added to your list of sequences. If so, discard the candidate sequence. If not, add the candidate sequence to your list of sequences.



          This will result in your list having (n-1)!/2 rather than (n-1)! sequences.



          Please provide comment if I have misunderstood your question.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          I am interpreting your question to indicate that you want a math algorithm that you can code into a computer program. I would do this as follows:

          1. construing the element-0 as home base, you have (n-1) choices for the element-1. Once element-1 has been chosen, you then have (n-2) choices for element-2. Continuing, you will generate (n-1)! candidate sequences.

          2. every time that you generate a candidate sequence you check whether the reverse of that sequence has already been added to your list of sequences. If so, discard the candidate sequence. If not, add the candidate sequence to your list of sequences.



          This will result in your list having (n-1)!/2 rather than (n-1)! sequences.



          Please provide comment if I have misunderstood your question.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          user2661923

          525112




          525112























              1














              If I understand your question correctly, it seems you want to generate all Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph with $n$ vertices. The number of different cycles is, as you say, $frac{(n-1)!}{2}$.



              An efficient way to do this is described in the answer here.



              First, find an algorithm which generates permutations sequentially. An example is algorithm $2$ here.



              Second, starting with the list ${2,3,ldots , n }$ (the first element $1$ is fixed) generate permutations of this list. If the first element of that permutation is larger than the last element, discard it, otherwise keep it.



              And you're done.



              This algorithm will check less than $(n-1)!$ permutations.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1














                If I understand your question correctly, it seems you want to generate all Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph with $n$ vertices. The number of different cycles is, as you say, $frac{(n-1)!}{2}$.



                An efficient way to do this is described in the answer here.



                First, find an algorithm which generates permutations sequentially. An example is algorithm $2$ here.



                Second, starting with the list ${2,3,ldots , n }$ (the first element $1$ is fixed) generate permutations of this list. If the first element of that permutation is larger than the last element, discard it, otherwise keep it.



                And you're done.



                This algorithm will check less than $(n-1)!$ permutations.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  If I understand your question correctly, it seems you want to generate all Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph with $n$ vertices. The number of different cycles is, as you say, $frac{(n-1)!}{2}$.



                  An efficient way to do this is described in the answer here.



                  First, find an algorithm which generates permutations sequentially. An example is algorithm $2$ here.



                  Second, starting with the list ${2,3,ldots , n }$ (the first element $1$ is fixed) generate permutations of this list. If the first element of that permutation is larger than the last element, discard it, otherwise keep it.



                  And you're done.



                  This algorithm will check less than $(n-1)!$ permutations.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  If I understand your question correctly, it seems you want to generate all Hamiltonian cycles in a complete undirected graph with $n$ vertices. The number of different cycles is, as you say, $frac{(n-1)!}{2}$.



                  An efficient way to do this is described in the answer here.



                  First, find an algorithm which generates permutations sequentially. An example is algorithm $2$ here.



                  Second, starting with the list ${2,3,ldots , n }$ (the first element $1$ is fixed) generate permutations of this list. If the first element of that permutation is larger than the last element, discard it, otherwise keep it.



                  And you're done.



                  This algorithm will check less than $(n-1)!$ permutations.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Jens

                  3,7382928




                  3,7382928















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      張江高科駅