Further terms of Taylor expansion for improved inequalities?
Background: We know the classical exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x le e^x qquad text{or} qquad x le e^{x - 1}
end{align*}
Taking $x_i = y_i/overline{y}$, where $y_i ge 0$ and $overline{y}$ is the arithmetic mean, and multiplying out the second form, we yield
begin{align*}
frac{prod_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}^n} le expleft(frac{sum_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}} - nright) = 1
end{align*}
And this yields a proof of the arithmetic-means and geometric-means (AM-GM) inequality.
An improved exponential inequality: We also have the exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6} le e^x
end{align*}
If we substitute $y = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6}$, we get the equivalent form
begin{align*}
y le e^{g(y)}
end{align*}
where
begin{align*}
g(y) = left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^frac{1}{3} - left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1
end{align*}
is the inverse function expressing $x$ in terms of $y$.
Can we derive other inequalities? From here, there are many directions we may take with our given inequality, but due to the non-linear nature of $g(y)$, a direct trick of normalization as in the AM-GM proof will yield no immediate discoveries.
This post is meant to be very open to discuss possible inequality sharpenings from the cubic-Taylor expansion inequality above. Some observations:
- $(g(y) + 1)^3 = -3(g(y) + 1)$
$[6y-2]_+^frac{1}{3} - [6y-2]_+^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1 < g(y) le ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^frac{1}{3} - ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1$, where $[x]_+ = max(x, 0)$.
Have fun!
algebra-precalculus inequality recreational-mathematics a.m.-g.m.-inequality
add a comment |
Background: We know the classical exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x le e^x qquad text{or} qquad x le e^{x - 1}
end{align*}
Taking $x_i = y_i/overline{y}$, where $y_i ge 0$ and $overline{y}$ is the arithmetic mean, and multiplying out the second form, we yield
begin{align*}
frac{prod_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}^n} le expleft(frac{sum_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}} - nright) = 1
end{align*}
And this yields a proof of the arithmetic-means and geometric-means (AM-GM) inequality.
An improved exponential inequality: We also have the exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6} le e^x
end{align*}
If we substitute $y = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6}$, we get the equivalent form
begin{align*}
y le e^{g(y)}
end{align*}
where
begin{align*}
g(y) = left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^frac{1}{3} - left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1
end{align*}
is the inverse function expressing $x$ in terms of $y$.
Can we derive other inequalities? From here, there are many directions we may take with our given inequality, but due to the non-linear nature of $g(y)$, a direct trick of normalization as in the AM-GM proof will yield no immediate discoveries.
This post is meant to be very open to discuss possible inequality sharpenings from the cubic-Taylor expansion inequality above. Some observations:
- $(g(y) + 1)^3 = -3(g(y) + 1)$
$[6y-2]_+^frac{1}{3} - [6y-2]_+^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1 < g(y) le ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^frac{1}{3} - ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1$, where $[x]_+ = max(x, 0)$.
Have fun!
algebra-precalculus inequality recreational-mathematics a.m.-g.m.-inequality
add a comment |
Background: We know the classical exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x le e^x qquad text{or} qquad x le e^{x - 1}
end{align*}
Taking $x_i = y_i/overline{y}$, where $y_i ge 0$ and $overline{y}$ is the arithmetic mean, and multiplying out the second form, we yield
begin{align*}
frac{prod_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}^n} le expleft(frac{sum_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}} - nright) = 1
end{align*}
And this yields a proof of the arithmetic-means and geometric-means (AM-GM) inequality.
An improved exponential inequality: We also have the exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6} le e^x
end{align*}
If we substitute $y = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6}$, we get the equivalent form
begin{align*}
y le e^{g(y)}
end{align*}
where
begin{align*}
g(y) = left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^frac{1}{3} - left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1
end{align*}
is the inverse function expressing $x$ in terms of $y$.
Can we derive other inequalities? From here, there are many directions we may take with our given inequality, but due to the non-linear nature of $g(y)$, a direct trick of normalization as in the AM-GM proof will yield no immediate discoveries.
This post is meant to be very open to discuss possible inequality sharpenings from the cubic-Taylor expansion inequality above. Some observations:
- $(g(y) + 1)^3 = -3(g(y) + 1)$
$[6y-2]_+^frac{1}{3} - [6y-2]_+^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1 < g(y) le ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^frac{1}{3} - ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1$, where $[x]_+ = max(x, 0)$.
Have fun!
algebra-precalculus inequality recreational-mathematics a.m.-g.m.-inequality
Background: We know the classical exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x le e^x qquad text{or} qquad x le e^{x - 1}
end{align*}
Taking $x_i = y_i/overline{y}$, where $y_i ge 0$ and $overline{y}$ is the arithmetic mean, and multiplying out the second form, we yield
begin{align*}
frac{prod_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}^n} le expleft(frac{sum_{i=1}^{n}y_i}{overline{y}} - nright) = 1
end{align*}
And this yields a proof of the arithmetic-means and geometric-means (AM-GM) inequality.
An improved exponential inequality: We also have the exponential inequality
begin{align*}
1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6} le e^x
end{align*}
If we substitute $y = 1 + x + frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{6}$, we get the equivalent form
begin{align*}
y le e^{g(y)}
end{align*}
where
begin{align*}
g(y) = left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^frac{1}{3} - left(sqrt{9y^2 - 6y + 2} + 3y - 1right)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1
end{align*}
is the inverse function expressing $x$ in terms of $y$.
Can we derive other inequalities? From here, there are many directions we may take with our given inequality, but due to the non-linear nature of $g(y)$, a direct trick of normalization as in the AM-GM proof will yield no immediate discoveries.
This post is meant to be very open to discuss possible inequality sharpenings from the cubic-Taylor expansion inequality above. Some observations:
- $(g(y) + 1)^3 = -3(g(y) + 1)$
$[6y-2]_+^frac{1}{3} - [6y-2]_+^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1 < g(y) le ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^frac{1}{3} - ([6y-2]_+ + 1)^{-frac{1}{3}} - 1$, where $[x]_+ = max(x, 0)$.
Have fun!
algebra-precalculus inequality recreational-mathematics a.m.-g.m.-inequality
algebra-precalculus inequality recreational-mathematics a.m.-g.m.-inequality
asked 1 hour ago
Tom Chen
478212
478212
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
By your idea we can get for example the following inequality.
Let $a$, $b$ and $c$ be positive numbers such that $abc=1$.
Prove that:
$$(a+b)^{a+b}+(b+c)^{b+c}+(c+a)^{c+a}geq4(a+b+c).$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051937%2ffurther-terms-of-taylor-expansion-for-improved-inequalities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By your idea we can get for example the following inequality.
Let $a$, $b$ and $c$ be positive numbers such that $abc=1$.
Prove that:
$$(a+b)^{a+b}+(b+c)^{b+c}+(c+a)^{c+a}geq4(a+b+c).$$
add a comment |
By your idea we can get for example the following inequality.
Let $a$, $b$ and $c$ be positive numbers such that $abc=1$.
Prove that:
$$(a+b)^{a+b}+(b+c)^{b+c}+(c+a)^{c+a}geq4(a+b+c).$$
add a comment |
By your idea we can get for example the following inequality.
Let $a$, $b$ and $c$ be positive numbers such that $abc=1$.
Prove that:
$$(a+b)^{a+b}+(b+c)^{b+c}+(c+a)^{c+a}geq4(a+b+c).$$
By your idea we can get for example the following inequality.
Let $a$, $b$ and $c$ be positive numbers such that $abc=1$.
Prove that:
$$(a+b)^{a+b}+(b+c)^{b+c}+(c+a)^{c+a}geq4(a+b+c).$$
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
Michael Rozenberg
95.4k1588183
95.4k1588183
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051937%2ffurther-terms-of-taylor-expansion-for-improved-inequalities%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown