A sufficient condition for minimality in a Topological Dynamic System












2












$begingroup$


Am trying to prove the following :




Let ($X,T$) a uniquely ergodic topological system.We suppose that the uniquely $T-$invariant measure $mu$ satisfies the property :$mu(U)>0$ for every non-empty open set $Usubseteq X$.Then show under these conditions that the pair $(X,T)$ is minimal.




Let me clarify some definitions:



1)Topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where $X $ is a compact metric space and $T:Xto X$ is a continuous transformation.



2)Minimal topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where there does not exist a closed set $emptyset neq F subseteq X$ such that $Fneq X$ and $T(F)subseteq F$.



I tried to approach this by showing that every $x in X$ has dense orbit but i only showed that
$$mubiggl(bigl{x in X: overline{{T^n(x):n in mathbb{N}_0}}=Xbigr}biggr) =1$$



and i dont know has to use the assumption that $mu$ is uniquely determined by being $T-$invariant.



Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 2 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
    $endgroup$
    – dem0nakos
    Jan 2 at 14:23
















2












$begingroup$


Am trying to prove the following :




Let ($X,T$) a uniquely ergodic topological system.We suppose that the uniquely $T-$invariant measure $mu$ satisfies the property :$mu(U)>0$ for every non-empty open set $Usubseteq X$.Then show under these conditions that the pair $(X,T)$ is minimal.




Let me clarify some definitions:



1)Topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where $X $ is a compact metric space and $T:Xto X$ is a continuous transformation.



2)Minimal topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where there does not exist a closed set $emptyset neq F subseteq X$ such that $Fneq X$ and $T(F)subseteq F$.



I tried to approach this by showing that every $x in X$ has dense orbit but i only showed that
$$mubiggl(bigl{x in X: overline{{T^n(x):n in mathbb{N}_0}}=Xbigr}biggr) =1$$



and i dont know has to use the assumption that $mu$ is uniquely determined by being $T-$invariant.



Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 2 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
    $endgroup$
    – dem0nakos
    Jan 2 at 14:23














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Am trying to prove the following :




Let ($X,T$) a uniquely ergodic topological system.We suppose that the uniquely $T-$invariant measure $mu$ satisfies the property :$mu(U)>0$ for every non-empty open set $Usubseteq X$.Then show under these conditions that the pair $(X,T)$ is minimal.




Let me clarify some definitions:



1)Topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where $X $ is a compact metric space and $T:Xto X$ is a continuous transformation.



2)Minimal topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where there does not exist a closed set $emptyset neq F subseteq X$ such that $Fneq X$ and $T(F)subseteq F$.



I tried to approach this by showing that every $x in X$ has dense orbit but i only showed that
$$mubiggl(bigl{x in X: overline{{T^n(x):n in mathbb{N}_0}}=Xbigr}biggr) =1$$



and i dont know has to use the assumption that $mu$ is uniquely determined by being $T-$invariant.



Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Am trying to prove the following :




Let ($X,T$) a uniquely ergodic topological system.We suppose that the uniquely $T-$invariant measure $mu$ satisfies the property :$mu(U)>0$ for every non-empty open set $Usubseteq X$.Then show under these conditions that the pair $(X,T)$ is minimal.




Let me clarify some definitions:



1)Topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where $X $ is a compact metric space and $T:Xto X$ is a continuous transformation.



2)Minimal topological System is the pair $(X,T)$ where there does not exist a closed set $emptyset neq F subseteq X$ such that $Fneq X$ and $T(F)subseteq F$.



I tried to approach this by showing that every $x in X$ has dense orbit but i only showed that
$$mubiggl(bigl{x in X: overline{{T^n(x):n in mathbb{N}_0}}=Xbigr}biggr) =1$$



and i dont know has to use the assumption that $mu$ is uniquely determined by being $T-$invariant.



Do you have any ideas? Thanks in advance !







dynamical-systems ergodic-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 2 at 14:08







dem0nakos

















asked Jan 2 at 13:32









dem0nakosdem0nakos

677211




677211












  • $begingroup$
    Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 2 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
    $endgroup$
    – dem0nakos
    Jan 2 at 14:23


















  • $begingroup$
    Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 2 at 14:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
    $endgroup$
    – dem0nakos
    Jan 2 at 14:23
















$begingroup$
Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Jan 2 at 14:19




$begingroup$
Could you recall for me what you mean by the measure being unique? Does it mean, it is really the only measure with those properties or are there some almost surely's floating around?
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Jan 2 at 14:19




1




1




$begingroup$
It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
$endgroup$
– dem0nakos
Jan 2 at 14:23




$begingroup$
It's the only probability measure defined on Borel sets of $X$ that is T-invariant , meaning that $mu(T^{-1}(A))=mu(A)$ for every Borel set $A$. Such measure must be ergodic.
$endgroup$
– dem0nakos
Jan 2 at 14:23










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Ok guys i think proved it, i used the following preposition which is equivalent for a dynamical topological pair $(X,T)$ to be uniquely ergodic :




For every continuous function $fin C(X)$
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(T^k(x)) to int fdmu tag 1$$
for every $xin X$ where $mu$ is the uniquely determined $T-$invariant Borel probability measure.




Now i can prove the the desired result as follows:



Suppose we have a set $F$ which closed, $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ and $F neq X$ then $Xsetminus F$ is non empty and open. Let $x_1 in Xsetminus F$, then there is an $epsilon>0$ such that
$$E=hat{B}(x_1,epsilon) = {xin X: d(x,x_1)leq epsilon} subseteq Xsetminus F$$
From our assumptions we get that $mu(E)>0 $ since $hat{B}(x_1,epsilon)$ contains the open ball $B(x_1,epsilon).$



Now we are trying to find the crucial continuous function $f$ in order to use $(1)$.Since we have two closed and disjoint sets $F,E$ we define
$$f(x) = frac{dist(x,F)}{dist(x,F)+dist(x,E)}$$
then we know that



$alpha)$ $f$ is continuous



$beta)$ $0leq f leq 1$



$gamma$) $f|F =0$ and $f|E=1$



So if we combine these facts and $(1)$ we get that
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x)bigr) to int fdmu=int_{Xsetminus F}f dmu geq int_{E}fdmu geq mu(E)>0 tag 2$$
for every $xin X$.



But now (2) tells us that $F$ must be the empty set since if we can find $x^*in F$ since $T(F) subseteq F$ we get that $T^k(x^*) in F$ for every k. In other words
$$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x^*)bigr) =0 $$
for every $n in mathbb{N}$ which contradicts $(2)$ since it holds for every $xin X$.



So, for every $F$ closed which is $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ it must be either $F= emptyset$ either $F=X$.So, $(X,T)$ must be minimal.



Is this correct? thanks again !






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059481%2fa-sufficient-condition-for-minimality-in-a-topological-dynamic-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Ok guys i think proved it, i used the following preposition which is equivalent for a dynamical topological pair $(X,T)$ to be uniquely ergodic :




    For every continuous function $fin C(X)$
    $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(T^k(x)) to int fdmu tag 1$$
    for every $xin X$ where $mu$ is the uniquely determined $T-$invariant Borel probability measure.




    Now i can prove the the desired result as follows:



    Suppose we have a set $F$ which closed, $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ and $F neq X$ then $Xsetminus F$ is non empty and open. Let $x_1 in Xsetminus F$, then there is an $epsilon>0$ such that
    $$E=hat{B}(x_1,epsilon) = {xin X: d(x,x_1)leq epsilon} subseteq Xsetminus F$$
    From our assumptions we get that $mu(E)>0 $ since $hat{B}(x_1,epsilon)$ contains the open ball $B(x_1,epsilon).$



    Now we are trying to find the crucial continuous function $f$ in order to use $(1)$.Since we have two closed and disjoint sets $F,E$ we define
    $$f(x) = frac{dist(x,F)}{dist(x,F)+dist(x,E)}$$
    then we know that



    $alpha)$ $f$ is continuous



    $beta)$ $0leq f leq 1$



    $gamma$) $f|F =0$ and $f|E=1$



    So if we combine these facts and $(1)$ we get that
    $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x)bigr) to int fdmu=int_{Xsetminus F}f dmu geq int_{E}fdmu geq mu(E)>0 tag 2$$
    for every $xin X$.



    But now (2) tells us that $F$ must be the empty set since if we can find $x^*in F$ since $T(F) subseteq F$ we get that $T^k(x^*) in F$ for every k. In other words
    $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x^*)bigr) =0 $$
    for every $n in mathbb{N}$ which contradicts $(2)$ since it holds for every $xin X$.



    So, for every $F$ closed which is $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ it must be either $F= emptyset$ either $F=X$.So, $(X,T)$ must be minimal.



    Is this correct? thanks again !






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Ok guys i think proved it, i used the following preposition which is equivalent for a dynamical topological pair $(X,T)$ to be uniquely ergodic :




      For every continuous function $fin C(X)$
      $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(T^k(x)) to int fdmu tag 1$$
      for every $xin X$ where $mu$ is the uniquely determined $T-$invariant Borel probability measure.




      Now i can prove the the desired result as follows:



      Suppose we have a set $F$ which closed, $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ and $F neq X$ then $Xsetminus F$ is non empty and open. Let $x_1 in Xsetminus F$, then there is an $epsilon>0$ such that
      $$E=hat{B}(x_1,epsilon) = {xin X: d(x,x_1)leq epsilon} subseteq Xsetminus F$$
      From our assumptions we get that $mu(E)>0 $ since $hat{B}(x_1,epsilon)$ contains the open ball $B(x_1,epsilon).$



      Now we are trying to find the crucial continuous function $f$ in order to use $(1)$.Since we have two closed and disjoint sets $F,E$ we define
      $$f(x) = frac{dist(x,F)}{dist(x,F)+dist(x,E)}$$
      then we know that



      $alpha)$ $f$ is continuous



      $beta)$ $0leq f leq 1$



      $gamma$) $f|F =0$ and $f|E=1$



      So if we combine these facts and $(1)$ we get that
      $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x)bigr) to int fdmu=int_{Xsetminus F}f dmu geq int_{E}fdmu geq mu(E)>0 tag 2$$
      for every $xin X$.



      But now (2) tells us that $F$ must be the empty set since if we can find $x^*in F$ since $T(F) subseteq F$ we get that $T^k(x^*) in F$ for every k. In other words
      $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x^*)bigr) =0 $$
      for every $n in mathbb{N}$ which contradicts $(2)$ since it holds for every $xin X$.



      So, for every $F$ closed which is $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ it must be either $F= emptyset$ either $F=X$.So, $(X,T)$ must be minimal.



      Is this correct? thanks again !






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Ok guys i think proved it, i used the following preposition which is equivalent for a dynamical topological pair $(X,T)$ to be uniquely ergodic :




        For every continuous function $fin C(X)$
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(T^k(x)) to int fdmu tag 1$$
        for every $xin X$ where $mu$ is the uniquely determined $T-$invariant Borel probability measure.




        Now i can prove the the desired result as follows:



        Suppose we have a set $F$ which closed, $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ and $F neq X$ then $Xsetminus F$ is non empty and open. Let $x_1 in Xsetminus F$, then there is an $epsilon>0$ such that
        $$E=hat{B}(x_1,epsilon) = {xin X: d(x,x_1)leq epsilon} subseteq Xsetminus F$$
        From our assumptions we get that $mu(E)>0 $ since $hat{B}(x_1,epsilon)$ contains the open ball $B(x_1,epsilon).$



        Now we are trying to find the crucial continuous function $f$ in order to use $(1)$.Since we have two closed and disjoint sets $F,E$ we define
        $$f(x) = frac{dist(x,F)}{dist(x,F)+dist(x,E)}$$
        then we know that



        $alpha)$ $f$ is continuous



        $beta)$ $0leq f leq 1$



        $gamma$) $f|F =0$ and $f|E=1$



        So if we combine these facts and $(1)$ we get that
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x)bigr) to int fdmu=int_{Xsetminus F}f dmu geq int_{E}fdmu geq mu(E)>0 tag 2$$
        for every $xin X$.



        But now (2) tells us that $F$ must be the empty set since if we can find $x^*in F$ since $T(F) subseteq F$ we get that $T^k(x^*) in F$ for every k. In other words
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x^*)bigr) =0 $$
        for every $n in mathbb{N}$ which contradicts $(2)$ since it holds for every $xin X$.



        So, for every $F$ closed which is $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ it must be either $F= emptyset$ either $F=X$.So, $(X,T)$ must be minimal.



        Is this correct? thanks again !






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Ok guys i think proved it, i used the following preposition which is equivalent for a dynamical topological pair $(X,T)$ to be uniquely ergodic :




        For every continuous function $fin C(X)$
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}f(T^k(x)) to int fdmu tag 1$$
        for every $xin X$ where $mu$ is the uniquely determined $T-$invariant Borel probability measure.




        Now i can prove the the desired result as follows:



        Suppose we have a set $F$ which closed, $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ and $F neq X$ then $Xsetminus F$ is non empty and open. Let $x_1 in Xsetminus F$, then there is an $epsilon>0$ such that
        $$E=hat{B}(x_1,epsilon) = {xin X: d(x,x_1)leq epsilon} subseteq Xsetminus F$$
        From our assumptions we get that $mu(E)>0 $ since $hat{B}(x_1,epsilon)$ contains the open ball $B(x_1,epsilon).$



        Now we are trying to find the crucial continuous function $f$ in order to use $(1)$.Since we have two closed and disjoint sets $F,E$ we define
        $$f(x) = frac{dist(x,F)}{dist(x,F)+dist(x,E)}$$
        then we know that



        $alpha)$ $f$ is continuous



        $beta)$ $0leq f leq 1$



        $gamma$) $f|F =0$ and $f|E=1$



        So if we combine these facts and $(1)$ we get that
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x)bigr) to int fdmu=int_{Xsetminus F}f dmu geq int_{E}fdmu geq mu(E)>0 tag 2$$
        for every $xin X$.



        But now (2) tells us that $F$ must be the empty set since if we can find $x^*in F$ since $T(F) subseteq F$ we get that $T^k(x^*) in F$ for every k. In other words
        $$frac{1}{n}sum_{k=0}^{n-1}fbigl(T^k(x^*)bigr) =0 $$
        for every $n in mathbb{N}$ which contradicts $(2)$ since it holds for every $xin X$.



        So, for every $F$ closed which is $T-$invariant $bigl(T(F)subseteq Fbigr)$ it must be either $F= emptyset$ either $F=X$.So, $(X,T)$ must be minimal.



        Is this correct? thanks again !







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 2 at 19:47

























        answered Jan 2 at 19:29









        dem0nakosdem0nakos

        677211




        677211






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059481%2fa-sufficient-condition-for-minimality-in-a-topological-dynamic-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg