A doubt from the paper “Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and...
I am currently reading the paper "Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and intersection theory" by Kiumars Kaveh, Askold Georgievich Khovanskii (paper). In the page 937 the following paragraph appears:
Let $L$ be a linear subspace in $mathbb{R}^n$ and $M$ a half-space in $L$ with boundary $partial M$. A half-space $M subset L$ is rational if the subspaces $L$ and $partial M$ can be spanned by integral vectors, i.e., are rational subspaces.
$hspace{5mm}$ With a rational half-space $M subset L$ one can associate $partial M_{mathbb{Z}} = partial M capmathbb{Z}^n$ and $L_{mathbb{Z}} = L cap mathbb{Z}^n$. Take the linear map $pi_M : L rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $ker(pi_M) = partial M$, $pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = Z$ and $pi_M(M cap mathbb{Z}^n) = mathbb{Z}_{geq 0}$, the set of all nonnegative integers. The
linear map $pi_M$ induces an isomorphism from $L_{mathbb{Z}}/partial M_{mathbb{Z}}$ to $mathbb{Z}$.
I have the following question:
Q) Why the linear map $pi_M$ exists?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra convex-geometry
add a comment |
I am currently reading the paper "Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and intersection theory" by Kiumars Kaveh, Askold Georgievich Khovanskii (paper). In the page 937 the following paragraph appears:
Let $L$ be a linear subspace in $mathbb{R}^n$ and $M$ a half-space in $L$ with boundary $partial M$. A half-space $M subset L$ is rational if the subspaces $L$ and $partial M$ can be spanned by integral vectors, i.e., are rational subspaces.
$hspace{5mm}$ With a rational half-space $M subset L$ one can associate $partial M_{mathbb{Z}} = partial M capmathbb{Z}^n$ and $L_{mathbb{Z}} = L cap mathbb{Z}^n$. Take the linear map $pi_M : L rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $ker(pi_M) = partial M$, $pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = Z$ and $pi_M(M cap mathbb{Z}^n) = mathbb{Z}_{geq 0}$, the set of all nonnegative integers. The
linear map $pi_M$ induces an isomorphism from $L_{mathbb{Z}}/partial M_{mathbb{Z}}$ to $mathbb{Z}$.
I have the following question:
Q) Why the linear map $pi_M$ exists?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra convex-geometry
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
add a comment |
I am currently reading the paper "Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and intersection theory" by Kiumars Kaveh, Askold Georgievich Khovanskii (paper). In the page 937 the following paragraph appears:
Let $L$ be a linear subspace in $mathbb{R}^n$ and $M$ a half-space in $L$ with boundary $partial M$. A half-space $M subset L$ is rational if the subspaces $L$ and $partial M$ can be spanned by integral vectors, i.e., are rational subspaces.
$hspace{5mm}$ With a rational half-space $M subset L$ one can associate $partial M_{mathbb{Z}} = partial M capmathbb{Z}^n$ and $L_{mathbb{Z}} = L cap mathbb{Z}^n$. Take the linear map $pi_M : L rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $ker(pi_M) = partial M$, $pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = Z$ and $pi_M(M cap mathbb{Z}^n) = mathbb{Z}_{geq 0}$, the set of all nonnegative integers. The
linear map $pi_M$ induces an isomorphism from $L_{mathbb{Z}}/partial M_{mathbb{Z}}$ to $mathbb{Z}$.
I have the following question:
Q) Why the linear map $pi_M$ exists?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra convex-geometry
I am currently reading the paper "Newton-Okounkov bodies, semigroups of integral points, graded algebras and intersection theory" by Kiumars Kaveh, Askold Georgievich Khovanskii (paper). In the page 937 the following paragraph appears:
Let $L$ be a linear subspace in $mathbb{R}^n$ and $M$ a half-space in $L$ with boundary $partial M$. A half-space $M subset L$ is rational if the subspaces $L$ and $partial M$ can be spanned by integral vectors, i.e., are rational subspaces.
$hspace{5mm}$ With a rational half-space $M subset L$ one can associate $partial M_{mathbb{Z}} = partial M capmathbb{Z}^n$ and $L_{mathbb{Z}} = L cap mathbb{Z}^n$. Take the linear map $pi_M : L rightarrow mathbb{R}$ such that $ker(pi_M) = partial M$, $pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = Z$ and $pi_M(M cap mathbb{Z}^n) = mathbb{Z}_{geq 0}$, the set of all nonnegative integers. The
linear map $pi_M$ induces an isomorphism from $L_{mathbb{Z}}/partial M_{mathbb{Z}}$ to $mathbb{Z}$.
I have the following question:
Q) Why the linear map $pi_M$ exists?
Thanks in advance.
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra convex-geometry
linear-algebra algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra convex-geometry
edited Dec 28 '18 at 9:21
KReiser
9,31211435
9,31211435
asked Dec 28 '18 at 8:53
tessellation
1,099612
1,099612
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
add a comment |
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$mathbb{Z}^n$ contains a vector normal to $partial M$ whose endpoint is in $M$ because $partial M$ is a rational subspace. Projection onto one of these normal vectors has all but one ($pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = mathbb{Z}$) of the listed properties because the integers form a ring.
Let $v in mathbb{Z}^n$, $v perp partial M$, $v in M$ and $pi_v$ be projection onto $v$. Then $pi_v(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = nmathbb{Z}$ for some $n in mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ (because the image is a torsion-free, rank $1$ $mathbb{Z}$-module). Take $pi_M = frac{1}{n} pi_v$.
Why does $mathbb{Z}^n$ contain a normal to $partial M$?
A constructive method labels the coordinates $x_1, dots , x_n$ then picks a permutation of these, $x_{sigma(1)}, dots, x_{sigma(n)}$. Then find the intersections of $partial M$ with the $x_{sigma(i)}x_{sigma(i+1)}$ coordinate planes, $i in [1,n-1]$. These intersections are lines with rational slopes. The perpendiculars to these intersections are also lines with rational slopes. Then, using the LCM, iteratively glue these vectors together to give a normal in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
For example, suppose the permutation is $x_1, x_3, x_2$, where I will use the friendlier labels $x, z, y$, respectively, and $partial M$'s intersections gives us coordinate plane perpendiculars through $(x,z) = (2,3)$ on the $xz$-plane and through $(y,z) = (7,2)$ on the $yz$-plane. The LCM of the $z$-components is $6$, so $2 cdot(2,3) = (4,6)$ and $3 cdot(7,2) = (21,6)$ assemble into $(4,21,6)$. If $n > 3$, we continue iterating through the permutation, having only one component of our current vector in common with the next coordinate plane perpendicular, so needing only one LCM to glue the new vector to the current vector.
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054692%2fa-doubt-from-the-paper-newton-okounkov-bodies-semigroups-of-integral-points-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$mathbb{Z}^n$ contains a vector normal to $partial M$ whose endpoint is in $M$ because $partial M$ is a rational subspace. Projection onto one of these normal vectors has all but one ($pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = mathbb{Z}$) of the listed properties because the integers form a ring.
Let $v in mathbb{Z}^n$, $v perp partial M$, $v in M$ and $pi_v$ be projection onto $v$. Then $pi_v(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = nmathbb{Z}$ for some $n in mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ (because the image is a torsion-free, rank $1$ $mathbb{Z}$-module). Take $pi_M = frac{1}{n} pi_v$.
Why does $mathbb{Z}^n$ contain a normal to $partial M$?
A constructive method labels the coordinates $x_1, dots , x_n$ then picks a permutation of these, $x_{sigma(1)}, dots, x_{sigma(n)}$. Then find the intersections of $partial M$ with the $x_{sigma(i)}x_{sigma(i+1)}$ coordinate planes, $i in [1,n-1]$. These intersections are lines with rational slopes. The perpendiculars to these intersections are also lines with rational slopes. Then, using the LCM, iteratively glue these vectors together to give a normal in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
For example, suppose the permutation is $x_1, x_3, x_2$, where I will use the friendlier labels $x, z, y$, respectively, and $partial M$'s intersections gives us coordinate plane perpendiculars through $(x,z) = (2,3)$ on the $xz$-plane and through $(y,z) = (7,2)$ on the $yz$-plane. The LCM of the $z$-components is $6$, so $2 cdot(2,3) = (4,6)$ and $3 cdot(7,2) = (21,6)$ assemble into $(4,21,6)$. If $n > 3$, we continue iterating through the permutation, having only one component of our current vector in common with the next coordinate plane perpendicular, so needing only one LCM to glue the new vector to the current vector.
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
add a comment |
$mathbb{Z}^n$ contains a vector normal to $partial M$ whose endpoint is in $M$ because $partial M$ is a rational subspace. Projection onto one of these normal vectors has all but one ($pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = mathbb{Z}$) of the listed properties because the integers form a ring.
Let $v in mathbb{Z}^n$, $v perp partial M$, $v in M$ and $pi_v$ be projection onto $v$. Then $pi_v(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = nmathbb{Z}$ for some $n in mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ (because the image is a torsion-free, rank $1$ $mathbb{Z}$-module). Take $pi_M = frac{1}{n} pi_v$.
Why does $mathbb{Z}^n$ contain a normal to $partial M$?
A constructive method labels the coordinates $x_1, dots , x_n$ then picks a permutation of these, $x_{sigma(1)}, dots, x_{sigma(n)}$. Then find the intersections of $partial M$ with the $x_{sigma(i)}x_{sigma(i+1)}$ coordinate planes, $i in [1,n-1]$. These intersections are lines with rational slopes. The perpendiculars to these intersections are also lines with rational slopes. Then, using the LCM, iteratively glue these vectors together to give a normal in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
For example, suppose the permutation is $x_1, x_3, x_2$, where I will use the friendlier labels $x, z, y$, respectively, and $partial M$'s intersections gives us coordinate plane perpendiculars through $(x,z) = (2,3)$ on the $xz$-plane and through $(y,z) = (7,2)$ on the $yz$-plane. The LCM of the $z$-components is $6$, so $2 cdot(2,3) = (4,6)$ and $3 cdot(7,2) = (21,6)$ assemble into $(4,21,6)$. If $n > 3$, we continue iterating through the permutation, having only one component of our current vector in common with the next coordinate plane perpendicular, so needing only one LCM to glue the new vector to the current vector.
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
add a comment |
$mathbb{Z}^n$ contains a vector normal to $partial M$ whose endpoint is in $M$ because $partial M$ is a rational subspace. Projection onto one of these normal vectors has all but one ($pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = mathbb{Z}$) of the listed properties because the integers form a ring.
Let $v in mathbb{Z}^n$, $v perp partial M$, $v in M$ and $pi_v$ be projection onto $v$. Then $pi_v(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = nmathbb{Z}$ for some $n in mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ (because the image is a torsion-free, rank $1$ $mathbb{Z}$-module). Take $pi_M = frac{1}{n} pi_v$.
Why does $mathbb{Z}^n$ contain a normal to $partial M$?
A constructive method labels the coordinates $x_1, dots , x_n$ then picks a permutation of these, $x_{sigma(1)}, dots, x_{sigma(n)}$. Then find the intersections of $partial M$ with the $x_{sigma(i)}x_{sigma(i+1)}$ coordinate planes, $i in [1,n-1]$. These intersections are lines with rational slopes. The perpendiculars to these intersections are also lines with rational slopes. Then, using the LCM, iteratively glue these vectors together to give a normal in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
For example, suppose the permutation is $x_1, x_3, x_2$, where I will use the friendlier labels $x, z, y$, respectively, and $partial M$'s intersections gives us coordinate plane perpendiculars through $(x,z) = (2,3)$ on the $xz$-plane and through $(y,z) = (7,2)$ on the $yz$-plane. The LCM of the $z$-components is $6$, so $2 cdot(2,3) = (4,6)$ and $3 cdot(7,2) = (21,6)$ assemble into $(4,21,6)$. If $n > 3$, we continue iterating through the permutation, having only one component of our current vector in common with the next coordinate plane perpendicular, so needing only one LCM to glue the new vector to the current vector.
$mathbb{Z}^n$ contains a vector normal to $partial M$ whose endpoint is in $M$ because $partial M$ is a rational subspace. Projection onto one of these normal vectors has all but one ($pi_M(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = mathbb{Z}$) of the listed properties because the integers form a ring.
Let $v in mathbb{Z}^n$, $v perp partial M$, $v in M$ and $pi_v$ be projection onto $v$. Then $pi_v(L_{mathbb{Z}}) = nmathbb{Z}$ for some $n in mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ (because the image is a torsion-free, rank $1$ $mathbb{Z}$-module). Take $pi_M = frac{1}{n} pi_v$.
Why does $mathbb{Z}^n$ contain a normal to $partial M$?
A constructive method labels the coordinates $x_1, dots , x_n$ then picks a permutation of these, $x_{sigma(1)}, dots, x_{sigma(n)}$. Then find the intersections of $partial M$ with the $x_{sigma(i)}x_{sigma(i+1)}$ coordinate planes, $i in [1,n-1]$. These intersections are lines with rational slopes. The perpendiculars to these intersections are also lines with rational slopes. Then, using the LCM, iteratively glue these vectors together to give a normal in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
For example, suppose the permutation is $x_1, x_3, x_2$, where I will use the friendlier labels $x, z, y$, respectively, and $partial M$'s intersections gives us coordinate plane perpendiculars through $(x,z) = (2,3)$ on the $xz$-plane and through $(y,z) = (7,2)$ on the $yz$-plane. The LCM of the $z$-components is $6$, so $2 cdot(2,3) = (4,6)$ and $3 cdot(7,2) = (21,6)$ assemble into $(4,21,6)$. If $n > 3$, we continue iterating through the permutation, having only one component of our current vector in common with the next coordinate plane perpendicular, so needing only one LCM to glue the new vector to the current vector.
edited Dec 28 '18 at 17:29
answered Dec 28 '18 at 9:25
Eric Towers
32k22265
32k22265
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
add a comment |
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
Could you please explain why a rational subspace must have a normal contained in $mathbb{Z}^n$.
– tessellation
Dec 28 '18 at 12:57
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@tessellation : Added.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:24
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
@MatthewTowers : Ah, right. Incommensurables... Fixing.
– Eric Towers
Dec 28 '18 at 16:58
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054692%2fa-doubt-from-the-paper-newton-okounkov-bodies-semigroups-of-integral-points-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Perhaps this is a bit eager, but why not just use the fact that as $partial M$ is a codimension-1 linear subspace in $L$, one may project onto the unique normal to $partial M$ inside $L$?
– KReiser
Dec 28 '18 at 9:25