Wedderburn Decomposition by using Clifford theorem.












1














Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$ and we know Wedderburn decomposition of semi simple algebra $FH$ over a finite field $F$ as $$FH=Foplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{4}(F)oplus M_{5}(F).$$ But i want Wedderburn decomposition of $FG$. After my all calculation i found that $$FG=Foplus M_{n_1}(F)oplus M_{n_2}(F)oplus M_{n_3}(F)oplus M_{n_4}(F)$$ and two choices of $n_{i}$ as $2,3,4,5$ and $4,4,5,5,,6.$ Now i am confused which one is answer. I thought Clifford theorem will help but i am unable to apply it. Please help me apply to it or any other idea. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • @JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago










  • Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago
















1














Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$ and we know Wedderburn decomposition of semi simple algebra $FH$ over a finite field $F$ as $$FH=Foplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{4}(F)oplus M_{5}(F).$$ But i want Wedderburn decomposition of $FG$. After my all calculation i found that $$FG=Foplus M_{n_1}(F)oplus M_{n_2}(F)oplus M_{n_3}(F)oplus M_{n_4}(F)$$ and two choices of $n_{i}$ as $2,3,4,5$ and $4,4,5,5,,6.$ Now i am confused which one is answer. I thought Clifford theorem will help but i am unable to apply it. Please help me apply to it or any other idea. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • @JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago










  • Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago














1












1








1


1





Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$ and we know Wedderburn decomposition of semi simple algebra $FH$ over a finite field $F$ as $$FH=Foplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{4}(F)oplus M_{5}(F).$$ But i want Wedderburn decomposition of $FG$. After my all calculation i found that $$FG=Foplus M_{n_1}(F)oplus M_{n_2}(F)oplus M_{n_3}(F)oplus M_{n_4}(F)$$ and two choices of $n_{i}$ as $2,3,4,5$ and $4,4,5,5,,6.$ Now i am confused which one is answer. I thought Clifford theorem will help but i am unable to apply it. Please help me apply to it or any other idea. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $H$ be a normal subgroup of $G$ and we know Wedderburn decomposition of semi simple algebra $FH$ over a finite field $F$ as $$FH=Foplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{3}(F)oplus M_{4}(F)oplus M_{5}(F).$$ But i want Wedderburn decomposition of $FG$. After my all calculation i found that $$FG=Foplus M_{n_1}(F)oplus M_{n_2}(F)oplus M_{n_3}(F)oplus M_{n_4}(F)$$ and two choices of $n_{i}$ as $2,3,4,5$ and $4,4,5,5,,6.$ Now i am confused which one is answer. I thought Clifford theorem will help but i am unable to apply it. Please help me apply to it or any other idea. Thanks.







modules representation-theory group-rings






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 23 hours ago









Jyrki Lahtonen

108k12166367




108k12166367










asked Dec 26 at 2:30









neelkanth

2,0792928




2,0792928












  • Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • @JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago










  • Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago


















  • Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
    – Jyrki Lahtonen
    23 hours ago










  • @JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago










  • Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
    – neelkanth
    15 hours ago
















Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago




Something is missing. It sounds like you are given the decomposition of $F[H]$ implying, among other things, that $|H|=60$ and that $F[H]$ is semisimple. Then you ask as to divine the decomposition of $F[G]$. Without telling us anything at all about $G$, for example its cardinality. With this data it is impossible to say even the dimension of $F[G]$. Were you also given that $F[G]$ has exactly five simple components? Or what?
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago












Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago




Also, why did you tag this with clifford-algebras? Clifford algebras are associative algebras constructed starting from a quadratic form on a vector space.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago












Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago




Or, were you given those two choices for the Wedderburn decomposition of $G$, and asked to determine, which one may come from a group $G$ having $H$ as a subgroup. That would make sense, but you should not leave us guessing what is given, and what's not.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
23 hours ago












@JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
– neelkanth
15 hours ago




@JyrkiLahtonen yes sir decomposition of normal subgroup is given...
– neelkanth
15 hours ago












Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
– neelkanth
15 hours ago




Sir H is of index $2$ i.e. $G$ is of order $120.$
– neelkanth
15 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052586%2fwedderburn-decomposition-by-using-clifford-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052586%2fwedderburn-decomposition-by-using-clifford-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg