Does the Snap Kick feat apply to Attacks of Opportunity?
Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?
If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?
dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
add a comment |
Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?
If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?
dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
add a comment |
Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?
If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?
dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
Does the Snap Kick feat work on Attacks of Opportunity (letting you make another attack)?
If yes, is the -2 to attack rolls cumulative?
dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack
dnd-3.5e feats opportunity-attack attack
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
edited 2 days ago
V2Blast
19.6k356121
19.6k356121
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
asked 2 days ago
András
26.1k1092185
26.1k1092185
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it does, and yes, it is.
Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137993%2fdoes-the-snap-kick-feat-apply-to-attacks-of-opportunity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes, it does, and yes, it is.
Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, it does, and yes, it is.
Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes, it does, and yes, it is.
Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
Yes, it does, and yes, it is.
Snap Kick lets you put one more attack into any attack sequence, which is what makes it so good. The cumulative −2 is definitely a cost, and makes it hard to really abuse Snap Kick (a good thing!), but the feat is still really good.
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
answered 2 days ago
KRyan
217k28542932
217k28542932
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
add a comment |
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
It may be worth adding why penalties from the same source would stack in this case. Not if I played much with ToB content, but with a glance I can't see why the above rule won't aply here.
– annoying imp
6 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
@annoyingimp Which rule above? Penalties are usually cumulative, it’s kind of the default. When a magic spell applies a penalty, you can’t just keep casting that spell to accumulate the penalties, but when the penalty is some non-spell thing you did, it definitely stacks.
– KRyan
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137993%2fdoes-the-snap-kick-feat-apply-to-attacks-of-opportunity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
