Possible characterization of compact metric spaces via real-valued uniformly continuous functions?
1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?
(Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )
metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces
add a comment |
1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?
(Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )
metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces
add a comment |
1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?
(Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )
metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces
1) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is bounded, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
2) If $X$ is a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f: X to mathbb R$ is compact, then is it necessarily true that $X$ is compact ?
If either of (1) or (2) is not true, what happens if we also assume $X$ is complete ?
(Note that (1), hence (2), is true if we require all real valued "continuous" image to be bounded ... )
metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces
metric-spaces compactness uniform-continuity complete-spaces
edited Dec 29 '18 at 2:28
user521337
asked Dec 29 '18 at 2:21
user521337user521337
9911315
9911315
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.
Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.
Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.
Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.
By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.
Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
|
show 9 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055475%2fpossible-characterization-of-compact-metric-spaces-via-real-valued-uniformly-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.
Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.
Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.
Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.
By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.
Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
|
show 9 more comments
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.
Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.
Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.
Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.
By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.
Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
|
show 9 more comments
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.
Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.
Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.
Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.
By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.
Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.
I'm not sure if you're familiar with this, but for (1) you can take $X$ to be the closed unit ball of any Banach space. Because $X$ is bounded, any uniformly continuous $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is bounded. However, $X$ is not compact. Note that $X$ is complete.
Proof that any uniformly continuous function $f$ from a bounded convex linear set $V$ to a metric space $W$ must be bounded: Since $V$ is bounded, there exists $vin V$ and $r>0$ such that $V=B_r^V(v)$. Since $f$ is uniformly continuous, for $varepsilon=1$ we find $delta>0$ such that $d(x,y)leqdeltaimplies d(f(x),f(y))leqvarepsilon=1$. Then for any $xin V$ we can move from $v$ to $x$ in steps of size $leqdelta$. This can be done in $lceil d(v,x)/deltarceilleq r/delta+1$ steps. By the triangle inequality, we get $d(f(v),f(x))leq r/delta+1$.
Statement (2) is true, actually. Let $X$ be a metric space such that the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is compact. In particular, the image of every uniformly continuous function $f:Xtomathbb{R}$ is closed, which is all we really need. The goal is to show that $X$ is compact, which means that every sequence has a convergent subsequence. So let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in $X$.
Consider the function $$f(x):=supleft{1-frac1n-d(x,x_n):ninmathbb{N}right}.$$ We want to show $f$ is uniformly continuous. Let $varepsilon>0$ and choose $delta=varepsilon>0$. Let $x,yin X$ with $d(x,y)<delta$. Assume without loss of generality that $f(y)geq f(x)$, so $d(f(x),f(y))=f(y)-f(x)$. Then $f(x)geq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$. We get $$1-frac1n-d(y,x_n)leq1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)+d(x,y)leq f(x)+delta$$ for all $ninmathbb{N}$, so $f(y)leq f(x)+delta$, so $d(f(x),f(y))leqdelta=varepsilon$.
By hypothesis, because $f$ is uniformly continuous, the image $f(X)$ is closed. Since $f(x_n)=1-frac1nto1$ as $ntoinfty$ we find $1inoverline{f(X)}$. Because $f(X)$ is closed, there exists $xin X$ such that $f(x)=1$. We can use this to find a subsequence of ${x_n}$ converging to $x$ as follows.
Take $x_{n_1}=x_1$. Then if $x_{n_k}$ is defined, by definition of the supremum there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $1-frac1n-d(x,x_n)>1-frac1{n_k}$. We define $x_{n_{k+1}}=x_n$. This way, ${n_k}$ is increasing, and $1-frac1{n_k}-d(x,x_{n_k})to1$, so $d(x,x_{n_k})to0$, so $x_{n_k}to x$. Therefore, $X$ is compact.
edited Dec 29 '18 at 12:45
answered Dec 29 '18 at 2:39
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
3,251516
3,251516
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
|
show 9 more comments
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
why is the image of $f$ compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:47
1
1
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I thought a compact function is a function that maps compact sets to compact sets. If you want a function which has a compact image, just take $X$ as the closed unit ball.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:49
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
I specifically said that I want the image of $f$ to be compact .... but again ... why is the image of every $f$ in your example compact ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 2:50
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
Sorry misread that, and I see your point, indeed the image need not be compact. It is bounded though, but I'll continue thinking about this.
– SmileyCraft
Dec 29 '18 at 2:54
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
why is it even bounded ?
– user521337
Dec 29 '18 at 3:08
|
show 9 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055475%2fpossible-characterization-of-compact-metric-spaces-via-real-valued-uniformly-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown