For any set we can construct a vector space on it












0














Can we construct a vector space on any finite set? It is clear, that on any finite set can be construct the transposition group $S_n$, where $n$ -- cardinal of elements of this set. I thought about non-zero characteristics fields, but I think that this is impossible, for ex. $mathbb{F}_2$ -- $2$-elements field on ${0,1}$ and we will be have $Id_X = (1_{mathbb{F}_2} + 1_{mathbb{F}_2})*S_1 = S_1 cdot S_1 neq Id_X$, where $Id_X$ -- identity transposition and $S_1$ -- any another transposition, $cdot$ -- composition between transpositions in $S_n$ and $+$ -- additive operation in field, $*$ -- multiplication on scalar.



So what after? How can I check zero characteristics fields?



And what about infinite sets?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Can we construct a vector space on any finite set? It is clear, that on any finite set can be construct the transposition group $S_n$, where $n$ -- cardinal of elements of this set. I thought about non-zero characteristics fields, but I think that this is impossible, for ex. $mathbb{F}_2$ -- $2$-elements field on ${0,1}$ and we will be have $Id_X = (1_{mathbb{F}_2} + 1_{mathbb{F}_2})*S_1 = S_1 cdot S_1 neq Id_X$, where $Id_X$ -- identity transposition and $S_1$ -- any another transposition, $cdot$ -- composition between transpositions in $S_n$ and $+$ -- additive operation in field, $*$ -- multiplication on scalar.



    So what after? How can I check zero characteristics fields?



    And what about infinite sets?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      2





      Can we construct a vector space on any finite set? It is clear, that on any finite set can be construct the transposition group $S_n$, where $n$ -- cardinal of elements of this set. I thought about non-zero characteristics fields, but I think that this is impossible, for ex. $mathbb{F}_2$ -- $2$-elements field on ${0,1}$ and we will be have $Id_X = (1_{mathbb{F}_2} + 1_{mathbb{F}_2})*S_1 = S_1 cdot S_1 neq Id_X$, where $Id_X$ -- identity transposition and $S_1$ -- any another transposition, $cdot$ -- composition between transpositions in $S_n$ and $+$ -- additive operation in field, $*$ -- multiplication on scalar.



      So what after? How can I check zero characteristics fields?



      And what about infinite sets?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Can we construct a vector space on any finite set? It is clear, that on any finite set can be construct the transposition group $S_n$, where $n$ -- cardinal of elements of this set. I thought about non-zero characteristics fields, but I think that this is impossible, for ex. $mathbb{F}_2$ -- $2$-elements field on ${0,1}$ and we will be have $Id_X = (1_{mathbb{F}_2} + 1_{mathbb{F}_2})*S_1 = S_1 cdot S_1 neq Id_X$, where $Id_X$ -- identity transposition and $S_1$ -- any another transposition, $cdot$ -- composition between transpositions in $S_n$ and $+$ -- additive operation in field, $*$ -- multiplication on scalar.



      So what after? How can I check zero characteristics fields?



      And what about infinite sets?







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 2:44









      Arsenii

      15318




      15318






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          No. For instance, there can be no vector space structure on a set of order $6$. No matter the ground field (and you only have two options here, $mathbb{F}_2$ or $mathbb{F}_3$) the arithmetic won't work out on the dimension to make the order of the underlying set $6$. (It should be clear that a vector space $V$ of finite dimension $n$ over a finite field of order $q$ will have $|V|=q^n$.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:10












          • How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:11












          • yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:15











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053543%2ffor-any-set-we-can-construct-a-vector-space-on-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          No. For instance, there can be no vector space structure on a set of order $6$. No matter the ground field (and you only have two options here, $mathbb{F}_2$ or $mathbb{F}_3$) the arithmetic won't work out on the dimension to make the order of the underlying set $6$. (It should be clear that a vector space $V$ of finite dimension $n$ over a finite field of order $q$ will have $|V|=q^n$.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:10












          • How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:11












          • yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:15
















          3














          No. For instance, there can be no vector space structure on a set of order $6$. No matter the ground field (and you only have two options here, $mathbb{F}_2$ or $mathbb{F}_3$) the arithmetic won't work out on the dimension to make the order of the underlying set $6$. (It should be clear that a vector space $V$ of finite dimension $n$ over a finite field of order $q$ will have $|V|=q^n$.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:10












          • How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:11












          • yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:15














          3












          3








          3






          No. For instance, there can be no vector space structure on a set of order $6$. No matter the ground field (and you only have two options here, $mathbb{F}_2$ or $mathbb{F}_3$) the arithmetic won't work out on the dimension to make the order of the underlying set $6$. (It should be clear that a vector space $V$ of finite dimension $n$ over a finite field of order $q$ will have $|V|=q^n$.)






          share|cite|improve this answer












          No. For instance, there can be no vector space structure on a set of order $6$. No matter the ground field (and you only have two options here, $mathbb{F}_2$ or $mathbb{F}_3$) the arithmetic won't work out on the dimension to make the order of the underlying set $6$. (It should be clear that a vector space $V$ of finite dimension $n$ over a finite field of order $q$ will have $|V|=q^n$.)







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 27 '18 at 2:57









          Randall

          9,12611129




          9,12611129












          • For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:10












          • How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:11












          • yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:15


















          • For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:10












          • How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:11












          • yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
            – Randall
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:12












          • oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
            – Arsenii
            Dec 27 '18 at 3:15
















          For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:10






          For now I think, that if we speaking about vec.space on a finite set $X$ with $n$ elements, we should think about the space with $n$ vectors and the $Set$-functor image of this vec-space, that will be have $n$ elements in it. So if we have set of order 6, we should find 6 element-vec.space but the number of this elements in vec,space depends on the number of the field, bcs $|V| = q^m$, so $n = q^m$, where $q$-- order of field-set and $m$ -- dim of space. And after... Why $n = q^m$ is impossible?
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:10














          How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
          – Randall
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:11






          How can you write $6$ as a power of prime? (Finite fields themselves have order a power of a prime, so $V$ will as well.)
          – Randall
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:11














          yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:12






          yes, okey) thx) perfect! but what about infinite sets?
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:12














          That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
          – Randall
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:12






          That's harder because of cardinality issues. For instance, if $V$ has cardinality of $mathbb{R}$, then choose a bijection $V to mathbb{R}$ and pull the vector space structure on $mathbb{R}$ back to $V$.
          – Randall
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:12














          oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:15




          oh, nice, just copy structure... Thank you so much, you answered my questions)
          – Arsenii
          Dec 27 '18 at 3:15


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053543%2ffor-any-set-we-can-construct-a-vector-space-on-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

          List of scandals in India

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?