Taking seats on a plane (Revisited)
$begingroup$
Most of you would be familiar with the plane seating problem. See this if not
I was trying to solve a similar problem. What is the probability that the $i^{th}$ chair is not occupied, after $k$ people are seated? ($k<i)$
I will use the notation $P(i,k)$ for denoting the probability.
I tried to write a recursive relation and came up with this:
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k|i,k-1)*P(i,k-1)$$
Now for writing P(i,k|i,k-1) which encapsulates one trial where the $k^{th}$ person comes and picks a seat, I considered two cases naturally: If chair $k$ was picked earlier and if it was not.
If chair $k$ was picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is $frac{n-k}{n-k+1}$. This is because there are $n-k+1$ remaining chairs after $k-1$ people are seated.
If chair $k$ was not picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is 1, as the person will pick the assigned chair.
So summing it up
$$ P(i,k | i,k-1) = P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1} $$
So the final recursion becomes
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)(P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1})$$
Now I use some intuitive reasoning to claim that $P(m,k) = P(n,k)$ for all $m,n$ where $m,n > k$. The logic is that for all the $k$ people coming, seats $m$ and $n$ are symmetric. They are part of a random pool of other seats from which they choose from if their seat is occupied. They only have a preference to their seat. So the probability that 3rd seat is unoccupied after 2 people are seated is the same as the probability for the 4th seat. So using this fact the recursion becomes linear in space to be :
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)*(P(i,k-1)+(1-P(i,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1}) $$
However the answer comes out to be wrong. I checked for the case (100,99) (Probability that 100 is unoccupied after 99 are seated) which should be equal to 0.5. Can someone find the flaw (or flaws) in the argument above?
probability-theory discrete-mathematics recursion
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most of you would be familiar with the plane seating problem. See this if not
I was trying to solve a similar problem. What is the probability that the $i^{th}$ chair is not occupied, after $k$ people are seated? ($k<i)$
I will use the notation $P(i,k)$ for denoting the probability.
I tried to write a recursive relation and came up with this:
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k|i,k-1)*P(i,k-1)$$
Now for writing P(i,k|i,k-1) which encapsulates one trial where the $k^{th}$ person comes and picks a seat, I considered two cases naturally: If chair $k$ was picked earlier and if it was not.
If chair $k$ was picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is $frac{n-k}{n-k+1}$. This is because there are $n-k+1$ remaining chairs after $k-1$ people are seated.
If chair $k$ was not picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is 1, as the person will pick the assigned chair.
So summing it up
$$ P(i,k | i,k-1) = P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1} $$
So the final recursion becomes
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)(P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1})$$
Now I use some intuitive reasoning to claim that $P(m,k) = P(n,k)$ for all $m,n$ where $m,n > k$. The logic is that for all the $k$ people coming, seats $m$ and $n$ are symmetric. They are part of a random pool of other seats from which they choose from if their seat is occupied. They only have a preference to their seat. So the probability that 3rd seat is unoccupied after 2 people are seated is the same as the probability for the 4th seat. So using this fact the recursion becomes linear in space to be :
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)*(P(i,k-1)+(1-P(i,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1}) $$
However the answer comes out to be wrong. I checked for the case (100,99) (Probability that 100 is unoccupied after 99 are seated) which should be equal to 0.5. Can someone find the flaw (or flaws) in the argument above?
probability-theory discrete-mathematics recursion
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Most of you would be familiar with the plane seating problem. See this if not
I was trying to solve a similar problem. What is the probability that the $i^{th}$ chair is not occupied, after $k$ people are seated? ($k<i)$
I will use the notation $P(i,k)$ for denoting the probability.
I tried to write a recursive relation and came up with this:
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k|i,k-1)*P(i,k-1)$$
Now for writing P(i,k|i,k-1) which encapsulates one trial where the $k^{th}$ person comes and picks a seat, I considered two cases naturally: If chair $k$ was picked earlier and if it was not.
If chair $k$ was picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is $frac{n-k}{n-k+1}$. This is because there are $n-k+1$ remaining chairs after $k-1$ people are seated.
If chair $k$ was not picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is 1, as the person will pick the assigned chair.
So summing it up
$$ P(i,k | i,k-1) = P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1} $$
So the final recursion becomes
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)(P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1})$$
Now I use some intuitive reasoning to claim that $P(m,k) = P(n,k)$ for all $m,n$ where $m,n > k$. The logic is that for all the $k$ people coming, seats $m$ and $n$ are symmetric. They are part of a random pool of other seats from which they choose from if their seat is occupied. They only have a preference to their seat. So the probability that 3rd seat is unoccupied after 2 people are seated is the same as the probability for the 4th seat. So using this fact the recursion becomes linear in space to be :
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)*(P(i,k-1)+(1-P(i,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1}) $$
However the answer comes out to be wrong. I checked for the case (100,99) (Probability that 100 is unoccupied after 99 are seated) which should be equal to 0.5. Can someone find the flaw (or flaws) in the argument above?
probability-theory discrete-mathematics recursion
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
$endgroup$
Most of you would be familiar with the plane seating problem. See this if not
I was trying to solve a similar problem. What is the probability that the $i^{th}$ chair is not occupied, after $k$ people are seated? ($k<i)$
I will use the notation $P(i,k)$ for denoting the probability.
I tried to write a recursive relation and came up with this:
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k|i,k-1)*P(i,k-1)$$
Now for writing P(i,k|i,k-1) which encapsulates one trial where the $k^{th}$ person comes and picks a seat, I considered two cases naturally: If chair $k$ was picked earlier and if it was not.
If chair $k$ was picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is $frac{n-k}{n-k+1}$. This is because there are $n-k+1$ remaining chairs after $k-1$ people are seated.
If chair $k$ was not picked earlier, then probability that chair $i$ is not picked is 1, as the person will pick the assigned chair.
So summing it up
$$ P(i,k | i,k-1) = P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1} $$
So the final recursion becomes
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)(P(k,k-1)*1 + (1-P(k,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1})$$
Now I use some intuitive reasoning to claim that $P(m,k) = P(n,k)$ for all $m,n$ where $m,n > k$. The logic is that for all the $k$ people coming, seats $m$ and $n$ are symmetric. They are part of a random pool of other seats from which they choose from if their seat is occupied. They only have a preference to their seat. So the probability that 3rd seat is unoccupied after 2 people are seated is the same as the probability for the 4th seat. So using this fact the recursion becomes linear in space to be :
$$ P(i,k) = P(i,k-1)*(P(i,k-1)+(1-P(i,k-1))frac{n-k}{n-k+1}) $$
However the answer comes out to be wrong. I checked for the case (100,99) (Probability that 100 is unoccupied after 99 are seated) which should be equal to 0.5. Can someone find the flaw (or flaws) in the argument above?
probability-theory discrete-mathematics recursion
probability-theory discrete-mathematics recursion
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
asked Jan 1 at 12:34
cobra121cobra121
112
112
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058445%2ftaking-seats-on-a-plane-revisited%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058445%2ftaking-seats-on-a-plane-revisited%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
what did you get for (100,99)?
$endgroup$
– Zachary Hunter
Jan 2 at 6:14
$begingroup$
0.64. I used (100,1) to be 98/99.
$endgroup$
– cobra121
Jan 3 at 16:32