Number of independent components of a unitary matrix












4












$begingroup$


By definition, a $n$ dimensional unitary matrix $U$ satisfies the condition
$U^{dagger}U=I$,
and
$UU^{dagger}=I$.
I'd like to ask if these two equations are independent. If so, there will be $n^2$ independent equations of constrain, which is equal to the number of independent components of a general $n$ dimensional matrix. This is obviously impossible. If not, how to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Aug 16 '15 at 3:02


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.











  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
    $endgroup$
    – WillO
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:18






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
    $endgroup$
    – Couchyam
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:28






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Aug 14 '15 at 10:02
















4












$begingroup$


By definition, a $n$ dimensional unitary matrix $U$ satisfies the condition
$U^{dagger}U=I$,
and
$UU^{dagger}=I$.
I'd like to ask if these two equations are independent. If so, there will be $n^2$ independent equations of constrain, which is equal to the number of independent components of a general $n$ dimensional matrix. This is obviously impossible. If not, how to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Aug 16 '15 at 3:02


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.











  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
    $endgroup$
    – WillO
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:18






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
    $endgroup$
    – Couchyam
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:28






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Aug 14 '15 at 10:02














4












4








4





$begingroup$


By definition, a $n$ dimensional unitary matrix $U$ satisfies the condition
$U^{dagger}U=I$,
and
$UU^{dagger}=I$.
I'd like to ask if these two equations are independent. If so, there will be $n^2$ independent equations of constrain, which is equal to the number of independent components of a general $n$ dimensional matrix. This is obviously impossible. If not, how to prove it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




By definition, a $n$ dimensional unitary matrix $U$ satisfies the condition
$U^{dagger}U=I$,
and
$UU^{dagger}=I$.
I'd like to ask if these two equations are independent. If so, there will be $n^2$ independent equations of constrain, which is equal to the number of independent components of a general $n$ dimensional matrix. This is obviously impossible. If not, how to prove it?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Aug 14 '15 at 2:15









Wen ChernWen Chern

12613




12613




migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Aug 16 '15 at 3:02


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.






migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Aug 16 '15 at 3:02


This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.










  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
    $endgroup$
    – WillO
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:18






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
    $endgroup$
    – Couchyam
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:28






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Aug 14 '15 at 10:02














  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
    $endgroup$
    – WillO
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:18






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
    $endgroup$
    – Couchyam
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:28






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
    $endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Aug 14 '15 at 2:43






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
    $endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Aug 14 '15 at 10:02








7




7




$begingroup$
Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
$endgroup$
– WillO
Aug 14 '15 at 2:18




$begingroup$
Quite generally, for square matrices, $AB=I$ implies $BA=I$.
$endgroup$
– WillO
Aug 14 '15 at 2:18




5




5




$begingroup$
Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
$endgroup$
– Couchyam
Aug 14 '15 at 2:28




$begingroup$
Both equations are necessary if $U$ is infinite dimensional. Consider a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis labelled by the natural numbers, and let $U$ be the shift operator that maps the $n$-th basis vector to the $n+1$-th; the adjoint of $U$ is noninvertible. Hence, $U^dagger U=I$, but $UU^dagger neq I$.
$endgroup$
– Couchyam
Aug 14 '15 at 2:28




5




5




$begingroup$
That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind
Aug 14 '15 at 2:43




$begingroup$
That's not a physics question. (If it was phrased as one, it'd still be off-topic as homework-like)
$endgroup$
– ACuriousMind
Aug 14 '15 at 2:43




2




2




$begingroup$
Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
Aug 14 '15 at 10:02




$begingroup$
Hint: An complex $ntimes n$ matrix contains $2n^2$ real d.o.f.
$endgroup$
– Qmechanic
Aug 14 '15 at 10:02










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

@ Wen Chern , since you do not know that $U^*U=I$ implies that $UU^*=I$, I think that you are not an eagle in the mathematical field. Since I have no response to my answer, I think that you did not understand one word of it. You can remember that follows: the $n^2$ complex relations $U^*U=I$ are not algebraically independent because both matrices $U^*U$ and $I$ are hermitian. If we consider the upper triangular parts of these matrices (included diagonals), then we obtain $n^2$ real equalities (write them for $n=2$). The previous equalities are algebraically independent; that implies that a unitary matrix depends on $n^2$ real parameters.



In the body of text, I change the notation $SU_n$ with the standard one $U_n$.



Let $U_n={U=[u_{i,j}]in M_n(mathbb{C})|UU^*=I_n}$ (the other equality $U^*U=I_n$ is useless). $f:Urightarrow UU^*-I$ is not an algebraic function in the $(u_{i,j})$; yet, it is an algebraic function in the $2n^2$ real variables $Re(u_{i,j}),Im(u_{i,j})$. Then $U_n$ is a real algebraic set defined by $f(U)=0$; note that $U_n$ is a group; then it suffices to study $U_n$ in a neighborhood of $I_n$. One has $Df_I:Hrightarrow H+H^*$; then the tangent space of $U_n$ in $I_n$ is ${H|Df_i(H)=H+H^*=0}$, that is the vector space $SH$ of skew-hermitian matrices. The number of real independent parameters defining $U_n$ is the dimension over $mathbb{R}$ of $SH$, that is $2dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}+n=n^2$.



Note that $f(U)=0$ is equivalent to $n^2$ real relations; that shows that $U_n$ depends at least on $2n^2-n^2=n^2$ parameters. That is above shows that theses $n^2$ relations are algebraically independent.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Let us assume that $U$ is an $ntimes n$ unitary matrix, i.e.,



    begin{equation}
    U^dagger U=I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(1)
    end{equation}



    The total number of entries in a unitary matrix is $n^2$ and the total number of real parameters is $2n^2$.



    Let us further assume that $z_{pq}=a_{pq}+ib_{pq}$ where $a_{pq},~b_{pq}inmathbb{R}$.



    From the equation (1), one can write



    begin{eqnarray}
    sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik}^dagger z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}\
    sum_{k=1}^n bar z_{ki} z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)
    end{eqnarray}



    For $i=j$, the eq. (2) reduces to



    begin{equation}
    sum_{k=1}^n |z_{ki}|^2=1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)
    end{equation}



    Therefore, for $i=1,2,...,n$, eq.(3) represents $n$ independent real conditions.



    For if $ine j$, $i leftrightarrow j$, the eq. (2) remains the same. This gives $binom{n}{2}$ independent equations, therefore, $2timesbinom{n}{2}$ real conditions:



    begin{eqnarray}
    sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}a_{kj}+b_{ki}b_{kj})&=&0\
    sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}b_{kj}+a_{kj}b_{ki})&=&0.
    end{eqnarray}



    Total number of independent real conditions is $n+2timesbinom{n}{2}=n^2$.



    Therefore, the total number of independent real parameters (components) $=$ Total number of real parameters $-$ total number of independent real conditions.



    begin{equation}
    N=2n^2-n^2=n^2.
    end{equation}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1398789%2fnumber-of-independent-components-of-a-unitary-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      @ Wen Chern , since you do not know that $U^*U=I$ implies that $UU^*=I$, I think that you are not an eagle in the mathematical field. Since I have no response to my answer, I think that you did not understand one word of it. You can remember that follows: the $n^2$ complex relations $U^*U=I$ are not algebraically independent because both matrices $U^*U$ and $I$ are hermitian. If we consider the upper triangular parts of these matrices (included diagonals), then we obtain $n^2$ real equalities (write them for $n=2$). The previous equalities are algebraically independent; that implies that a unitary matrix depends on $n^2$ real parameters.



      In the body of text, I change the notation $SU_n$ with the standard one $U_n$.



      Let $U_n={U=[u_{i,j}]in M_n(mathbb{C})|UU^*=I_n}$ (the other equality $U^*U=I_n$ is useless). $f:Urightarrow UU^*-I$ is not an algebraic function in the $(u_{i,j})$; yet, it is an algebraic function in the $2n^2$ real variables $Re(u_{i,j}),Im(u_{i,j})$. Then $U_n$ is a real algebraic set defined by $f(U)=0$; note that $U_n$ is a group; then it suffices to study $U_n$ in a neighborhood of $I_n$. One has $Df_I:Hrightarrow H+H^*$; then the tangent space of $U_n$ in $I_n$ is ${H|Df_i(H)=H+H^*=0}$, that is the vector space $SH$ of skew-hermitian matrices. The number of real independent parameters defining $U_n$ is the dimension over $mathbb{R}$ of $SH$, that is $2dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}+n=n^2$.



      Note that $f(U)=0$ is equivalent to $n^2$ real relations; that shows that $U_n$ depends at least on $2n^2-n^2=n^2$ parameters. That is above shows that theses $n^2$ relations are algebraically independent.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        @ Wen Chern , since you do not know that $U^*U=I$ implies that $UU^*=I$, I think that you are not an eagle in the mathematical field. Since I have no response to my answer, I think that you did not understand one word of it. You can remember that follows: the $n^2$ complex relations $U^*U=I$ are not algebraically independent because both matrices $U^*U$ and $I$ are hermitian. If we consider the upper triangular parts of these matrices (included diagonals), then we obtain $n^2$ real equalities (write them for $n=2$). The previous equalities are algebraically independent; that implies that a unitary matrix depends on $n^2$ real parameters.



        In the body of text, I change the notation $SU_n$ with the standard one $U_n$.



        Let $U_n={U=[u_{i,j}]in M_n(mathbb{C})|UU^*=I_n}$ (the other equality $U^*U=I_n$ is useless). $f:Urightarrow UU^*-I$ is not an algebraic function in the $(u_{i,j})$; yet, it is an algebraic function in the $2n^2$ real variables $Re(u_{i,j}),Im(u_{i,j})$. Then $U_n$ is a real algebraic set defined by $f(U)=0$; note that $U_n$ is a group; then it suffices to study $U_n$ in a neighborhood of $I_n$. One has $Df_I:Hrightarrow H+H^*$; then the tangent space of $U_n$ in $I_n$ is ${H|Df_i(H)=H+H^*=0}$, that is the vector space $SH$ of skew-hermitian matrices. The number of real independent parameters defining $U_n$ is the dimension over $mathbb{R}$ of $SH$, that is $2dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}+n=n^2$.



        Note that $f(U)=0$ is equivalent to $n^2$ real relations; that shows that $U_n$ depends at least on $2n^2-n^2=n^2$ parameters. That is above shows that theses $n^2$ relations are algebraically independent.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          @ Wen Chern , since you do not know that $U^*U=I$ implies that $UU^*=I$, I think that you are not an eagle in the mathematical field. Since I have no response to my answer, I think that you did not understand one word of it. You can remember that follows: the $n^2$ complex relations $U^*U=I$ are not algebraically independent because both matrices $U^*U$ and $I$ are hermitian. If we consider the upper triangular parts of these matrices (included diagonals), then we obtain $n^2$ real equalities (write them for $n=2$). The previous equalities are algebraically independent; that implies that a unitary matrix depends on $n^2$ real parameters.



          In the body of text, I change the notation $SU_n$ with the standard one $U_n$.



          Let $U_n={U=[u_{i,j}]in M_n(mathbb{C})|UU^*=I_n}$ (the other equality $U^*U=I_n$ is useless). $f:Urightarrow UU^*-I$ is not an algebraic function in the $(u_{i,j})$; yet, it is an algebraic function in the $2n^2$ real variables $Re(u_{i,j}),Im(u_{i,j})$. Then $U_n$ is a real algebraic set defined by $f(U)=0$; note that $U_n$ is a group; then it suffices to study $U_n$ in a neighborhood of $I_n$. One has $Df_I:Hrightarrow H+H^*$; then the tangent space of $U_n$ in $I_n$ is ${H|Df_i(H)=H+H^*=0}$, that is the vector space $SH$ of skew-hermitian matrices. The number of real independent parameters defining $U_n$ is the dimension over $mathbb{R}$ of $SH$, that is $2dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}+n=n^2$.



          Note that $f(U)=0$ is equivalent to $n^2$ real relations; that shows that $U_n$ depends at least on $2n^2-n^2=n^2$ parameters. That is above shows that theses $n^2$ relations are algebraically independent.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          @ Wen Chern , since you do not know that $U^*U=I$ implies that $UU^*=I$, I think that you are not an eagle in the mathematical field. Since I have no response to my answer, I think that you did not understand one word of it. You can remember that follows: the $n^2$ complex relations $U^*U=I$ are not algebraically independent because both matrices $U^*U$ and $I$ are hermitian. If we consider the upper triangular parts of these matrices (included diagonals), then we obtain $n^2$ real equalities (write them for $n=2$). The previous equalities are algebraically independent; that implies that a unitary matrix depends on $n^2$ real parameters.



          In the body of text, I change the notation $SU_n$ with the standard one $U_n$.



          Let $U_n={U=[u_{i,j}]in M_n(mathbb{C})|UU^*=I_n}$ (the other equality $U^*U=I_n$ is useless). $f:Urightarrow UU^*-I$ is not an algebraic function in the $(u_{i,j})$; yet, it is an algebraic function in the $2n^2$ real variables $Re(u_{i,j}),Im(u_{i,j})$. Then $U_n$ is a real algebraic set defined by $f(U)=0$; note that $U_n$ is a group; then it suffices to study $U_n$ in a neighborhood of $I_n$. One has $Df_I:Hrightarrow H+H^*$; then the tangent space of $U_n$ in $I_n$ is ${H|Df_i(H)=H+H^*=0}$, that is the vector space $SH$ of skew-hermitian matrices. The number of real independent parameters defining $U_n$ is the dimension over $mathbb{R}$ of $SH$, that is $2dfrac{n(n-1)}{2}+n=n^2$.



          Note that $f(U)=0$ is equivalent to $n^2$ real relations; that shows that $U_n$ depends at least on $2n^2-n^2=n^2$ parameters. That is above shows that theses $n^2$ relations are algebraically independent.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Aug 21 '15 at 18:54

























          answered Aug 16 '15 at 20:25









          loup blancloup blanc

          22.6k21850




          22.6k21850























              0












              $begingroup$

              Let us assume that $U$ is an $ntimes n$ unitary matrix, i.e.,



              begin{equation}
              U^dagger U=I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(1)
              end{equation}



              The total number of entries in a unitary matrix is $n^2$ and the total number of real parameters is $2n^2$.



              Let us further assume that $z_{pq}=a_{pq}+ib_{pq}$ where $a_{pq},~b_{pq}inmathbb{R}$.



              From the equation (1), one can write



              begin{eqnarray}
              sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik}^dagger z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}\
              sum_{k=1}^n bar z_{ki} z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)
              end{eqnarray}



              For $i=j$, the eq. (2) reduces to



              begin{equation}
              sum_{k=1}^n |z_{ki}|^2=1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)
              end{equation}



              Therefore, for $i=1,2,...,n$, eq.(3) represents $n$ independent real conditions.



              For if $ine j$, $i leftrightarrow j$, the eq. (2) remains the same. This gives $binom{n}{2}$ independent equations, therefore, $2timesbinom{n}{2}$ real conditions:



              begin{eqnarray}
              sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}a_{kj}+b_{ki}b_{kj})&=&0\
              sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}b_{kj}+a_{kj}b_{ki})&=&0.
              end{eqnarray}



              Total number of independent real conditions is $n+2timesbinom{n}{2}=n^2$.



              Therefore, the total number of independent real parameters (components) $=$ Total number of real parameters $-$ total number of independent real conditions.



              begin{equation}
              N=2n^2-n^2=n^2.
              end{equation}






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Let us assume that $U$ is an $ntimes n$ unitary matrix, i.e.,



                begin{equation}
                U^dagger U=I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(1)
                end{equation}



                The total number of entries in a unitary matrix is $n^2$ and the total number of real parameters is $2n^2$.



                Let us further assume that $z_{pq}=a_{pq}+ib_{pq}$ where $a_{pq},~b_{pq}inmathbb{R}$.



                From the equation (1), one can write



                begin{eqnarray}
                sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik}^dagger z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}\
                sum_{k=1}^n bar z_{ki} z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)
                end{eqnarray}



                For $i=j$, the eq. (2) reduces to



                begin{equation}
                sum_{k=1}^n |z_{ki}|^2=1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)
                end{equation}



                Therefore, for $i=1,2,...,n$, eq.(3) represents $n$ independent real conditions.



                For if $ine j$, $i leftrightarrow j$, the eq. (2) remains the same. This gives $binom{n}{2}$ independent equations, therefore, $2timesbinom{n}{2}$ real conditions:



                begin{eqnarray}
                sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}a_{kj}+b_{ki}b_{kj})&=&0\
                sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}b_{kj}+a_{kj}b_{ki})&=&0.
                end{eqnarray}



                Total number of independent real conditions is $n+2timesbinom{n}{2}=n^2$.



                Therefore, the total number of independent real parameters (components) $=$ Total number of real parameters $-$ total number of independent real conditions.



                begin{equation}
                N=2n^2-n^2=n^2.
                end{equation}






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Let us assume that $U$ is an $ntimes n$ unitary matrix, i.e.,



                  begin{equation}
                  U^dagger U=I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(1)
                  end{equation}



                  The total number of entries in a unitary matrix is $n^2$ and the total number of real parameters is $2n^2$.



                  Let us further assume that $z_{pq}=a_{pq}+ib_{pq}$ where $a_{pq},~b_{pq}inmathbb{R}$.



                  From the equation (1), one can write



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik}^dagger z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}\
                  sum_{k=1}^n bar z_{ki} z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)
                  end{eqnarray}



                  For $i=j$, the eq. (2) reduces to



                  begin{equation}
                  sum_{k=1}^n |z_{ki}|^2=1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)
                  end{equation}



                  Therefore, for $i=1,2,...,n$, eq.(3) represents $n$ independent real conditions.



                  For if $ine j$, $i leftrightarrow j$, the eq. (2) remains the same. This gives $binom{n}{2}$ independent equations, therefore, $2timesbinom{n}{2}$ real conditions:



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}a_{kj}+b_{ki}b_{kj})&=&0\
                  sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}b_{kj}+a_{kj}b_{ki})&=&0.
                  end{eqnarray}



                  Total number of independent real conditions is $n+2timesbinom{n}{2}=n^2$.



                  Therefore, the total number of independent real parameters (components) $=$ Total number of real parameters $-$ total number of independent real conditions.



                  begin{equation}
                  N=2n^2-n^2=n^2.
                  end{equation}






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let us assume that $U$ is an $ntimes n$ unitary matrix, i.e.,



                  begin{equation}
                  U^dagger U=I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(1)
                  end{equation}



                  The total number of entries in a unitary matrix is $n^2$ and the total number of real parameters is $2n^2$.



                  Let us further assume that $z_{pq}=a_{pq}+ib_{pq}$ where $a_{pq},~b_{pq}inmathbb{R}$.



                  From the equation (1), one can write



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  sum_{k=1}^n z_{ik}^dagger z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}\
                  sum_{k=1}^n bar z_{ki} z_{kj}&=&delta_{ij}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(2)
                  end{eqnarray}



                  For $i=j$, the eq. (2) reduces to



                  begin{equation}
                  sum_{k=1}^n |z_{ki}|^2=1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(3)
                  end{equation}



                  Therefore, for $i=1,2,...,n$, eq.(3) represents $n$ independent real conditions.



                  For if $ine j$, $i leftrightarrow j$, the eq. (2) remains the same. This gives $binom{n}{2}$ independent equations, therefore, $2timesbinom{n}{2}$ real conditions:



                  begin{eqnarray}
                  sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}a_{kj}+b_{ki}b_{kj})&=&0\
                  sum_{k=1}^n (a_{ki}b_{kj}+a_{kj}b_{ki})&=&0.
                  end{eqnarray}



                  Total number of independent real conditions is $n+2timesbinom{n}{2}=n^2$.



                  Therefore, the total number of independent real parameters (components) $=$ Total number of real parameters $-$ total number of independent real conditions.



                  begin{equation}
                  N=2n^2-n^2=n^2.
                  end{equation}







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 23 '18 at 5:43









                  mhmuradmhmurad

                  212




                  212






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1398789%2fnumber-of-independent-components-of-a-unitary-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Human spaceflight

                      Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                      File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg