Find a subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{12}oplus mathbb{Z}_{4}oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$ of order 9
$begingroup$
Question:
Find a subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$ that is of order 9.
By a certain theorem, $mathbb{Z}_{4}oplusmathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_{60}$ from the fact that 4 and 15 are relatively prime.
This gives
$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}cong mathbb{Z}_{12}oplus mathbb{Z}_{60}$
It now suffices to find all elements of order 9 in the group $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$; knowing that the order of any element in a group is the order of the cyclic subgroup generated by that element.
But, aside from listing the elements manually-which is tedious- what is a more efficient way to go about?
abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question:
Find a subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$ that is of order 9.
By a certain theorem, $mathbb{Z}_{4}oplusmathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_{60}$ from the fact that 4 and 15 are relatively prime.
This gives
$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}cong mathbb{Z}_{12}oplus mathbb{Z}_{60}$
It now suffices to find all elements of order 9 in the group $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$; knowing that the order of any element in a group is the order of the cyclic subgroup generated by that element.
But, aside from listing the elements manually-which is tedious- what is a more efficient way to go about?
abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Question:
Find a subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$ that is of order 9.
By a certain theorem, $mathbb{Z}_{4}oplusmathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_{60}$ from the fact that 4 and 15 are relatively prime.
This gives
$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}cong mathbb{Z}_{12}oplus mathbb{Z}_{60}$
It now suffices to find all elements of order 9 in the group $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$; knowing that the order of any element in a group is the order of the cyclic subgroup generated by that element.
But, aside from listing the elements manually-which is tedious- what is a more efficient way to go about?
abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory finite-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
Question:
Find a subgroup of $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$ that is of order 9.
By a certain theorem, $mathbb{Z}_{4}oplusmathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_{60}$ from the fact that 4 and 15 are relatively prime.
This gives
$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}cong mathbb{Z}_{12}oplus mathbb{Z}_{60}$
It now suffices to find all elements of order 9 in the group $mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_{4} oplus mathbb{Z}_{15}$; knowing that the order of any element in a group is the order of the cyclic subgroup generated by that element.
But, aside from listing the elements manually-which is tedious- what is a more efficient way to go about?
abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory finite-groups direct-product
abstract-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory finite-groups direct-product
edited Dec 30 '18 at 14:30
Henning Makholm
239k17303540
239k17303540
asked Apr 9 '17 at 4:50
MathematicingMathematicing
2,44321854
2,44321854
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The structure theorem for abelian groups is the right way to go but you are using it in an unhelpful direction. It implies that you can split up that sum further: $$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_5.$$ You can read off the subgroup of order $9$. To be explicit, the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{12}$ is cyclic generated by $4$ and the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{15}$ is cyclic generated by $5$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the decomposition into minimal cyclic subgroups as in the answer by user399601 is probably the easiest way to go, here is a somewhat difference approach. Whatever the structure of your subgroup, its elements have orders that are powers of$~3$, so you can restrict attention to the subgroup of such elements. The property of having order a power of$~3$ is equivalent to the same property for the components in each of the given factors in the direct sum. In $Bbb Z_4$ only the identity qualifies, in the other two factors the subgroup with the property is of order$~3$. That gives $3times1times3=9$ elements in all, and you have to search no longer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2225781%2ffind-a-subgroup-of-mathbbz-12-oplus-mathbbz-4-oplus-mathbbz-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The structure theorem for abelian groups is the right way to go but you are using it in an unhelpful direction. It implies that you can split up that sum further: $$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_5.$$ You can read off the subgroup of order $9$. To be explicit, the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{12}$ is cyclic generated by $4$ and the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{15}$ is cyclic generated by $5$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The structure theorem for abelian groups is the right way to go but you are using it in an unhelpful direction. It implies that you can split up that sum further: $$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_5.$$ You can read off the subgroup of order $9$. To be explicit, the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{12}$ is cyclic generated by $4$ and the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{15}$ is cyclic generated by $5$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The structure theorem for abelian groups is the right way to go but you are using it in an unhelpful direction. It implies that you can split up that sum further: $$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_5.$$ You can read off the subgroup of order $9$. To be explicit, the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{12}$ is cyclic generated by $4$ and the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{15}$ is cyclic generated by $5$.
$endgroup$
The structure theorem for abelian groups is the right way to go but you are using it in an unhelpful direction. It implies that you can split up that sum further: $$mathbb{Z}_{12} oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_{15} cong mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_4 oplus mathbb{Z}_3 oplus mathbb{Z}_5.$$ You can read off the subgroup of order $9$. To be explicit, the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{12}$ is cyclic generated by $4$ and the subgroup $mathbb{Z}_3 subseteq mathbb{Z}_{15}$ is cyclic generated by $5$.
answered Apr 9 '17 at 4:56
user399601user399601
1,598412
1,598412
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the decomposition into minimal cyclic subgroups as in the answer by user399601 is probably the easiest way to go, here is a somewhat difference approach. Whatever the structure of your subgroup, its elements have orders that are powers of$~3$, so you can restrict attention to the subgroup of such elements. The property of having order a power of$~3$ is equivalent to the same property for the components in each of the given factors in the direct sum. In $Bbb Z_4$ only the identity qualifies, in the other two factors the subgroup with the property is of order$~3$. That gives $3times1times3=9$ elements in all, and you have to search no longer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the decomposition into minimal cyclic subgroups as in the answer by user399601 is probably the easiest way to go, here is a somewhat difference approach. Whatever the structure of your subgroup, its elements have orders that are powers of$~3$, so you can restrict attention to the subgroup of such elements. The property of having order a power of$~3$ is equivalent to the same property for the components in each of the given factors in the direct sum. In $Bbb Z_4$ only the identity qualifies, in the other two factors the subgroup with the property is of order$~3$. That gives $3times1times3=9$ elements in all, and you have to search no longer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the decomposition into minimal cyclic subgroups as in the answer by user399601 is probably the easiest way to go, here is a somewhat difference approach. Whatever the structure of your subgroup, its elements have orders that are powers of$~3$, so you can restrict attention to the subgroup of such elements. The property of having order a power of$~3$ is equivalent to the same property for the components in each of the given factors in the direct sum. In $Bbb Z_4$ only the identity qualifies, in the other two factors the subgroup with the property is of order$~3$. That gives $3times1times3=9$ elements in all, and you have to search no longer.
$endgroup$
While the decomposition into minimal cyclic subgroups as in the answer by user399601 is probably the easiest way to go, here is a somewhat difference approach. Whatever the structure of your subgroup, its elements have orders that are powers of$~3$, so you can restrict attention to the subgroup of such elements. The property of having order a power of$~3$ is equivalent to the same property for the components in each of the given factors in the direct sum. In $Bbb Z_4$ only the identity qualifies, in the other two factors the subgroup with the property is of order$~3$. That gives $3times1times3=9$ elements in all, and you have to search no longer.
edited Apr 9 '17 at 8:27
answered Apr 9 '17 at 5:15
Marc van LeeuwenMarc van Leeuwen
86.6k5106220
86.6k5106220
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2225781%2ffind-a-subgroup-of-mathbbz-12-oplus-mathbbz-4-oplus-mathbbz-15%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Note that this isn't asking for a cyclic subgroup of order $9$: so there could be a subgroup of order $9$, but no element of order $9$. You should also keep an eye out for subgroups of the form $Bbb Z_3oplusBbb Z_3$.
$endgroup$
– Stahl
Apr 9 '17 at 4:52
$begingroup$
yes, you are correct. Apparently, the browser 'saves' the entire draft of the thread upon reopening and I conveniently forgotten this fact, assuming that I had already input a fitting title.
$endgroup$
– Mathematicing
Apr 9 '17 at 4:54