Is a gambit still a gambit if it's calculated through to the end?
I recently gambitted a knight (I call it a gambit as I gave away a knight without being able to take back).
However I had calculated through all the possibilities and five moves or so later I have an extra pawn and a better position. Does this still count as a gambit or doesn't it as I know I can get the material back?
Essentially, what is the actual definition of a gambit?
gambits terminology
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
add a comment |
I recently gambitted a knight (I call it a gambit as I gave away a knight without being able to take back).
However I had calculated through all the possibilities and five moves or so later I have an extra pawn and a better position. Does this still count as a gambit or doesn't it as I know I can get the material back?
Essentially, what is the actual definition of a gambit?
gambits terminology
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
add a comment |
I recently gambitted a knight (I call it a gambit as I gave away a knight without being able to take back).
However I had calculated through all the possibilities and five moves or so later I have an extra pawn and a better position. Does this still count as a gambit or doesn't it as I know I can get the material back?
Essentially, what is the actual definition of a gambit?
gambits terminology
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
I recently gambitted a knight (I call it a gambit as I gave away a knight without being able to take back).
However I had calculated through all the possibilities and five moves or so later I have an extra pawn and a better position. Does this still count as a gambit or doesn't it as I know I can get the material back?
Essentially, what is the actual definition of a gambit?
gambits terminology
gambits terminology
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
edited 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
12.8k43560
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
asked 2 days ago
Arkleseisure
1926
1926
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, it's not a gambit; a gambit is 'just' a sacrifice which is part of (well-known) opening theory, nothing more, nothing less.
But, technically, what you describe is not even a real sacrifice, but a 'sham sacrifice'.
Wikipedia gives the following definitions:
Real versus sham
Rudolf Spielmann proposed a division between sham and real sacrifices:
- In a 'real sacrifice', the sacrificing player will often have to play on with less material than his opponent for quite some time.
- In a 'sham sacrifice', the player offering the sacrifice will soon regain material of the same or greater value, or else force mate. A sham sacrifice of this latter type is sometimes known as a pseudo sacrifice. (Rudolf Spielman, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess", 1995, Dover, ISBN 0-486-28449-2)
In compensation for a real sacrifice, the player receives dynamic, positional, or other non-material advantages which he must capitalize on, or risk losing the game due to the material deficit. Because of the risk involved, real sacrifices are also called 'speculative sacrifices'.
If the name 'sham sacrifice' sounds too negative to you, just call it a 'tactical combination'.
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "435"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23320%2fis-a-gambit-still-a-gambit-if-its-calculated-through-to-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, it's not a gambit; a gambit is 'just' a sacrifice which is part of (well-known) opening theory, nothing more, nothing less.
But, technically, what you describe is not even a real sacrifice, but a 'sham sacrifice'.
Wikipedia gives the following definitions:
Real versus sham
Rudolf Spielmann proposed a division between sham and real sacrifices:
- In a 'real sacrifice', the sacrificing player will often have to play on with less material than his opponent for quite some time.
- In a 'sham sacrifice', the player offering the sacrifice will soon regain material of the same or greater value, or else force mate. A sham sacrifice of this latter type is sometimes known as a pseudo sacrifice. (Rudolf Spielman, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess", 1995, Dover, ISBN 0-486-28449-2)
In compensation for a real sacrifice, the player receives dynamic, positional, or other non-material advantages which he must capitalize on, or risk losing the game due to the material deficit. Because of the risk involved, real sacrifices are also called 'speculative sacrifices'.
If the name 'sham sacrifice' sounds too negative to you, just call it a 'tactical combination'.
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
add a comment |
No, it's not a gambit; a gambit is 'just' a sacrifice which is part of (well-known) opening theory, nothing more, nothing less.
But, technically, what you describe is not even a real sacrifice, but a 'sham sacrifice'.
Wikipedia gives the following definitions:
Real versus sham
Rudolf Spielmann proposed a division between sham and real sacrifices:
- In a 'real sacrifice', the sacrificing player will often have to play on with less material than his opponent for quite some time.
- In a 'sham sacrifice', the player offering the sacrifice will soon regain material of the same or greater value, or else force mate. A sham sacrifice of this latter type is sometimes known as a pseudo sacrifice. (Rudolf Spielman, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess", 1995, Dover, ISBN 0-486-28449-2)
In compensation for a real sacrifice, the player receives dynamic, positional, or other non-material advantages which he must capitalize on, or risk losing the game due to the material deficit. Because of the risk involved, real sacrifices are also called 'speculative sacrifices'.
If the name 'sham sacrifice' sounds too negative to you, just call it a 'tactical combination'.
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
add a comment |
No, it's not a gambit; a gambit is 'just' a sacrifice which is part of (well-known) opening theory, nothing more, nothing less.
But, technically, what you describe is not even a real sacrifice, but a 'sham sacrifice'.
Wikipedia gives the following definitions:
Real versus sham
Rudolf Spielmann proposed a division between sham and real sacrifices:
- In a 'real sacrifice', the sacrificing player will often have to play on with less material than his opponent for quite some time.
- In a 'sham sacrifice', the player offering the sacrifice will soon regain material of the same or greater value, or else force mate. A sham sacrifice of this latter type is sometimes known as a pseudo sacrifice. (Rudolf Spielman, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess", 1995, Dover, ISBN 0-486-28449-2)
In compensation for a real sacrifice, the player receives dynamic, positional, or other non-material advantages which he must capitalize on, or risk losing the game due to the material deficit. Because of the risk involved, real sacrifices are also called 'speculative sacrifices'.
If the name 'sham sacrifice' sounds too negative to you, just call it a 'tactical combination'.
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
No, it's not a gambit; a gambit is 'just' a sacrifice which is part of (well-known) opening theory, nothing more, nothing less.
But, technically, what you describe is not even a real sacrifice, but a 'sham sacrifice'.
Wikipedia gives the following definitions:
Real versus sham
Rudolf Spielmann proposed a division between sham and real sacrifices:
- In a 'real sacrifice', the sacrificing player will often have to play on with less material than his opponent for quite some time.
- In a 'sham sacrifice', the player offering the sacrifice will soon regain material of the same or greater value, or else force mate. A sham sacrifice of this latter type is sometimes known as a pseudo sacrifice. (Rudolf Spielman, "The Art of Sacrifice in Chess", 1995, Dover, ISBN 0-486-28449-2)
In compensation for a real sacrifice, the player receives dynamic, positional, or other non-material advantages which he must capitalize on, or risk losing the game due to the material deficit. Because of the risk involved, real sacrifices are also called 'speculative sacrifices'.
If the name 'sham sacrifice' sounds too negative to you, just call it a 'tactical combination'.
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
answered 2 days ago
Glorfindel
12.8k43560
12.8k43560
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
add a comment |
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
Agree with Glorfindel. Also a sacrifice that is not fully calculated is sometimes called a "speculative sacrifice"
– Michael West
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
I've lost to what my opponents have been calling a False sacrifice 6 or 7 times now.
– Steve
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f23320%2fis-a-gambit-still-a-gambit-if-its-calculated-through-to-the-end%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
