What is an informal term for a person who can't do anything right? [on hold]
In Russian we have the term "рукожоп". I would translate it as "asshands" which literally means that your hands grow out of your behind and you can't do anything right (or do anything at all).
Example:
Dad: "Hey son, can you hang up this picture on the wall?"
Son: "No dad, my hands grow out of my behind, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down" (Or "I am a _____" - i.e. the term I'm looking for.)
Is there anything similar in English? Is the term "screw up" the one? Or are there any other ones? I want slang specifically, preferably American.
single-word-requests american-english translation offensive-language
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by MetaEd♦ 19 hours ago
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 6 more comments
In Russian we have the term "рукожоп". I would translate it as "asshands" which literally means that your hands grow out of your behind and you can't do anything right (or do anything at all).
Example:
Dad: "Hey son, can you hang up this picture on the wall?"
Son: "No dad, my hands grow out of my behind, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down" (Or "I am a _____" - i.e. the term I'm looking for.)
Is there anything similar in English? Is the term "screw up" the one? Or are there any other ones? I want slang specifically, preferably American.
single-word-requests american-english translation offensive-language
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by MetaEd♦ 19 hours ago
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
1
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
1
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
1
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
1
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57
|
show 6 more comments
In Russian we have the term "рукожоп". I would translate it as "asshands" which literally means that your hands grow out of your behind and you can't do anything right (or do anything at all).
Example:
Dad: "Hey son, can you hang up this picture on the wall?"
Son: "No dad, my hands grow out of my behind, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down" (Or "I am a _____" - i.e. the term I'm looking for.)
Is there anything similar in English? Is the term "screw up" the one? Or are there any other ones? I want slang specifically, preferably American.
single-word-requests american-english translation offensive-language
In Russian we have the term "рукожоп". I would translate it as "asshands" which literally means that your hands grow out of your behind and you can't do anything right (or do anything at all).
Example:
Dad: "Hey son, can you hang up this picture on the wall?"
Son: "No dad, my hands grow out of my behind, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down" (Or "I am a _____" - i.e. the term I'm looking for.)
Is there anything similar in English? Is the term "screw up" the one? Or are there any other ones? I want slang specifically, preferably American.
single-word-requests american-english translation offensive-language
single-word-requests american-english translation offensive-language
edited Dec 29 '18 at 0:41
Mitch
50.3k15101211
50.3k15101211
asked Dec 27 '18 at 21:17
Happy
368310
368310
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by MetaEd♦ 19 hours ago
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by MetaEd♦ 19 hours ago
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
1
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
1
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
1
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
1
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57
|
show 6 more comments
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
1
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
1
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
1
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
1
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
1
1
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
1
1
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
1
1
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
1
1
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57
|
show 6 more comments
15 Answers
15
active
oldest
votes
"All thumbs", according to Wiktionary "clumsy, awkward, not dextrous."
"Klutz", according to Wiktionary "a clumsy or stupid person."
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
If you’re looking for vulgar slang, “fuckup” is a good option:
an extremely offensive word for someone who often makes serious mistakes or fails completely
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/fuck-up_2
Screw up works too, but it’s not as offensive.
Both of these words are also verbs.
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
Incompetent springs to mind:
a. Of inadequate ability or fitness; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable.
B. An incompetent person.
While we have a lot of fun slang terms here, this would be a term you could use either casually or in a slightly more formal setting.
I've also seen "Incompetent" used as an insult ("Are you incompetent, boy?"), so it would work to be more self-deprecating.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
"Butterfingers" might be a good word considering the context you used regarding the term "asshands". Generally it implies someone inept with their hands, or lacking in manual dexterity.
As a more brusque offensive term, I'd use the word "Fuck-up."
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
A bumbler is informal without being vulgar or obscene.
He can't do anything right. He is a bumbler.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
add a comment |
schlemiel
A person who fouls up everything by incompetence or bad luck. It was borrowed into English from Yiddish which is from a name of a character in a story (1813).
Compare with schlemazel.
Which actually means 'bad luck' (schlim mazel).
The saying goes, in order to tell which is which, is that the person who spills their bowl of soup is the schlemiel, and the person they spill it on is the schlemazel.
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
add a comment |
An idiom, that seems somewhat similar to the Russian one, is
No dad, i’m all fingers and thumbs, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down.
be all fingers and thumbs.
To be clumsy with one's hands. Primarily heard in UK, Australia. Tom could never be a surgeon—he's all fingers and thumbs. Can you sew this button on for me? I'm all fingers and thumbs.
- thefreedictionary.com
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
If s/he "can't do anything right" not just in terms of construction and house-work, but more generally, you can call that person a good-for-nothing.
Dictionary definition:
good-for-noth·ing
(go͝od′fər-nŭth′ĭng)
noun: A person of little worth or usefulness.
adjective: Having little worth; useless.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
doofus or less commonly dufus. Same meaning.
a stupid, incompetent, or foolish person.
MW notes that the word is slang, and that it's relatively recent (first known use 1960).
Further background: there's also some connection to the 1959 TV show "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis". And Hipsterdufus is apparently now a thing.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
Noun: Useless Tit
Adjective: Tit-useless
Often but not always applied to males, probably related to the non-functionality of the male breast.
Dave is a useless tit.
Dave is tit-useless at anything.
Probably a contraction of "...as useless as tits on a nun/bull/ram/log"
Supporting link: https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/53418
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
add a comment |
A sad sack is a blundering, inept person.
MW defines it as "US, informal", and says the first known use with this meaning is from 1943. However, etymonline says:
sad sack is 1920s, popularized by World War II armed forces
(specifically by cartoon character invented by Sgt. George Baker,
1942, and published in U.S. Armed Forces magazine "Yank"), probably a
euphemistic shortening of common military slang phrase sad sack of
shit.
The term comes from a military context, a soldier who can't seem to do anything correctly.
The definitions in the Urban Dictionary seem to turn the meaning more toward a depressed or depressing person. But the original context used sad in the sense of pitiful.
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
add a comment |
Inept
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/inept
in·ept (ĭn-ĕpt′)
adj.
1. Lacking or showing a lack of skill or competence; bungling or clumsy: an inept actor; an inept performance.
2. Showing a lack of judgment, sense, or reason; inappropriate or foolish: an inept remark.
add a comment |
Adding nincompoop as a suggestion.
A silly or foolish person.
A slightly older word in UK English so not too widely used.
add a comment |
There is a word we use called Nixie. It comes from the German word Nichtse which means a slacker/good-for-nothing.
The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
add a comment |
A dennis-the-menace 😀 thats someone who does things wrong over 90 percent of the time . A person like the character that pretty much f's up everyting he does . An argument can be made that this type of omni fuck up is intentional and deliberate , as opposed to a Klutz who messes things up on accident .
New contributor
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
protected by Andrew Leach♦ Dec 29 '18 at 9:47
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
15 Answers
15
active
oldest
votes
15 Answers
15
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"All thumbs", according to Wiktionary "clumsy, awkward, not dextrous."
"Klutz", according to Wiktionary "a clumsy or stupid person."
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
"All thumbs", according to Wiktionary "clumsy, awkward, not dextrous."
"Klutz", according to Wiktionary "a clumsy or stupid person."
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
"All thumbs", according to Wiktionary "clumsy, awkward, not dextrous."
"Klutz", according to Wiktionary "a clumsy or stupid person."
"All thumbs", according to Wiktionary "clumsy, awkward, not dextrous."
"Klutz", according to Wiktionary "a clumsy or stupid person."
answered Dec 27 '18 at 22:19
Al Maki
2,026715
2,026715
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
15
15
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
Yeah, "klutz"..
– Hot Licks
Dec 28 '18 at 0:01
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
"All thumbs" is an adjectival phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person"). However, "klutz" is a noun and fits the bill.
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:57
2
2
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
I think I’m offering fair and not unkind criticism when I say that this answer is not American slang per se, as the OP requested, but rather is a more general English idiom and adopted Yiddish.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:35
2
2
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
A klutz is someone that is clumsy... a klutz would be more likely to drop and break the picture in the process of hanging it not hang it upside down. I don't think this term properly describes what OP is looking for.
– JeffC
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
"klutz" fits the question well, which seems to be asking for "physically clumsy" specifically, not incompetent in general like "fuckup". "klutz" doesn't have much of a connotation of being a bad / useless person in general, for tasks that aren't physical / mechanical. e.g. a theoretical physicist could be all thumbs, and that's why they're a theoretician who works at a computer and/or blackboard all day instead of an experimental physicist who builds stuff in their lab.
– Peter Cordes
2 days ago
add a comment |
If you’re looking for vulgar slang, “fuckup” is a good option:
an extremely offensive word for someone who often makes serious mistakes or fails completely
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/fuck-up_2
Screw up works too, but it’s not as offensive.
Both of these words are also verbs.
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
If you’re looking for vulgar slang, “fuckup” is a good option:
an extremely offensive word for someone who often makes serious mistakes or fails completely
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/fuck-up_2
Screw up works too, but it’s not as offensive.
Both of these words are also verbs.
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
If you’re looking for vulgar slang, “fuckup” is a good option:
an extremely offensive word for someone who often makes serious mistakes or fails completely
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/fuck-up_2
Screw up works too, but it’s not as offensive.
Both of these words are also verbs.
If you’re looking for vulgar slang, “fuckup” is a good option:
an extremely offensive word for someone who often makes serious mistakes or fails completely
https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/fuck-up_2
Screw up works too, but it’s not as offensive.
Both of these words are also verbs.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 23:35
Laurel
31.2k660111
31.2k660111
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
That seems somewhat judgemental of the person's character.
– einpoklum
Dec 28 '18 at 23:14
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
@einpoklum I do think that, if I’m understanding Russian culture correctly, asshands can be used as a judgement of character.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 8:45
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
I agree with @einpoklum, I think that "fuckup" or "screwup" is too broad in meaning. If it was "растяпа" (bumbler,muddler,wally) then maybe, but I understand "рукожоп" as being particularly about lacking in manual skills.
– JohnGH
2 days ago
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
fuckup is good. fucktard is even better.
– Mazura
yesterday
add a comment |
Incompetent springs to mind:
a. Of inadequate ability or fitness; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable.
B. An incompetent person.
While we have a lot of fun slang terms here, this would be a term you could use either casually or in a slightly more formal setting.
I've also seen "Incompetent" used as an insult ("Are you incompetent, boy?"), so it would work to be more self-deprecating.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
Incompetent springs to mind:
a. Of inadequate ability or fitness; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable.
B. An incompetent person.
While we have a lot of fun slang terms here, this would be a term you could use either casually or in a slightly more formal setting.
I've also seen "Incompetent" used as an insult ("Are you incompetent, boy?"), so it would work to be more self-deprecating.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
Incompetent springs to mind:
a. Of inadequate ability or fitness; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable.
B. An incompetent person.
While we have a lot of fun slang terms here, this would be a term you could use either casually or in a slightly more formal setting.
I've also seen "Incompetent" used as an insult ("Are you incompetent, boy?"), so it would work to be more self-deprecating.
Incompetent springs to mind:
a. Of inadequate ability or fitness; not having the requisite capacity or qualification; incapable.
B. An incompetent person.
While we have a lot of fun slang terms here, this would be a term you could use either casually or in a slightly more formal setting.
I've also seen "Incompetent" used as an insult ("Are you incompetent, boy?"), so it would work to be more self-deprecating.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 28 '18 at 16:14
scohe001
2,2611120
2,2611120
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
"Butterfingers" might be a good word considering the context you used regarding the term "asshands". Generally it implies someone inept with their hands, or lacking in manual dexterity.
As a more brusque offensive term, I'd use the word "Fuck-up."
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
"Butterfingers" might be a good word considering the context you used regarding the term "asshands". Generally it implies someone inept with their hands, or lacking in manual dexterity.
As a more brusque offensive term, I'd use the word "Fuck-up."
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
"Butterfingers" might be a good word considering the context you used regarding the term "asshands". Generally it implies someone inept with their hands, or lacking in manual dexterity.
As a more brusque offensive term, I'd use the word "Fuck-up."
"Butterfingers" might be a good word considering the context you used regarding the term "asshands". Generally it implies someone inept with their hands, or lacking in manual dexterity.
As a more brusque offensive term, I'd use the word "Fuck-up."
answered Dec 28 '18 at 9:46
Sandwich
40824
40824
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
5
5
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
This is usually used in the sense of dropping things (literally as though your fingers were slippery with butter) rather than generally lacking dexterity though.
– Alchymist
Dec 28 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
A bumbler is informal without being vulgar or obscene.
He can't do anything right. He is a bumbler.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
add a comment |
A bumbler is informal without being vulgar or obscene.
He can't do anything right. He is a bumbler.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
add a comment |
A bumbler is informal without being vulgar or obscene.
He can't do anything right. He is a bumbler.
A bumbler is informal without being vulgar or obscene.
He can't do anything right. He is a bumbler.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 18:44
Tharpa
53935
53935
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
add a comment |
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Tharpa, this isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published definition of bumbler (linked to the source)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
add a comment |
schlemiel
A person who fouls up everything by incompetence or bad luck. It was borrowed into English from Yiddish which is from a name of a character in a story (1813).
Compare with schlemazel.
Which actually means 'bad luck' (schlim mazel).
The saying goes, in order to tell which is which, is that the person who spills their bowl of soup is the schlemiel, and the person they spill it on is the schlemazel.
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
add a comment |
schlemiel
A person who fouls up everything by incompetence or bad luck. It was borrowed into English from Yiddish which is from a name of a character in a story (1813).
Compare with schlemazel.
Which actually means 'bad luck' (schlim mazel).
The saying goes, in order to tell which is which, is that the person who spills their bowl of soup is the schlemiel, and the person they spill it on is the schlemazel.
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
add a comment |
schlemiel
A person who fouls up everything by incompetence or bad luck. It was borrowed into English from Yiddish which is from a name of a character in a story (1813).
Compare with schlemazel.
Which actually means 'bad luck' (schlim mazel).
The saying goes, in order to tell which is which, is that the person who spills their bowl of soup is the schlemiel, and the person they spill it on is the schlemazel.
schlemiel
A person who fouls up everything by incompetence or bad luck. It was borrowed into English from Yiddish which is from a name of a character in a story (1813).
Compare with schlemazel.
Which actually means 'bad luck' (schlim mazel).
The saying goes, in order to tell which is which, is that the person who spills their bowl of soup is the schlemiel, and the person they spill it on is the schlemazel.
answered Dec 29 '18 at 0:57
Mitch
50.3k15101211
50.3k15101211
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
add a comment |
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
4
4
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
Laverne & Shirley fan? I don't think this is in common enough usage today to be effective. I don't think most people would know what this means.
– JeffC
2 days ago
1
1
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
@JeffC many Yiddishisms were much more common in the past, especially in the NYC area. But every so often pop culture will revive one of them. Verklempt, meh, putz, spritz. Schlemiel wass definitely made more popular by L&S.
– Mitch
2 days ago
add a comment |
An idiom, that seems somewhat similar to the Russian one, is
No dad, i’m all fingers and thumbs, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down.
be all fingers and thumbs.
To be clumsy with one's hands. Primarily heard in UK, Australia. Tom could never be a surgeon—he's all fingers and thumbs. Can you sew this button on for me? I'm all fingers and thumbs.
- thefreedictionary.com
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
An idiom, that seems somewhat similar to the Russian one, is
No dad, i’m all fingers and thumbs, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down.
be all fingers and thumbs.
To be clumsy with one's hands. Primarily heard in UK, Australia. Tom could never be a surgeon—he's all fingers and thumbs. Can you sew this button on for me? I'm all fingers and thumbs.
- thefreedictionary.com
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
An idiom, that seems somewhat similar to the Russian one, is
No dad, i’m all fingers and thumbs, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down.
be all fingers and thumbs.
To be clumsy with one's hands. Primarily heard in UK, Australia. Tom could never be a surgeon—he's all fingers and thumbs. Can you sew this button on for me? I'm all fingers and thumbs.
- thefreedictionary.com
An idiom, that seems somewhat similar to the Russian one, is
No dad, i’m all fingers and thumbs, I'll probably end up hanging it upside down.
be all fingers and thumbs.
To be clumsy with one's hands. Primarily heard in UK, Australia. Tom could never be a surgeon—he's all fingers and thumbs. Can you sew this button on for me? I'm all fingers and thumbs.
- thefreedictionary.com
edited Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
answered Dec 28 '18 at 3:26
k1eran
18.4k63777
18.4k63777
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
1
1
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
This is a verbal phrase, whereas the question asks for a noun ("an informal term for a person").
– Chappo
Dec 28 '18 at 10:55
1
1
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
@Chappo I did not think “an informal term for a person” meant it was limited to nouns, but I guess it would be best if OP edited question to be more specific.
– k1eran
Dec 28 '18 at 11:18
add a comment |
If s/he "can't do anything right" not just in terms of construction and house-work, but more generally, you can call that person a good-for-nothing.
Dictionary definition:
good-for-noth·ing
(go͝od′fər-nŭth′ĭng)
noun: A person of little worth or usefulness.
adjective: Having little worth; useless.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
If s/he "can't do anything right" not just in terms of construction and house-work, but more generally, you can call that person a good-for-nothing.
Dictionary definition:
good-for-noth·ing
(go͝od′fər-nŭth′ĭng)
noun: A person of little worth or usefulness.
adjective: Having little worth; useless.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
If s/he "can't do anything right" not just in terms of construction and house-work, but more generally, you can call that person a good-for-nothing.
Dictionary definition:
good-for-noth·ing
(go͝od′fər-nŭth′ĭng)
noun: A person of little worth or usefulness.
adjective: Having little worth; useless.
If s/he "can't do anything right" not just in terms of construction and house-work, but more generally, you can call that person a good-for-nothing.
Dictionary definition:
good-for-noth·ing
(go͝od′fər-nŭth′ĭng)
noun: A person of little worth or usefulness.
adjective: Having little worth; useless.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 23:12
einpoklum
1,60732138
1,60732138
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
Just because someone is too clumsy to hang a picture, doesn't mean they are a good-for-nothing. They might be excellent at mathematics or poetry or managing a company.
– chasly from UK
2 days ago
add a comment |
doofus or less commonly dufus. Same meaning.
a stupid, incompetent, or foolish person.
MW notes that the word is slang, and that it's relatively recent (first known use 1960).
Further background: there's also some connection to the 1959 TV show "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis". And Hipsterdufus is apparently now a thing.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
doofus or less commonly dufus. Same meaning.
a stupid, incompetent, or foolish person.
MW notes that the word is slang, and that it's relatively recent (first known use 1960).
Further background: there's also some connection to the 1959 TV show "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis". And Hipsterdufus is apparently now a thing.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
doofus or less commonly dufus. Same meaning.
a stupid, incompetent, or foolish person.
MW notes that the word is slang, and that it's relatively recent (first known use 1960).
Further background: there's also some connection to the 1959 TV show "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis". And Hipsterdufus is apparently now a thing.
doofus or less commonly dufus. Same meaning.
a stupid, incompetent, or foolish person.
MW notes that the word is slang, and that it's relatively recent (first known use 1960).
Further background: there's also some connection to the 1959 TV show "The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis". And Hipsterdufus is apparently now a thing.
edited 2 days ago
Chappo
2,60041225
2,60041225
answered Dec 29 '18 at 5:39
Wayfaring Stranger
7,63221529
7,63221529
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Noun: Useless Tit
Adjective: Tit-useless
Often but not always applied to males, probably related to the non-functionality of the male breast.
Dave is a useless tit.
Dave is tit-useless at anything.
Probably a contraction of "...as useless as tits on a nun/bull/ram/log"
Supporting link: https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/53418
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
add a comment |
Noun: Useless Tit
Adjective: Tit-useless
Often but not always applied to males, probably related to the non-functionality of the male breast.
Dave is a useless tit.
Dave is tit-useless at anything.
Probably a contraction of "...as useless as tits on a nun/bull/ram/log"
Supporting link: https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/53418
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
add a comment |
Noun: Useless Tit
Adjective: Tit-useless
Often but not always applied to males, probably related to the non-functionality of the male breast.
Dave is a useless tit.
Dave is tit-useless at anything.
Probably a contraction of "...as useless as tits on a nun/bull/ram/log"
Supporting link: https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/53418
Noun: Useless Tit
Adjective: Tit-useless
Often but not always applied to males, probably related to the non-functionality of the male breast.
Dave is a useless tit.
Dave is tit-useless at anything.
Probably a contraction of "...as useless as tits on a nun/bull/ram/log"
Supporting link: https://www.answerbag.com/q_view/53418
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 29 '18 at 4:06
Criggie
910514
910514
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
1
1
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
"Tit" seems to indicate an intentional insult. Am I wrong? If not, I don't think OP wanted that shade of meaning.
– einpoklum
2 days ago
add a comment |
A sad sack is a blundering, inept person.
MW defines it as "US, informal", and says the first known use with this meaning is from 1943. However, etymonline says:
sad sack is 1920s, popularized by World War II armed forces
(specifically by cartoon character invented by Sgt. George Baker,
1942, and published in U.S. Armed Forces magazine "Yank"), probably a
euphemistic shortening of common military slang phrase sad sack of
shit.
The term comes from a military context, a soldier who can't seem to do anything correctly.
The definitions in the Urban Dictionary seem to turn the meaning more toward a depressed or depressing person. But the original context used sad in the sense of pitiful.
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
add a comment |
A sad sack is a blundering, inept person.
MW defines it as "US, informal", and says the first known use with this meaning is from 1943. However, etymonline says:
sad sack is 1920s, popularized by World War II armed forces
(specifically by cartoon character invented by Sgt. George Baker,
1942, and published in U.S. Armed Forces magazine "Yank"), probably a
euphemistic shortening of common military slang phrase sad sack of
shit.
The term comes from a military context, a soldier who can't seem to do anything correctly.
The definitions in the Urban Dictionary seem to turn the meaning more toward a depressed or depressing person. But the original context used sad in the sense of pitiful.
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
add a comment |
A sad sack is a blundering, inept person.
MW defines it as "US, informal", and says the first known use with this meaning is from 1943. However, etymonline says:
sad sack is 1920s, popularized by World War II armed forces
(specifically by cartoon character invented by Sgt. George Baker,
1942, and published in U.S. Armed Forces magazine "Yank"), probably a
euphemistic shortening of common military slang phrase sad sack of
shit.
The term comes from a military context, a soldier who can't seem to do anything correctly.
The definitions in the Urban Dictionary seem to turn the meaning more toward a depressed or depressing person. But the original context used sad in the sense of pitiful.
A sad sack is a blundering, inept person.
MW defines it as "US, informal", and says the first known use with this meaning is from 1943. However, etymonline says:
sad sack is 1920s, popularized by World War II armed forces
(specifically by cartoon character invented by Sgt. George Baker,
1942, and published in U.S. Armed Forces magazine "Yank"), probably a
euphemistic shortening of common military slang phrase sad sack of
shit.
The term comes from a military context, a soldier who can't seem to do anything correctly.
The definitions in the Urban Dictionary seem to turn the meaning more toward a depressed or depressing person. But the original context used sad in the sense of pitiful.
edited 2 days ago
answered Dec 28 '18 at 12:01
already puzzled
1775
1775
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
Thanks for finding that! Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that from my phone.
– already puzzled
Dec 28 '18 at 21:47
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
I've added the links/detail but you might like to re-edit your middle paragraphs in light of the (slightly duplicated) etymological discussion. :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
Thanks! Feel free to touch up.
– already puzzled
2 days ago
add a comment |
Inept
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/inept
in·ept (ĭn-ĕpt′)
adj.
1. Lacking or showing a lack of skill or competence; bungling or clumsy: an inept actor; an inept performance.
2. Showing a lack of judgment, sense, or reason; inappropriate or foolish: an inept remark.
add a comment |
Inept
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/inept
in·ept (ĭn-ĕpt′)
adj.
1. Lacking or showing a lack of skill or competence; bungling or clumsy: an inept actor; an inept performance.
2. Showing a lack of judgment, sense, or reason; inappropriate or foolish: an inept remark.
add a comment |
Inept
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/inept
in·ept (ĭn-ĕpt′)
adj.
1. Lacking or showing a lack of skill or competence; bungling or clumsy: an inept actor; an inept performance.
2. Showing a lack of judgment, sense, or reason; inappropriate or foolish: an inept remark.
Inept
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/inept
in·ept (ĭn-ĕpt′)
adj.
1. Lacking or showing a lack of skill or competence; bungling or clumsy: an inept actor; an inept performance.
2. Showing a lack of judgment, sense, or reason; inappropriate or foolish: an inept remark.
answered yesterday
Michael Durrant
6871412
6871412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Adding nincompoop as a suggestion.
A silly or foolish person.
A slightly older word in UK English so not too widely used.
add a comment |
Adding nincompoop as a suggestion.
A silly or foolish person.
A slightly older word in UK English so not too widely used.
add a comment |
Adding nincompoop as a suggestion.
A silly or foolish person.
A slightly older word in UK English so not too widely used.
Adding nincompoop as a suggestion.
A silly or foolish person.
A slightly older word in UK English so not too widely used.
answered yesterday
Adam Naylor
156116
156116
add a comment |
add a comment |
There is a word we use called Nixie. It comes from the German word Nichtse which means a slacker/good-for-nothing.
The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a word we use called Nixie. It comes from the German word Nichtse which means a slacker/good-for-nothing.
The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a word we use called Nixie. It comes from the German word Nichtse which means a slacker/good-for-nothing.
The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
There is a word we use called Nixie. It comes from the German word Nichtse which means a slacker/good-for-nothing.
The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community.
answered Dec 29 '18 at 0:30
Tyler Weaver
1584
1584
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
add a comment |
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
2
2
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
"The word is very popular among the Pennsylvania Dutch community" - should we infer anything from this? ;-)
– Chappo
Dec 29 '18 at 0:36
2
2
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
"Nichtse" never heard this. Would it perhaps be Dutch?
– alk
2 days ago
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
A think of a Nixie as a water spirit.
– Ben
yesterday
add a comment |
A dennis-the-menace 😀 thats someone who does things wrong over 90 percent of the time . A person like the character that pretty much f's up everyting he does . An argument can be made that this type of omni fuck up is intentional and deliberate , as opposed to a Klutz who messes things up on accident .
New contributor
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
A dennis-the-menace 😀 thats someone who does things wrong over 90 percent of the time . A person like the character that pretty much f's up everyting he does . An argument can be made that this type of omni fuck up is intentional and deliberate , as opposed to a Klutz who messes things up on accident .
New contributor
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
A dennis-the-menace 😀 thats someone who does things wrong over 90 percent of the time . A person like the character that pretty much f's up everyting he does . An argument can be made that this type of omni fuck up is intentional and deliberate , as opposed to a Klutz who messes things up on accident .
New contributor
A dennis-the-menace 😀 thats someone who does things wrong over 90 percent of the time . A person like the character that pretty much f's up everyting he does . An argument can be made that this type of omni fuck up is intentional and deliberate , as opposed to a Klutz who messes things up on accident .
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
answered Dec 29 '18 at 9:15
Randin
932
932
New contributor
New contributor
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
Hi Randin, welcome to EL&U. This isn't a bad start, but it's too short: the system has flagged it as "low-quality because of its length and content." An answer on EL&U is expected to be authoritative, detailed, and explain why it is correct. Can I suggest you edit your answer to provide more information - e.g., add a published reference and a bit more detail (e.g. can it apply to adults)? For further guidance, see How to Answer and take the EL&U Tour :-)
– Chappo
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
thank u now i see why Chappo
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
Can i get the negative points taken back ?
– Randin
2 days ago
2
2
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
None of the downvotes are mine, but it's likely it's because the voters don't think your answer suits the question. That might be because you haven't provided any external reference, or it might be because your answer would be meaningless to the many English speakers who have never heard of the character. I've given you a link - you could do worse than to add it, along with a paragraph explaining who Dennis was and what he was like.
– Chappo
2 days ago
1
1
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
PS Dennis was well-meaning and likeable, even if exasperating. Your description of him as deliberate and intentional doesn't match the actual character.
– Chappo
2 days ago
|
show 1 more comment
protected by Andrew Leach♦ Dec 29 '18 at 9:47
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
Are you specifically looking for slang terms or adjectives? Clumsy could be an adjective.
– Sweet_Cherry
Dec 27 '18 at 21:33
1
@Sweet_Cherry no, I want slang specifically, preferably American.
– Happy
Dec 27 '18 at 21:35
1
If you weren't asking for AmE then I might proffer "pillock", "prat", "plonker", "muppet", etc - you're missing out on a lot of great BrE colloquialisms!
– Dai
Dec 28 '18 at 16:49
1
You seem to be looking for a noun, but if it were an adjective, ham-handed is possible.
– hatchet
Dec 28 '18 at 22:38
1
Neither “all thumbs” nor “klutz” are slang, and neither is specific to American slang.
– NonCreature0714
Dec 29 '18 at 7:57