creating smooth curves with $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$












2














I would like to create smooth curves, which have $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$.



What I would like to create are curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors. I don't know any better way to describe it, in computer graphics I used them a lot, but in math I don't know what kind of curves they are. They are defined by the two endpoints and a 3rd point.



gamma curves



What I am looking for is a similar curve, what can be described easily in math. For example with a simple exponential function or power function. Can you tell me what kind of curves these ones are (just by lookin at the image below), and how can I create a function which fits a curve using the 2 endpoints and a value in the middle?



So what I am looking for is some equation or algorithm what takes a midpoint value $f(0.5) = x$, returns me $a, b$ and $c$ for example if the curve can be parameterized like this (just ideas):



$a exp (bt) + c$ or $a b^t + c$



Update: yes, $x^t$ works like this, but it gets really sharp when $t < 0.1$. I would prefer something with a smooth derivative at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind. (I use smooth here as "not steep")










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
    – mac
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:36










  • Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:39










  • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










  • FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
    – Michael McGowan
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:40
















2














I would like to create smooth curves, which have $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$.



What I would like to create are curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors. I don't know any better way to describe it, in computer graphics I used them a lot, but in math I don't know what kind of curves they are. They are defined by the two endpoints and a 3rd point.



gamma curves



What I am looking for is a similar curve, what can be described easily in math. For example with a simple exponential function or power function. Can you tell me what kind of curves these ones are (just by lookin at the image below), and how can I create a function which fits a curve using the 2 endpoints and a value in the middle?



So what I am looking for is some equation or algorithm what takes a midpoint value $f(0.5) = x$, returns me $a, b$ and $c$ for example if the curve can be parameterized like this (just ideas):



$a exp (bt) + c$ or $a b^t + c$



Update: yes, $x^t$ works like this, but it gets really sharp when $t < 0.1$. I would prefer something with a smooth derivative at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind. (I use smooth here as "not steep")










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
    – mac
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:36










  • Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:39










  • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










  • FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
    – Michael McGowan
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:40














2












2








2


0





I would like to create smooth curves, which have $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$.



What I would like to create are curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors. I don't know any better way to describe it, in computer graphics I used them a lot, but in math I don't know what kind of curves they are. They are defined by the two endpoints and a 3rd point.



gamma curves



What I am looking for is a similar curve, what can be described easily in math. For example with a simple exponential function or power function. Can you tell me what kind of curves these ones are (just by lookin at the image below), and how can I create a function which fits a curve using the 2 endpoints and a value in the middle?



So what I am looking for is some equation or algorithm what takes a midpoint value $f(0.5) = x$, returns me $a, b$ and $c$ for example if the curve can be parameterized like this (just ideas):



$a exp (bt) + c$ or $a b^t + c$



Update: yes, $x^t$ works like this, but it gets really sharp when $t < 0.1$. I would prefer something with a smooth derivative at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind. (I use smooth here as "not steep")










share|cite|improve this question















I would like to create smooth curves, which have $f(0) = 0$ and $f(1) = 1$.



What I would like to create are curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors. I don't know any better way to describe it, in computer graphics I used them a lot, but in math I don't know what kind of curves they are. They are defined by the two endpoints and a 3rd point.



gamma curves



What I am looking for is a similar curve, what can be described easily in math. For example with a simple exponential function or power function. Can you tell me what kind of curves these ones are (just by lookin at the image below), and how can I create a function which fits a curve using the 2 endpoints and a value in the middle?



So what I am looking for is some equation or algorithm what takes a midpoint value $f(0.5) = x$, returns me $a, b$ and $c$ for example if the curve can be parameterized like this (just ideas):



$a exp (bt) + c$ or $a b^t + c$



Update: yes, $x^t$ works like this, but it gets really sharp when $t < 0.1$. I would prefer something with a smooth derivative at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind. (I use smooth here as "not steep")







calculus geometry interpolation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 at 10:06









Lorenzo B.

1,8222520




1,8222520










asked Jul 7 '11 at 9:25









hyperknot

4301411




4301411








  • 1




    How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
    – mac
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:36










  • Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:39










  • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










  • FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
    – Michael McGowan
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:40














  • 1




    How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
    – mac
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:36










  • Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:39










  • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










  • FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
    – Michael McGowan
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:40








1




1




How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
– mac
Jul 7 '11 at 9:36




How about $f(x)=x^t$ where $t$ is a positive real constant? This has $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$, and if $f(0.5)=k$ where $0<k<1$ then I guess $0.5^t=k$, so $t=-log_2 k$.
– mac
Jul 7 '11 at 9:36












Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
– Har
Jul 7 '11 at 9:39




Great minds think alike, we even agree on notation. :)
– Har
Jul 7 '11 at 9:39












Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
– hyperknot
Jul 7 '11 at 9:45




Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
– hyperknot
Jul 7 '11 at 9:45












FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
– Michael McGowan
Jul 7 '11 at 13:40




FYI a "smooth function" actually has a technical meaning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smooth_function
– Michael McGowan
Jul 7 '11 at 13:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














EDIT



It turns out that for $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$, the function $f(t)$ as given in the original answer below can be simplified very much. (The key observation is that $sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} = sqrt {(2x - 1)^2 } = |2x - 1|$.) Specifically, for any $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$,
$$
f(t) = frac{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^{2t} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}}.
$$
Note that $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and
$$
f(0.5) = frac{{frac{{1 - x}}{x} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}} = frac{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{x}}}{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{{x^2 }}}} = x.
$$
Since $f$ is, loosely speaking, an exponential function on a bounded domain, it has a bounded derivative, as the OP wants.



Original answer



If $x=0.5$, then take $f(t)=t$. If $0 < x < 1$ and $x neq 0.5$, take
$$
f(t) = frac{{e^{bt} - 1}}{{e^b - 1}},
$$
where
$$
b = 2 ln (xi)
$$
with
$$
xi = frac{{1 + sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
$$
if $x < 0.5$ and
$$
xi = frac{{1 - sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
$$
if $x > 0.5$.
Then $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and $f(0.5)=x$ (and $f$ has a bounded derivative, as you want).






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:01










  • Thx! Even better!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:50



















1














How about $f(x)=x^t$ for some $t>0$? It satisfies $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ for any $t$.



All that is left is to pick $t$. For example, if you want that $f(b)=a$, then we get $b^t=a$, or $t = log(a)/log(b)$.



Edit: In particular, if we denote $f_t(x)=x^t$, we have that $f_{2.2}(0.5)=0.218$ and $f_{1/2.2}(0.218)=0.5$. In other words, it is clear from the numbers and the general shapes of the curves that they are exactly $f(x)=x^t$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










  • It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:02






  • 1




    Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:04










  • OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:04










  • Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:07



















0














It might be worth doing some research into Finite Element shape functions as the basis of these functions is very similar to the problem you are trying to solve here.



My experience with shape functions is that the equations are usually identified through trial and error although there are approaches that can ease you through the process.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50060%2fcreating-smooth-curves-with-f0-0-and-f1-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    EDIT



    It turns out that for $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$, the function $f(t)$ as given in the original answer below can be simplified very much. (The key observation is that $sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} = sqrt {(2x - 1)^2 } = |2x - 1|$.) Specifically, for any $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$,
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^{2t} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}}.
    $$
    Note that $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and
    $$
    f(0.5) = frac{{frac{{1 - x}}{x} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}} = frac{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{x}}}{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{{x^2 }}}} = x.
    $$
    Since $f$ is, loosely speaking, an exponential function on a bounded domain, it has a bounded derivative, as the OP wants.



    Original answer



    If $x=0.5$, then take $f(t)=t$. If $0 < x < 1$ and $x neq 0.5$, take
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{e^{bt} - 1}}{{e^b - 1}},
    $$
    where
    $$
    b = 2 ln (xi)
    $$
    with
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 + sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x < 0.5$ and
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 - sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x > 0.5$.
    Then $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and $f(0.5)=x$ (and $f$ has a bounded derivative, as you want).






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:01










    • Thx! Even better!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 13:50
















    1














    EDIT



    It turns out that for $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$, the function $f(t)$ as given in the original answer below can be simplified very much. (The key observation is that $sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} = sqrt {(2x - 1)^2 } = |2x - 1|$.) Specifically, for any $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$,
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^{2t} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}}.
    $$
    Note that $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and
    $$
    f(0.5) = frac{{frac{{1 - x}}{x} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}} = frac{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{x}}}{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{{x^2 }}}} = x.
    $$
    Since $f$ is, loosely speaking, an exponential function on a bounded domain, it has a bounded derivative, as the OP wants.



    Original answer



    If $x=0.5$, then take $f(t)=t$. If $0 < x < 1$ and $x neq 0.5$, take
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{e^{bt} - 1}}{{e^b - 1}},
    $$
    where
    $$
    b = 2 ln (xi)
    $$
    with
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 + sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x < 0.5$ and
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 - sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x > 0.5$.
    Then $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and $f(0.5)=x$ (and $f$ has a bounded derivative, as you want).






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:01










    • Thx! Even better!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 13:50














    1












    1








    1






    EDIT



    It turns out that for $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$, the function $f(t)$ as given in the original answer below can be simplified very much. (The key observation is that $sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} = sqrt {(2x - 1)^2 } = |2x - 1|$.) Specifically, for any $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$,
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^{2t} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}}.
    $$
    Note that $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and
    $$
    f(0.5) = frac{{frac{{1 - x}}{x} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}} = frac{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{x}}}{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{{x^2 }}}} = x.
    $$
    Since $f$ is, loosely speaking, an exponential function on a bounded domain, it has a bounded derivative, as the OP wants.



    Original answer



    If $x=0.5$, then take $f(t)=t$. If $0 < x < 1$ and $x neq 0.5$, take
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{e^{bt} - 1}}{{e^b - 1}},
    $$
    where
    $$
    b = 2 ln (xi)
    $$
    with
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 + sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x < 0.5$ and
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 - sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x > 0.5$.
    Then $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and $f(0.5)=x$ (and $f$ has a bounded derivative, as you want).






    share|cite|improve this answer














    EDIT



    It turns out that for $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$, the function $f(t)$ as given in the original answer below can be simplified very much. (The key observation is that $sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} = sqrt {(2x - 1)^2 } = |2x - 1|$.) Specifically, for any $0 < x < 1$ with $x neq 0.5$,
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^{2t} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}}.
    $$
    Note that $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and
    $$
    f(0.5) = frac{{frac{{1 - x}}{x} - 1}}{{(frac{{1 - x}}{x})^2 - 1}} = frac{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{x}}}{{frac{{1 - 2x}}{{x^2 }}}} = x.
    $$
    Since $f$ is, loosely speaking, an exponential function on a bounded domain, it has a bounded derivative, as the OP wants.



    Original answer



    If $x=0.5$, then take $f(t)=t$. If $0 < x < 1$ and $x neq 0.5$, take
    $$
    f(t) = frac{{e^{bt} - 1}}{{e^b - 1}},
    $$
    where
    $$
    b = 2 ln (xi)
    $$
    with
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 + sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x < 0.5$ and
    $$
    xi = frac{{1 - sqrt {1 - 4x(1 - x)} }}{{2x}}
    $$
    if $x > 0.5$.
    Then $f(0)=0$, $f(1)=1$, and $f(0.5)=x$ (and $f$ has a bounded derivative, as you want).







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 7 '11 at 13:34

























    answered Jul 7 '11 at 10:39









    Shai Covo

    21.2k23053




    21.2k23053












    • Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:01










    • Thx! Even better!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 13:50


















    • Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:01










    • Thx! Even better!
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 13:50
















    Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:01




    Perfect! Thank you! It gives me exactly the kind of functions I was thinking!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:01












    Thx! Even better!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:50




    Thx! Even better!
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 13:50











    1














    How about $f(x)=x^t$ for some $t>0$? It satisfies $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ for any $t$.



    All that is left is to pick $t$. For example, if you want that $f(b)=a$, then we get $b^t=a$, or $t = log(a)/log(b)$.



    Edit: In particular, if we denote $f_t(x)=x^t$, we have that $f_{2.2}(0.5)=0.218$ and $f_{1/2.2}(0.218)=0.5$. In other words, it is clear from the numbers and the general shapes of the curves that they are exactly $f(x)=x^t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










    • It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:02






    • 1




      Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:04










    • OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:04










    • Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:07
















    1














    How about $f(x)=x^t$ for some $t>0$? It satisfies $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ for any $t$.



    All that is left is to pick $t$. For example, if you want that $f(b)=a$, then we get $b^t=a$, or $t = log(a)/log(b)$.



    Edit: In particular, if we denote $f_t(x)=x^t$, we have that $f_{2.2}(0.5)=0.218$ and $f_{1/2.2}(0.218)=0.5$. In other words, it is clear from the numbers and the general shapes of the curves that they are exactly $f(x)=x^t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










    • It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:02






    • 1




      Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:04










    • OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:04










    • Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:07














    1












    1








    1






    How about $f(x)=x^t$ for some $t>0$? It satisfies $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ for any $t$.



    All that is left is to pick $t$. For example, if you want that $f(b)=a$, then we get $b^t=a$, or $t = log(a)/log(b)$.



    Edit: In particular, if we denote $f_t(x)=x^t$, we have that $f_{2.2}(0.5)=0.218$ and $f_{1/2.2}(0.218)=0.5$. In other words, it is clear from the numbers and the general shapes of the curves that they are exactly $f(x)=x^t$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    How about $f(x)=x^t$ for some $t>0$? It satisfies $f(0)=0$ and $f(1)=1$ for any $t$.



    All that is left is to pick $t$. For example, if you want that $f(b)=a$, then we get $b^t=a$, or $t = log(a)/log(b)$.



    Edit: In particular, if we denote $f_t(x)=x^t$, we have that $f_{2.2}(0.5)=0.218$ and $f_{1/2.2}(0.218)=0.5$. In other words, it is clear from the numbers and the general shapes of the curves that they are exactly $f(x)=x^t$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 7 '11 at 11:15

























    answered Jul 7 '11 at 9:37









    Har

    31318




    31318












    • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










    • It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:02






    • 1




      Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:04










    • OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:04










    • Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:07


















    • Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 9:45










    • It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:02






    • 1




      Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 10:04










    • OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
      – hyperknot
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:04










    • Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
      – Har
      Jul 7 '11 at 12:07
















    Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45




    Yes, its correct, but it gets really sharp when t < 0.1. I would prefer something with a smooth derivatie at all points. Thats why I had exponential functions in mind.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 9:45












    It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:02




    It seems to me that the dashed line in the picture also has this problem. I'm willing to bet that the graphs in the picture were actually $x^t$. I might be wrong but I like my odds. :)
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:02




    1




    1




    Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:04




    Also, note that $0.5^{2.2}=0.218$, so the numbers in the picture support this hypothesis.
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 10:04












    OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:04




    OK, you are right with the particular numbers, but I was just using this graphic to describe the problem I was into. If you plot a function from Shai Covo's answer you can see its shape is really different as x gets closer to 0 or 1.
    – hyperknot
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:04












    Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:07




    Fair enough. Hard for me to know exactly what you were looking for, I was just trying to create "curves similar to the gamma curves known from CRT monitors" (as given by the picture).
    – Har
    Jul 7 '11 at 12:07











    0














    It might be worth doing some research into Finite Element shape functions as the basis of these functions is very similar to the problem you are trying to solve here.



    My experience with shape functions is that the equations are usually identified through trial and error although there are approaches that can ease you through the process.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      It might be worth doing some research into Finite Element shape functions as the basis of these functions is very similar to the problem you are trying to solve here.



      My experience with shape functions is that the equations are usually identified through trial and error although there are approaches that can ease you through the process.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        It might be worth doing some research into Finite Element shape functions as the basis of these functions is very similar to the problem you are trying to solve here.



        My experience with shape functions is that the equations are usually identified through trial and error although there are approaches that can ease you through the process.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        It might be worth doing some research into Finite Element shape functions as the basis of these functions is very similar to the problem you are trying to solve here.



        My experience with shape functions is that the equations are usually identified through trial and error although there are approaches that can ease you through the process.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jul 7 '11 at 9:42









        Ian Turner

        932




        932






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50060%2fcreating-smooth-curves-with-f0-0-and-f1-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            張江高科駅