Binomial expansion infinite series: why need form $a^n(1+frac{b}{a}x)^n$?












0












$begingroup$


I suppose my question is about limits and infinities. I have been considering the expansion of $(a+bx)^n$ for negative and fractional $n$, and my text book says to always factorise out the $a^n$ like so:



$(a+bx)^n =a^n(1+frac{b}{a}x)^n= a^n[1+nfrac{b}{a}x+frac{n(n-1)}{2!}(frac{b}{a}x)^2+...]$



And then the expansion is valid for $|frac{bx}{a}|<1$



My question is, why is the $a$ term involved in thevalidity requirement? Why is it incorrect to simply expand the binomial as



$(a+bx)^n = a^n+a^{n-1}n(bx)+frac{a^{n-2}n(n-1)}{2!}(bx)^2+...]$



and say it is valid for $|bx|<1$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I suppose my question is about limits and infinities. I have been considering the expansion of $(a+bx)^n$ for negative and fractional $n$, and my text book says to always factorise out the $a^n$ like so:



    $(a+bx)^n =a^n(1+frac{b}{a}x)^n= a^n[1+nfrac{b}{a}x+frac{n(n-1)}{2!}(frac{b}{a}x)^2+...]$



    And then the expansion is valid for $|frac{bx}{a}|<1$



    My question is, why is the $a$ term involved in thevalidity requirement? Why is it incorrect to simply expand the binomial as



    $(a+bx)^n = a^n+a^{n-1}n(bx)+frac{a^{n-2}n(n-1)}{2!}(bx)^2+...]$



    and say it is valid for $|bx|<1$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I suppose my question is about limits and infinities. I have been considering the expansion of $(a+bx)^n$ for negative and fractional $n$, and my text book says to always factorise out the $a^n$ like so:



      $(a+bx)^n =a^n(1+frac{b}{a}x)^n= a^n[1+nfrac{b}{a}x+frac{n(n-1)}{2!}(frac{b}{a}x)^2+...]$



      And then the expansion is valid for $|frac{bx}{a}|<1$



      My question is, why is the $a$ term involved in thevalidity requirement? Why is it incorrect to simply expand the binomial as



      $(a+bx)^n = a^n+a^{n-1}n(bx)+frac{a^{n-2}n(n-1)}{2!}(bx)^2+...]$



      and say it is valid for $|bx|<1$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I suppose my question is about limits and infinities. I have been considering the expansion of $(a+bx)^n$ for negative and fractional $n$, and my text book says to always factorise out the $a^n$ like so:



      $(a+bx)^n =a^n(1+frac{b}{a}x)^n= a^n[1+nfrac{b}{a}x+frac{n(n-1)}{2!}(frac{b}{a}x)^2+...]$



      And then the expansion is valid for $|frac{bx}{a}|<1$



      My question is, why is the $a$ term involved in thevalidity requirement? Why is it incorrect to simply expand the binomial as



      $(a+bx)^n = a^n+a^{n-1}n(bx)+frac{a^{n-2}n(n-1)}{2!}(bx)^2+...]$



      and say it is valid for $|bx|<1$?







      sequences-and-series infinity binomial-theorem negative-binomial






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 14 '16 at 13:46









      21joanna1221joanna12

      1,0671616




      1,0671616






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          This is first of all a matter of book-keeping. The $(1+bx/a)^n$ is
          considered a geometric series
          $$
          (1+y)^n=sum_{ige 0} binom{n}{i}y^i
          $$
          where $y=bx/a$ is the free variable, and where
          the radius of convergence is known to be $|y|<1$. So instead of
          remembering a lot of different subcases of how to approach this,
          only a single criterion (parameter) comes into play.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            It doesn't matter, if $n$ is an integer, as then the expansion has finite termage; and when $n$ isn't an integer, the convergence of the series is contingent on the ratio of $bx$ to $a$; so factoring-out the $a$ & gathering all the variables & constants into a single term makes whether it satisfies the convergence criterion more explicit.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1926561%2fbinomial-expansion-infinite-series-why-need-form-an1-fracbaxn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              This is first of all a matter of book-keeping. The $(1+bx/a)^n$ is
              considered a geometric series
              $$
              (1+y)^n=sum_{ige 0} binom{n}{i}y^i
              $$
              where $y=bx/a$ is the free variable, and where
              the radius of convergence is known to be $|y|<1$. So instead of
              remembering a lot of different subcases of how to approach this,
              only a single criterion (parameter) comes into play.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                This is first of all a matter of book-keeping. The $(1+bx/a)^n$ is
                considered a geometric series
                $$
                (1+y)^n=sum_{ige 0} binom{n}{i}y^i
                $$
                where $y=bx/a$ is the free variable, and where
                the radius of convergence is known to be $|y|<1$. So instead of
                remembering a lot of different subcases of how to approach this,
                only a single criterion (parameter) comes into play.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  This is first of all a matter of book-keeping. The $(1+bx/a)^n$ is
                  considered a geometric series
                  $$
                  (1+y)^n=sum_{ige 0} binom{n}{i}y^i
                  $$
                  where $y=bx/a$ is the free variable, and where
                  the radius of convergence is known to be $|y|<1$. So instead of
                  remembering a lot of different subcases of how to approach this,
                  only a single criterion (parameter) comes into play.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  This is first of all a matter of book-keeping. The $(1+bx/a)^n$ is
                  considered a geometric series
                  $$
                  (1+y)^n=sum_{ige 0} binom{n}{i}y^i
                  $$
                  where $y=bx/a$ is the free variable, and where
                  the radius of convergence is known to be $|y|<1$. So instead of
                  remembering a lot of different subcases of how to approach this,
                  only a single criterion (parameter) comes into play.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 14 '16 at 13:55









                  R. J. MatharR. J. Mathar

                  211




                  211























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      It doesn't matter, if $n$ is an integer, as then the expansion has finite termage; and when $n$ isn't an integer, the convergence of the series is contingent on the ratio of $bx$ to $a$; so factoring-out the $a$ & gathering all the variables & constants into a single term makes whether it satisfies the convergence criterion more explicit.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        It doesn't matter, if $n$ is an integer, as then the expansion has finite termage; and when $n$ isn't an integer, the convergence of the series is contingent on the ratio of $bx$ to $a$; so factoring-out the $a$ & gathering all the variables & constants into a single term makes whether it satisfies the convergence criterion more explicit.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          It doesn't matter, if $n$ is an integer, as then the expansion has finite termage; and when $n$ isn't an integer, the convergence of the series is contingent on the ratio of $bx$ to $a$; so factoring-out the $a$ & gathering all the variables & constants into a single term makes whether it satisfies the convergence criterion more explicit.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          It doesn't matter, if $n$ is an integer, as then the expansion has finite termage; and when $n$ isn't an integer, the convergence of the series is contingent on the ratio of $bx$ to $a$; so factoring-out the $a$ & gathering all the variables & constants into a single term makes whether it satisfies the convergence criterion more explicit.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 3 '18 at 19:24









                          AmbretteOrriseyAmbretteOrrisey

                          54210




                          54210






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1926561%2fbinomial-expansion-infinite-series-why-need-form-an1-fracbaxn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Human spaceflight

                              Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

                              File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg