Generalizing $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2$












6












$begingroup$


I was looking at this paper on section [17],




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$




Let generalize $(1)$



$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$



Where $kge 0$



I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$




Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$



$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$



How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
    $endgroup$
    – Richard
    Jan 2 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    I tested them numerically. it seems correct
    $endgroup$
    – user583851
    Jan 2 at 18:30
















6












$begingroup$


I was looking at this paper on section [17],




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$




Let generalize $(1)$



$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$



Where $kge 0$



I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$




Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$



$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$



How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
    $endgroup$
    – Richard
    Jan 2 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    I tested them numerically. it seems correct
    $endgroup$
    – user583851
    Jan 2 at 18:30














6












6








6


4



$begingroup$


I was looking at this paper on section [17],




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$




Let generalize $(1)$



$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$



Where $kge 0$



I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$




Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$



$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$



How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I was looking at this paper on section [17],




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$




Let generalize $(1)$



$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$



Where $kge 0$



I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be




$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$




Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$



$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$



How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$







sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 2 at 18:03









mrtaurho

4,12621234




4,12621234










asked Jan 2 at 17:43









user583851user583851

49119




49119












  • $begingroup$
    How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
    $endgroup$
    – Richard
    Jan 2 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    I tested them numerically. it seems correct
    $endgroup$
    – user583851
    Jan 2 at 18:30


















  • $begingroup$
    How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
    $endgroup$
    – Richard
    Jan 2 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    I tested them numerically. it seems correct
    $endgroup$
    – user583851
    Jan 2 at 18:30
















$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21




$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21












$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30




$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.



The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as



$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.



On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059744%2fgeneralizing-sum-n-1-infty-frach-n2n-choose-n22n2n-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
    $$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
    equals
    $$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
    The natural temptation is now to compute
    $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
    through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.



    The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as



    $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
    or
    $$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
    clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.



    On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
      $$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
      equals
      $$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
      The natural temptation is now to compute
      $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
      through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.



      The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as



      $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
      or
      $$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
      clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.



      On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
        $$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
        equals
        $$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
        The natural temptation is now to compute
        $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
        through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.



        The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as



        $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
        or
        $$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
        clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.



        On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
        $$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
        equals
        $$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
        The natural temptation is now to compute
        $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
        through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.



        The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as



        $$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
        or
        $$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
        clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.



        On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 2 at 21:21

























        answered Jan 2 at 21:14









        Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

        289k33281661




        289k33281661






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059744%2fgeneralizing-sum-n-1-infty-frach-n2n-choose-n22n2n-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg