On a special type of sequence in complete metric space
Let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in a complete metric space $X$ such that for every uniformly continuous function $f:X to mathbb R$, the sequence ${f(x_n)}$ is convergent in $mathbb R$. Then is it true that ${x_n}$ is convergent ?
My try: If ${x_n}$ has a convergent subsequence, then ${x_n}$ converges. Indeed, if ${x_{k_n}}$ is a convergent subsequence with limit $yin X$ , then since the function $ f: X to mathbb R $ defined as $f(x)=d(x,y), forall xin X$ is uniformly continuous, so $lim f(x_n)=lim d(x_n,y)$ exists, but since $lim d(x_{k_n},y)=0$, so $lim d(x_n,y)=0$, thus ${x_n}$ converges to $y$.
Unfortunately, I am unable to decide whether ${x_n} $ has a convergent (or for that matter, just Cauchy, since $X$ is complete) subsequence or not.
metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
add a comment |
Let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in a complete metric space $X$ such that for every uniformly continuous function $f:X to mathbb R$, the sequence ${f(x_n)}$ is convergent in $mathbb R$. Then is it true that ${x_n}$ is convergent ?
My try: If ${x_n}$ has a convergent subsequence, then ${x_n}$ converges. Indeed, if ${x_{k_n}}$ is a convergent subsequence with limit $yin X$ , then since the function $ f: X to mathbb R $ defined as $f(x)=d(x,y), forall xin X$ is uniformly continuous, so $lim f(x_n)=lim d(x_n,y)$ exists, but since $lim d(x_{k_n},y)=0$, so $lim d(x_n,y)=0$, thus ${x_n}$ converges to $y$.
Unfortunately, I am unable to decide whether ${x_n} $ has a convergent (or for that matter, just Cauchy, since $X$ is complete) subsequence or not.
metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
add a comment |
Let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in a complete metric space $X$ such that for every uniformly continuous function $f:X to mathbb R$, the sequence ${f(x_n)}$ is convergent in $mathbb R$. Then is it true that ${x_n}$ is convergent ?
My try: If ${x_n}$ has a convergent subsequence, then ${x_n}$ converges. Indeed, if ${x_{k_n}}$ is a convergent subsequence with limit $yin X$ , then since the function $ f: X to mathbb R $ defined as $f(x)=d(x,y), forall xin X$ is uniformly continuous, so $lim f(x_n)=lim d(x_n,y)$ exists, but since $lim d(x_{k_n},y)=0$, so $lim d(x_n,y)=0$, thus ${x_n}$ converges to $y$.
Unfortunately, I am unable to decide whether ${x_n} $ has a convergent (or for that matter, just Cauchy, since $X$ is complete) subsequence or not.
metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
Let ${x_n}$ be a sequence in a complete metric space $X$ such that for every uniformly continuous function $f:X to mathbb R$, the sequence ${f(x_n)}$ is convergent in $mathbb R$. Then is it true that ${x_n}$ is convergent ?
My try: If ${x_n}$ has a convergent subsequence, then ${x_n}$ converges. Indeed, if ${x_{k_n}}$ is a convergent subsequence with limit $yin X$ , then since the function $ f: X to mathbb R $ defined as $f(x)=d(x,y), forall xin X$ is uniformly continuous, so $lim f(x_n)=lim d(x_n,y)$ exists, but since $lim d(x_{k_n},y)=0$, so $lim d(x_n,y)=0$, thus ${x_n}$ converges to $y$.
Unfortunately, I am unable to decide whether ${x_n} $ has a convergent (or for that matter, just Cauchy, since $X$ is complete) subsequence or not.
metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
metric-spaces uniform-continuity complete-spaces
edited Dec 29 '18 at 3:10
user521337
asked Dec 29 '18 at 2:10
user521337user521337
9911315
9911315
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Let's define $a_n = lim_{mto infty} d(x_n, x_m)$. Since distance is uniformly continuous, each of the $a_n$ exists. Eventually all points are contained within a ball of radius $a_1+epsilon$ about $x_1$. This implies that the $a_n$ are eventually bounded above by $2(a_1+epsilon)$, and so by Bolzano-Weierstrass must converge to some nonnegative number $z$. If $z$ is equal to $0$ we can show that the $x_n$ are Cauchy. Otherwise, if $z>0$ then there exists $k_0$ so that $a_k, k geq k_0$ is within $frac{z}{2}$ of $z$.
Since $a_{k_0} = lim_{mto infty} d(x_{k_0}, x_m) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$, we can now pick $k_1 > k_0$ so that $d(x_{k_0},x_{k_1}) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$. Continue this process inductively, at each step picking a $k_j$ so that $x_{k_j}$ is at least $frac{z}{2}$ from all the previously chosen $x_{k_i}$. This gives us a countable subcollection of the ${x_i}$ who are mutually at least $frac{z}{2}$ distance apart.
We can construct a uniformly continuous function $f$ equal to $1$ on $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$ and $0$ on $x_{k_i}$ for odd $i$. This is because all the $x_{k_i}$ are suitably spaced out (as a sketch, we can define $f$ equal to $1$ on the ball of radius $frac{z}{4}$ about $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$, and have $f$ decrease to zero in a controlled manner by the time we hit the boundary of the radius $frac{z}{2}$ ball about $x_{k_i}$). This $f$ is equal to $0$ and $1$ infinitely often, contradicting the fact that $z>0$. So $z=0$, and we can pick some convergent subsequence amongst the $x_n$.
add a comment |
Whether the metric $d$ is complete or not, if $Y$ is a non-empty subset of $X$ then $d(x,Y)=inf {d(x,y):yin Y}$ is uniformly continuous. If ${x_n}$ is not a Cauchy sequence then there exists a disjoint pair $A, B$ of infinite subsets of $Bbb N$ such that $inf {d(a,b): ain Aland bin B}>0.$ So let $f(x)=d(x, {x_n:nin A})$. Then $f(x_n)=0$ when $nin A$ but $inf {f(x_n):nin B}>0$ so ${f(x_n)}$ is not convergent.
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055471%2fon-a-special-type-of-sequence-in-complete-metric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let's define $a_n = lim_{mto infty} d(x_n, x_m)$. Since distance is uniformly continuous, each of the $a_n$ exists. Eventually all points are contained within a ball of radius $a_1+epsilon$ about $x_1$. This implies that the $a_n$ are eventually bounded above by $2(a_1+epsilon)$, and so by Bolzano-Weierstrass must converge to some nonnegative number $z$. If $z$ is equal to $0$ we can show that the $x_n$ are Cauchy. Otherwise, if $z>0$ then there exists $k_0$ so that $a_k, k geq k_0$ is within $frac{z}{2}$ of $z$.
Since $a_{k_0} = lim_{mto infty} d(x_{k_0}, x_m) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$, we can now pick $k_1 > k_0$ so that $d(x_{k_0},x_{k_1}) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$. Continue this process inductively, at each step picking a $k_j$ so that $x_{k_j}$ is at least $frac{z}{2}$ from all the previously chosen $x_{k_i}$. This gives us a countable subcollection of the ${x_i}$ who are mutually at least $frac{z}{2}$ distance apart.
We can construct a uniformly continuous function $f$ equal to $1$ on $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$ and $0$ on $x_{k_i}$ for odd $i$. This is because all the $x_{k_i}$ are suitably spaced out (as a sketch, we can define $f$ equal to $1$ on the ball of radius $frac{z}{4}$ about $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$, and have $f$ decrease to zero in a controlled manner by the time we hit the boundary of the radius $frac{z}{2}$ ball about $x_{k_i}$). This $f$ is equal to $0$ and $1$ infinitely often, contradicting the fact that $z>0$. So $z=0$, and we can pick some convergent subsequence amongst the $x_n$.
add a comment |
Let's define $a_n = lim_{mto infty} d(x_n, x_m)$. Since distance is uniformly continuous, each of the $a_n$ exists. Eventually all points are contained within a ball of radius $a_1+epsilon$ about $x_1$. This implies that the $a_n$ are eventually bounded above by $2(a_1+epsilon)$, and so by Bolzano-Weierstrass must converge to some nonnegative number $z$. If $z$ is equal to $0$ we can show that the $x_n$ are Cauchy. Otherwise, if $z>0$ then there exists $k_0$ so that $a_k, k geq k_0$ is within $frac{z}{2}$ of $z$.
Since $a_{k_0} = lim_{mto infty} d(x_{k_0}, x_m) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$, we can now pick $k_1 > k_0$ so that $d(x_{k_0},x_{k_1}) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$. Continue this process inductively, at each step picking a $k_j$ so that $x_{k_j}$ is at least $frac{z}{2}$ from all the previously chosen $x_{k_i}$. This gives us a countable subcollection of the ${x_i}$ who are mutually at least $frac{z}{2}$ distance apart.
We can construct a uniformly continuous function $f$ equal to $1$ on $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$ and $0$ on $x_{k_i}$ for odd $i$. This is because all the $x_{k_i}$ are suitably spaced out (as a sketch, we can define $f$ equal to $1$ on the ball of radius $frac{z}{4}$ about $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$, and have $f$ decrease to zero in a controlled manner by the time we hit the boundary of the radius $frac{z}{2}$ ball about $x_{k_i}$). This $f$ is equal to $0$ and $1$ infinitely often, contradicting the fact that $z>0$. So $z=0$, and we can pick some convergent subsequence amongst the $x_n$.
add a comment |
Let's define $a_n = lim_{mto infty} d(x_n, x_m)$. Since distance is uniformly continuous, each of the $a_n$ exists. Eventually all points are contained within a ball of radius $a_1+epsilon$ about $x_1$. This implies that the $a_n$ are eventually bounded above by $2(a_1+epsilon)$, and so by Bolzano-Weierstrass must converge to some nonnegative number $z$. If $z$ is equal to $0$ we can show that the $x_n$ are Cauchy. Otherwise, if $z>0$ then there exists $k_0$ so that $a_k, k geq k_0$ is within $frac{z}{2}$ of $z$.
Since $a_{k_0} = lim_{mto infty} d(x_{k_0}, x_m) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$, we can now pick $k_1 > k_0$ so that $d(x_{k_0},x_{k_1}) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$. Continue this process inductively, at each step picking a $k_j$ so that $x_{k_j}$ is at least $frac{z}{2}$ from all the previously chosen $x_{k_i}$. This gives us a countable subcollection of the ${x_i}$ who are mutually at least $frac{z}{2}$ distance apart.
We can construct a uniformly continuous function $f$ equal to $1$ on $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$ and $0$ on $x_{k_i}$ for odd $i$. This is because all the $x_{k_i}$ are suitably spaced out (as a sketch, we can define $f$ equal to $1$ on the ball of radius $frac{z}{4}$ about $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$, and have $f$ decrease to zero in a controlled manner by the time we hit the boundary of the radius $frac{z}{2}$ ball about $x_{k_i}$). This $f$ is equal to $0$ and $1$ infinitely often, contradicting the fact that $z>0$. So $z=0$, and we can pick some convergent subsequence amongst the $x_n$.
Let's define $a_n = lim_{mto infty} d(x_n, x_m)$. Since distance is uniformly continuous, each of the $a_n$ exists. Eventually all points are contained within a ball of radius $a_1+epsilon$ about $x_1$. This implies that the $a_n$ are eventually bounded above by $2(a_1+epsilon)$, and so by Bolzano-Weierstrass must converge to some nonnegative number $z$. If $z$ is equal to $0$ we can show that the $x_n$ are Cauchy. Otherwise, if $z>0$ then there exists $k_0$ so that $a_k, k geq k_0$ is within $frac{z}{2}$ of $z$.
Since $a_{k_0} = lim_{mto infty} d(x_{k_0}, x_m) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$, we can now pick $k_1 > k_0$ so that $d(x_{k_0},x_{k_1}) in (frac{z}{2},frac{3z}{2})$. Continue this process inductively, at each step picking a $k_j$ so that $x_{k_j}$ is at least $frac{z}{2}$ from all the previously chosen $x_{k_i}$. This gives us a countable subcollection of the ${x_i}$ who are mutually at least $frac{z}{2}$ distance apart.
We can construct a uniformly continuous function $f$ equal to $1$ on $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$ and $0$ on $x_{k_i}$ for odd $i$. This is because all the $x_{k_i}$ are suitably spaced out (as a sketch, we can define $f$ equal to $1$ on the ball of radius $frac{z}{4}$ about $x_{k_i}$ for even $i$, and have $f$ decrease to zero in a controlled manner by the time we hit the boundary of the radius $frac{z}{2}$ ball about $x_{k_i}$). This $f$ is equal to $0$ and $1$ infinitely often, contradicting the fact that $z>0$. So $z=0$, and we can pick some convergent subsequence amongst the $x_n$.
answered Dec 29 '18 at 7:18
wfawwerwfawwer
363
363
add a comment |
add a comment |
Whether the metric $d$ is complete or not, if $Y$ is a non-empty subset of $X$ then $d(x,Y)=inf {d(x,y):yin Y}$ is uniformly continuous. If ${x_n}$ is not a Cauchy sequence then there exists a disjoint pair $A, B$ of infinite subsets of $Bbb N$ such that $inf {d(a,b): ain Aland bin B}>0.$ So let $f(x)=d(x, {x_n:nin A})$. Then $f(x_n)=0$ when $nin A$ but $inf {f(x_n):nin B}>0$ so ${f(x_n)}$ is not convergent.
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Whether the metric $d$ is complete or not, if $Y$ is a non-empty subset of $X$ then $d(x,Y)=inf {d(x,y):yin Y}$ is uniformly continuous. If ${x_n}$ is not a Cauchy sequence then there exists a disjoint pair $A, B$ of infinite subsets of $Bbb N$ such that $inf {d(a,b): ain Aland bin B}>0.$ So let $f(x)=d(x, {x_n:nin A})$. Then $f(x_n)=0$ when $nin A$ but $inf {f(x_n):nin B}>0$ so ${f(x_n)}$ is not convergent.
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Whether the metric $d$ is complete or not, if $Y$ is a non-empty subset of $X$ then $d(x,Y)=inf {d(x,y):yin Y}$ is uniformly continuous. If ${x_n}$ is not a Cauchy sequence then there exists a disjoint pair $A, B$ of infinite subsets of $Bbb N$ such that $inf {d(a,b): ain Aland bin B}>0.$ So let $f(x)=d(x, {x_n:nin A})$. Then $f(x_n)=0$ when $nin A$ but $inf {f(x_n):nin B}>0$ so ${f(x_n)}$ is not convergent.
Whether the metric $d$ is complete or not, if $Y$ is a non-empty subset of $X$ then $d(x,Y)=inf {d(x,y):yin Y}$ is uniformly continuous. If ${x_n}$ is not a Cauchy sequence then there exists a disjoint pair $A, B$ of infinite subsets of $Bbb N$ such that $inf {d(a,b): ain Aland bin B}>0.$ So let $f(x)=d(x, {x_n:nin A})$. Then $f(x_n)=0$ when $nin A$ but $inf {f(x_n):nin B}>0$ so ${f(x_n)}$ is not convergent.
edited Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
answered Dec 29 '18 at 15:38
DanielWainfleetDanielWainfleet
34.5k31648
34.5k31648
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
how does your $A,B$ depend on ${x_n}$ ? What is $5$ doing there ?
– user521337
Dec 30 '18 at 1:40
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
The 5 is (was) a typo.
– DanielWainfleet
Dec 30 '18 at 8:32
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055471%2fon-a-special-type-of-sequence-in-complete-metric-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown