Birational Morphism to a Normal Scheme Isomorphism
My question refers the answer of @user18119 in following thread: Are these two notions of Galois morphism the same
We have $f:Xto Y$ a finite morphism of integral schemes and $G$ letautomorphism group of $X$ over $Y$.
There was showed that following statements where equivalent:
The function field extension $K(Y)subset K(X)$ is Galois (in the field-theoretic sense)
The quotient $X/G$ exists and the natural morphism $X/Gto Y$ is an isomorphism.
In the (2) implies (1) direction $Xto Y$ factoriezes through the finite morphism $g: X/Gto Y$. By (1) $g$ is birational. Futhermore $Y$ is normal.
Why these two conditions already imply that $g$ is an isomorphism?
Clearly that suffice to check it on the level of stalks.
algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry
add a comment |
My question refers the answer of @user18119 in following thread: Are these two notions of Galois morphism the same
We have $f:Xto Y$ a finite morphism of integral schemes and $G$ letautomorphism group of $X$ over $Y$.
There was showed that following statements where equivalent:
The function field extension $K(Y)subset K(X)$ is Galois (in the field-theoretic sense)
The quotient $X/G$ exists and the natural morphism $X/Gto Y$ is an isomorphism.
In the (2) implies (1) direction $Xto Y$ factoriezes through the finite morphism $g: X/Gto Y$. By (1) $g$ is birational. Futhermore $Y$ is normal.
Why these two conditions already imply that $g$ is an isomorphism?
Clearly that suffice to check it on the level of stalks.
algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry
3
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10
add a comment |
My question refers the answer of @user18119 in following thread: Are these two notions of Galois morphism the same
We have $f:Xto Y$ a finite morphism of integral schemes and $G$ letautomorphism group of $X$ over $Y$.
There was showed that following statements where equivalent:
The function field extension $K(Y)subset K(X)$ is Galois (in the field-theoretic sense)
The quotient $X/G$ exists and the natural morphism $X/Gto Y$ is an isomorphism.
In the (2) implies (1) direction $Xto Y$ factoriezes through the finite morphism $g: X/Gto Y$. By (1) $g$ is birational. Futhermore $Y$ is normal.
Why these two conditions already imply that $g$ is an isomorphism?
Clearly that suffice to check it on the level of stalks.
algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry
My question refers the answer of @user18119 in following thread: Are these two notions of Galois morphism the same
We have $f:Xto Y$ a finite morphism of integral schemes and $G$ letautomorphism group of $X$ over $Y$.
There was showed that following statements where equivalent:
The function field extension $K(Y)subset K(X)$ is Galois (in the field-theoretic sense)
The quotient $X/G$ exists and the natural morphism $X/Gto Y$ is an isomorphism.
In the (2) implies (1) direction $Xto Y$ factoriezes through the finite morphism $g: X/Gto Y$. By (1) $g$ is birational. Futhermore $Y$ is normal.
Why these two conditions already imply that $g$ is an isomorphism?
Clearly that suffice to check it on the level of stalks.
algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry
algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry
asked Dec 26 at 0:53
KarlPeter
5881314
5881314
3
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10
add a comment |
3
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10
3
3
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052549%2fbirational-morphism-to-a-normal-scheme-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052549%2fbirational-morphism-to-a-normal-scheme-isomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
1 and 2 are equivalent only if you assume $Y$ is normal. For your question, any finite birational morphism $h:Zto Y$ is an isomorphism if $Y$ is normal. To see this, notice that you may replace $Y$ by any affine open cover and assume that $Y$ is affine. Finite morphisms are affine, so $Z$ is also affine. If $Y,Z$ are spectrum of $A,B$, we have an integral birational extension $Ato B$ which is finite. Since $A$ is integrally closed, this means $A=B$.
– Mohan
Dec 26 at 1:10