Given two form $omega$, find $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$? [duplicate]












0












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Does there exist a $1$-form $alpha$ with $dalpha = omega$?

    2 answers




I am reading a textbook on differential forms and there is a question of the form: given a $k$-form, $omega$, on say $mathbb{R^3}$, find $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$. For example, if $omega= (x_{1}^2 +x_{2}^2)dx_1 wedge dx_2$, what is $mu$?



I am looking for a systematic method to solve these types of questions.
Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by amd, Community Jan 8 at 3:02


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.























    0












    $begingroup$



    This question already has an answer here:




    • Does there exist a $1$-form $alpha$ with $dalpha = omega$?

      2 answers




    I am reading a textbook on differential forms and there is a question of the form: given a $k$-form, $omega$, on say $mathbb{R^3}$, find $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$. For example, if $omega= (x_{1}^2 +x_{2}^2)dx_1 wedge dx_2$, what is $mu$?



    I am looking for a systematic method to solve these types of questions.
    Thanks










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$



    marked as duplicate by amd, Community Jan 8 at 3:02


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.





















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does there exist a $1$-form $alpha$ with $dalpha = omega$?

        2 answers




      I am reading a textbook on differential forms and there is a question of the form: given a $k$-form, $omega$, on say $mathbb{R^3}$, find $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$. For example, if $omega= (x_{1}^2 +x_{2}^2)dx_1 wedge dx_2$, what is $mu$?



      I am looking for a systematic method to solve these types of questions.
      Thanks










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does there exist a $1$-form $alpha$ with $dalpha = omega$?

        2 answers




      I am reading a textbook on differential forms and there is a question of the form: given a $k$-form, $omega$, on say $mathbb{R^3}$, find $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$. For example, if $omega= (x_{1}^2 +x_{2}^2)dx_1 wedge dx_2$, what is $mu$?



      I am looking for a systematic method to solve these types of questions.
      Thanks





      This question already has an answer here:




      • Does there exist a $1$-form $alpha$ with $dalpha = omega$?

        2 answers








      differential-forms






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 7 at 2:40









      Ac711Ac711

      345




      345




      marked as duplicate by amd, Community Jan 8 at 3:02


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









      marked as duplicate by amd, Community Jan 8 at 3:02


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $dmu=omega$ implies that $d^2mu=domega=0$. The Poincare Lemma implies that $omega$ is exact, if you look at a standard proof of this lemma, it constructs $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$ given a closed form $omega$.



          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_and_exact_differential_forms#Poincar%C3%A9_lemma






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            $dmu=omega$ implies that $d^2mu=domega=0$. The Poincare Lemma implies that $omega$ is exact, if you look at a standard proof of this lemma, it constructs $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$ given a closed form $omega$.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_and_exact_differential_forms#Poincar%C3%A9_lemma






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              $dmu=omega$ implies that $d^2mu=domega=0$. The Poincare Lemma implies that $omega$ is exact, if you look at a standard proof of this lemma, it constructs $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$ given a closed form $omega$.



              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_and_exact_differential_forms#Poincar%C3%A9_lemma






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                $dmu=omega$ implies that $d^2mu=domega=0$. The Poincare Lemma implies that $omega$ is exact, if you look at a standard proof of this lemma, it constructs $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$ given a closed form $omega$.



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_and_exact_differential_forms#Poincar%C3%A9_lemma






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                $dmu=omega$ implies that $d^2mu=domega=0$. The Poincare Lemma implies that $omega$ is exact, if you look at a standard proof of this lemma, it constructs $mu$ such that $dmu=omega$ given a closed form $omega$.



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_and_exact_differential_forms#Poincar%C3%A9_lemma







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 7 at 3:15

























                answered Jan 7 at 3:02









                Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

                58.1k11445




                58.1k11445















                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

                    List of scandals in India

                    Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?