Prove that there are no natural numbers $x$ whose digits are $0$ or $2$, such that $x$ is a perfect square.
$begingroup$
Prove that there are no natural numbers $x$ whose digits are $0$ or $2$, such that $x$ is a perfect square. I need some help here. I thought starting with $x = n * 10^k$ where $10^k$ represents the number of the zeros at the end of the number and $n$ is the group of digits which end with $2$ could help, but it didn't. Can anyone help?
linear-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove that there are no natural numbers $x$ whose digits are $0$ or $2$, such that $x$ is a perfect square. I need some help here. I thought starting with $x = n * 10^k$ where $10^k$ represents the number of the zeros at the end of the number and $n$ is the group of digits which end with $2$ could help, but it didn't. Can anyone help?
linear-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
7
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove that there are no natural numbers $x$ whose digits are $0$ or $2$, such that $x$ is a perfect square. I need some help here. I thought starting with $x = n * 10^k$ where $10^k$ represents the number of the zeros at the end of the number and $n$ is the group of digits which end with $2$ could help, but it didn't. Can anyone help?
linear-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
Prove that there are no natural numbers $x$ whose digits are $0$ or $2$, such that $x$ is a perfect square. I need some help here. I thought starting with $x = n * 10^k$ where $10^k$ represents the number of the zeros at the end of the number and $n$ is the group of digits which end with $2$ could help, but it didn't. Can anyone help?
linear-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory
linear-algebra number-theory elementary-number-theory
asked Jan 18 at 1:11
Wolf M.Wolf M.
1097
1097
1
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
7
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
7
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31
1
1
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
7
7
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Dividing by an appropriate power of $100$ we can ensure that the final two digits are not both $0$. But a simple search (or congruence argument) shows that none of $2,20,22$ are squares $pmod {100}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077726%2fprove-that-there-are-no-natural-numbers-x-whose-digits-are-0-or-2-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Dividing by an appropriate power of $100$ we can ensure that the final two digits are not both $0$. But a simple search (or congruence argument) shows that none of $2,20,22$ are squares $pmod {100}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dividing by an appropriate power of $100$ we can ensure that the final two digits are not both $0$. But a simple search (or congruence argument) shows that none of $2,20,22$ are squares $pmod {100}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Dividing by an appropriate power of $100$ we can ensure that the final two digits are not both $0$. But a simple search (or congruence argument) shows that none of $2,20,22$ are squares $pmod {100}$.
$endgroup$
Dividing by an appropriate power of $100$ we can ensure that the final two digits are not both $0$. But a simple search (or congruence argument) shows that none of $2,20,22$ are squares $pmod {100}$.
edited Jan 18 at 2:27
answered Jan 18 at 1:15
lulululu
43.7k25081
43.7k25081
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077726%2fprove-that-there-are-no-natural-numbers-x-whose-digits-are-0-or-2-such-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
It might be more fruitful to decompose $y = n cdot 10^k$ such that $10$ does not divide $n$, where $x = y^2$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Jan 18 at 1:29
7
$begingroup$
The last non-zero digit of a perfect square is always 1, 4, 5, 6, or 9.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Jan 18 at 1:31