I poured simple syrup over cooked apples. Why did it turn watery?
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I boiled apples in water until tender. I took apples out, then added lemon and sugar to water in pot and boiled it. When I poured it over the apples it made a nice thickened gel. By morning it's all watery. Why?
syrup
syrup
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
asked Dec 27 at 15:41
Patricia Hoff
7113
7113
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
add a comment |
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "49"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95172%2fi-poured-simple-syrup-over-cooked-apples-why-did-it-turn-watery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
add a comment |
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
add a comment |
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Some of the water content of the apples has migrated from the apples to the surrounding syrup.
This is due to an effect called osmosis. The apple, like all living things is made out of cells that have (among other things) water inside them. The cell walls are semipermeable, meaning small molecules like water can pass through them, but larger molecules like sugars cannot.
All dissolved substances (sugars, salt, etc.) attract water to themselves, so if you expose the apples to a highly sugary solution (like syrup), the water will be pulled from the apples into the syrup.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
answered Dec 27 at 21:24
uLoop
42114
42114
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
uLoop is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
add a comment |
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
I think it unlikely that the apple cell walls are intact after boiling. You don't need to invoke osmosis to explain the water migration - simple diffusion is enough.
– user20637
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@user20637 minor nitpick, it's the cellmembranes, not cell walls that prevent diffusion. Nevertheless, those are probably also toast after boiling.
– JAD
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
@JAD Hat-tip for the accurate nitpick. I think you agree it's not osmosis. I wouldn't be surprised if syneresis also made a contribution- so water would migrate from boiled apples even in the absence of sugar syrup - but I'm not sure.
– user20637
yesterday
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
add a comment |
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
The syrup has very high sugar content and the apples much lower. The syrup pulls water out of the apples by a process known as osmosis, which tries to equalize the sugar concentration on each side of the permeable membranes of the apples' cells.
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
edited Dec 27 at 22:34
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
answered Dec 27 at 21:09
David Richerby
2,7271527
2,7271527
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
add a comment |
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
1
1
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
The other answer clearly had the right idea, but is wrong in both the word choice and the way it is described. It is still more descriptive than this answer. If someone knows what osmosis is, they understand that is what he was going for. If they don't, your answer doesn't help them understand what is going on. (Note that I did upvote because you are right.)
– KMB
Dec 27 at 21:22
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
@KMB I added a bit more detail.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:35
2
2
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
I upvoted because this is clearly the best answer, but "The syrup pulls water out of the apples" is a bit misleading, because the syrup isn't doing anything. As you mention, it's basically just that the system is tending towards uniformity/homogeneity. It's basically statistical mechanics.
– Faheem Mitha
Dec 27 at 23:25
add a comment |
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
Sugar is hydrophilic, meaning it's attracted to water. Your water soaked/softened apples likely had a higher moisture content compared to your syrup. The water migrated out of the apples and equalized the sugar concentration. This process is referred to as osmosis.
Next time, try boiling the apples in that sugar syrup instead of just water.
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
edited 2 days ago
KMB
20816
20816
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
answered Dec 27 at 16:36
StevenXavier
1,186213
1,186213
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
9
9
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
@briantist Actually, the explanation is almost entirely wrong. First, "hygroscopic" refers to substances that absorb water vapour from the air, which isn't likely to be what's happening and which contradicts the rest of the answer. Second, it's not sugar moving from the syrup into the apples, but water moving from the apples into the syrup.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 21:10
5
5
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
This is the issue with the upvote system and the HNQ. An answer with a fancy word which looks plausible at first glance gets many upvotes, even when it makes no sense
– Tim
Dec 27 at 22:15
3
3
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
@Tim On the other hand, HNQ was the only reason I found this.
– David Richerby
Dec 27 at 22:33
2
2
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
The part about boiling the apples in the syrup next time is exactly right.
– JPmiaou
Dec 27 at 23:50
1
1
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
@DavidRicherby I suggested that edit around the time of your comment. It sat in the edit queue for too long. This is what i thought was the intent of his answer. He, for instance, thought the word for hydrophilic was hydroscopic which is a very common mistake (hygroscopic was a correction by someone else).
– KMB
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Patricia Hoff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Seasoned Advice!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f95172%2fi-poured-simple-syrup-over-cooked-apples-why-did-it-turn-watery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
