Calculating limit of definite integral












8












$begingroup$


I need to calculate:
$$
lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}, dt
$$
The result should be $1$.



Is there a quicker way than calculating the primitive function?



I thought about seperating to $int_0^{x+1} -int_0^x$ but still can't think of the solution.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The searched limit is equal to $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Jan 31 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 31 at 15:27










  • $begingroup$
    Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
    $endgroup$
    – Henricus V.
    Jan 31 at 22:11
















8












$begingroup$


I need to calculate:
$$
lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}, dt
$$
The result should be $1$.



Is there a quicker way than calculating the primitive function?



I thought about seperating to $int_0^{x+1} -int_0^x$ but still can't think of the solution.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The searched limit is equal to $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Jan 31 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 31 at 15:27










  • $begingroup$
    Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
    $endgroup$
    – Henricus V.
    Jan 31 at 22:11














8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


I need to calculate:
$$
lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}, dt
$$
The result should be $1$.



Is there a quicker way than calculating the primitive function?



I thought about seperating to $int_0^{x+1} -int_0^x$ but still can't think of the solution.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I need to calculate:
$$
lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}, dt
$$
The result should be $1$.



Is there a quicker way than calculating the primitive function?



I thought about seperating to $int_0^{x+1} -int_0^x$ but still can't think of the solution.







limits definite-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 17:36









Paramanand Singh

50.7k557168




50.7k557168










asked Jan 31 at 15:05









IdoIdo

1025




1025












  • $begingroup$
    The searched limit is equal to $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Jan 31 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 31 at 15:27










  • $begingroup$
    Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
    $endgroup$
    – Henricus V.
    Jan 31 at 22:11


















  • $begingroup$
    The searched limit is equal to $1$
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
    Jan 31 at 15:13










  • $begingroup$
    Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 31 at 15:27










  • $begingroup$
    Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
    $endgroup$
    – Henricus V.
    Jan 31 at 22:11
















$begingroup$
The searched limit is equal to $1$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Jan 31 at 15:13




$begingroup$
The searched limit is equal to $1$
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
Jan 31 at 15:13












$begingroup$
Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 31 at 15:27




$begingroup$
Your chosen title is inappropriate, since there is no improper integral in your question.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 31 at 15:27












$begingroup$
Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
$endgroup$
– Henricus V.
Jan 31 at 22:11




$begingroup$
Can you find upper and lower bounds of the integrand?
$endgroup$
– Henricus V.
Jan 31 at 22:11










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















18












$begingroup$

Why not apply the MVT? The integral is
$$F(x+1)-F(x)=frac{F(x+1)-F(x)}{x+1-x}=F'(x_0)$$ for an $x_0$ between $x$ and $x+1$. Now $F'(x)$ certainly converges to $1$ if $x$ tends to infinity.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    15












    $begingroup$

    Note thatbegin{align}int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt&=int_x^{x+1}1,mathrm dt+int_x^{x+1}frac{-20t+7}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt\&=1-20int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt.end{align}So, all that remains to be proved is that$$lim_{xtoinfty}int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt=0.$$Can you take it from here?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
      $endgroup$
      – Ido
      Jan 31 at 15:53












    • $begingroup$
      That's what I would do, yes.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 31 at 16:08










    • $begingroup$
      I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
      $endgroup$
      – Ido
      Jan 31 at 16:30








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Jan 31 at 17:42










    • $begingroup$
      @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
      $endgroup$
      – Paramanand Singh
      Feb 1 at 17:42



















    12












    $begingroup$

    For $t > 8$ you have:



    $$0 le 1 - frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8} = frac{20t+7}{t^2+20t+8} le frac{20t+8}{t^2} le frac{21}{t}$$



    Hence integrating those inequalities on $[x,x+1]$:



    $$0 le 1- int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt le 21 int_x^{x+1} frac{dt}{t} le frac{21}{x}$$



    proving that $lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt =1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I see, thank you very much :)
      $endgroup$
      – Ido
      Jan 31 at 15:54



















    3












    $begingroup$

    For large values of $x$, the graph of $f(t) = frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}$ [you can show this by finding $f'(t)$ and show that $f'(t)$ approaches zero as $t$ approaches to infinity] is approximately horizontal, so the area represented by the integral is approximately a rectangle with width $(x + 1) - x = 1$ and height $f(x) = frac{x^2+1}{x^2+20x+8}$, which approaches 1 as $x$ approaches infinity.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hoppe
      Feb 1 at 12:09



















    2












    $begingroup$

    This is an easy consequence of the definition of limit.





    Note that the integrand $f(t) $ tends to $1$ as $ttoinfty $ and hence corresponding to every $epsilon >0$ we have a corresponding $M_{epsilon} >0$ such that $$1-epsilon <f(t) <1+epsilon $$ whenever $t>M_epsilon $. Let $x>M_epsilon $ and then integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ in interval $[x, x+1]$ we get $$1-epsilon <int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dt< 1+epsilon $$ whenever $x>M_epsilon $ and thus by definition the desired limit is $1$.



    There is nothing special about the integrand and its limit and what we have proved above can be summarized as the following




    Lemma: Let $f:[a, infty) tomathbb {R} $ be a function which is Riemann integrable on every interval of type $[a, b] $ with $b>a$ and let $f(x) to L$ as $xto infty $. Then $int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dtto L$ as $xto infty $.







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Use the estimate:
      $$frac{t-10}{t+10}<frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}<frac t{t+10}, t>1 Rightarrow \
      int_x^{x+1} frac{t-10}{t+10}dt<I(x)<int_x^{x+1} frac t{t+10}dt Rightarrow \
      1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}<I(x)<1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10} Rightarrow \
      lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right)le lim_{xtoinfty} I(x) le lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right) Rightarrow \
      lim_{xtoinfty} I(x)=lim_{xtoinfty} int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt=1.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094982%2fcalculating-limit-of-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        18












        $begingroup$

        Why not apply the MVT? The integral is
        $$F(x+1)-F(x)=frac{F(x+1)-F(x)}{x+1-x}=F'(x_0)$$ for an $x_0$ between $x$ and $x+1$. Now $F'(x)$ certainly converges to $1$ if $x$ tends to infinity.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          18












          $begingroup$

          Why not apply the MVT? The integral is
          $$F(x+1)-F(x)=frac{F(x+1)-F(x)}{x+1-x}=F'(x_0)$$ for an $x_0$ between $x$ and $x+1$. Now $F'(x)$ certainly converges to $1$ if $x$ tends to infinity.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            18












            18








            18





            $begingroup$

            Why not apply the MVT? The integral is
            $$F(x+1)-F(x)=frac{F(x+1)-F(x)}{x+1-x}=F'(x_0)$$ for an $x_0$ between $x$ and $x+1$. Now $F'(x)$ certainly converges to $1$ if $x$ tends to infinity.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Why not apply the MVT? The integral is
            $$F(x+1)-F(x)=frac{F(x+1)-F(x)}{x+1-x}=F'(x_0)$$ for an $x_0$ between $x$ and $x+1$. Now $F'(x)$ certainly converges to $1$ if $x$ tends to infinity.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 31 at 16:24









            Michael HoppeMichael Hoppe

            11.2k31837




            11.2k31837























                15












                $begingroup$

                Note thatbegin{align}int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt&=int_x^{x+1}1,mathrm dt+int_x^{x+1}frac{-20t+7}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt\&=1-20int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt.end{align}So, all that remains to be proved is that$$lim_{xtoinfty}int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt=0.$$Can you take it from here?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:53












                • $begingroup$
                  That's what I would do, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 16:08










                • $begingroup$
                  I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 16:30








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 17:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                  $endgroup$
                  – Paramanand Singh
                  Feb 1 at 17:42
















                15












                $begingroup$

                Note thatbegin{align}int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt&=int_x^{x+1}1,mathrm dt+int_x^{x+1}frac{-20t+7}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt\&=1-20int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt.end{align}So, all that remains to be proved is that$$lim_{xtoinfty}int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt=0.$$Can you take it from here?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:53












                • $begingroup$
                  That's what I would do, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 16:08










                • $begingroup$
                  I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 16:30








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 17:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                  $endgroup$
                  – Paramanand Singh
                  Feb 1 at 17:42














                15












                15








                15





                $begingroup$

                Note thatbegin{align}int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt&=int_x^{x+1}1,mathrm dt+int_x^{x+1}frac{-20t+7}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt\&=1-20int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt.end{align}So, all that remains to be proved is that$$lim_{xtoinfty}int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt=0.$$Can you take it from here?






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Note thatbegin{align}int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt&=int_x^{x+1}1,mathrm dt+int_x^{x+1}frac{-20t+7}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt\&=1-20int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt.end{align}So, all that remains to be proved is that$$lim_{xtoinfty}int_x^{x+1}frac{t-frac7{20}}{t^2+20t+8},mathrm dt=0.$$Can you take it from here?







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 31 at 15:16









                José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                167k22132235




                167k22132235












                • $begingroup$
                  Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:53












                • $begingroup$
                  That's what I would do, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 16:08










                • $begingroup$
                  I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 16:30








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 17:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                  $endgroup$
                  – Paramanand Singh
                  Feb 1 at 17:42


















                • $begingroup$
                  Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:53












                • $begingroup$
                  That's what I would do, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 16:08










                • $begingroup$
                  I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 16:30








                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                  $endgroup$
                  – José Carlos Santos
                  Jan 31 at 17:42










                • $begingroup$
                  @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                  $endgroup$
                  – Paramanand Singh
                  Feb 1 at 17:42
















                $begingroup$
                Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 15:53






                $begingroup$
                Oh i thought about it too, but wasn't sure how to continue. so i guess i prove it with the squeeze theorem like the answer of mathcounterexamples?
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 15:53














                $begingroup$
                That's what I would do, yes.
                $endgroup$
                – José Carlos Santos
                Jan 31 at 16:08




                $begingroup$
                That's what I would do, yes.
                $endgroup$
                – José Carlos Santos
                Jan 31 at 16:08












                $begingroup$
                I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 16:30






                $begingroup$
                I've got one more question - I now understand the idea of using the squeeze theorem, but is it legitimate to argue that when $x$ goes to $infty$ than the "t" function goes to $1$, and claim that therefore the result is the limit of $1*(x+1-x)=1$? thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 16:30






                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                $endgroup$
                – José Carlos Santos
                Jan 31 at 17:42




                $begingroup$
                A proof can be found along these lines, yes.
                $endgroup$
                – José Carlos Santos
                Jan 31 at 17:42












                $begingroup$
                @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                $endgroup$
                – Paramanand Singh
                Feb 1 at 17:42




                $begingroup$
                @Ido: see my answer for a "proof along these lines".
                $endgroup$
                – Paramanand Singh
                Feb 1 at 17:42











                12












                $begingroup$

                For $t > 8$ you have:



                $$0 le 1 - frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8} = frac{20t+7}{t^2+20t+8} le frac{20t+8}{t^2} le frac{21}{t}$$



                Hence integrating those inequalities on $[x,x+1]$:



                $$0 le 1- int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt le 21 int_x^{x+1} frac{dt}{t} le frac{21}{x}$$



                proving that $lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt =1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I see, thank you very much :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:54
















                12












                $begingroup$

                For $t > 8$ you have:



                $$0 le 1 - frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8} = frac{20t+7}{t^2+20t+8} le frac{20t+8}{t^2} le frac{21}{t}$$



                Hence integrating those inequalities on $[x,x+1]$:



                $$0 le 1- int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt le 21 int_x^{x+1} frac{dt}{t} le frac{21}{x}$$



                proving that $lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt =1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I see, thank you very much :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:54














                12












                12








                12





                $begingroup$

                For $t > 8$ you have:



                $$0 le 1 - frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8} = frac{20t+7}{t^2+20t+8} le frac{20t+8}{t^2} le frac{21}{t}$$



                Hence integrating those inequalities on $[x,x+1]$:



                $$0 le 1- int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt le 21 int_x^{x+1} frac{dt}{t} le frac{21}{x}$$



                proving that $lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt =1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                For $t > 8$ you have:



                $$0 le 1 - frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8} = frac{20t+7}{t^2+20t+8} le frac{20t+8}{t^2} le frac{21}{t}$$



                Hence integrating those inequalities on $[x,x+1]$:



                $$0 le 1- int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt le 21 int_x^{x+1} frac{dt}{t} le frac{21}{x}$$



                proving that $lim_{xto infty} int_x^{x+1} frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt =1$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Feb 1 at 9:39

























                answered Jan 31 at 15:15









                mathcounterexamples.netmathcounterexamples.net

                27k22158




                27k22158












                • $begingroup$
                  I see, thank you very much :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:54


















                • $begingroup$
                  I see, thank you very much :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ido
                  Jan 31 at 15:54
















                $begingroup$
                I see, thank you very much :)
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 15:54




                $begingroup$
                I see, thank you very much :)
                $endgroup$
                – Ido
                Jan 31 at 15:54











                3












                $begingroup$

                For large values of $x$, the graph of $f(t) = frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}$ [you can show this by finding $f'(t)$ and show that $f'(t)$ approaches zero as $t$ approaches to infinity] is approximately horizontal, so the area represented by the integral is approximately a rectangle with width $(x + 1) - x = 1$ and height $f(x) = frac{x^2+1}{x^2+20x+8}$, which approaches 1 as $x$ approaches infinity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Hoppe
                  Feb 1 at 12:09
















                3












                $begingroup$

                For large values of $x$, the graph of $f(t) = frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}$ [you can show this by finding $f'(t)$ and show that $f'(t)$ approaches zero as $t$ approaches to infinity] is approximately horizontal, so the area represented by the integral is approximately a rectangle with width $(x + 1) - x = 1$ and height $f(x) = frac{x^2+1}{x^2+20x+8}$, which approaches 1 as $x$ approaches infinity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Hoppe
                  Feb 1 at 12:09














                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                For large values of $x$, the graph of $f(t) = frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}$ [you can show this by finding $f'(t)$ and show that $f'(t)$ approaches zero as $t$ approaches to infinity] is approximately horizontal, so the area represented by the integral is approximately a rectangle with width $(x + 1) - x = 1$ and height $f(x) = frac{x^2+1}{x^2+20x+8}$, which approaches 1 as $x$ approaches infinity.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                For large values of $x$, the graph of $f(t) = frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}$ [you can show this by finding $f'(t)$ and show that $f'(t)$ approaches zero as $t$ approaches to infinity] is approximately horizontal, so the area represented by the integral is approximately a rectangle with width $(x + 1) - x = 1$ and height $f(x) = frac{x^2+1}{x^2+20x+8}$, which approaches 1 as $x$ approaches infinity.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 1 at 6:55









                11235813211123581321

                17418




                17418












                • $begingroup$
                  That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Hoppe
                  Feb 1 at 12:09


















                • $begingroup$
                  That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Michael Hoppe
                  Feb 1 at 12:09
















                $begingroup$
                That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                $endgroup$
                – Michael Hoppe
                Feb 1 at 12:09




                $begingroup$
                That's a visualisation of the approach via MVT.
                $endgroup$
                – Michael Hoppe
                Feb 1 at 12:09











                2












                $begingroup$

                This is an easy consequence of the definition of limit.





                Note that the integrand $f(t) $ tends to $1$ as $ttoinfty $ and hence corresponding to every $epsilon >0$ we have a corresponding $M_{epsilon} >0$ such that $$1-epsilon <f(t) <1+epsilon $$ whenever $t>M_epsilon $. Let $x>M_epsilon $ and then integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ in interval $[x, x+1]$ we get $$1-epsilon <int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dt< 1+epsilon $$ whenever $x>M_epsilon $ and thus by definition the desired limit is $1$.



                There is nothing special about the integrand and its limit and what we have proved above can be summarized as the following




                Lemma: Let $f:[a, infty) tomathbb {R} $ be a function which is Riemann integrable on every interval of type $[a, b] $ with $b>a$ and let $f(x) to L$ as $xto infty $. Then $int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dtto L$ as $xto infty $.







                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  This is an easy consequence of the definition of limit.





                  Note that the integrand $f(t) $ tends to $1$ as $ttoinfty $ and hence corresponding to every $epsilon >0$ we have a corresponding $M_{epsilon} >0$ such that $$1-epsilon <f(t) <1+epsilon $$ whenever $t>M_epsilon $. Let $x>M_epsilon $ and then integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ in interval $[x, x+1]$ we get $$1-epsilon <int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dt< 1+epsilon $$ whenever $x>M_epsilon $ and thus by definition the desired limit is $1$.



                  There is nothing special about the integrand and its limit and what we have proved above can be summarized as the following




                  Lemma: Let $f:[a, infty) tomathbb {R} $ be a function which is Riemann integrable on every interval of type $[a, b] $ with $b>a$ and let $f(x) to L$ as $xto infty $. Then $int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dtto L$ as $xto infty $.







                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    This is an easy consequence of the definition of limit.





                    Note that the integrand $f(t) $ tends to $1$ as $ttoinfty $ and hence corresponding to every $epsilon >0$ we have a corresponding $M_{epsilon} >0$ such that $$1-epsilon <f(t) <1+epsilon $$ whenever $t>M_epsilon $. Let $x>M_epsilon $ and then integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ in interval $[x, x+1]$ we get $$1-epsilon <int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dt< 1+epsilon $$ whenever $x>M_epsilon $ and thus by definition the desired limit is $1$.



                    There is nothing special about the integrand and its limit and what we have proved above can be summarized as the following




                    Lemma: Let $f:[a, infty) tomathbb {R} $ be a function which is Riemann integrable on every interval of type $[a, b] $ with $b>a$ and let $f(x) to L$ as $xto infty $. Then $int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dtto L$ as $xto infty $.







                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    This is an easy consequence of the definition of limit.





                    Note that the integrand $f(t) $ tends to $1$ as $ttoinfty $ and hence corresponding to every $epsilon >0$ we have a corresponding $M_{epsilon} >0$ such that $$1-epsilon <f(t) <1+epsilon $$ whenever $t>M_epsilon $. Let $x>M_epsilon $ and then integrating the above inequality with respect to $t$ in interval $[x, x+1]$ we get $$1-epsilon <int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dt< 1+epsilon $$ whenever $x>M_epsilon $ and thus by definition the desired limit is $1$.



                    There is nothing special about the integrand and its limit and what we have proved above can be summarized as the following




                    Lemma: Let $f:[a, infty) tomathbb {R} $ be a function which is Riemann integrable on every interval of type $[a, b] $ with $b>a$ and let $f(x) to L$ as $xto infty $. Then $int_{x} ^{x+1}f(t),dtto L$ as $xto infty $.








                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 1 at 17:40

























                    answered Feb 1 at 17:27









                    Paramanand SinghParamanand Singh

                    50.7k557168




                    50.7k557168























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Use the estimate:
                        $$frac{t-10}{t+10}<frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}<frac t{t+10}, t>1 Rightarrow \
                        int_x^{x+1} frac{t-10}{t+10}dt<I(x)<int_x^{x+1} frac t{t+10}dt Rightarrow \
                        1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}<I(x)<1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10} Rightarrow \
                        lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right)le lim_{xtoinfty} I(x) le lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right) Rightarrow \
                        lim_{xtoinfty} I(x)=lim_{xtoinfty} int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt=1.$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Use the estimate:
                          $$frac{t-10}{t+10}<frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}<frac t{t+10}, t>1 Rightarrow \
                          int_x^{x+1} frac{t-10}{t+10}dt<I(x)<int_x^{x+1} frac t{t+10}dt Rightarrow \
                          1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}<I(x)<1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10} Rightarrow \
                          lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right)le lim_{xtoinfty} I(x) le lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right) Rightarrow \
                          lim_{xtoinfty} I(x)=lim_{xtoinfty} int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt=1.$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Use the estimate:
                            $$frac{t-10}{t+10}<frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}<frac t{t+10}, t>1 Rightarrow \
                            int_x^{x+1} frac{t-10}{t+10}dt<I(x)<int_x^{x+1} frac t{t+10}dt Rightarrow \
                            1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}<I(x)<1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10} Rightarrow \
                            lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right)le lim_{xtoinfty} I(x) le lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right) Rightarrow \
                            lim_{xtoinfty} I(x)=lim_{xtoinfty} int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt=1.$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Use the estimate:
                            $$frac{t-10}{t+10}<frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}<frac t{t+10}, t>1 Rightarrow \
                            int_x^{x+1} frac{t-10}{t+10}dt<I(x)<int_x^{x+1} frac t{t+10}dt Rightarrow \
                            1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}<I(x)<1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10} Rightarrow \
                            lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-20ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right)le lim_{xtoinfty} I(x) le lim_{xtoinfty} left(1-10ln frac{x+11}{x+10}right) Rightarrow \
                            lim_{xtoinfty} I(x)=lim_{xtoinfty} int_x^{x+1}frac{t^2+1}{t^2+20t+8}dt=1.$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Feb 1 at 19:50









                            farruhotafarruhota

                            21k2841




                            21k2841






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3094982%2fcalculating-limit-of-definite-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Human spaceflight

                                Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                                張江高科駅