How can I make raindrops bigger?
$begingroup$
I've got an intelligent humanoid species living on a planet very similar to Earth's. However, on this planet, rainstorms are more frequent and slightly... different. Each raindrop is at least an inch in diameter, making rainstorms more intense and creating some interesting design problems for the inhabitants.
How can I justify these raindrops being so much larger than the ones we find on Earth?
I'm looking for environmental or engineered conditions that can cause this, without manipulating universal constants like hydrogen-bond length. The surface of the planet is essentially identical to our own, with trees, animals, and an Earth-like landscape. It orbits within the star's habitable zone, but I haven't yet decided what the size/density/composition of the planet should be, so that's open to manipulation. The atmosphere density and composition are almost entirely mutable, but I'd like to keep the O2 concentration at about 20% to maintain my Earth-like lifeforms. All raindrops that reach the surface are in liquid or liquid-like form (no hail) and are larger than an inch in diameter. Typical rainfall during storms is highly variable, ranging between 5mm and 500mm per storm.
science-based earth-like weather
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got an intelligent humanoid species living on a planet very similar to Earth's. However, on this planet, rainstorms are more frequent and slightly... different. Each raindrop is at least an inch in diameter, making rainstorms more intense and creating some interesting design problems for the inhabitants.
How can I justify these raindrops being so much larger than the ones we find on Earth?
I'm looking for environmental or engineered conditions that can cause this, without manipulating universal constants like hydrogen-bond length. The surface of the planet is essentially identical to our own, with trees, animals, and an Earth-like landscape. It orbits within the star's habitable zone, but I haven't yet decided what the size/density/composition of the planet should be, so that's open to manipulation. The atmosphere density and composition are almost entirely mutable, but I'd like to keep the O2 concentration at about 20% to maintain my Earth-like lifeforms. All raindrops that reach the surface are in liquid or liquid-like form (no hail) and are larger than an inch in diameter. Typical rainfall during storms is highly variable, ranging between 5mm and 500mm per storm.
science-based earth-like weather
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've got an intelligent humanoid species living on a planet very similar to Earth's. However, on this planet, rainstorms are more frequent and slightly... different. Each raindrop is at least an inch in diameter, making rainstorms more intense and creating some interesting design problems for the inhabitants.
How can I justify these raindrops being so much larger than the ones we find on Earth?
I'm looking for environmental or engineered conditions that can cause this, without manipulating universal constants like hydrogen-bond length. The surface of the planet is essentially identical to our own, with trees, animals, and an Earth-like landscape. It orbits within the star's habitable zone, but I haven't yet decided what the size/density/composition of the planet should be, so that's open to manipulation. The atmosphere density and composition are almost entirely mutable, but I'd like to keep the O2 concentration at about 20% to maintain my Earth-like lifeforms. All raindrops that reach the surface are in liquid or liquid-like form (no hail) and are larger than an inch in diameter. Typical rainfall during storms is highly variable, ranging between 5mm and 500mm per storm.
science-based earth-like weather
$endgroup$
I've got an intelligent humanoid species living on a planet very similar to Earth's. However, on this planet, rainstorms are more frequent and slightly... different. Each raindrop is at least an inch in diameter, making rainstorms more intense and creating some interesting design problems for the inhabitants.
How can I justify these raindrops being so much larger than the ones we find on Earth?
I'm looking for environmental or engineered conditions that can cause this, without manipulating universal constants like hydrogen-bond length. The surface of the planet is essentially identical to our own, with trees, animals, and an Earth-like landscape. It orbits within the star's habitable zone, but I haven't yet decided what the size/density/composition of the planet should be, so that's open to manipulation. The atmosphere density and composition are almost entirely mutable, but I'd like to keep the O2 concentration at about 20% to maintain my Earth-like lifeforms. All raindrops that reach the surface are in liquid or liquid-like form (no hail) and are larger than an inch in diameter. Typical rainfall during storms is highly variable, ranging between 5mm and 500mm per storm.
science-based earth-like weather
science-based earth-like weather
asked Jan 10 at 20:02
DubukayDubukay
8,83842463
8,83842463
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37
add a comment |
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Decrease Gravity
Explanation:
The water droplets we experience on earth are mostly so small because of gravity: when a water droplet becomes too big, gravity rips it apart before it can get bigger (like when you're not quite closing a tap, the only reason it doesn't get bigger is because the mass of the droplet is bigger than the force "gluing" the water to the tap).
So when you decrease the gravity, the droplets in the clouds can get bigger without raining down on your planet. The reason why water can even stay up in clouds is because the mass of a water droplet increases by the $frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$ of its diameter while the surface only by $pi cdot d^2$. (d = diameter), so at some point the mass and volume has decreased so much that the updraft from the air is enough.
Here you can see how the blue line($frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$) is increasing faster than orange line ($ pi cdot d^2$)
Which is why less gravity is key.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Pollution will do the trick for you.
For the record, Brazil has the largest raindrops on Earth, in its northern region - right where people burn a soccer field area worth of forest per day to make room for farming lands. Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length.
Source: Geophyisical Research Letters, Volume 31, issue 13
Everywhere else on Earth, raindrops tend to split if they grow larger than 4 or 5 millimeters.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The upper size of raindrops is set by the strength of surface tension compared to the forces that batter them, mostly wind due to falling(*). This is hard to scale up indefinitely, so under terrestrial conditions they will likely remain less than 8.8 mm.
Another solution is to do something like Hal Clement's classic sf novel Close to critical (1964) where the atmosphere is mostly water close to the critical point: during night water droplets several meters in size condense out and fall slowly (since the density of the droplets is close to the "air"). This might be a bit too alien for you, since it requires a high-temperature high-pressure atmosphere. But it does have huge droplets.
(* If the droplet has radius $r$ the total surface tension energy is $E=4pigamma r^2$. If it falls at terminal velocity the drag force is equal to the gravitational force, and we can guess that the wind shaking it will have a force of the same size $Fapprox (4pi g rho/3) r^3$. Here we assume zero density air; thicker air like the Clement story would use $rho_{fluid}-rho_{air}$. To split the droplet this force has to work along the distance $2r$ to overcome the surface tension energy, giving us $F(2r)=(8pi g rho/3) r^4=E$, or $rapprox sqrt{ 3 gamma / 2g rho }$. So unless water becomes lighter or gets a higher surface tension the only way of increasing the droplet size is to lower gravity. And the effect looks relatively minor.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rain drops form in the upper atmosphere when air humidity condenses around condensation nuclei.
As soon as their weight overcomes the sum of buoyancy and updraft, they fall down to the ground.
Here is the trick for you to increase the droplet size. You cannot substantially increase the buoyancy, but if you have stronger updraft, due to a stronger ascending current, the droplets will have to grow bigger before their weight is great enough to fall.
This is a version on steroids of what already happens on Earth: low clouds in calm air result in a fine mist or drizzle, while cumulonimbus with strong winds give bigger drops.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you thicken the atmosphere you will get the effects you are looking for. Increase the Troposphere from the Earth normal ~12km average to 18 or 24km thick. This won't materially change the surface conditions but will greatly increase the amount of weather that can happen above you. If you have ever encountered monsoon conditions then you know how much heavier tropical rain can be where the Troposphere is thicker compared to temperate or Artic rain where the Troposphere is thinner.
---- Update ----
According to the USGS (https://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html ) raindrop size is directly related to the number of other raindrops encountered, with an upper limit in earth normal conditions of around 5mm. A thicker atmosphere encourages more encounters and hence larger raindrops. A typical 'soft' Irish day may have drops of 0.1mm or smaller; you are not aware of being rained on, just the feeling of becoming increasingly damp. Contrast that with an Equatorial coastal Monsoon burst where drops of 5mm or more will physically hurt you as they strike.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going into details (most of which are already covered by other posts in depth) You would want a combination of decreased gravity, increased updrafts, and increased water surface tension. Each individually could be relatively small changes, but when acting together they may provide the cumulative effect you're looking for.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
'Invent' a trace element that makes water have a higher surface tension, or make the water molecules stick more to each other because of the trace element.
The element will likely have to blow up from the planet surface, like dessert dust blows into clouds on our planet, which in turn allows you to design where the rain will have the bigger drops. You can select a smaller area or a bigger area, or even planet wide, by describing where the dust ends up. Or you can leave it open to the readers to work it out.
It is also open to you whether the element still works when the rain has hit the surface. If you let it sink faster than the water you can have the surface of the water normal.
If such an element is not known on earth it can still be on your planet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136247%2fhow-can-i-make-raindrops-bigger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Decrease Gravity
Explanation:
The water droplets we experience on earth are mostly so small because of gravity: when a water droplet becomes too big, gravity rips it apart before it can get bigger (like when you're not quite closing a tap, the only reason it doesn't get bigger is because the mass of the droplet is bigger than the force "gluing" the water to the tap).
So when you decrease the gravity, the droplets in the clouds can get bigger without raining down on your planet. The reason why water can even stay up in clouds is because the mass of a water droplet increases by the $frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$ of its diameter while the surface only by $pi cdot d^2$. (d = diameter), so at some point the mass and volume has decreased so much that the updraft from the air is enough.
Here you can see how the blue line($frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$) is increasing faster than orange line ($ pi cdot d^2$)
Which is why less gravity is key.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Decrease Gravity
Explanation:
The water droplets we experience on earth are mostly so small because of gravity: when a water droplet becomes too big, gravity rips it apart before it can get bigger (like when you're not quite closing a tap, the only reason it doesn't get bigger is because the mass of the droplet is bigger than the force "gluing" the water to the tap).
So when you decrease the gravity, the droplets in the clouds can get bigger without raining down on your planet. The reason why water can even stay up in clouds is because the mass of a water droplet increases by the $frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$ of its diameter while the surface only by $pi cdot d^2$. (d = diameter), so at some point the mass and volume has decreased so much that the updraft from the air is enough.
Here you can see how the blue line($frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$) is increasing faster than orange line ($ pi cdot d^2$)
Which is why less gravity is key.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Decrease Gravity
Explanation:
The water droplets we experience on earth are mostly so small because of gravity: when a water droplet becomes too big, gravity rips it apart before it can get bigger (like when you're not quite closing a tap, the only reason it doesn't get bigger is because the mass of the droplet is bigger than the force "gluing" the water to the tap).
So when you decrease the gravity, the droplets in the clouds can get bigger without raining down on your planet. The reason why water can even stay up in clouds is because the mass of a water droplet increases by the $frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$ of its diameter while the surface only by $pi cdot d^2$. (d = diameter), so at some point the mass and volume has decreased so much that the updraft from the air is enough.
Here you can see how the blue line($frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$) is increasing faster than orange line ($ pi cdot d^2$)
Which is why less gravity is key.
$endgroup$
Decrease Gravity
Explanation:
The water droplets we experience on earth are mostly so small because of gravity: when a water droplet becomes too big, gravity rips it apart before it can get bigger (like when you're not quite closing a tap, the only reason it doesn't get bigger is because the mass of the droplet is bigger than the force "gluing" the water to the tap).
So when you decrease the gravity, the droplets in the clouds can get bigger without raining down on your planet. The reason why water can even stay up in clouds is because the mass of a water droplet increases by the $frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$ of its diameter while the surface only by $pi cdot d^2$. (d = diameter), so at some point the mass and volume has decreased so much that the updraft from the air is enough.
Here you can see how the blue line($frac{4}3cdot picdot d^3$) is increasing faster than orange line ($ pi cdot d^2$)
Which is why less gravity is key.
edited Jan 11 at 17:08
answered Jan 10 at 20:58
SoanSoan
2,016418
2,016418
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
|
show 9 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
2
2
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
$begingroup$
Since you are accounting for pi in the area, I would also account for it in the volume calculation
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
Jan 11 at 5:58
1
1
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
$begingroup$
good point I should do that
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 6:11
2
2
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
$begingroup$
Yes and guess what less gravity does? It decreases the maximum falling speed because the down wards acceleration is smaller
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 18:42
1
1
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
$begingroup$
If you drop water from sufficient high you would see the "blob" of water would literaly explode from the air pressure after only 9 or 10 meters. So I think the gravity must be really low or atmosphera really thin
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:46
1
1
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
$begingroup$
so perhaps you could include surface tension and air density in the equation.
$endgroup$
– Emmanuel
Jan 11 at 18:53
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Pollution will do the trick for you.
For the record, Brazil has the largest raindrops on Earth, in its northern region - right where people burn a soccer field area worth of forest per day to make room for farming lands. Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length.
Source: Geophyisical Research Letters, Volume 31, issue 13
Everywhere else on Earth, raindrops tend to split if they grow larger than 4 or 5 millimeters.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pollution will do the trick for you.
For the record, Brazil has the largest raindrops on Earth, in its northern region - right where people burn a soccer field area worth of forest per day to make room for farming lands. Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length.
Source: Geophyisical Research Letters, Volume 31, issue 13
Everywhere else on Earth, raindrops tend to split if they grow larger than 4 or 5 millimeters.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pollution will do the trick for you.
For the record, Brazil has the largest raindrops on Earth, in its northern region - right where people burn a soccer field area worth of forest per day to make room for farming lands. Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length.
Source: Geophyisical Research Letters, Volume 31, issue 13
Everywhere else on Earth, raindrops tend to split if they grow larger than 4 or 5 millimeters.
$endgroup$
Pollution will do the trick for you.
For the record, Brazil has the largest raindrops on Earth, in its northern region - right where people burn a soccer field area worth of forest per day to make room for farming lands. Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length.
Source: Geophyisical Research Letters, Volume 31, issue 13
Everywhere else on Earth, raindrops tend to split if they grow larger than 4 or 5 millimeters.
edited Jan 11 at 19:03
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 10 at 21:24
RenanRenan
47.5k13110243
47.5k13110243
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
How does pollution increase rain drop size?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 13 at 6:55
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus "Some scientists such as Peter Hobbs think that the smoke causes water to condense onto raindrops of up to 1 centimeter in length."
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 13 at 14:52
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
So it seeds the raindrops?
$endgroup$
– BillThePlatypus
Jan 14 at 15:29
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
$begingroup$
@BillThePlatypus yes, this is what I got from the article.
$endgroup$
– Renan
Jan 14 at 15:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The upper size of raindrops is set by the strength of surface tension compared to the forces that batter them, mostly wind due to falling(*). This is hard to scale up indefinitely, so under terrestrial conditions they will likely remain less than 8.8 mm.
Another solution is to do something like Hal Clement's classic sf novel Close to critical (1964) where the atmosphere is mostly water close to the critical point: during night water droplets several meters in size condense out and fall slowly (since the density of the droplets is close to the "air"). This might be a bit too alien for you, since it requires a high-temperature high-pressure atmosphere. But it does have huge droplets.
(* If the droplet has radius $r$ the total surface tension energy is $E=4pigamma r^2$. If it falls at terminal velocity the drag force is equal to the gravitational force, and we can guess that the wind shaking it will have a force of the same size $Fapprox (4pi g rho/3) r^3$. Here we assume zero density air; thicker air like the Clement story would use $rho_{fluid}-rho_{air}$. To split the droplet this force has to work along the distance $2r$ to overcome the surface tension energy, giving us $F(2r)=(8pi g rho/3) r^4=E$, or $rapprox sqrt{ 3 gamma / 2g rho }$. So unless water becomes lighter or gets a higher surface tension the only way of increasing the droplet size is to lower gravity. And the effect looks relatively minor.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The upper size of raindrops is set by the strength of surface tension compared to the forces that batter them, mostly wind due to falling(*). This is hard to scale up indefinitely, so under terrestrial conditions they will likely remain less than 8.8 mm.
Another solution is to do something like Hal Clement's classic sf novel Close to critical (1964) where the atmosphere is mostly water close to the critical point: during night water droplets several meters in size condense out and fall slowly (since the density of the droplets is close to the "air"). This might be a bit too alien for you, since it requires a high-temperature high-pressure atmosphere. But it does have huge droplets.
(* If the droplet has radius $r$ the total surface tension energy is $E=4pigamma r^2$. If it falls at terminal velocity the drag force is equal to the gravitational force, and we can guess that the wind shaking it will have a force of the same size $Fapprox (4pi g rho/3) r^3$. Here we assume zero density air; thicker air like the Clement story would use $rho_{fluid}-rho_{air}$. To split the droplet this force has to work along the distance $2r$ to overcome the surface tension energy, giving us $F(2r)=(8pi g rho/3) r^4=E$, or $rapprox sqrt{ 3 gamma / 2g rho }$. So unless water becomes lighter or gets a higher surface tension the only way of increasing the droplet size is to lower gravity. And the effect looks relatively minor.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The upper size of raindrops is set by the strength of surface tension compared to the forces that batter them, mostly wind due to falling(*). This is hard to scale up indefinitely, so under terrestrial conditions they will likely remain less than 8.8 mm.
Another solution is to do something like Hal Clement's classic sf novel Close to critical (1964) where the atmosphere is mostly water close to the critical point: during night water droplets several meters in size condense out and fall slowly (since the density of the droplets is close to the "air"). This might be a bit too alien for you, since it requires a high-temperature high-pressure atmosphere. But it does have huge droplets.
(* If the droplet has radius $r$ the total surface tension energy is $E=4pigamma r^2$. If it falls at terminal velocity the drag force is equal to the gravitational force, and we can guess that the wind shaking it will have a force of the same size $Fapprox (4pi g rho/3) r^3$. Here we assume zero density air; thicker air like the Clement story would use $rho_{fluid}-rho_{air}$. To split the droplet this force has to work along the distance $2r$ to overcome the surface tension energy, giving us $F(2r)=(8pi g rho/3) r^4=E$, or $rapprox sqrt{ 3 gamma / 2g rho }$. So unless water becomes lighter or gets a higher surface tension the only way of increasing the droplet size is to lower gravity. And the effect looks relatively minor.)
$endgroup$
The upper size of raindrops is set by the strength of surface tension compared to the forces that batter them, mostly wind due to falling(*). This is hard to scale up indefinitely, so under terrestrial conditions they will likely remain less than 8.8 mm.
Another solution is to do something like Hal Clement's classic sf novel Close to critical (1964) where the atmosphere is mostly water close to the critical point: during night water droplets several meters in size condense out and fall slowly (since the density of the droplets is close to the "air"). This might be a bit too alien for you, since it requires a high-temperature high-pressure atmosphere. But it does have huge droplets.
(* If the droplet has radius $r$ the total surface tension energy is $E=4pigamma r^2$. If it falls at terminal velocity the drag force is equal to the gravitational force, and we can guess that the wind shaking it will have a force of the same size $Fapprox (4pi g rho/3) r^3$. Here we assume zero density air; thicker air like the Clement story would use $rho_{fluid}-rho_{air}$. To split the droplet this force has to work along the distance $2r$ to overcome the surface tension energy, giving us $F(2r)=(8pi g rho/3) r^4=E$, or $rapprox sqrt{ 3 gamma / 2g rho }$. So unless water becomes lighter or gets a higher surface tension the only way of increasing the droplet size is to lower gravity. And the effect looks relatively minor.)
edited Jan 10 at 21:25
answered Jan 10 at 21:04
Anders SandbergAnders Sandberg
82416
82416
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rain drops form in the upper atmosphere when air humidity condenses around condensation nuclei.
As soon as their weight overcomes the sum of buoyancy and updraft, they fall down to the ground.
Here is the trick for you to increase the droplet size. You cannot substantially increase the buoyancy, but if you have stronger updraft, due to a stronger ascending current, the droplets will have to grow bigger before their weight is great enough to fall.
This is a version on steroids of what already happens on Earth: low clouds in calm air result in a fine mist or drizzle, while cumulonimbus with strong winds give bigger drops.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rain drops form in the upper atmosphere when air humidity condenses around condensation nuclei.
As soon as their weight overcomes the sum of buoyancy and updraft, they fall down to the ground.
Here is the trick for you to increase the droplet size. You cannot substantially increase the buoyancy, but if you have stronger updraft, due to a stronger ascending current, the droplets will have to grow bigger before their weight is great enough to fall.
This is a version on steroids of what already happens on Earth: low clouds in calm air result in a fine mist or drizzle, while cumulonimbus with strong winds give bigger drops.
$endgroup$
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Rain drops form in the upper atmosphere when air humidity condenses around condensation nuclei.
As soon as their weight overcomes the sum of buoyancy and updraft, they fall down to the ground.
Here is the trick for you to increase the droplet size. You cannot substantially increase the buoyancy, but if you have stronger updraft, due to a stronger ascending current, the droplets will have to grow bigger before their weight is great enough to fall.
This is a version on steroids of what already happens on Earth: low clouds in calm air result in a fine mist or drizzle, while cumulonimbus with strong winds give bigger drops.
$endgroup$
Rain drops form in the upper atmosphere when air humidity condenses around condensation nuclei.
As soon as their weight overcomes the sum of buoyancy and updraft, they fall down to the ground.
Here is the trick for you to increase the droplet size. You cannot substantially increase the buoyancy, but if you have stronger updraft, due to a stronger ascending current, the droplets will have to grow bigger before their weight is great enough to fall.
This is a version on steroids of what already happens on Earth: low clouds in calm air result in a fine mist or drizzle, while cumulonimbus with strong winds give bigger drops.
edited Jan 11 at 0:03
jdunlop
7,64811643
7,64811643
answered Jan 10 at 20:44
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
81.7k27196400
81.7k27196400
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
add a comment |
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
10
10
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
$begingroup$
If I recall correctly, on Earth, the strongest updrafts push the water higher up into the atmosphere where it freezes, creating hail. How do you avoid that?
$endgroup$
– jpmc26
Jan 11 at 2:11
4
4
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
$begingroup$
There's also the problem that large enough updrafts will break the droplets into smaller ones.
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
Jan 11 at 22:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you thicken the atmosphere you will get the effects you are looking for. Increase the Troposphere from the Earth normal ~12km average to 18 or 24km thick. This won't materially change the surface conditions but will greatly increase the amount of weather that can happen above you. If you have ever encountered monsoon conditions then you know how much heavier tropical rain can be where the Troposphere is thicker compared to temperate or Artic rain where the Troposphere is thinner.
---- Update ----
According to the USGS (https://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html ) raindrop size is directly related to the number of other raindrops encountered, with an upper limit in earth normal conditions of around 5mm. A thicker atmosphere encourages more encounters and hence larger raindrops. A typical 'soft' Irish day may have drops of 0.1mm or smaller; you are not aware of being rained on, just the feeling of becoming increasingly damp. Contrast that with an Equatorial coastal Monsoon burst where drops of 5mm or more will physically hurt you as they strike.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you thicken the atmosphere you will get the effects you are looking for. Increase the Troposphere from the Earth normal ~12km average to 18 or 24km thick. This won't materially change the surface conditions but will greatly increase the amount of weather that can happen above you. If you have ever encountered monsoon conditions then you know how much heavier tropical rain can be where the Troposphere is thicker compared to temperate or Artic rain where the Troposphere is thinner.
---- Update ----
According to the USGS (https://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html ) raindrop size is directly related to the number of other raindrops encountered, with an upper limit in earth normal conditions of around 5mm. A thicker atmosphere encourages more encounters and hence larger raindrops. A typical 'soft' Irish day may have drops of 0.1mm or smaller; you are not aware of being rained on, just the feeling of becoming increasingly damp. Contrast that with an Equatorial coastal Monsoon burst where drops of 5mm or more will physically hurt you as they strike.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you thicken the atmosphere you will get the effects you are looking for. Increase the Troposphere from the Earth normal ~12km average to 18 or 24km thick. This won't materially change the surface conditions but will greatly increase the amount of weather that can happen above you. If you have ever encountered monsoon conditions then you know how much heavier tropical rain can be where the Troposphere is thicker compared to temperate or Artic rain where the Troposphere is thinner.
---- Update ----
According to the USGS (https://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html ) raindrop size is directly related to the number of other raindrops encountered, with an upper limit in earth normal conditions of around 5mm. A thicker atmosphere encourages more encounters and hence larger raindrops. A typical 'soft' Irish day may have drops of 0.1mm or smaller; you are not aware of being rained on, just the feeling of becoming increasingly damp. Contrast that with an Equatorial coastal Monsoon burst where drops of 5mm or more will physically hurt you as they strike.
$endgroup$
If you thicken the atmosphere you will get the effects you are looking for. Increase the Troposphere from the Earth normal ~12km average to 18 or 24km thick. This won't materially change the surface conditions but will greatly increase the amount of weather that can happen above you. If you have ever encountered monsoon conditions then you know how much heavier tropical rain can be where the Troposphere is thicker compared to temperate or Artic rain where the Troposphere is thinner.
---- Update ----
According to the USGS (https://water.usgs.gov/edu/raindropsizes.html ) raindrop size is directly related to the number of other raindrops encountered, with an upper limit in earth normal conditions of around 5mm. A thicker atmosphere encourages more encounters and hence larger raindrops. A typical 'soft' Irish day may have drops of 0.1mm or smaller; you are not aware of being rained on, just the feeling of becoming increasingly damp. Contrast that with an Equatorial coastal Monsoon burst where drops of 5mm or more will physically hurt you as they strike.
edited Jan 14 at 17:14
answered Jan 11 at 14:32
Paul SmithPaul Smith
67638
67638
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
I thought tropical rain was heavier because more water could evaporate in the warm tropics, not because the Troposphere is thicker.
$endgroup$
– Martin Bonner
Jan 11 at 14:41
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
$begingroup$
@MartinBonner Temperature makes difference, but not as big a difference as you might think.
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 11 at 14:47
5
5
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
I was in Nepal and the rain drops where not that much bigger instead there where more rain drop than air around you so your proposal would only lead to the same amount of water falling as when having bigger drops but not actually lead to bigger rain drops.
$endgroup$
– Soan
Jan 11 at 17:04
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
In Monsoon conditions, the rain drops are exactly the same size as any other rain.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:50
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
$begingroup$
@Fattie - Really? That is not my personal experience. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?
$endgroup$
– Paul Smith
Jan 14 at 17:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going into details (most of which are already covered by other posts in depth) You would want a combination of decreased gravity, increased updrafts, and increased water surface tension. Each individually could be relatively small changes, but when acting together they may provide the cumulative effect you're looking for.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going into details (most of which are already covered by other posts in depth) You would want a combination of decreased gravity, increased updrafts, and increased water surface tension. Each individually could be relatively small changes, but when acting together they may provide the cumulative effect you're looking for.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without going into details (most of which are already covered by other posts in depth) You would want a combination of decreased gravity, increased updrafts, and increased water surface tension. Each individually could be relatively small changes, but when acting together they may provide the cumulative effect you're looking for.
$endgroup$
Without going into details (most of which are already covered by other posts in depth) You would want a combination of decreased gravity, increased updrafts, and increased water surface tension. Each individually could be relatively small changes, but when acting together they may provide the cumulative effect you're looking for.
answered Jan 11 at 19:33
Richard BennettRichard Bennett
312
312
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Richard Bennett! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 11 at 20:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
'Invent' a trace element that makes water have a higher surface tension, or make the water molecules stick more to each other because of the trace element.
The element will likely have to blow up from the planet surface, like dessert dust blows into clouds on our planet, which in turn allows you to design where the rain will have the bigger drops. You can select a smaller area or a bigger area, or even planet wide, by describing where the dust ends up. Or you can leave it open to the readers to work it out.
It is also open to you whether the element still works when the rain has hit the surface. If you let it sink faster than the water you can have the surface of the water normal.
If such an element is not known on earth it can still be on your planet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
'Invent' a trace element that makes water have a higher surface tension, or make the water molecules stick more to each other because of the trace element.
The element will likely have to blow up from the planet surface, like dessert dust blows into clouds on our planet, which in turn allows you to design where the rain will have the bigger drops. You can select a smaller area or a bigger area, or even planet wide, by describing where the dust ends up. Or you can leave it open to the readers to work it out.
It is also open to you whether the element still works when the rain has hit the surface. If you let it sink faster than the water you can have the surface of the water normal.
If such an element is not known on earth it can still be on your planet.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
'Invent' a trace element that makes water have a higher surface tension, or make the water molecules stick more to each other because of the trace element.
The element will likely have to blow up from the planet surface, like dessert dust blows into clouds on our planet, which in turn allows you to design where the rain will have the bigger drops. You can select a smaller area or a bigger area, or even planet wide, by describing where the dust ends up. Or you can leave it open to the readers to work it out.
It is also open to you whether the element still works when the rain has hit the surface. If you let it sink faster than the water you can have the surface of the water normal.
If such an element is not known on earth it can still be on your planet.
$endgroup$
'Invent' a trace element that makes water have a higher surface tension, or make the water molecules stick more to each other because of the trace element.
The element will likely have to blow up from the planet surface, like dessert dust blows into clouds on our planet, which in turn allows you to design where the rain will have the bigger drops. You can select a smaller area or a bigger area, or even planet wide, by describing where the dust ends up. Or you can leave it open to the readers to work it out.
It is also open to you whether the element still works when the rain has hit the surface. If you let it sink faster than the water you can have the surface of the water normal.
If such an element is not known on earth it can still be on your planet.
answered Jan 17 at 18:49
WillekeWilleke
1114
1114
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
$begingroup$
Welcome to Worldbuilding, Willeke! If you have a moment, please take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site. You may also find Worldbuilding Meta and The Sandbox useful. Here is a meta post on the culture and style of Worldbuilding.SE, just to help you understand our scope and methods, and how we do things here. Have fun!
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Jan 17 at 19:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136247%2fhow-can-i-make-raindrops-bigger%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This is a great question but should be asked on Physics.SE
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 13:51
$begingroup$
@Fattie I’ve gotta disagree with you there. While I’ve gotten mostly physics answers, I can imagine chemistry based answers (can there be a coagulant in the atmosphere that causes this?) or engineering based answers (giant sprinkler system?) that wouldn’t fit there.
$endgroup$
– Dubukay
Jan 13 at 19:12
$begingroup$
fine points, @Dubukay !
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Jan 13 at 20:37