Choosing an integer that is most likely to be the sum of die rolls
$begingroup$
Choose any positive integer $n$. Then roll an unbiased six-sided die as many times as needed until the sum of the results is either exactly equal to $n$ (you win) or greater than $n$ (you lose).
If you were to play this game; what number $n$ would you select in order to maximise the chance of winning and what is the probability of it?
(For example, choose $n=7$, then you would roll a die and if you get $6$ on the 1st throw and $1$ on the 2nd throw you would stop since you reached $n$).
probability dice
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Choose any positive integer $n$. Then roll an unbiased six-sided die as many times as needed until the sum of the results is either exactly equal to $n$ (you win) or greater than $n$ (you lose).
If you were to play this game; what number $n$ would you select in order to maximise the chance of winning and what is the probability of it?
(For example, choose $n=7$, then you would roll a die and if you get $6$ on the 1st throw and $1$ on the 2nd throw you would stop since you reached $n$).
probability dice
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Choose any positive integer $n$. Then roll an unbiased six-sided die as many times as needed until the sum of the results is either exactly equal to $n$ (you win) or greater than $n$ (you lose).
If you were to play this game; what number $n$ would you select in order to maximise the chance of winning and what is the probability of it?
(For example, choose $n=7$, then you would roll a die and if you get $6$ on the 1st throw and $1$ on the 2nd throw you would stop since you reached $n$).
probability dice
$endgroup$
Choose any positive integer $n$. Then roll an unbiased six-sided die as many times as needed until the sum of the results is either exactly equal to $n$ (you win) or greater than $n$ (you lose).
If you were to play this game; what number $n$ would you select in order to maximise the chance of winning and what is the probability of it?
(For example, choose $n=7$, then you would roll a die and if you get $6$ on the 1st throw and $1$ on the 2nd throw you would stop since you reached $n$).
probability dice
probability dice
asked Jan 11 at 18:30
MilTomMilTom
1288
1288
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Denote by $p_{k}$ the probability that a sum of $k$ is observed. Clearly
$$p_{1}=frac{1}{6}$$
For $p_{2}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $2$ and a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $1$, followed by another one. This can be written as
$$p_{2}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1})$$
For $p_{3}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $3$ and winning. The only other ways to win are to roll a $1$ or $2$, each with probability $frac{1}{6}$. If we roll a $1$, then our odds of winning are $p_{2}$ and if we roll a $2$, our odds of winning are $p_{1}$. Therefore
$$p_{3}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}+frac{p_{2}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2})$$
Similarly we have
$$p_{4}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})$$
$$p_{5}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})$$
$$p_{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4}+p_{5})$$
Now, for $k>6$ we cannot win in one roll so we have
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}(p_{k-1}+p_{k-2}+p_{k-3}+p_{k-4}+p_{k-5}+p_{k-6})$$
Observe that for any $k>6$,
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<frac{1}{6}cdot 6max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}=max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}$$
This proves that the winning choice is not bigger than $6$, and in fact must be the max of $p_{1},p_{2},...p_{6}$. Clearly this is $p_{6}$, so we should choose $n=6$ to maximize the odds of winning.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general you can reach $n$ directly from any of the six preceding numbers each with probability $frac16$ so if $p_n$ is the probability that a sum of $n$ is hit then $$p_n=frac{1}{6}left(p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}+p_{n-3}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-5}+p_{n-6}right)$$ starting with $p_0=1$ and $p_{-1}=p_{-2}=p_{-3}=p_{-4}=p_{-5}=0$
This is increasing from $n=1$ to $n=6$ since in this range $p_n=p_{n-1}+frac16p_{n-1}=frac76p_{n-1}=frac{7^{n-1}}{6^n}$. In particular $p_6=frac{7^5}{6^n}approx 0.3602323$
$p_6$ must then (by induction) be the highest $p_n$ for positive $n$, since $p_n$ for $n gt 6$ is the average of the preceding six values, which will be strictly less than $p_6$. The average roll is $3.5$ so about $frac{1}{3.5} =frac27$ of the values are hit, meaning $p_n to frac27 approx 0.2857143$ as $n$ increases. Actual values for smaller $n$ are:
p_0 1 / 1 1
p_1 1 / 6 0.1666667
p_2 7 / 36 0.1944444
p_3 49 / 216 0.2268519
p_4 343 / 1296 0.2646605
p_5 2401 / 7776 0.3087706
p_6 16807 / 46656 0.3602323
p_7 70993 / 279936 0.2536044
p_8 450295 / 1679616 0.2680940
p_9 2825473 / 10077696 0.2803689
p_10 17492167 / 60466176 0.2892885
p_11 106442161 / 362797056 0.2933931
p_12 633074071 / 2176782336 0.2908302
p_13 3647371105 / 13060694016 0.2792632
p_14 22219348327 / 78364164096 0.2835397
p_15 134526474769 / 470184984576 0.2861139
p_16 809860055095 / 2821109907456 0.2870714
p_17 4852905842113 / 16926659444736 0.2867019
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070185%2fchoosing-an-integer-that-is-most-likely-to-be-the-sum-of-die-rolls%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Denote by $p_{k}$ the probability that a sum of $k$ is observed. Clearly
$$p_{1}=frac{1}{6}$$
For $p_{2}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $2$ and a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $1$, followed by another one. This can be written as
$$p_{2}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1})$$
For $p_{3}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $3$ and winning. The only other ways to win are to roll a $1$ or $2$, each with probability $frac{1}{6}$. If we roll a $1$, then our odds of winning are $p_{2}$ and if we roll a $2$, our odds of winning are $p_{1}$. Therefore
$$p_{3}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}+frac{p_{2}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2})$$
Similarly we have
$$p_{4}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})$$
$$p_{5}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})$$
$$p_{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4}+p_{5})$$
Now, for $k>6$ we cannot win in one roll so we have
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}(p_{k-1}+p_{k-2}+p_{k-3}+p_{k-4}+p_{k-5}+p_{k-6})$$
Observe that for any $k>6$,
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<frac{1}{6}cdot 6max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}=max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}$$
This proves that the winning choice is not bigger than $6$, and in fact must be the max of $p_{1},p_{2},...p_{6}$. Clearly this is $p_{6}$, so we should choose $n=6$ to maximize the odds of winning.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $p_{k}$ the probability that a sum of $k$ is observed. Clearly
$$p_{1}=frac{1}{6}$$
For $p_{2}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $2$ and a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $1$, followed by another one. This can be written as
$$p_{2}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1})$$
For $p_{3}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $3$ and winning. The only other ways to win are to roll a $1$ or $2$, each with probability $frac{1}{6}$. If we roll a $1$, then our odds of winning are $p_{2}$ and if we roll a $2$, our odds of winning are $p_{1}$. Therefore
$$p_{3}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}+frac{p_{2}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2})$$
Similarly we have
$$p_{4}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})$$
$$p_{5}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})$$
$$p_{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4}+p_{5})$$
Now, for $k>6$ we cannot win in one roll so we have
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}(p_{k-1}+p_{k-2}+p_{k-3}+p_{k-4}+p_{k-5}+p_{k-6})$$
Observe that for any $k>6$,
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<frac{1}{6}cdot 6max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}=max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}$$
This proves that the winning choice is not bigger than $6$, and in fact must be the max of $p_{1},p_{2},...p_{6}$. Clearly this is $p_{6}$, so we should choose $n=6$ to maximize the odds of winning.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $p_{k}$ the probability that a sum of $k$ is observed. Clearly
$$p_{1}=frac{1}{6}$$
For $p_{2}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $2$ and a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $1$, followed by another one. This can be written as
$$p_{2}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1})$$
For $p_{3}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $3$ and winning. The only other ways to win are to roll a $1$ or $2$, each with probability $frac{1}{6}$. If we roll a $1$, then our odds of winning are $p_{2}$ and if we roll a $2$, our odds of winning are $p_{1}$. Therefore
$$p_{3}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}+frac{p_{2}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2})$$
Similarly we have
$$p_{4}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})$$
$$p_{5}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})$$
$$p_{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4}+p_{5})$$
Now, for $k>6$ we cannot win in one roll so we have
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}(p_{k-1}+p_{k-2}+p_{k-3}+p_{k-4}+p_{k-5}+p_{k-6})$$
Observe that for any $k>6$,
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<frac{1}{6}cdot 6max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}=max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}$$
This proves that the winning choice is not bigger than $6$, and in fact must be the max of $p_{1},p_{2},...p_{6}$. Clearly this is $p_{6}$, so we should choose $n=6$ to maximize the odds of winning.
$endgroup$
Denote by $p_{k}$ the probability that a sum of $k$ is observed. Clearly
$$p_{1}=frac{1}{6}$$
For $p_{2}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $2$ and a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $1$, followed by another one. This can be written as
$$p_{2}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1})$$
For $p_{3}$, there is a $frac{1}{6}$ chance of rolling a $3$ and winning. The only other ways to win are to roll a $1$ or $2$, each with probability $frac{1}{6}$. If we roll a $1$, then our odds of winning are $p_{2}$ and if we roll a $2$, our odds of winning are $p_{1}$. Therefore
$$p_{3}=frac{1}{6}+frac{p_{1}}{6}+frac{p_{2}}{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2})$$
Similarly we have
$$p_{4}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3})$$
$$p_{5}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4})$$
$$p_{6}=frac{1}{6}(1+p_{1}+p_{2}+p_{3}+p_{4}+p_{5})$$
Now, for $k>6$ we cannot win in one roll so we have
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}(p_{k-1}+p_{k-2}+p_{k-3}+p_{k-4}+p_{k-5}+p_{k-6})$$
Observe that for any $k>6$,
$$p_{k}=frac{1}{6}sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<frac{1}{6}cdot 6max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}=max_{m=1,2,3,4,5,6}p_{k-m}$$
This proves that the winning choice is not bigger than $6$, and in fact must be the max of $p_{1},p_{2},...p_{6}$. Clearly this is $p_{6}$, so we should choose $n=6$ to maximize the odds of winning.
edited Jan 12 at 0:57
answered Jan 11 at 18:52
pwerthpwerth
3,265417
3,265417
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
"Observe that for any $k$, $$sum_{m=1}^{6}p_{k-m}<1".$$ The "observation" is wrong for all $k>6$.
$endgroup$
– user
Jan 11 at 23:13
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
Actually $p_k gt frac14$ for $k gt 6$, contrary to your statement $p_k lt frac16$
$endgroup$
– Henry
Jan 11 at 23:15
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
$begingroup$
You are both correct. I need to slightly reword my definition of $p_{n}$.
$endgroup$
– pwerth
Jan 12 at 0:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general you can reach $n$ directly from any of the six preceding numbers each with probability $frac16$ so if $p_n$ is the probability that a sum of $n$ is hit then $$p_n=frac{1}{6}left(p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}+p_{n-3}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-5}+p_{n-6}right)$$ starting with $p_0=1$ and $p_{-1}=p_{-2}=p_{-3}=p_{-4}=p_{-5}=0$
This is increasing from $n=1$ to $n=6$ since in this range $p_n=p_{n-1}+frac16p_{n-1}=frac76p_{n-1}=frac{7^{n-1}}{6^n}$. In particular $p_6=frac{7^5}{6^n}approx 0.3602323$
$p_6$ must then (by induction) be the highest $p_n$ for positive $n$, since $p_n$ for $n gt 6$ is the average of the preceding six values, which will be strictly less than $p_6$. The average roll is $3.5$ so about $frac{1}{3.5} =frac27$ of the values are hit, meaning $p_n to frac27 approx 0.2857143$ as $n$ increases. Actual values for smaller $n$ are:
p_0 1 / 1 1
p_1 1 / 6 0.1666667
p_2 7 / 36 0.1944444
p_3 49 / 216 0.2268519
p_4 343 / 1296 0.2646605
p_5 2401 / 7776 0.3087706
p_6 16807 / 46656 0.3602323
p_7 70993 / 279936 0.2536044
p_8 450295 / 1679616 0.2680940
p_9 2825473 / 10077696 0.2803689
p_10 17492167 / 60466176 0.2892885
p_11 106442161 / 362797056 0.2933931
p_12 633074071 / 2176782336 0.2908302
p_13 3647371105 / 13060694016 0.2792632
p_14 22219348327 / 78364164096 0.2835397
p_15 134526474769 / 470184984576 0.2861139
p_16 809860055095 / 2821109907456 0.2870714
p_17 4852905842113 / 16926659444736 0.2867019
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general you can reach $n$ directly from any of the six preceding numbers each with probability $frac16$ so if $p_n$ is the probability that a sum of $n$ is hit then $$p_n=frac{1}{6}left(p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}+p_{n-3}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-5}+p_{n-6}right)$$ starting with $p_0=1$ and $p_{-1}=p_{-2}=p_{-3}=p_{-4}=p_{-5}=0$
This is increasing from $n=1$ to $n=6$ since in this range $p_n=p_{n-1}+frac16p_{n-1}=frac76p_{n-1}=frac{7^{n-1}}{6^n}$. In particular $p_6=frac{7^5}{6^n}approx 0.3602323$
$p_6$ must then (by induction) be the highest $p_n$ for positive $n$, since $p_n$ for $n gt 6$ is the average of the preceding six values, which will be strictly less than $p_6$. The average roll is $3.5$ so about $frac{1}{3.5} =frac27$ of the values are hit, meaning $p_n to frac27 approx 0.2857143$ as $n$ increases. Actual values for smaller $n$ are:
p_0 1 / 1 1
p_1 1 / 6 0.1666667
p_2 7 / 36 0.1944444
p_3 49 / 216 0.2268519
p_4 343 / 1296 0.2646605
p_5 2401 / 7776 0.3087706
p_6 16807 / 46656 0.3602323
p_7 70993 / 279936 0.2536044
p_8 450295 / 1679616 0.2680940
p_9 2825473 / 10077696 0.2803689
p_10 17492167 / 60466176 0.2892885
p_11 106442161 / 362797056 0.2933931
p_12 633074071 / 2176782336 0.2908302
p_13 3647371105 / 13060694016 0.2792632
p_14 22219348327 / 78364164096 0.2835397
p_15 134526474769 / 470184984576 0.2861139
p_16 809860055095 / 2821109907456 0.2870714
p_17 4852905842113 / 16926659444736 0.2867019
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general you can reach $n$ directly from any of the six preceding numbers each with probability $frac16$ so if $p_n$ is the probability that a sum of $n$ is hit then $$p_n=frac{1}{6}left(p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}+p_{n-3}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-5}+p_{n-6}right)$$ starting with $p_0=1$ and $p_{-1}=p_{-2}=p_{-3}=p_{-4}=p_{-5}=0$
This is increasing from $n=1$ to $n=6$ since in this range $p_n=p_{n-1}+frac16p_{n-1}=frac76p_{n-1}=frac{7^{n-1}}{6^n}$. In particular $p_6=frac{7^5}{6^n}approx 0.3602323$
$p_6$ must then (by induction) be the highest $p_n$ for positive $n$, since $p_n$ for $n gt 6$ is the average of the preceding six values, which will be strictly less than $p_6$. The average roll is $3.5$ so about $frac{1}{3.5} =frac27$ of the values are hit, meaning $p_n to frac27 approx 0.2857143$ as $n$ increases. Actual values for smaller $n$ are:
p_0 1 / 1 1
p_1 1 / 6 0.1666667
p_2 7 / 36 0.1944444
p_3 49 / 216 0.2268519
p_4 343 / 1296 0.2646605
p_5 2401 / 7776 0.3087706
p_6 16807 / 46656 0.3602323
p_7 70993 / 279936 0.2536044
p_8 450295 / 1679616 0.2680940
p_9 2825473 / 10077696 0.2803689
p_10 17492167 / 60466176 0.2892885
p_11 106442161 / 362797056 0.2933931
p_12 633074071 / 2176782336 0.2908302
p_13 3647371105 / 13060694016 0.2792632
p_14 22219348327 / 78364164096 0.2835397
p_15 134526474769 / 470184984576 0.2861139
p_16 809860055095 / 2821109907456 0.2870714
p_17 4852905842113 / 16926659444736 0.2867019
$endgroup$
In general you can reach $n$ directly from any of the six preceding numbers each with probability $frac16$ so if $p_n$ is the probability that a sum of $n$ is hit then $$p_n=frac{1}{6}left(p_{n-1}+p_{n-2}+p_{n-3}+p_{n-4}+p_{n-5}+p_{n-6}right)$$ starting with $p_0=1$ and $p_{-1}=p_{-2}=p_{-3}=p_{-4}=p_{-5}=0$
This is increasing from $n=1$ to $n=6$ since in this range $p_n=p_{n-1}+frac16p_{n-1}=frac76p_{n-1}=frac{7^{n-1}}{6^n}$. In particular $p_6=frac{7^5}{6^n}approx 0.3602323$
$p_6$ must then (by induction) be the highest $p_n$ for positive $n$, since $p_n$ for $n gt 6$ is the average of the preceding six values, which will be strictly less than $p_6$. The average roll is $3.5$ so about $frac{1}{3.5} =frac27$ of the values are hit, meaning $p_n to frac27 approx 0.2857143$ as $n$ increases. Actual values for smaller $n$ are:
p_0 1 / 1 1
p_1 1 / 6 0.1666667
p_2 7 / 36 0.1944444
p_3 49 / 216 0.2268519
p_4 343 / 1296 0.2646605
p_5 2401 / 7776 0.3087706
p_6 16807 / 46656 0.3602323
p_7 70993 / 279936 0.2536044
p_8 450295 / 1679616 0.2680940
p_9 2825473 / 10077696 0.2803689
p_10 17492167 / 60466176 0.2892885
p_11 106442161 / 362797056 0.2933931
p_12 633074071 / 2176782336 0.2908302
p_13 3647371105 / 13060694016 0.2792632
p_14 22219348327 / 78364164096 0.2835397
p_15 134526474769 / 470184984576 0.2861139
p_16 809860055095 / 2821109907456 0.2870714
p_17 4852905842113 / 16926659444736 0.2867019
answered Jan 11 at 23:13
HenryHenry
101k481168
101k481168
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070185%2fchoosing-an-integer-that-is-most-likely-to-be-the-sum-of-die-rolls%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown