What is the condition that $e^x=ax+a-1$ has non-negative solution?












1














Consider the equation $e^x=ax+a-1$ for $aleq 2$. What is the condition that there exists a $xgeq 0$ as the solution of this equation? What are the solutions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
    – Jaideep Khare
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:53






  • 1




    Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:58


















1














Consider the equation $e^x=ax+a-1$ for $aleq 2$. What is the condition that there exists a $xgeq 0$ as the solution of this equation? What are the solutions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
    – Jaideep Khare
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:53






  • 1




    Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:58
















1












1








1







Consider the equation $e^x=ax+a-1$ for $aleq 2$. What is the condition that there exists a $xgeq 0$ as the solution of this equation? What are the solutions?










share|cite|improve this question













Consider the equation $e^x=ax+a-1$ for $aleq 2$. What is the condition that there exists a $xgeq 0$ as the solution of this equation? What are the solutions?







calculus systems-of-equations roots






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 28 '18 at 9:51









Math_Y

605




605












  • Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
    – Jaideep Khare
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:53






  • 1




    Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:58




















  • Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
    – Jaideep Khare
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:53






  • 1




    Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 28 '18 at 9:58


















Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
– Jaideep Khare
Dec 28 '18 at 9:53




Can you please tell what methods have you tried to solve this question?
– Jaideep Khare
Dec 28 '18 at 9:53




1




1




Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 28 '18 at 9:58






Minimize the function over $x geq 0$. You can see that there is non-negative zero iff $aln , a geq 1$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 28 '18 at 9:58












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















-6














Hint: Thw solution can be written using the LambertW function:
$$x=-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{
frac {a-1}{a}}
$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • It is not related to amount of $a$?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:48










  • Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:51






  • 2




    IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
    – Yves Daoust
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:45



















3














Hint :



Let $f(x)$ be a function $f : [0,+infty) to mathbb R$ such that :
$$f(x) = e^x-ax-a+1$$



The function $f$ is differentiable over $[0,+infty)$ with :
$$f'(x) = e^x -a implies f'(x)=0 Leftrightarrow x = ln a$$



Now, investigate cases to see what happens for $a leq 2$. Be careful for $a<0$ though, as the solution to the derivative won't exist and a different case holds.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:08










  • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:10










  • Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:29










  • @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
    – Rory Daulton
    Dec 28 '18 at 15:34





















0














Hint:



The equation can be written



$$frac{e^x+1}{x+1}=a$$ and a plot clearly shows where the positive solutions for $ale2$ lie.



enter image description here



Now you have to show that the LHS decreases from $2$ at $x=0$ to a single minimum, which delimits the useful range.



The location of the minimum cannot be expressed with a closed-form expression, but you can relate it to the function value, and draw a simple condition.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054737%2fwhat-is-the-condition-that-ex-axa-1-has-non-negative-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    -6














    Hint: Thw solution can be written using the LambertW function:
    $$x=-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{
    frac {a-1}{a}}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • It is not related to amount of $a$?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:48










    • Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:51






    • 2




      IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
      – Yves Daoust
      Dec 28 '18 at 12:45
















    -6














    Hint: Thw solution can be written using the LambertW function:
    $$x=-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{
    frac {a-1}{a}}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • It is not related to amount of $a$?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:48










    • Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:51






    • 2




      IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
      – Yves Daoust
      Dec 28 '18 at 12:45














    -6












    -6








    -6






    Hint: Thw solution can be written using the LambertW function:
    $$x=-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{
    frac {a-1}{a}}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Hint: Thw solution can be written using the LambertW function:
    $$x=-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{
    frac {a-1}{a}}
    $$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 28 '18 at 10:52

























    answered Dec 28 '18 at 10:36









    Dr. Sonnhard Graubner

    73.4k42865




    73.4k42865












    • It is not related to amount of $a$?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:48










    • Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:51






    • 2




      IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
      – Yves Daoust
      Dec 28 '18 at 12:45


















    • It is not related to amount of $a$?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:48










    • Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:51






    • 2




      IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
      – Yves Daoust
      Dec 28 '18 at 12:45
















    It is not related to amount of $a$?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:48




    It is not related to amount of $a$?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:48












    Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:51




    Sorry it was only an exemple the solution has to be $$-{rm W} left(-{frac {1}{a}{{rm e}^{-{frac {a-1}{a}}}}}right)-{ frac {a-1}{a}} $$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:51




    2




    2




    IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
    – Yves Daoust
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:45




    IMO, this brings you farther from the solution than the original setting of the question.
    – Yves Daoust
    Dec 28 '18 at 12:45











    3














    Hint :



    Let $f(x)$ be a function $f : [0,+infty) to mathbb R$ such that :
    $$f(x) = e^x-ax-a+1$$



    The function $f$ is differentiable over $[0,+infty)$ with :
    $$f'(x) = e^x -a implies f'(x)=0 Leftrightarrow x = ln a$$



    Now, investigate cases to see what happens for $a leq 2$. Be careful for $a<0$ though, as the solution to the derivative won't exist and a different case holds.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:08










    • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
      – Rebellos
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:10










    • Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:29










    • @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
      – Rory Daulton
      Dec 28 '18 at 15:34


















    3














    Hint :



    Let $f(x)$ be a function $f : [0,+infty) to mathbb R$ such that :
    $$f(x) = e^x-ax-a+1$$



    The function $f$ is differentiable over $[0,+infty)$ with :
    $$f'(x) = e^x -a implies f'(x)=0 Leftrightarrow x = ln a$$



    Now, investigate cases to see what happens for $a leq 2$. Be careful for $a<0$ though, as the solution to the derivative won't exist and a different case holds.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:08










    • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
      – Rebellos
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:10










    • Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:29










    • @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
      – Rory Daulton
      Dec 28 '18 at 15:34
















    3












    3








    3






    Hint :



    Let $f(x)$ be a function $f : [0,+infty) to mathbb R$ such that :
    $$f(x) = e^x-ax-a+1$$



    The function $f$ is differentiable over $[0,+infty)$ with :
    $$f'(x) = e^x -a implies f'(x)=0 Leftrightarrow x = ln a$$



    Now, investigate cases to see what happens for $a leq 2$. Be careful for $a<0$ though, as the solution to the derivative won't exist and a different case holds.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Hint :



    Let $f(x)$ be a function $f : [0,+infty) to mathbb R$ such that :
    $$f(x) = e^x-ax-a+1$$



    The function $f$ is differentiable over $[0,+infty)$ with :
    $$f'(x) = e^x -a implies f'(x)=0 Leftrightarrow x = ln a$$



    Now, investigate cases to see what happens for $a leq 2$. Be careful for $a<0$ though, as the solution to the derivative won't exist and a different case holds.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 28 '18 at 10:21

























    answered Dec 28 '18 at 10:03









    Rebellos

    14.5k31245




    14.5k31245












    • you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:08










    • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
      – Rebellos
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:10










    • Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:29










    • @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
      – Rory Daulton
      Dec 28 '18 at 15:34




















    • you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
      – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:08










    • @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
      – Rebellos
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:10










    • Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
      – Math_Y
      Dec 28 '18 at 10:29










    • @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
      – Rory Daulton
      Dec 28 '18 at 15:34


















    you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:08




    you must also consider the case if $$a<0$$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:08












    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:10




    @Dr.SonnhardGraubner Yes, in that case the equation $f'(x) = 0$ has no solutions and is also $f'(x) >0$.
    – Rebellos
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:10












    Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:29




    Thank you very much. There exists a closed form relation for the solutions?
    – Math_Y
    Dec 28 '18 at 10:29












    @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
    – Rory Daulton
    Dec 28 '18 at 15:34






    @Math_Y: There is a closed form: $age e^{W(1)}$ where $W$ is the Lambert W function. This comes from the equation $aln a=1$, or equivalently $a^a=e$.
    – Rory Daulton
    Dec 28 '18 at 15:34













    0














    Hint:



    The equation can be written



    $$frac{e^x+1}{x+1}=a$$ and a plot clearly shows where the positive solutions for $ale2$ lie.



    enter image description here



    Now you have to show that the LHS decreases from $2$ at $x=0$ to a single minimum, which delimits the useful range.



    The location of the minimum cannot be expressed with a closed-form expression, but you can relate it to the function value, and draw a simple condition.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      0














      Hint:



      The equation can be written



      $$frac{e^x+1}{x+1}=a$$ and a plot clearly shows where the positive solutions for $ale2$ lie.



      enter image description here



      Now you have to show that the LHS decreases from $2$ at $x=0$ to a single minimum, which delimits the useful range.



      The location of the minimum cannot be expressed with a closed-form expression, but you can relate it to the function value, and draw a simple condition.






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0






        Hint:



        The equation can be written



        $$frac{e^x+1}{x+1}=a$$ and a plot clearly shows where the positive solutions for $ale2$ lie.



        enter image description here



        Now you have to show that the LHS decreases from $2$ at $x=0$ to a single minimum, which delimits the useful range.



        The location of the minimum cannot be expressed with a closed-form expression, but you can relate it to the function value, and draw a simple condition.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Hint:



        The equation can be written



        $$frac{e^x+1}{x+1}=a$$ and a plot clearly shows where the positive solutions for $ale2$ lie.



        enter image description here



        Now you have to show that the LHS decreases from $2$ at $x=0$ to a single minimum, which delimits the useful range.



        The location of the minimum cannot be expressed with a closed-form expression, but you can relate it to the function value, and draw a simple condition.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 28 '18 at 12:54

























        answered Dec 28 '18 at 12:42









        Yves Daoust

        124k671222




        124k671222






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054737%2fwhat-is-the-condition-that-ex-axa-1-has-non-negative-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg