Generalizing $sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2$
$begingroup$
I was looking at this paper on section [17],
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$
Let generalize $(1)$
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$
Where $kge 0$
I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$
Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$
$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$
How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$
sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was looking at this paper on section [17],
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$
Let generalize $(1)$
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$
Where $kge 0$
I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$
Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$
$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$
How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$
sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was looking at this paper on section [17],
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$
Let generalize $(1)$
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$
Where $kge 0$
I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$
Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$
$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$
How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$
sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers
$endgroup$
I was looking at this paper on section [17],
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)}=2tag1$$
Let generalize $(1)$
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}tag2$$
Where $kge 0$
I conjectured the closed form for $(2)$ to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots [2n-(2k+1)]}=frac{2(-1)^k}{(2k+1)!!(2k+1)}tag3$$
Here are a first few values of $k=1,2$ and $3$
$$begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)}&=-frac{2}{9}tag4\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)}&=frac{2}{75}tag5\
sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{H_n{2n choose n}}{2^{2n}(2n-1)(2n-3)(2n-5)(2n-7)}&=-frac{2}{735}tag6
end{align}$$
How do we go about to prove this conjecture $(3)?$
sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers
sequences-and-series closed-form harmonic-numbers
edited Jan 2 at 18:03
mrtaurho
4,12621234
4,12621234
asked Jan 2 at 17:43
user583851user583851
49119
49119
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.
The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.
On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059744%2fgeneralizing-sum-n-1-infty-frach-n2n-choose-n22n2n-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.
The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.
On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.
The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.
On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.
The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.
On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.
$endgroup$
What about reindexing and induction? The terms $frac{1}{(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)}$ have a nice telescopic structure: by the residue theorem
$$ frac{1}{(2n-1)(2n-3)cdots(2n-2k-1)}=(-1)^ksum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}cdotfrac{1}{2^{k+1}(2h)!!(2k-2h)!!} $$
equals
$$ frac{(-1)^k}{2^{2k+1}k!} sum_{h=0}^{k}frac{(-1)^h}{(2n-2h-1)}binom{k}{h}.$$
The natural temptation is now to compute
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n}{4^{n}}binom{2n}{n}frac{1}{2n-2h-1}$$
through $frac{-log(1-z)}{1-z}=sum_{ngeq 1}H_n z^n$ and $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}left(costhetaright)^{2n},dtheta$, multiply both sides by $(-1)^k binom{k}{h}$, sum over $h=0,1,ldots,k$ and finish by invoking Fubini's theorem (allowing to switch the integrals with respect to $dtheta$ and $dz$) and the Fourier series $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{cos(mvarphi)}{m}$ and $sum_{mgeq 1}frac{sin(mvarphi)}{m}$.
The only obstruction is that $frac{1}{2n-2h-1}=int_{0}^{1}z^nleft[frac{1}{2z^{h+3/2}}right],dz$ does not hold unconditionally: we would have been happier in having rising Pochhammer symbols rather than falling ones. On the other hand, reindexing fixes this issue. Since $binom{2n+2}{n+1} = frac{2(2n+1)}{n+1}binom{2n}{n}$, the original series can be written as
$$ sum_{ngeq 1}frac{H_n binom{2n}{n}}{4^n(2n-1)} = sum_{ngeq 0}frac{2H_{n+1}binom{2n}{n}}{4^{n+1}(n+1)}=-frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}sum_{ngeq 0}int_{0}^{pi/2}z^nleft(costhetaright)^{2n}log(1-z),dtheta,dz $$
or
$$ -frac{1}{pi}int_{0}^{1}int_{0}^{pi/2}frac{log(1-z)}{1-zcos^2theta},dtheta,dz =-frac{1}{2}int_{0}^{1}frac{log(1-z)}{sqrt{1-z}},dz,$$
clearly given by a derivative of the Beta function. This approach works also by replacing $(2n-1)$ with $(2n-1)cdots(2n-2k-1)$, you just have to be careful in managing the involved constants depending on $k$.
On second thought, I have just applied the binomial transform in disguise.
edited Jan 2 at 21:21
answered Jan 2 at 21:14
Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio
289k33281661
289k33281661
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059744%2fgeneralizing-sum-n-1-infty-frach-n2n-choose-n22n2n-1-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How did you determine (4), (5) and (6)? Have you tested them numerically?
$endgroup$
– Richard
Jan 2 at 18:21
$begingroup$
I tested them numerically. it seems correct
$endgroup$
– user583851
Jan 2 at 18:30