standard matrix of a orthogonal projection linear transformation












1












$begingroup$


I am try to solve part (b) of question 1 in:
enter image description here



I'm not exactly sure how I should approach part (b). My attempt at the question so far is to plug in the elementary basis vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ into the span of vector given to see what the linear transformation does to $e_1, e_2, e_3$ and form the standard matrix from there which hasn't worked so far. Any hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 21:44












  • $begingroup$
    do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:19
















1












$begingroup$


I am try to solve part (b) of question 1 in:
enter image description here



I'm not exactly sure how I should approach part (b). My attempt at the question so far is to plug in the elementary basis vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ into the span of vector given to see what the linear transformation does to $e_1, e_2, e_3$ and form the standard matrix from there which hasn't worked so far. Any hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 21:44












  • $begingroup$
    do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:19














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I am try to solve part (b) of question 1 in:
enter image description here



I'm not exactly sure how I should approach part (b). My attempt at the question so far is to plug in the elementary basis vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ into the span of vector given to see what the linear transformation does to $e_1, e_2, e_3$ and form the standard matrix from there which hasn't worked so far. Any hints?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am try to solve part (b) of question 1 in:
enter image description here



I'm not exactly sure how I should approach part (b). My attempt at the question so far is to plug in the elementary basis vectors $e_1, e_2, e_3$ into the span of vector given to see what the linear transformation does to $e_1, e_2, e_3$ and form the standard matrix from there which hasn't worked so far. Any hints?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 22:10









idriskameni

749321




749321










asked Jan 18 at 21:42









lohboyslohboys

10319




10319












  • $begingroup$
    Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 21:44












  • $begingroup$
    do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:19


















  • $begingroup$
    Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 21:44












  • $begingroup$
    do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 21:48










  • $begingroup$
    Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:11










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
    $endgroup$
    – tch
    Jan 18 at 22:19
















$begingroup$
Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 21:44






$begingroup$
Try to think about how you would (orthogonally) project a vector $x$ onto the span of $e_1$ and $e_2$. Once you've done this, see if you can write it as a matrix operation.
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 21:44














$begingroup$
do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 21:48




$begingroup$
do you mean project $e1$ and $e2$ with the span vectors? i.e. ((1,1,0)($e1$))($e1$) and so forth with $e2$ ?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 21:48












$begingroup$
Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 22:08




$begingroup$
Basically. I assume by $((1,1,0)(e1))$ you mean the inner product?
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 22:08












$begingroup$
yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 22:11




$begingroup$
yes, inner product. So by computing what I suggested, I should be able to figure out the standard matrix for the linear transformation?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 22:11












$begingroup$
Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 22:19




$begingroup$
Sorry, instead of $e_1$ and $e_2$ i should have said $v_1$ and $v_2$, your orthonormal basis vectors for the span of $V$.
$endgroup$
– tch
Jan 18 at 22:19










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Here is a way. We note that for $yin mathbb{R}^3$ the projected vector $Ay$ is such that $y-Ay$ is orthogonal to $V$. In particular if we form a matrix $B$ whose columns are $(1,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$ respectively, we get that
$$
B'(y-Ay)=0.
$$

But $Ay=Bc$ for some $c$ whence
$$
B'(y-Bc)=0iff B'y=B'Bc
$$

Since $B$ is full-rank, it follows that $B'B$ is invertible whence
$$
c=(B'B)^{-1}B'yimplies Ay=Bc=B(B'B)^{-1}B'y.
$$

So $A=B(B'B)^{-1}B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The transpose of the matrix.
    $endgroup$
    – Foobaz John
    Jan 18 at 22:48



















0












$begingroup$

To expand on my comments since they were getting long.



Suppose we have a set of orthonormal vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$. If we want to compute the orthogonal projection of $x$ onto the span of $v_1$ and $v_2$ we would first project $x$ onto $v_1$:
$$
y = P_1x = (v_1^Tx) v_1
$$

and then onto $v_2$:
$$
P_2x = (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$



Therefore,
$$
Px = (v_1^Tx)v_1 + (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$

We can write this as the sum of rank-1 outer products:
$$
Px = v_1v_1^Tx + v_2v_2^Tx = (v_1v_1^T+v_2v_2^T)x
$$



Therefore,
$$
P = VV^T = [v_1 v_2]
begin{bmatrix}
v_1^T \ v_2^T
end{bmatrix}
$$



If $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthonormal you can first orthonormalize them (using Gram-Schmidt) and then do this. Alternatively, you can use the formula Foobaz John gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 19 at 2:46












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078788%2fstandard-matrix-of-a-orthogonal-projection-linear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Here is a way. We note that for $yin mathbb{R}^3$ the projected vector $Ay$ is such that $y-Ay$ is orthogonal to $V$. In particular if we form a matrix $B$ whose columns are $(1,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$ respectively, we get that
$$
B'(y-Ay)=0.
$$

But $Ay=Bc$ for some $c$ whence
$$
B'(y-Bc)=0iff B'y=B'Bc
$$

Since $B$ is full-rank, it follows that $B'B$ is invertible whence
$$
c=(B'B)^{-1}B'yimplies Ay=Bc=B(B'B)^{-1}B'y.
$$

So $A=B(B'B)^{-1}B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The transpose of the matrix.
    $endgroup$
    – Foobaz John
    Jan 18 at 22:48
















0












$begingroup$

Here is a way. We note that for $yin mathbb{R}^3$ the projected vector $Ay$ is such that $y-Ay$ is orthogonal to $V$. In particular if we form a matrix $B$ whose columns are $(1,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$ respectively, we get that
$$
B'(y-Ay)=0.
$$

But $Ay=Bc$ for some $c$ whence
$$
B'(y-Bc)=0iff B'y=B'Bc
$$

Since $B$ is full-rank, it follows that $B'B$ is invertible whence
$$
c=(B'B)^{-1}B'yimplies Ay=Bc=B(B'B)^{-1}B'y.
$$

So $A=B(B'B)^{-1}B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The transpose of the matrix.
    $endgroup$
    – Foobaz John
    Jan 18 at 22:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Here is a way. We note that for $yin mathbb{R}^3$ the projected vector $Ay$ is such that $y-Ay$ is orthogonal to $V$. In particular if we form a matrix $B$ whose columns are $(1,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$ respectively, we get that
$$
B'(y-Ay)=0.
$$

But $Ay=Bc$ for some $c$ whence
$$
B'(y-Bc)=0iff B'y=B'Bc
$$

Since $B$ is full-rank, it follows that $B'B$ is invertible whence
$$
c=(B'B)^{-1}B'yimplies Ay=Bc=B(B'B)^{-1}B'y.
$$

So $A=B(B'B)^{-1}B'$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here is a way. We note that for $yin mathbb{R}^3$ the projected vector $Ay$ is such that $y-Ay$ is orthogonal to $V$. In particular if we form a matrix $B$ whose columns are $(1,1,0)^T$ and $(0,0,1)^T$ respectively, we get that
$$
B'(y-Ay)=0.
$$

But $Ay=Bc$ for some $c$ whence
$$
B'(y-Bc)=0iff B'y=B'Bc
$$

Since $B$ is full-rank, it follows that $B'B$ is invertible whence
$$
c=(B'B)^{-1}B'yimplies Ay=Bc=B(B'B)^{-1}B'y.
$$

So $A=B(B'B)^{-1}B'$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 18 at 22:15









Foobaz JohnFoobaz John

23k41552




23k41552












  • $begingroup$
    this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The transpose of the matrix.
    $endgroup$
    – Foobaz John
    Jan 18 at 22:48


















  • $begingroup$
    this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 18 at 22:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The transpose of the matrix.
    $endgroup$
    – Foobaz John
    Jan 18 at 22:48
















$begingroup$
this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 22:30




$begingroup$
this is quite a complex explanation for myself, what exactly is $B'$ in this instance?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 18 at 22:30




1




1




$begingroup$
The transpose of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– Foobaz John
Jan 18 at 22:48




$begingroup$
The transpose of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– Foobaz John
Jan 18 at 22:48











0












$begingroup$

To expand on my comments since they were getting long.



Suppose we have a set of orthonormal vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$. If we want to compute the orthogonal projection of $x$ onto the span of $v_1$ and $v_2$ we would first project $x$ onto $v_1$:
$$
y = P_1x = (v_1^Tx) v_1
$$

and then onto $v_2$:
$$
P_2x = (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$



Therefore,
$$
Px = (v_1^Tx)v_1 + (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$

We can write this as the sum of rank-1 outer products:
$$
Px = v_1v_1^Tx + v_2v_2^Tx = (v_1v_1^T+v_2v_2^T)x
$$



Therefore,
$$
P = VV^T = [v_1 v_2]
begin{bmatrix}
v_1^T \ v_2^T
end{bmatrix}
$$



If $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthonormal you can first orthonormalize them (using Gram-Schmidt) and then do this. Alternatively, you can use the formula Foobaz John gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 19 at 2:46
















0












$begingroup$

To expand on my comments since they were getting long.



Suppose we have a set of orthonormal vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$. If we want to compute the orthogonal projection of $x$ onto the span of $v_1$ and $v_2$ we would first project $x$ onto $v_1$:
$$
y = P_1x = (v_1^Tx) v_1
$$

and then onto $v_2$:
$$
P_2x = (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$



Therefore,
$$
Px = (v_1^Tx)v_1 + (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$

We can write this as the sum of rank-1 outer products:
$$
Px = v_1v_1^Tx + v_2v_2^Tx = (v_1v_1^T+v_2v_2^T)x
$$



Therefore,
$$
P = VV^T = [v_1 v_2]
begin{bmatrix}
v_1^T \ v_2^T
end{bmatrix}
$$



If $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthonormal you can first orthonormalize them (using Gram-Schmidt) and then do this. Alternatively, you can use the formula Foobaz John gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 19 at 2:46














0












0








0





$begingroup$

To expand on my comments since they were getting long.



Suppose we have a set of orthonormal vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$. If we want to compute the orthogonal projection of $x$ onto the span of $v_1$ and $v_2$ we would first project $x$ onto $v_1$:
$$
y = P_1x = (v_1^Tx) v_1
$$

and then onto $v_2$:
$$
P_2x = (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$



Therefore,
$$
Px = (v_1^Tx)v_1 + (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$

We can write this as the sum of rank-1 outer products:
$$
Px = v_1v_1^Tx + v_2v_2^Tx = (v_1v_1^T+v_2v_2^T)x
$$



Therefore,
$$
P = VV^T = [v_1 v_2]
begin{bmatrix}
v_1^T \ v_2^T
end{bmatrix}
$$



If $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthonormal you can first orthonormalize them (using Gram-Schmidt) and then do this. Alternatively, you can use the formula Foobaz John gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



To expand on my comments since they were getting long.



Suppose we have a set of orthonormal vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$. If we want to compute the orthogonal projection of $x$ onto the span of $v_1$ and $v_2$ we would first project $x$ onto $v_1$:
$$
y = P_1x = (v_1^Tx) v_1
$$

and then onto $v_2$:
$$
P_2x = (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$



Therefore,
$$
Px = (v_1^Tx)v_1 + (v_2^Tx)v_2
$$

We can write this as the sum of rank-1 outer products:
$$
Px = v_1v_1^Tx + v_2v_2^Tx = (v_1v_1^T+v_2v_2^T)x
$$



Therefore,
$$
P = VV^T = [v_1 v_2]
begin{bmatrix}
v_1^T \ v_2^T
end{bmatrix}
$$



If $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthonormal you can first orthonormalize them (using Gram-Schmidt) and then do this. Alternatively, you can use the formula Foobaz John gave.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 19 at 0:18









tchtch

833310




833310












  • $begingroup$
    if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 19 at 2:46


















  • $begingroup$
    if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
    $endgroup$
    – lohboys
    Jan 19 at 2:46
















$begingroup$
if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 19 at 2:46




$begingroup$
if I'm interpreting this correctly, $P$ gives the standard matrix of this linear transformation yes?
$endgroup$
– lohboys
Jan 19 at 2:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078788%2fstandard-matrix-of-a-orthogonal-projection-linear-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg