Commutative Banach algebras and maximum ideal space












4














Let $A, B$ be commutative unital Banach algebras and let $varphi: A rightarrow B$ be a continuous unital map such that $$overline{varphi(A)} = B$$



Let $$varphi^{*}: text{Max}(B) rightarrow text{Max}(A)$$
$$varphi^{*}(m) = m(varphi)$$
be the map from the space of maximal ideals of $B$ to the space of maximal ideals of $A$ induced by $varphi$.



How to prove that $varphi^{*}$ is a topologically injective map?



(Recall that an operator $T: X rightarrow Y$ is called topologically injective if $T: X rightarrow text{im}(T)$ is a homeomorphism)



My progress on the problem is the following: first of all, the space of maximal ideals of a commutative Banach algebra $A$ can be identified with the space of continuous functionals of the form $m: A rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Clearly the map above is continuous, since the pointwise convergence of a net $(n_{i})$ in $text{Max}(B)$ implies the convergence of the net $ m_{i} circ varphi) $



(the space of continuous linear functional is endowed with the weak* topology)



If we assume for the moment that the map is bijective, then the fact that a continuous bijective map between compact Hausdorff spaces is a homeomorphism, yields the result.



(here the space of maximal ideals is compact in weak* topology since the algebra is unital)



The suggested proposition looks like a relaxation of the aformentioned reasoning above though i cannot figure out an easy way to modify it to make it work. Are there any hints?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    2 days ago
















4














Let $A, B$ be commutative unital Banach algebras and let $varphi: A rightarrow B$ be a continuous unital map such that $$overline{varphi(A)} = B$$



Let $$varphi^{*}: text{Max}(B) rightarrow text{Max}(A)$$
$$varphi^{*}(m) = m(varphi)$$
be the map from the space of maximal ideals of $B$ to the space of maximal ideals of $A$ induced by $varphi$.



How to prove that $varphi^{*}$ is a topologically injective map?



(Recall that an operator $T: X rightarrow Y$ is called topologically injective if $T: X rightarrow text{im}(T)$ is a homeomorphism)



My progress on the problem is the following: first of all, the space of maximal ideals of a commutative Banach algebra $A$ can be identified with the space of continuous functionals of the form $m: A rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Clearly the map above is continuous, since the pointwise convergence of a net $(n_{i})$ in $text{Max}(B)$ implies the convergence of the net $ m_{i} circ varphi) $



(the space of continuous linear functional is endowed with the weak* topology)



If we assume for the moment that the map is bijective, then the fact that a continuous bijective map between compact Hausdorff spaces is a homeomorphism, yields the result.



(here the space of maximal ideals is compact in weak* topology since the algebra is unital)



The suggested proposition looks like a relaxation of the aformentioned reasoning above though i cannot figure out an easy way to modify it to make it work. Are there any hints?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    2 days ago














4












4








4







Let $A, B$ be commutative unital Banach algebras and let $varphi: A rightarrow B$ be a continuous unital map such that $$overline{varphi(A)} = B$$



Let $$varphi^{*}: text{Max}(B) rightarrow text{Max}(A)$$
$$varphi^{*}(m) = m(varphi)$$
be the map from the space of maximal ideals of $B$ to the space of maximal ideals of $A$ induced by $varphi$.



How to prove that $varphi^{*}$ is a topologically injective map?



(Recall that an operator $T: X rightarrow Y$ is called topologically injective if $T: X rightarrow text{im}(T)$ is a homeomorphism)



My progress on the problem is the following: first of all, the space of maximal ideals of a commutative Banach algebra $A$ can be identified with the space of continuous functionals of the form $m: A rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Clearly the map above is continuous, since the pointwise convergence of a net $(n_{i})$ in $text{Max}(B)$ implies the convergence of the net $ m_{i} circ varphi) $



(the space of continuous linear functional is endowed with the weak* topology)



If we assume for the moment that the map is bijective, then the fact that a continuous bijective map between compact Hausdorff spaces is a homeomorphism, yields the result.



(here the space of maximal ideals is compact in weak* topology since the algebra is unital)



The suggested proposition looks like a relaxation of the aformentioned reasoning above though i cannot figure out an easy way to modify it to make it work. Are there any hints?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $A, B$ be commutative unital Banach algebras and let $varphi: A rightarrow B$ be a continuous unital map such that $$overline{varphi(A)} = B$$



Let $$varphi^{*}: text{Max}(B) rightarrow text{Max}(A)$$
$$varphi^{*}(m) = m(varphi)$$
be the map from the space of maximal ideals of $B$ to the space of maximal ideals of $A$ induced by $varphi$.



How to prove that $varphi^{*}$ is a topologically injective map?



(Recall that an operator $T: X rightarrow Y$ is called topologically injective if $T: X rightarrow text{im}(T)$ is a homeomorphism)



My progress on the problem is the following: first of all, the space of maximal ideals of a commutative Banach algebra $A$ can be identified with the space of continuous functionals of the form $m: A rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Clearly the map above is continuous, since the pointwise convergence of a net $(n_{i})$ in $text{Max}(B)$ implies the convergence of the net $ m_{i} circ varphi) $



(the space of continuous linear functional is endowed with the weak* topology)



If we assume for the moment that the map is bijective, then the fact that a continuous bijective map between compact Hausdorff spaces is a homeomorphism, yields the result.



(here the space of maximal ideals is compact in weak* topology since the algebra is unital)



The suggested proposition looks like a relaxation of the aformentioned reasoning above though i cannot figure out an easy way to modify it to make it work. Are there any hints?







functional-analysis maximal-and-prime-ideals banach-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 26 at 1:03

























asked Dec 26 at 0:57









hyperkahler

1,501714




1,501714












  • You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    2 days ago


















  • You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    2 days ago
















You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
– Adrián González-Pérez
2 days ago




You need to use the fact that all characters in the spectrum are of norm one to relate the topology of $mathrm{im}(varphi^ast)$ with the topology of $mathrm{Max}(B)$.
– Adrián González-Pérez
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Use that all characters are of norm one.



Indeed, they are bounded since their kernel is a maximal ideal and therefore closed. The fact that they are contractive follows from spectral theory. If $a - lambda 1$ is invertible so is $chi(a) - lambda$. The counter-reciprocal gives that when $lambda$ is in the image of $a$ under $chi$ then $a - lambda 1$ is not invertible and so
$$
|chi(a)| leq sup { |lambda| : lambda in mathrm{sp}(a) } leq | a |
$$



Using the fact that $varphi[A]$ is dense in $B$ you have that if two continuous functional $varphi_1$ and $varphi_2$ agree on $varphi[A]$, then they are equal. This gives the injectivity.



For topological injectivity you need to see that if $varphi^ast(chi_n) = chi_n circ varphi in mathrm{im}(varphi^*)subset mathrm{Max}(A)$ converge to $chi circ varphi$ then $chi_n to chi$ in $mathrm{Max}(B)$. Let $b in B$, we can find $a_epsilon$ with $|varphi(a_epsilon) - b| < epsilon$ and
begin{eqnarray*}
|chi_n(b) - chi(b) | & leq &| chi_n(b) - chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon))| + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + | chi(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(b)|\
& leq & epsilon + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + epsilon.
end{eqnarray*}

But that implies that the limit of $|chi_n(b) - chi(b)|$ is smaller or equal than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon$ and therefore $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052551%2fcommutative-banach-algebras-and-maximum-ideal-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Use that all characters are of norm one.



    Indeed, they are bounded since their kernel is a maximal ideal and therefore closed. The fact that they are contractive follows from spectral theory. If $a - lambda 1$ is invertible so is $chi(a) - lambda$. The counter-reciprocal gives that when $lambda$ is in the image of $a$ under $chi$ then $a - lambda 1$ is not invertible and so
    $$
    |chi(a)| leq sup { |lambda| : lambda in mathrm{sp}(a) } leq | a |
    $$



    Using the fact that $varphi[A]$ is dense in $B$ you have that if two continuous functional $varphi_1$ and $varphi_2$ agree on $varphi[A]$, then they are equal. This gives the injectivity.



    For topological injectivity you need to see that if $varphi^ast(chi_n) = chi_n circ varphi in mathrm{im}(varphi^*)subset mathrm{Max}(A)$ converge to $chi circ varphi$ then $chi_n to chi$ in $mathrm{Max}(B)$. Let $b in B$, we can find $a_epsilon$ with $|varphi(a_epsilon) - b| < epsilon$ and
    begin{eqnarray*}
    |chi_n(b) - chi(b) | & leq &| chi_n(b) - chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon))| + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + | chi(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(b)|\
    & leq & epsilon + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + epsilon.
    end{eqnarray*}

    But that implies that the limit of $|chi_n(b) - chi(b)|$ is smaller or equal than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon$ and therefore $0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      Use that all characters are of norm one.



      Indeed, they are bounded since their kernel is a maximal ideal and therefore closed. The fact that they are contractive follows from spectral theory. If $a - lambda 1$ is invertible so is $chi(a) - lambda$. The counter-reciprocal gives that when $lambda$ is in the image of $a$ under $chi$ then $a - lambda 1$ is not invertible and so
      $$
      |chi(a)| leq sup { |lambda| : lambda in mathrm{sp}(a) } leq | a |
      $$



      Using the fact that $varphi[A]$ is dense in $B$ you have that if two continuous functional $varphi_1$ and $varphi_2$ agree on $varphi[A]$, then they are equal. This gives the injectivity.



      For topological injectivity you need to see that if $varphi^ast(chi_n) = chi_n circ varphi in mathrm{im}(varphi^*)subset mathrm{Max}(A)$ converge to $chi circ varphi$ then $chi_n to chi$ in $mathrm{Max}(B)$. Let $b in B$, we can find $a_epsilon$ with $|varphi(a_epsilon) - b| < epsilon$ and
      begin{eqnarray*}
      |chi_n(b) - chi(b) | & leq &| chi_n(b) - chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon))| + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + | chi(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(b)|\
      & leq & epsilon + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + epsilon.
      end{eqnarray*}

      But that implies that the limit of $|chi_n(b) - chi(b)|$ is smaller or equal than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon$ and therefore $0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        Use that all characters are of norm one.



        Indeed, they are bounded since their kernel is a maximal ideal and therefore closed. The fact that they are contractive follows from spectral theory. If $a - lambda 1$ is invertible so is $chi(a) - lambda$. The counter-reciprocal gives that when $lambda$ is in the image of $a$ under $chi$ then $a - lambda 1$ is not invertible and so
        $$
        |chi(a)| leq sup { |lambda| : lambda in mathrm{sp}(a) } leq | a |
        $$



        Using the fact that $varphi[A]$ is dense in $B$ you have that if two continuous functional $varphi_1$ and $varphi_2$ agree on $varphi[A]$, then they are equal. This gives the injectivity.



        For topological injectivity you need to see that if $varphi^ast(chi_n) = chi_n circ varphi in mathrm{im}(varphi^*)subset mathrm{Max}(A)$ converge to $chi circ varphi$ then $chi_n to chi$ in $mathrm{Max}(B)$. Let $b in B$, we can find $a_epsilon$ with $|varphi(a_epsilon) - b| < epsilon$ and
        begin{eqnarray*}
        |chi_n(b) - chi(b) | & leq &| chi_n(b) - chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon))| + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + | chi(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(b)|\
        & leq & epsilon + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + epsilon.
        end{eqnarray*}

        But that implies that the limit of $|chi_n(b) - chi(b)|$ is smaller or equal than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon$ and therefore $0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Use that all characters are of norm one.



        Indeed, they are bounded since their kernel is a maximal ideal and therefore closed. The fact that they are contractive follows from spectral theory. If $a - lambda 1$ is invertible so is $chi(a) - lambda$. The counter-reciprocal gives that when $lambda$ is in the image of $a$ under $chi$ then $a - lambda 1$ is not invertible and so
        $$
        |chi(a)| leq sup { |lambda| : lambda in mathrm{sp}(a) } leq | a |
        $$



        Using the fact that $varphi[A]$ is dense in $B$ you have that if two continuous functional $varphi_1$ and $varphi_2$ agree on $varphi[A]$, then they are equal. This gives the injectivity.



        For topological injectivity you need to see that if $varphi^ast(chi_n) = chi_n circ varphi in mathrm{im}(varphi^*)subset mathrm{Max}(A)$ converge to $chi circ varphi$ then $chi_n to chi$ in $mathrm{Max}(B)$. Let $b in B$, we can find $a_epsilon$ with $|varphi(a_epsilon) - b| < epsilon$ and
        begin{eqnarray*}
        |chi_n(b) - chi(b) | & leq &| chi_n(b) - chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon))| + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + | chi(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(b)|\
        & leq & epsilon + |chi_n(varphi(a_epsilon)) - chi(varphi(a_epsilon))| + epsilon.
        end{eqnarray*}

        But that implies that the limit of $|chi_n(b) - chi(b)|$ is smaller or equal than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon$ and therefore $0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Adrián González-Pérez

        971138




        971138






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052551%2fcommutative-banach-algebras-and-maximum-ideal-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg