Grouplike elements is a group
$begingroup$
Let $(H, m, u, Delta, epsilon, S)$ be a $K$-Hopf Algebra. We call an element $xin H$ grouplike if $Delta(x) = x otimes x$ and $epsilon(x) = 1_K$. The set of all grouplike elements is a group (denoted $G(H)$).
How do we show this?
I thought I might have the group $(G(H), mu, e, S')$ with $ mu : G(H) times G(H) rightarrow G(H) : (x,y) rightarrow m(xotimes y)\ e: {*} rightarrow G(H):* rightarrow u(1_K) \ S':G(H) rightarrow G(H):x rightarrow S(x)$
I can show that this structure gives us a group. But what I can't show is that the images of $mu$ and $S'$ are indeed in $G(H)$.
We have to show that
1) $∆(m(xotimes y)) = m(xotimes y) otimes m(xotimes y)$ (EDIT: Solved)
2) $epsilon(m(xotimes y)) = 1_K$ (EDIT: Solved)
3) $∆(S(x)) = S(x) otimes S(x)$
4) $epsilon(S(x)) = 1_K$
Any hints would be appreciated
abstract-algebra group-theory hopf-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(H, m, u, Delta, epsilon, S)$ be a $K$-Hopf Algebra. We call an element $xin H$ grouplike if $Delta(x) = x otimes x$ and $epsilon(x) = 1_K$. The set of all grouplike elements is a group (denoted $G(H)$).
How do we show this?
I thought I might have the group $(G(H), mu, e, S')$ with $ mu : G(H) times G(H) rightarrow G(H) : (x,y) rightarrow m(xotimes y)\ e: {*} rightarrow G(H):* rightarrow u(1_K) \ S':G(H) rightarrow G(H):x rightarrow S(x)$
I can show that this structure gives us a group. But what I can't show is that the images of $mu$ and $S'$ are indeed in $G(H)$.
We have to show that
1) $∆(m(xotimes y)) = m(xotimes y) otimes m(xotimes y)$ (EDIT: Solved)
2) $epsilon(m(xotimes y)) = 1_K$ (EDIT: Solved)
3) $∆(S(x)) = S(x) otimes S(x)$
4) $epsilon(S(x)) = 1_K$
Any hints would be appreciated
abstract-algebra group-theory hopf-algebras
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(H, m, u, Delta, epsilon, S)$ be a $K$-Hopf Algebra. We call an element $xin H$ grouplike if $Delta(x) = x otimes x$ and $epsilon(x) = 1_K$. The set of all grouplike elements is a group (denoted $G(H)$).
How do we show this?
I thought I might have the group $(G(H), mu, e, S')$ with $ mu : G(H) times G(H) rightarrow G(H) : (x,y) rightarrow m(xotimes y)\ e: {*} rightarrow G(H):* rightarrow u(1_K) \ S':G(H) rightarrow G(H):x rightarrow S(x)$
I can show that this structure gives us a group. But what I can't show is that the images of $mu$ and $S'$ are indeed in $G(H)$.
We have to show that
1) $∆(m(xotimes y)) = m(xotimes y) otimes m(xotimes y)$ (EDIT: Solved)
2) $epsilon(m(xotimes y)) = 1_K$ (EDIT: Solved)
3) $∆(S(x)) = S(x) otimes S(x)$
4) $epsilon(S(x)) = 1_K$
Any hints would be appreciated
abstract-algebra group-theory hopf-algebras
$endgroup$
Let $(H, m, u, Delta, epsilon, S)$ be a $K$-Hopf Algebra. We call an element $xin H$ grouplike if $Delta(x) = x otimes x$ and $epsilon(x) = 1_K$. The set of all grouplike elements is a group (denoted $G(H)$).
How do we show this?
I thought I might have the group $(G(H), mu, e, S')$ with $ mu : G(H) times G(H) rightarrow G(H) : (x,y) rightarrow m(xotimes y)\ e: {*} rightarrow G(H):* rightarrow u(1_K) \ S':G(H) rightarrow G(H):x rightarrow S(x)$
I can show that this structure gives us a group. But what I can't show is that the images of $mu$ and $S'$ are indeed in $G(H)$.
We have to show that
1) $∆(m(xotimes y)) = m(xotimes y) otimes m(xotimes y)$ (EDIT: Solved)
2) $epsilon(m(xotimes y)) = 1_K$ (EDIT: Solved)
3) $∆(S(x)) = S(x) otimes S(x)$
4) $epsilon(S(x)) = 1_K$
Any hints would be appreciated
abstract-algebra group-theory hopf-algebras
abstract-algebra group-theory hopf-algebras
edited Jan 17 '17 at 10:19
tomak
asked Jan 17 '17 at 9:23
tomaktomak
556313
556313
1
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06
1
1
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $g$ and $h$ be grouplike elements. Then $Delta(gh)=Delta(g)Delta(h)=(gotimes g)(hotimes h)=(ghotimes gh)$. Indeed the multiplication on $Hotimes H$ uses the standard flip map $tau$, thus $m_{Hotimes H}=(motimes m)circ (1otimes tauotimes 1)$. Thus the multiplication of grouplike elements is inner.
Now since $H$ is a Hopf algebra, the antipode axiom tells us that $S(g)g=varepsilon(g)1$. Since $varepsilon(g)=1$ (because $g$ is grouplike), this becomes $S(g)g=1$ and thus $S(g)$ is a left inverse for $g$. Similarly, $S(g)$ is a right inverse for $g$.
Now we show that $S(g)in G(H)$. By applying $Delta$ to $S(g)g=1$, we get that $$Delta(S(g))(gotimes g)=1otimes 1.$$ Hence $Delta(S(g))$ is the inverse of $gotimes g$ in the algebra $Hotimes H$. By uniqueness of inverses, $Delta(S(g))=S(g)otimes S(g)$ as desired.
Questions 2 and 4 follows immediately from the fact that the counit applied to grouplike elements is $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
First, note that the set of grouplikes $G(H)$ is closed wrt the multiplication of $Η$. This is a consequence of the fact that the comultiplication is an algebra homomorphism:
$$
Delta(gh) =
Delta(g) Delta(h) = (g otimes g)(h otimes h) = gh otimes gh
$$
i.e. $g,h in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $gh in G(H)$.
On the other hand, $1_{Η} in G(H)$, since in any Hopf algebra we have: $Delta(1_{Η}) = 1_{Η} otimes 1_{Η}$.
Next, using that $S$ is a coalgebra antimorphism, i.e. if $Delta(h)=sum h_{(1)}otimes h_{(2)}$ then $Delta(S(h))=sum S(h_{(2)})otimes S(h_{(1)})$, implies that (for any $g in G(Η)$):
$$
Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)
$$
thus: $g in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $S(g) in G(H)$.
Finally, by the definition of the antipode, we get (for all $g in G(Η)$):
$$
S(g)g = gS(g) = 1_{H}
$$
thus:
for all $g in G(Η)$ we have $S(g) = g^{-1}$ completing the proof.
P.S.1: If $Η$ is only a bialgebra then the above imply that $G(H)$ is a monoid. The presence of the antipode differentiates the situation, and makes $G(H)$ a group.
P.S.2: The above proof of the relation $Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)$, actually implements user's Mathematician_42 comment (posted in his answer above) that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{op cop}$ or equivalently an algebra antihomomorphism and a coalgebra antimorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2101342%2fgrouplike-elements-is-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $g$ and $h$ be grouplike elements. Then $Delta(gh)=Delta(g)Delta(h)=(gotimes g)(hotimes h)=(ghotimes gh)$. Indeed the multiplication on $Hotimes H$ uses the standard flip map $tau$, thus $m_{Hotimes H}=(motimes m)circ (1otimes tauotimes 1)$. Thus the multiplication of grouplike elements is inner.
Now since $H$ is a Hopf algebra, the antipode axiom tells us that $S(g)g=varepsilon(g)1$. Since $varepsilon(g)=1$ (because $g$ is grouplike), this becomes $S(g)g=1$ and thus $S(g)$ is a left inverse for $g$. Similarly, $S(g)$ is a right inverse for $g$.
Now we show that $S(g)in G(H)$. By applying $Delta$ to $S(g)g=1$, we get that $$Delta(S(g))(gotimes g)=1otimes 1.$$ Hence $Delta(S(g))$ is the inverse of $gotimes g$ in the algebra $Hotimes H$. By uniqueness of inverses, $Delta(S(g))=S(g)otimes S(g)$ as desired.
Questions 2 and 4 follows immediately from the fact that the counit applied to grouplike elements is $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $g$ and $h$ be grouplike elements. Then $Delta(gh)=Delta(g)Delta(h)=(gotimes g)(hotimes h)=(ghotimes gh)$. Indeed the multiplication on $Hotimes H$ uses the standard flip map $tau$, thus $m_{Hotimes H}=(motimes m)circ (1otimes tauotimes 1)$. Thus the multiplication of grouplike elements is inner.
Now since $H$ is a Hopf algebra, the antipode axiom tells us that $S(g)g=varepsilon(g)1$. Since $varepsilon(g)=1$ (because $g$ is grouplike), this becomes $S(g)g=1$ and thus $S(g)$ is a left inverse for $g$. Similarly, $S(g)$ is a right inverse for $g$.
Now we show that $S(g)in G(H)$. By applying $Delta$ to $S(g)g=1$, we get that $$Delta(S(g))(gotimes g)=1otimes 1.$$ Hence $Delta(S(g))$ is the inverse of $gotimes g$ in the algebra $Hotimes H$. By uniqueness of inverses, $Delta(S(g))=S(g)otimes S(g)$ as desired.
Questions 2 and 4 follows immediately from the fact that the counit applied to grouplike elements is $1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $g$ and $h$ be grouplike elements. Then $Delta(gh)=Delta(g)Delta(h)=(gotimes g)(hotimes h)=(ghotimes gh)$. Indeed the multiplication on $Hotimes H$ uses the standard flip map $tau$, thus $m_{Hotimes H}=(motimes m)circ (1otimes tauotimes 1)$. Thus the multiplication of grouplike elements is inner.
Now since $H$ is a Hopf algebra, the antipode axiom tells us that $S(g)g=varepsilon(g)1$. Since $varepsilon(g)=1$ (because $g$ is grouplike), this becomes $S(g)g=1$ and thus $S(g)$ is a left inverse for $g$. Similarly, $S(g)$ is a right inverse for $g$.
Now we show that $S(g)in G(H)$. By applying $Delta$ to $S(g)g=1$, we get that $$Delta(S(g))(gotimes g)=1otimes 1.$$ Hence $Delta(S(g))$ is the inverse of $gotimes g$ in the algebra $Hotimes H$. By uniqueness of inverses, $Delta(S(g))=S(g)otimes S(g)$ as desired.
Questions 2 and 4 follows immediately from the fact that the counit applied to grouplike elements is $1$.
$endgroup$
Let $g$ and $h$ be grouplike elements. Then $Delta(gh)=Delta(g)Delta(h)=(gotimes g)(hotimes h)=(ghotimes gh)$. Indeed the multiplication on $Hotimes H$ uses the standard flip map $tau$, thus $m_{Hotimes H}=(motimes m)circ (1otimes tauotimes 1)$. Thus the multiplication of grouplike elements is inner.
Now since $H$ is a Hopf algebra, the antipode axiom tells us that $S(g)g=varepsilon(g)1$. Since $varepsilon(g)=1$ (because $g$ is grouplike), this becomes $S(g)g=1$ and thus $S(g)$ is a left inverse for $g$. Similarly, $S(g)$ is a right inverse for $g$.
Now we show that $S(g)in G(H)$. By applying $Delta$ to $S(g)g=1$, we get that $$Delta(S(g))(gotimes g)=1otimes 1.$$ Hence $Delta(S(g))$ is the inverse of $gotimes g$ in the algebra $Hotimes H$. By uniqueness of inverses, $Delta(S(g))=S(g)otimes S(g)$ as desired.
Questions 2 and 4 follows immediately from the fact that the counit applied to grouplike elements is $1$.
edited Jan 17 at 23:04
darij grinberg
11.5k33168
11.5k33168
answered Jan 17 '17 at 9:58
Mathematician 42Mathematician 42
8,79411438
8,79411438
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I don't understand the final conclusion. Since $S(g)$ is the inverse of g, it follows...
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:54
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
I'm going to edit it, it's not complete.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 11:04
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
$begingroup$
Ok. So we get $∆(S(g)) = ((Sotimes S) circ ∆)(g) = (Sotimes S)(gotimes g) = S(g) otimes S(g)$. And for 4) $(epsilon circ S)(g) = epsilon(g) = 1$ (since S is a anti-algebra morphism. PS: by anti-algebra morphism you mean coalgebra morphism? PPS: I didn't know that S was a coalgebra morphism. I'll try to show that.
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 11:34
1
1
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
$begingroup$
I edited it again, this is an easy argument. You can also use that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{text{op cop}}$, but I believe the above argument is more streamlined.
$endgroup$
– Mathematician 42
Jan 17 '17 at 14:24
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
First, note that the set of grouplikes $G(H)$ is closed wrt the multiplication of $Η$. This is a consequence of the fact that the comultiplication is an algebra homomorphism:
$$
Delta(gh) =
Delta(g) Delta(h) = (g otimes g)(h otimes h) = gh otimes gh
$$
i.e. $g,h in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $gh in G(H)$.
On the other hand, $1_{Η} in G(H)$, since in any Hopf algebra we have: $Delta(1_{Η}) = 1_{Η} otimes 1_{Η}$.
Next, using that $S$ is a coalgebra antimorphism, i.e. if $Delta(h)=sum h_{(1)}otimes h_{(2)}$ then $Delta(S(h))=sum S(h_{(2)})otimes S(h_{(1)})$, implies that (for any $g in G(Η)$):
$$
Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)
$$
thus: $g in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $S(g) in G(H)$.
Finally, by the definition of the antipode, we get (for all $g in G(Η)$):
$$
S(g)g = gS(g) = 1_{H}
$$
thus:
for all $g in G(Η)$ we have $S(g) = g^{-1}$ completing the proof.
P.S.1: If $Η$ is only a bialgebra then the above imply that $G(H)$ is a monoid. The presence of the antipode differentiates the situation, and makes $G(H)$ a group.
P.S.2: The above proof of the relation $Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)$, actually implements user's Mathematician_42 comment (posted in his answer above) that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{op cop}$ or equivalently an algebra antihomomorphism and a coalgebra antimorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, note that the set of grouplikes $G(H)$ is closed wrt the multiplication of $Η$. This is a consequence of the fact that the comultiplication is an algebra homomorphism:
$$
Delta(gh) =
Delta(g) Delta(h) = (g otimes g)(h otimes h) = gh otimes gh
$$
i.e. $g,h in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $gh in G(H)$.
On the other hand, $1_{Η} in G(H)$, since in any Hopf algebra we have: $Delta(1_{Η}) = 1_{Η} otimes 1_{Η}$.
Next, using that $S$ is a coalgebra antimorphism, i.e. if $Delta(h)=sum h_{(1)}otimes h_{(2)}$ then $Delta(S(h))=sum S(h_{(2)})otimes S(h_{(1)})$, implies that (for any $g in G(Η)$):
$$
Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)
$$
thus: $g in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $S(g) in G(H)$.
Finally, by the definition of the antipode, we get (for all $g in G(Η)$):
$$
S(g)g = gS(g) = 1_{H}
$$
thus:
for all $g in G(Η)$ we have $S(g) = g^{-1}$ completing the proof.
P.S.1: If $Η$ is only a bialgebra then the above imply that $G(H)$ is a monoid. The presence of the antipode differentiates the situation, and makes $G(H)$ a group.
P.S.2: The above proof of the relation $Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)$, actually implements user's Mathematician_42 comment (posted in his answer above) that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{op cop}$ or equivalently an algebra antihomomorphism and a coalgebra antimorphism.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First, note that the set of grouplikes $G(H)$ is closed wrt the multiplication of $Η$. This is a consequence of the fact that the comultiplication is an algebra homomorphism:
$$
Delta(gh) =
Delta(g) Delta(h) = (g otimes g)(h otimes h) = gh otimes gh
$$
i.e. $g,h in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $gh in G(H)$.
On the other hand, $1_{Η} in G(H)$, since in any Hopf algebra we have: $Delta(1_{Η}) = 1_{Η} otimes 1_{Η}$.
Next, using that $S$ is a coalgebra antimorphism, i.e. if $Delta(h)=sum h_{(1)}otimes h_{(2)}$ then $Delta(S(h))=sum S(h_{(2)})otimes S(h_{(1)})$, implies that (for any $g in G(Η)$):
$$
Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)
$$
thus: $g in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $S(g) in G(H)$.
Finally, by the definition of the antipode, we get (for all $g in G(Η)$):
$$
S(g)g = gS(g) = 1_{H}
$$
thus:
for all $g in G(Η)$ we have $S(g) = g^{-1}$ completing the proof.
P.S.1: If $Η$ is only a bialgebra then the above imply that $G(H)$ is a monoid. The presence of the antipode differentiates the situation, and makes $G(H)$ a group.
P.S.2: The above proof of the relation $Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)$, actually implements user's Mathematician_42 comment (posted in his answer above) that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{op cop}$ or equivalently an algebra antihomomorphism and a coalgebra antimorphism.
$endgroup$
First, note that the set of grouplikes $G(H)$ is closed wrt the multiplication of $Η$. This is a consequence of the fact that the comultiplication is an algebra homomorphism:
$$
Delta(gh) =
Delta(g) Delta(h) = (g otimes g)(h otimes h) = gh otimes gh
$$
i.e. $g,h in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $gh in G(H)$.
On the other hand, $1_{Η} in G(H)$, since in any Hopf algebra we have: $Delta(1_{Η}) = 1_{Η} otimes 1_{Η}$.
Next, using that $S$ is a coalgebra antimorphism, i.e. if $Delta(h)=sum h_{(1)}otimes h_{(2)}$ then $Delta(S(h))=sum S(h_{(2)})otimes S(h_{(1)})$, implies that (for any $g in G(Η)$):
$$
Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)
$$
thus: $g in G(H)$ $Rightarrow$ $S(g) in G(H)$.
Finally, by the definition of the antipode, we get (for all $g in G(Η)$):
$$
S(g)g = gS(g) = 1_{H}
$$
thus:
for all $g in G(Η)$ we have $S(g) = g^{-1}$ completing the proof.
P.S.1: If $Η$ is only a bialgebra then the above imply that $G(H)$ is a monoid. The presence of the antipode differentiates the situation, and makes $G(H)$ a group.
P.S.2: The above proof of the relation $Delta(S(g)) = S(g) otimes S(g)$, actually implements user's Mathematician_42 comment (posted in his answer above) that $S$ is a bialgebra morphism from $H$ to $H^{op cop}$ or equivalently an algebra antihomomorphism and a coalgebra antimorphism.
edited Jan 17 at 23:05
darij grinberg
11.5k33168
11.5k33168
answered Jan 18 '17 at 2:19
KonKanKonKan
5,91621338
5,91621338
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2101342%2fgrouplike-elements-is-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
For 1) is is probably more obvious what is going on if you write $m(xotimes y) = xy$ and remember that $Delta$ is a homomorphism of algebras.
$endgroup$
– Tobias Kildetoft
Jan 17 '17 at 9:59
$begingroup$
Ok. 1) and 2) are actually easily verified
$endgroup$
– tomak
Jan 17 '17 at 10:18
$begingroup$
What is true is that the set of grouplike elements is a group. Please correct your title, so that it makes sense.
$endgroup$
– Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Jan 18 '17 at 3:06