Is $f(x) = |x|^{3/2}$ differentiable at $0$? [closed]
Is the following statement is true/false ?
Given $f : mathbb{R} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ define by
$f(x) = |x|^frac{3}{2}$
then $f(x)$ is not differentiable not at $0$?
I thinks this statetment is true because $f(x) =|x|$ is not differentible at $0$
real-analysis
closed as off-topic by RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy Jan 1 at 21:35
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Is the following statement is true/false ?
Given $f : mathbb{R} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ define by
$f(x) = |x|^frac{3}{2}$
then $f(x)$ is not differentiable not at $0$?
I thinks this statetment is true because $f(x) =|x|$ is not differentible at $0$
real-analysis
closed as off-topic by RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy Jan 1 at 21:35
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
8
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43
add a comment |
Is the following statement is true/false ?
Given $f : mathbb{R} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ define by
$f(x) = |x|^frac{3}{2}$
then $f(x)$ is not differentiable not at $0$?
I thinks this statetment is true because $f(x) =|x|$ is not differentible at $0$
real-analysis
Is the following statement is true/false ?
Given $f : mathbb{R} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ define by
$f(x) = |x|^frac{3}{2}$
then $f(x)$ is not differentiable not at $0$?
I thinks this statetment is true because $f(x) =|x|$ is not differentible at $0$
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Dec 29 '18 at 6:12
Did
246k23221456
246k23221456
asked Dec 29 '18 at 1:40
jasminejasmine
1,645416
1,645416
closed as off-topic by RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy Jan 1 at 21:35
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy Jan 1 at 21:35
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – RRL, Did, Saad, clathratus, amWhy
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
8
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43
add a comment |
8
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43
8
8
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Consider the basic definition of a function being differentiable at a given point. In this case, notice that
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{h^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
$$lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{left(-hright)^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} -left(-hright)^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Putting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} together shows that
$$f^{'}left(0right) = lim_{h to 0} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = 0 tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, $f$ is differentiable at $0$.
In general, consider
$$fleft(xright) = lvert x rvert^c, c in R tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Adjusting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} gives left & right side limits as
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} text{ and } lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} tag{5}label{eq5}$$
If $c = 1$, then the limit values become $pm 1$, so $f$ is not differentiable at $0$, as noted in the question. For $c < 1$, the limits become $pm infty$, so once again the function is not differentiable at $0$. However, for any $c > 1$, the function is differentiable at $0$, as you can verify from
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} = 0 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
This, of course, includes not only the $c = frac{3}{2}$ asked for specifically in the question, but also for $c = 2$ mentioned by Randall in the question comments (note this makes the function the equivalent of $fleft(xright) = x^2$).
In most cases, including this one, a somewhat easier approach would be to determine the derivative of the function for values of $x < 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{-}$, then the derivative of the function for $x > 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{+}$. If both limits exist and are equal to each other, then the function is differentiable at $0$. For this specific example, for $x < 0$, $f_{1}left(xright) = left(-xright)^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = -frac{3}{2}left(-xright)^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{-}} f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. For $x > 0$, $f_{2}left(xright) = x^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = frac{3}{2}x^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. As both limits are $0$, $fleft(xright)$ is differentiable at $x = 0$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Consider the basic definition of a function being differentiable at a given point. In this case, notice that
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{h^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
$$lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{left(-hright)^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} -left(-hright)^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Putting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} together shows that
$$f^{'}left(0right) = lim_{h to 0} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = 0 tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, $f$ is differentiable at $0$.
In general, consider
$$fleft(xright) = lvert x rvert^c, c in R tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Adjusting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} gives left & right side limits as
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} text{ and } lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} tag{5}label{eq5}$$
If $c = 1$, then the limit values become $pm 1$, so $f$ is not differentiable at $0$, as noted in the question. For $c < 1$, the limits become $pm infty$, so once again the function is not differentiable at $0$. However, for any $c > 1$, the function is differentiable at $0$, as you can verify from
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} = 0 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
This, of course, includes not only the $c = frac{3}{2}$ asked for specifically in the question, but also for $c = 2$ mentioned by Randall in the question comments (note this makes the function the equivalent of $fleft(xright) = x^2$).
In most cases, including this one, a somewhat easier approach would be to determine the derivative of the function for values of $x < 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{-}$, then the derivative of the function for $x > 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{+}$. If both limits exist and are equal to each other, then the function is differentiable at $0$. For this specific example, for $x < 0$, $f_{1}left(xright) = left(-xright)^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = -frac{3}{2}left(-xright)^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{-}} f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. For $x > 0$, $f_{2}left(xright) = x^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = frac{3}{2}x^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. As both limits are $0$, $fleft(xright)$ is differentiable at $x = 0$.
add a comment |
Consider the basic definition of a function being differentiable at a given point. In this case, notice that
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{h^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
$$lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{left(-hright)^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} -left(-hright)^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Putting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} together shows that
$$f^{'}left(0right) = lim_{h to 0} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = 0 tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, $f$ is differentiable at $0$.
In general, consider
$$fleft(xright) = lvert x rvert^c, c in R tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Adjusting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} gives left & right side limits as
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} text{ and } lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} tag{5}label{eq5}$$
If $c = 1$, then the limit values become $pm 1$, so $f$ is not differentiable at $0$, as noted in the question. For $c < 1$, the limits become $pm infty$, so once again the function is not differentiable at $0$. However, for any $c > 1$, the function is differentiable at $0$, as you can verify from
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} = 0 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
This, of course, includes not only the $c = frac{3}{2}$ asked for specifically in the question, but also for $c = 2$ mentioned by Randall in the question comments (note this makes the function the equivalent of $fleft(xright) = x^2$).
In most cases, including this one, a somewhat easier approach would be to determine the derivative of the function for values of $x < 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{-}$, then the derivative of the function for $x > 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{+}$. If both limits exist and are equal to each other, then the function is differentiable at $0$. For this specific example, for $x < 0$, $f_{1}left(xright) = left(-xright)^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = -frac{3}{2}left(-xright)^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{-}} f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. For $x > 0$, $f_{2}left(xright) = x^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = frac{3}{2}x^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. As both limits are $0$, $fleft(xright)$ is differentiable at $x = 0$.
add a comment |
Consider the basic definition of a function being differentiable at a given point. In this case, notice that
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{h^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
$$lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{left(-hright)^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} -left(-hright)^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Putting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} together shows that
$$f^{'}left(0right) = lim_{h to 0} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = 0 tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, $f$ is differentiable at $0$.
In general, consider
$$fleft(xright) = lvert x rvert^c, c in R tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Adjusting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} gives left & right side limits as
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} text{ and } lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} tag{5}label{eq5}$$
If $c = 1$, then the limit values become $pm 1$, so $f$ is not differentiable at $0$, as noted in the question. For $c < 1$, the limits become $pm infty$, so once again the function is not differentiable at $0$. However, for any $c > 1$, the function is differentiable at $0$, as you can verify from
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} = 0 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
This, of course, includes not only the $c = frac{3}{2}$ asked for specifically in the question, but also for $c = 2$ mentioned by Randall in the question comments (note this makes the function the equivalent of $fleft(xright) = x^2$).
In most cases, including this one, a somewhat easier approach would be to determine the derivative of the function for values of $x < 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{-}$, then the derivative of the function for $x > 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{+}$. If both limits exist and are equal to each other, then the function is differentiable at $0$. For this specific example, for $x < 0$, $f_{1}left(xright) = left(-xright)^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = -frac{3}{2}left(-xright)^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{-}} f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. For $x > 0$, $f_{2}left(xright) = x^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = frac{3}{2}x^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. As both limits are $0$, $fleft(xright)$ is differentiable at $x = 0$.
Consider the basic definition of a function being differentiable at a given point. In this case, notice that
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} cfrac{h^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{1}label{eq1}$$
$$lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{lvert h rvert^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} cfrac{left(-hright)^{frac{3}{2}}}{h} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} -left(-hright)^frac{1}{2} = 0 tag{2}label{eq2}$$
Putting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} together shows that
$$f^{'}left(0right) = lim_{h to 0} cfrac{f(h) - f(0)}{h - 0} = 0 tag{3}label{eq3}$$
Thus, $f$ is differentiable at $0$.
In general, consider
$$fleft(xright) = lvert x rvert^c, c in R tag{4}label{eq4}$$
Adjusting eqref{eq1} and eqref{eq2} gives left & right side limits as
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} text{ and } lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} tag{5}label{eq5}$$
If $c = 1$, then the limit values become $pm 1$, so $f$ is not differentiable at $0$, as noted in the question. For $c < 1$, the limits become $pm infty$, so once again the function is not differentiable at $0$. However, for any $c > 1$, the function is differentiable at $0$, as you can verify from
$$lim_{h to 0^{+}} h^{c - 1} = lim_{h to 0^{-}} - left(-hright)^{c - 1} = 0 tag{6}label{eq6}$$
This, of course, includes not only the $c = frac{3}{2}$ asked for specifically in the question, but also for $c = 2$ mentioned by Randall in the question comments (note this makes the function the equivalent of $fleft(xright) = x^2$).
In most cases, including this one, a somewhat easier approach would be to determine the derivative of the function for values of $x < 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{-}$, then the derivative of the function for $x > 0$ and the limit as $x to 0^{+}$. If both limits exist and are equal to each other, then the function is differentiable at $0$. For this specific example, for $x < 0$, $f_{1}left(xright) = left(-xright)^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = -frac{3}{2}left(-xright)^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{-}} f_{1}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. For $x > 0$, $f_{2}left(xright) = x^{frac{3}{2}}$ so $f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = frac{3}{2}x^{frac{1}{2}}$, giving that $lim_{x to 0^{+}} f_{2}^{'}left(xright) = 0$. As both limits are $0$, $fleft(xright)$ is differentiable at $x = 0$.
edited Dec 31 '18 at 5:06
answered Dec 29 '18 at 1:59
John OmielanJohn Omielan
1,27618
1,27618
add a comment |
add a comment |
8
What theorem are you using? I mean, $|x|^2$ is differentiable at 0. You seem to want to say that a composition with one nondifferentiable piece must be nondifferentiable. My comment shows that is false reasoning.
– Randall
Dec 29 '18 at 1:43