Hell Knight Signifier Double Dip?
I was looking into Hell Knight Signifier builds and I found a reference to something called the "Divine Double-Dip", where (for example) you would take 3 levels of Oracle for a Mystery revelation, and 7 levels of cleric for domain casting. Which would result in, at lvl 20, 13th lvl Oracle casting and 17th level Cleric casting on top of everything the Signifier gives you.
Does "+1 level of spellcasting class" really work like that? That seems like an oddly OP oversight.
pathfinder prestige-class
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
add a comment |
I was looking into Hell Knight Signifier builds and I found a reference to something called the "Divine Double-Dip", where (for example) you would take 3 levels of Oracle for a Mystery revelation, and 7 levels of cleric for domain casting. Which would result in, at lvl 20, 13th lvl Oracle casting and 17th level Cleric casting on top of everything the Signifier gives you.
Does "+1 level of spellcasting class" really work like that? That seems like an oddly OP oversight.
pathfinder prestige-class
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48
add a comment |
I was looking into Hell Knight Signifier builds and I found a reference to something called the "Divine Double-Dip", where (for example) you would take 3 levels of Oracle for a Mystery revelation, and 7 levels of cleric for domain casting. Which would result in, at lvl 20, 13th lvl Oracle casting and 17th level Cleric casting on top of everything the Signifier gives you.
Does "+1 level of spellcasting class" really work like that? That seems like an oddly OP oversight.
pathfinder prestige-class
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
I was looking into Hell Knight Signifier builds and I found a reference to something called the "Divine Double-Dip", where (for example) you would take 3 levels of Oracle for a Mystery revelation, and 7 levels of cleric for domain casting. Which would result in, at lvl 20, 13th lvl Oracle casting and 17th level Cleric casting on top of everything the Signifier gives you.
Does "+1 level of spellcasting class" really work like that? That seems like an oddly OP oversight.
pathfinder prestige-class
pathfinder prestige-class
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
42.4k14133195
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
asked Dec 28 '18 at 2:36
Aria Nicholas
1396
1396
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48
add a comment |
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It does not boost your spellcaster level for both classes.
Re-read the linked reddit post. They're specifically referring to the Catechism ability, which lets your Hellknight Signifier levels stack for purposes of special abilities, such as cleric domain powers or oracle mysteries.
An oracle 3 / cleric 7 / Hellknight Signifier 10 would effectively be level 13 for all of their level-dependent oracle mystery effects and level 17 for all of their level-dependent cleric domain powers, but they would have to choose between casting spells as an oracle 13 / cleric 7 or as an oracle 3 / cleric 17 (recommended over the 13/7).
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138051%2fhell-knight-signifier-double-dip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It does not boost your spellcaster level for both classes.
Re-read the linked reddit post. They're specifically referring to the Catechism ability, which lets your Hellknight Signifier levels stack for purposes of special abilities, such as cleric domain powers or oracle mysteries.
An oracle 3 / cleric 7 / Hellknight Signifier 10 would effectively be level 13 for all of their level-dependent oracle mystery effects and level 17 for all of their level-dependent cleric domain powers, but they would have to choose between casting spells as an oracle 13 / cleric 7 or as an oracle 3 / cleric 17 (recommended over the 13/7).
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
It does not boost your spellcaster level for both classes.
Re-read the linked reddit post. They're specifically referring to the Catechism ability, which lets your Hellknight Signifier levels stack for purposes of special abilities, such as cleric domain powers or oracle mysteries.
An oracle 3 / cleric 7 / Hellknight Signifier 10 would effectively be level 13 for all of their level-dependent oracle mystery effects and level 17 for all of their level-dependent cleric domain powers, but they would have to choose between casting spells as an oracle 13 / cleric 7 or as an oracle 3 / cleric 17 (recommended over the 13/7).
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
It does not boost your spellcaster level for both classes.
Re-read the linked reddit post. They're specifically referring to the Catechism ability, which lets your Hellknight Signifier levels stack for purposes of special abilities, such as cleric domain powers or oracle mysteries.
An oracle 3 / cleric 7 / Hellknight Signifier 10 would effectively be level 13 for all of their level-dependent oracle mystery effects and level 17 for all of their level-dependent cleric domain powers, but they would have to choose between casting spells as an oracle 13 / cleric 7 or as an oracle 3 / cleric 17 (recommended over the 13/7).
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
It does not boost your spellcaster level for both classes.
Re-read the linked reddit post. They're specifically referring to the Catechism ability, which lets your Hellknight Signifier levels stack for purposes of special abilities, such as cleric domain powers or oracle mysteries.
An oracle 3 / cleric 7 / Hellknight Signifier 10 would effectively be level 13 for all of their level-dependent oracle mystery effects and level 17 for all of their level-dependent cleric domain powers, but they would have to choose between casting spells as an oracle 13 / cleric 7 or as an oracle 3 / cleric 17 (recommended over the 13/7).
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
edited Dec 28 '18 at 15:33
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:55
Oblivious Sage
42.4k14133195
42.4k14133195
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
Or some other middle ground of Caster Level, I think. I can't find the text on it but recall picking CL increase on a per-Prestige-level basis.
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:56
1
1
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
@Ifusaso Yeah, I think you're right. That's probably strictly worse than putting all the CL increases into the same class, though.
– Oblivious Sage
Dec 28 '18 at 2:57
2
2
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
@Ifusaso Some prestige classes indicate that you can choose your progression on a per-level basis, and some don’t. Even among those that do, some limit you to a spellcasting class you had prior to actually becoming that prestige class, while others allow other classes introduced in between the prestige class levels to be selected. And, of course, since the spellcasting boiler plate was almost-certainly copied-and-pasted for each class, it’s extremely unclear when—if ever—those distinctions were even intended. In any event, the point is usually moot because it’s rarely a good idea.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:33
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
On which point, I would recommend updating this answer to point out that a 3rd-level oracle/7th-level cleric should be progressing cleric spellcasting. If one wanted oracle spellcasting instead (which is not really a great idea since cleric spellcasting is superior), instead being a 9th-level oracle/1st-level cleric makes vastly more sense. Actually, for that matter, a 1st-level oracle/9th-level cleric is better than the 3/7 version—they only did that for the sake of a second revelation, which might be worth it at 20th, but certainly not before then.
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:38
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
(The point is, you want to maximize your spellcasting from one class, rather than be half-decent at both—being half-decent at both means you aren’t actually good at anything.)
– KRyan
Dec 28 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f138051%2fhell-knight-signifier-double-dip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Could you link your source?
– Ifusaso
Dec 28 '18 at 2:46
Added source link to original question :)
– Aria Nicholas
Dec 28 '18 at 2:48