Proof regarding the genus of a topological space
$begingroup$
Intuitively, I would think that if there exists a continuous mapping $f:Xrightarrow Y$ between 2 topological spaces $X$ and $Y$, then the genus of $Y$ must be smaller that the Genus of $X$ (as during the mapping, holes in $X$ can be eliminated but no new holes may be made). However, I am finding it difficult to prove this formally. I was thinking of using the transformation of loops in $X$ to $Y$ by applying $f$, but I cannot continue from this. As such, how can one prove this formally?
proof-verification geometric-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Intuitively, I would think that if there exists a continuous mapping $f:Xrightarrow Y$ between 2 topological spaces $X$ and $Y$, then the genus of $Y$ must be smaller that the Genus of $X$ (as during the mapping, holes in $X$ can be eliminated but no new holes may be made). However, I am finding it difficult to prove this formally. I was thinking of using the transformation of loops in $X$ to $Y$ by applying $f$, but I cannot continue from this. As such, how can one prove this formally?
proof-verification geometric-topology
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Intuitively, I would think that if there exists a continuous mapping $f:Xrightarrow Y$ between 2 topological spaces $X$ and $Y$, then the genus of $Y$ must be smaller that the Genus of $X$ (as during the mapping, holes in $X$ can be eliminated but no new holes may be made). However, I am finding it difficult to prove this formally. I was thinking of using the transformation of loops in $X$ to $Y$ by applying $f$, but I cannot continue from this. As such, how can one prove this formally?
proof-verification geometric-topology
$endgroup$
Intuitively, I would think that if there exists a continuous mapping $f:Xrightarrow Y$ between 2 topological spaces $X$ and $Y$, then the genus of $Y$ must be smaller that the Genus of $X$ (as during the mapping, holes in $X$ can be eliminated but no new holes may be made). However, I am finding it difficult to prove this formally. I was thinking of using the transformation of loops in $X$ to $Y$ by applying $f$, but I cannot continue from this. As such, how can one prove this formally?
proof-verification geometric-topology
proof-verification geometric-topology
asked Jan 5 at 7:26
Aryaman GuptaAryaman Gupta
356
356
1
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36
1
1
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not true. An easy and concrete counterexample would be the quotient map (which is also the universal covering map)
$fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}^2/mathbb{Z}^2 cong T$ to the torus, where we identify $(x,y)sim(tilde x,tilde y)$ iff $x-tilde x in mathbb Z$ and $y-tilde y in mathbb Z$.
This yields a continous surjective map, which is locally even a homeomorphism. But the genus of $mathbb R^2$ is $0$, where the genus of the torus $T$ is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062474%2fproof-regarding-the-genus-of-a-topological-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is not true. An easy and concrete counterexample would be the quotient map (which is also the universal covering map)
$fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}^2/mathbb{Z}^2 cong T$ to the torus, where we identify $(x,y)sim(tilde x,tilde y)$ iff $x-tilde x in mathbb Z$ and $y-tilde y in mathbb Z$.
This yields a continous surjective map, which is locally even a homeomorphism. But the genus of $mathbb R^2$ is $0$, where the genus of the torus $T$ is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not true. An easy and concrete counterexample would be the quotient map (which is also the universal covering map)
$fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}^2/mathbb{Z}^2 cong T$ to the torus, where we identify $(x,y)sim(tilde x,tilde y)$ iff $x-tilde x in mathbb Z$ and $y-tilde y in mathbb Z$.
This yields a continous surjective map, which is locally even a homeomorphism. But the genus of $mathbb R^2$ is $0$, where the genus of the torus $T$ is $1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is not true. An easy and concrete counterexample would be the quotient map (which is also the universal covering map)
$fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}^2/mathbb{Z}^2 cong T$ to the torus, where we identify $(x,y)sim(tilde x,tilde y)$ iff $x-tilde x in mathbb Z$ and $y-tilde y in mathbb Z$.
This yields a continous surjective map, which is locally even a homeomorphism. But the genus of $mathbb R^2$ is $0$, where the genus of the torus $T$ is $1$.
$endgroup$
This is not true. An easy and concrete counterexample would be the quotient map (which is also the universal covering map)
$fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}^2/mathbb{Z}^2 cong T$ to the torus, where we identify $(x,y)sim(tilde x,tilde y)$ iff $x-tilde x in mathbb Z$ and $y-tilde y in mathbb Z$.
This yields a continous surjective map, which is locally even a homeomorphism. But the genus of $mathbb R^2$ is $0$, where the genus of the torus $T$ is $1$.
answered Jan 7 at 10:12
BabelfishBabelfish
1,128520
1,128520
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062474%2fproof-regarding-the-genus-of-a-topological-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Holes can be made. You can wrap a line around a circle as many times as you like.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 5 at 7:36