Soft question regarding topics In real analysis [on hold]












0














I'm self studying "Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot". I'm starting to enjoy the subject, but found it slightly challenging from the first chapter which I've now completed. Do the topics on sequences, series, continuity, integrability that follow in an analysis subject become better to manage and somewhat easier to think about intuitively after studying the place of the Real number system.










share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Andrés E. Caicedo, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus, Lord_Farin, dantopa 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2




    Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
    – Rakesh Bhatt
    Dec 26 at 3:02






  • 2




    Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
    – twnly
    Dec 26 at 3:04








  • 2




    I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
    – MathIsLife12
    Dec 26 at 3:27
















0














I'm self studying "Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot". I'm starting to enjoy the subject, but found it slightly challenging from the first chapter which I've now completed. Do the topics on sequences, series, continuity, integrability that follow in an analysis subject become better to manage and somewhat easier to think about intuitively after studying the place of the Real number system.










share|cite|improve this question













put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Andrés E. Caicedo, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus, Lord_Farin, dantopa 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 2




    Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
    – Rakesh Bhatt
    Dec 26 at 3:02






  • 2




    Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
    – twnly
    Dec 26 at 3:04








  • 2




    I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
    – MathIsLife12
    Dec 26 at 3:27














0












0








0







I'm self studying "Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot". I'm starting to enjoy the subject, but found it slightly challenging from the first chapter which I've now completed. Do the topics on sequences, series, continuity, integrability that follow in an analysis subject become better to manage and somewhat easier to think about intuitively after studying the place of the Real number system.










share|cite|improve this question













I'm self studying "Understanding Analysis by Stephen Abbot". I'm starting to enjoy the subject, but found it slightly challenging from the first chapter which I've now completed. Do the topics on sequences, series, continuity, integrability that follow in an analysis subject become better to manage and somewhat easier to think about intuitively after studying the place of the Real number system.







real-analysis soft-question






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 26 at 3:00









James

11




11




put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Andrés E. Caicedo, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus, Lord_Farin, dantopa 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






put on hold as unclear what you're asking by Andrés E. Caicedo, Lord Shark the Unknown, Leucippus, Lord_Farin, dantopa 2 days ago


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 2




    Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
    – Rakesh Bhatt
    Dec 26 at 3:02






  • 2




    Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
    – twnly
    Dec 26 at 3:04








  • 2




    I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
    – MathIsLife12
    Dec 26 at 3:27














  • 2




    Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
    – Rakesh Bhatt
    Dec 26 at 3:02






  • 2




    Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
    – twnly
    Dec 26 at 3:04








  • 2




    I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
    – MathIsLife12
    Dec 26 at 3:27








2




2




Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
– Rakesh Bhatt
Dec 26 at 3:02




Nothing is easy unless you work hard.
– Rakesh Bhatt
Dec 26 at 3:02




2




2




Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
– twnly
Dec 26 at 3:04






Well, most of the common examples are over $mathbb{R}$. Consider $[a,b]$ being a compact set, integration being defined over $mathbb{R}$ and $mathbb{R}$ being complete. So a good understanding of the real number system is important. Make special note of the least upper bound property, which comes up frequently later.
– twnly
Dec 26 at 3:04






2




2




I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
– MathIsLife12
Dec 26 at 3:27




I find that learning analysis just from a book without an intelligent instructor or professor is nearly impossible. Maybe I just haven’t found the right book.
– MathIsLife12
Dec 26 at 3:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Like anything else, intuition comes through experience and practice; you will not immediately get it. Real analysis is not a trivial subject either; which is ironic because, at least the way it is often taught at the undergraduate level, it's essentially making calculus more rigorous, which is a subject we introduce to high schoolers.



It's an example of the fact that while the ideas that come from it may be simpler and easier to grasp, the underlying framework is very nontrivial and can indeed be difficult to understand. As a matter of perspective, at least at my university, it is generally regarded as the hardest class for math majors.



So don't be surprised if you're not getting it - it's not something a ton of people can get, so if you're understanding stuff so far, even if you don't yet have the underlying intuition, that in itself is something to be proud of. The intuition won't come immediately, but it does come about if you practice and read thoroughly through the material. Personally, I also found self-explaining proofs to be really helpful; granted, this was in the university setting and not self-study, but even just rewriting down proofs from the text or lectures, in my own words, explaining in my own way, went far in helping me to understand the material and develop an intuitive understanding of what went on in the course.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Like anything else, intuition comes through experience and practice; you will not immediately get it. Real analysis is not a trivial subject either; which is ironic because, at least the way it is often taught at the undergraduate level, it's essentially making calculus more rigorous, which is a subject we introduce to high schoolers.



    It's an example of the fact that while the ideas that come from it may be simpler and easier to grasp, the underlying framework is very nontrivial and can indeed be difficult to understand. As a matter of perspective, at least at my university, it is generally regarded as the hardest class for math majors.



    So don't be surprised if you're not getting it - it's not something a ton of people can get, so if you're understanding stuff so far, even if you don't yet have the underlying intuition, that in itself is something to be proud of. The intuition won't come immediately, but it does come about if you practice and read thoroughly through the material. Personally, I also found self-explaining proofs to be really helpful; granted, this was in the university setting and not self-study, but even just rewriting down proofs from the text or lectures, in my own words, explaining in my own way, went far in helping me to understand the material and develop an intuitive understanding of what went on in the course.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      1














      Like anything else, intuition comes through experience and practice; you will not immediately get it. Real analysis is not a trivial subject either; which is ironic because, at least the way it is often taught at the undergraduate level, it's essentially making calculus more rigorous, which is a subject we introduce to high schoolers.



      It's an example of the fact that while the ideas that come from it may be simpler and easier to grasp, the underlying framework is very nontrivial and can indeed be difficult to understand. As a matter of perspective, at least at my university, it is generally regarded as the hardest class for math majors.



      So don't be surprised if you're not getting it - it's not something a ton of people can get, so if you're understanding stuff so far, even if you don't yet have the underlying intuition, that in itself is something to be proud of. The intuition won't come immediately, but it does come about if you practice and read thoroughly through the material. Personally, I also found self-explaining proofs to be really helpful; granted, this was in the university setting and not self-study, but even just rewriting down proofs from the text or lectures, in my own words, explaining in my own way, went far in helping me to understand the material and develop an intuitive understanding of what went on in the course.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        Like anything else, intuition comes through experience and practice; you will not immediately get it. Real analysis is not a trivial subject either; which is ironic because, at least the way it is often taught at the undergraduate level, it's essentially making calculus more rigorous, which is a subject we introduce to high schoolers.



        It's an example of the fact that while the ideas that come from it may be simpler and easier to grasp, the underlying framework is very nontrivial and can indeed be difficult to understand. As a matter of perspective, at least at my university, it is generally regarded as the hardest class for math majors.



        So don't be surprised if you're not getting it - it's not something a ton of people can get, so if you're understanding stuff so far, even if you don't yet have the underlying intuition, that in itself is something to be proud of. The intuition won't come immediately, but it does come about if you practice and read thoroughly through the material. Personally, I also found self-explaining proofs to be really helpful; granted, this was in the university setting and not self-study, but even just rewriting down proofs from the text or lectures, in my own words, explaining in my own way, went far in helping me to understand the material and develop an intuitive understanding of what went on in the course.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Like anything else, intuition comes through experience and practice; you will not immediately get it. Real analysis is not a trivial subject either; which is ironic because, at least the way it is often taught at the undergraduate level, it's essentially making calculus more rigorous, which is a subject we introduce to high schoolers.



        It's an example of the fact that while the ideas that come from it may be simpler and easier to grasp, the underlying framework is very nontrivial and can indeed be difficult to understand. As a matter of perspective, at least at my university, it is generally regarded as the hardest class for math majors.



        So don't be surprised if you're not getting it - it's not something a ton of people can get, so if you're understanding stuff so far, even if you don't yet have the underlying intuition, that in itself is something to be proud of. The intuition won't come immediately, but it does come about if you practice and read thoroughly through the material. Personally, I also found self-explaining proofs to be really helpful; granted, this was in the university setting and not self-study, but even just rewriting down proofs from the text or lectures, in my own words, explaining in my own way, went far in helping me to understand the material and develop an intuitive understanding of what went on in the course.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 26 at 3:25









        Eevee Trainer

        4,090530




        4,090530















            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅