Can I use this chord progression in G major?












5














I am trying to write a song in G major and I am wondering if it would be ok to use this chord progression in G major:



G - Em - D - Am










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4




    You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 17:16








  • 4




    What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
    – Sarkreth
    Dec 27 at 18:55










  • What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
    – piiperi
    Dec 27 at 22:21










  • Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
    – Eric Duminil
    Dec 28 at 1:22










  • @EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
    – treyBake
    2 days ago
















5














I am trying to write a song in G major and I am wondering if it would be ok to use this chord progression in G major:



G - Em - D - Am










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4




    You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 17:16








  • 4




    What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
    – Sarkreth
    Dec 27 at 18:55










  • What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
    – piiperi
    Dec 27 at 22:21










  • Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
    – Eric Duminil
    Dec 28 at 1:22










  • @EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
    – treyBake
    2 days ago














5












5








5


1





I am trying to write a song in G major and I am wondering if it would be ok to use this chord progression in G major:



G - Em - D - Am










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am trying to write a song in G major and I am wondering if it would be ok to use this chord progression in G major:



G - Em - D - Am







chords chord-progressions key






share|improve this question









New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 28 at 4:54









VibrantWavE

315216




315216






New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 27 at 16:49









Shirin

283




283




New contributor




Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Shirin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 4




    You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 17:16








  • 4




    What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
    – Sarkreth
    Dec 27 at 18:55










  • What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
    – piiperi
    Dec 27 at 22:21










  • Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
    – Eric Duminil
    Dec 28 at 1:22










  • @EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
    – treyBake
    2 days ago














  • 4




    You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 17:16








  • 4




    What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
    – Sarkreth
    Dec 27 at 18:55










  • What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
    – piiperi
    Dec 27 at 22:21










  • Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
    – Eric Duminil
    Dec 28 at 1:22










  • @EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
    – treyBake
    2 days ago








4




4




You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
– Tim
Dec 27 at 17:16






You'd actually be writing the song 'in G major' key, and probably using the notes from the 'G major' scale, and as the answers say, it'll work just fine. 'Is it ok to use...' Heck, yes! Don't feel there are restrictions to writing; basic 'rule' is - if it sounds good - it is!.
– Tim
Dec 27 at 17:16






4




4




What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
– Sarkreth
Dec 27 at 18:55




What do you mean "ok"? You don't have to stick to any keys/scales, you don't have to stick to the chord-and-melody approach, you don't even have to stick to using 12 notes. We might be able to help you out better if you give us an idea of the kind of music you're trying to create.
– Sarkreth
Dec 27 at 18:55












What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
– piiperi
Dec 27 at 22:21




What kind of consequences are you afraid of? What if you used those chords, and then it later turned out that it was not ok, what bad would happen? Is this for a music theory exam or what?
– piiperi
Dec 27 at 22:21












Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
– Eric Duminil
Dec 28 at 1:22




Here are 14 songs containing this chord progression : hooktheory.com/trends#node=1.6.5.2&key=rel
– Eric Duminil
Dec 28 at 1:22












@EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
– treyBake
2 days ago




@EricDuminil a good resource, though Fluorescent Adolescence is definitely not G Em D Am - pretty sure it's in the key of Amaj for starters ...musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtd.asp?ppn=MN0064914
– treyBake
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















14














Of course, In the key of G major the following chords are part of the scale:



G Maj, A min, B min, C Maj, D Maj, E min, F# dim.



That pattern is valid for any Key, {I, IV, V} are Maj, {ii, iii, vi} are minor, vii is diminished.



Your progression is a I --> vi --> V --> ii.



On another note you can use any chords you want if they sound cool.






share|improve this answer





















  • V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago










  • @Dekkadeci Why?
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
    – ggcg
    2 days ago










  • @ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago












  • @ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago



















3














Of course you can use any sequence of chords that you want.




...in G major?




This is more specific as you want the music to identify as being in a major key.



The traditional way to define a key is with the dominant chord V. People often think - very naturally - it's the tonic I chord which defines a key. Of course the tonic chord defines the tonic, but we need more harmony information to know if the music is in a major key rather than being in a mode. For example the difference between the key G major and the mode G mixolydian. The dominant will define that.



All your chords give the tones for the G major scale and you have the dominant chord D so it is clearly in G major. If you had omitted the D chord, the tonality would be a little ambiguous.



Also, compare this with saying the chords are from E minor. You have the right set of tones for the key signature of E minor. But the dominant of E minor would be B. It isn't there, so this isn't E minor. You could call it E aeolian in that case.



Once you have a key established you are not precluded from using chords outside the key signature! That's fine too. It would be called chromatic harmony. There are many ways to do it.






share|improve this answer























  • An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 18:22










  • @Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:40










  • I meant V IV I above... uppercase
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:54



















2














Sure. G, Em, Am, D7 is the cliché progression, but you can put them in your order if they fit the melody.



You could also use Bb, A7, Ab7 or just about anything else and still be 'in G major'. The scale is a framework, not a restriction.






share|improve this answer





















  • Please quote that quote you always quote...
    – coconochao
    Dec 27 at 18:00











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Shirin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77957%2fcan-i-use-this-chord-progression-in-g-major%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









14














Of course, In the key of G major the following chords are part of the scale:



G Maj, A min, B min, C Maj, D Maj, E min, F# dim.



That pattern is valid for any Key, {I, IV, V} are Maj, {ii, iii, vi} are minor, vii is diminished.



Your progression is a I --> vi --> V --> ii.



On another note you can use any chords you want if they sound cool.






share|improve this answer





















  • V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago










  • @Dekkadeci Why?
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
    – ggcg
    2 days ago










  • @ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago












  • @ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago
















14














Of course, In the key of G major the following chords are part of the scale:



G Maj, A min, B min, C Maj, D Maj, E min, F# dim.



That pattern is valid for any Key, {I, IV, V} are Maj, {ii, iii, vi} are minor, vii is diminished.



Your progression is a I --> vi --> V --> ii.



On another note you can use any chords you want if they sound cool.






share|improve this answer





















  • V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago










  • @Dekkadeci Why?
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
    – ggcg
    2 days ago










  • @ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago












  • @ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago














14












14








14






Of course, In the key of G major the following chords are part of the scale:



G Maj, A min, B min, C Maj, D Maj, E min, F# dim.



That pattern is valid for any Key, {I, IV, V} are Maj, {ii, iii, vi} are minor, vii is diminished.



Your progression is a I --> vi --> V --> ii.



On another note you can use any chords you want if they sound cool.






share|improve this answer












Of course, In the key of G major the following chords are part of the scale:



G Maj, A min, B min, C Maj, D Maj, E min, F# dim.



That pattern is valid for any Key, {I, IV, V} are Maj, {ii, iii, vi} are minor, vii is diminished.



Your progression is a I --> vi --> V --> ii.



On another note you can use any chords you want if they sound cool.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 27 at 16:58









ggcg

4,325322




4,325322












  • V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago










  • @Dekkadeci Why?
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
    – ggcg
    2 days ago










  • @ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago












  • @ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago


















  • V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago










  • @Dekkadeci Why?
    – wizzwizz4
    2 days ago






  • 2




    Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
    – ggcg
    2 days ago










  • @ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago












  • @ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
    – Dekkadeci
    2 days ago
















V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
– Dekkadeci
2 days ago




V-ii is an unacceptable chord progression in common practice period harmony.
– Dekkadeci
2 days ago












@Dekkadeci Why?
– wizzwizz4
2 days ago




@Dekkadeci Why?
– wizzwizz4
2 days ago




2




2




Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
– ggcg
2 days ago




Absolutely NOT @Dekkadeci. Get your hands on a harmony book. There are many reasons why this is acceptable. ii is a substitution for the IV so this is similar to a V --> IV-->I. It is a variant of a common progression. An example of a Plagal cadence.
– ggcg
2 days ago












@ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
– leftaroundabout
2 days ago






@ggcg well, I wouldn't say “there are reasons this is acceptable” but “there are ways you can make it acceptable”. is certainly a bit against the grain of common-practice, and is usually justified by putting the in second inversion so it can be seen as a tonic with ⁶₄ suspension. can be done too, but makes common-practice voice-leading more difficult. You should perhaps add an example... — Anyway, most pop songs don't really obey common-practice rules at all, so this is hardly relevant here.
– leftaroundabout
2 days ago














@ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
– Dekkadeci
2 days ago




@ggcg - I got my hands on the harmony books recommended by the RCM program more than a decade ago for lessons. The only chords they say should follow a dominant-function chord are I (and i, and inversions), vi (and (b)VI, and inversions), and iv6. That's it. Somehow, they don't even mention secondary dominants of V as an option.
– Dekkadeci
2 days ago











3














Of course you can use any sequence of chords that you want.




...in G major?




This is more specific as you want the music to identify as being in a major key.



The traditional way to define a key is with the dominant chord V. People often think - very naturally - it's the tonic I chord which defines a key. Of course the tonic chord defines the tonic, but we need more harmony information to know if the music is in a major key rather than being in a mode. For example the difference between the key G major and the mode G mixolydian. The dominant will define that.



All your chords give the tones for the G major scale and you have the dominant chord D so it is clearly in G major. If you had omitted the D chord, the tonality would be a little ambiguous.



Also, compare this with saying the chords are from E minor. You have the right set of tones for the key signature of E minor. But the dominant of E minor would be B. It isn't there, so this isn't E minor. You could call it E aeolian in that case.



Once you have a key established you are not precluded from using chords outside the key signature! That's fine too. It would be called chromatic harmony. There are many ways to do it.






share|improve this answer























  • An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 18:22










  • @Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:40










  • I meant V IV I above... uppercase
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:54
















3














Of course you can use any sequence of chords that you want.




...in G major?




This is more specific as you want the music to identify as being in a major key.



The traditional way to define a key is with the dominant chord V. People often think - very naturally - it's the tonic I chord which defines a key. Of course the tonic chord defines the tonic, but we need more harmony information to know if the music is in a major key rather than being in a mode. For example the difference between the key G major and the mode G mixolydian. The dominant will define that.



All your chords give the tones for the G major scale and you have the dominant chord D so it is clearly in G major. If you had omitted the D chord, the tonality would be a little ambiguous.



Also, compare this with saying the chords are from E minor. You have the right set of tones for the key signature of E minor. But the dominant of E minor would be B. It isn't there, so this isn't E minor. You could call it E aeolian in that case.



Once you have a key established you are not precluded from using chords outside the key signature! That's fine too. It would be called chromatic harmony. There are many ways to do it.






share|improve this answer























  • An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 18:22










  • @Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:40










  • I meant V IV I above... uppercase
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:54














3












3








3






Of course you can use any sequence of chords that you want.




...in G major?




This is more specific as you want the music to identify as being in a major key.



The traditional way to define a key is with the dominant chord V. People often think - very naturally - it's the tonic I chord which defines a key. Of course the tonic chord defines the tonic, but we need more harmony information to know if the music is in a major key rather than being in a mode. For example the difference between the key G major and the mode G mixolydian. The dominant will define that.



All your chords give the tones for the G major scale and you have the dominant chord D so it is clearly in G major. If you had omitted the D chord, the tonality would be a little ambiguous.



Also, compare this with saying the chords are from E minor. You have the right set of tones for the key signature of E minor. But the dominant of E minor would be B. It isn't there, so this isn't E minor. You could call it E aeolian in that case.



Once you have a key established you are not precluded from using chords outside the key signature! That's fine too. It would be called chromatic harmony. There are many ways to do it.






share|improve this answer














Of course you can use any sequence of chords that you want.




...in G major?




This is more specific as you want the music to identify as being in a major key.



The traditional way to define a key is with the dominant chord V. People often think - very naturally - it's the tonic I chord which defines a key. Of course the tonic chord defines the tonic, but we need more harmony information to know if the music is in a major key rather than being in a mode. For example the difference between the key G major and the mode G mixolydian. The dominant will define that.



All your chords give the tones for the G major scale and you have the dominant chord D so it is clearly in G major. If you had omitted the D chord, the tonality would be a little ambiguous.



Also, compare this with saying the chords are from E minor. You have the right set of tones for the key signature of E minor. But the dominant of E minor would be B. It isn't there, so this isn't E minor. You could call it E aeolian in that case.



Once you have a key established you are not precluded from using chords outside the key signature! That's fine too. It would be called chromatic harmony. There are many ways to do it.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 27 at 18:53

























answered Dec 27 at 17:21









Michael Curtis

5,700325




5,700325












  • An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 18:22










  • @Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:40










  • I meant V IV I above... uppercase
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:54


















  • An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
    – Tim
    Dec 27 at 18:22










  • @Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:40










  • I meant V IV I above... uppercase
    – Michael Curtis
    Dec 27 at 18:54
















An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
– Tim
Dec 27 at 18:22




An interesting idea of needing the dominant of a key to establish the tonic.Where does that leave Sweet Home Alabama?
– Tim
Dec 27 at 18:22












@Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
– Michael Curtis
Dec 27 at 18:40




@Tim, dominant establishes being in a key, the tonality. You asked me before about that song, but I don't understand why. It goes V iV I over and over except that part that goes bVII I. To the extent that a rock song can be in a key, it's in G major.
– Michael Curtis
Dec 27 at 18:40












I meant V IV I above... uppercase
– Michael Curtis
Dec 27 at 18:54




I meant V IV I above... uppercase
– Michael Curtis
Dec 27 at 18:54











2














Sure. G, Em, Am, D7 is the cliché progression, but you can put them in your order if they fit the melody.



You could also use Bb, A7, Ab7 or just about anything else and still be 'in G major'. The scale is a framework, not a restriction.






share|improve this answer





















  • Please quote that quote you always quote...
    – coconochao
    Dec 27 at 18:00
















2














Sure. G, Em, Am, D7 is the cliché progression, but you can put them in your order if they fit the melody.



You could also use Bb, A7, Ab7 or just about anything else and still be 'in G major'. The scale is a framework, not a restriction.






share|improve this answer





















  • Please quote that quote you always quote...
    – coconochao
    Dec 27 at 18:00














2












2








2






Sure. G, Em, Am, D7 is the cliché progression, but you can put them in your order if they fit the melody.



You could also use Bb, A7, Ab7 or just about anything else and still be 'in G major'. The scale is a framework, not a restriction.






share|improve this answer












Sure. G, Em, Am, D7 is the cliché progression, but you can put them in your order if they fit the melody.



You could also use Bb, A7, Ab7 or just about anything else and still be 'in G major'. The scale is a framework, not a restriction.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 27 at 17:12









Laurence Payne

31.7k1558




31.7k1558












  • Please quote that quote you always quote...
    – coconochao
    Dec 27 at 18:00


















  • Please quote that quote you always quote...
    – coconochao
    Dec 27 at 18:00
















Please quote that quote you always quote...
– coconochao
Dec 27 at 18:00




Please quote that quote you always quote...
– coconochao
Dec 27 at 18:00










Shirin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Shirin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Shirin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Shirin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77957%2fcan-i-use-this-chord-progression-in-g-major%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Human spaceflight

Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

張江高科駅