How to prove normal cones are closed?
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be a convex subset of $mathbb{R}^{n}$ and let $bar{x} in C$. Then the normal cone $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed and convex. Here, we're defining the normal cone as follows:
$$N_{C}(bar{x}) = {v in mathbb{R}^{n} vert langle v, x - bar{x} rangle le 0, forall x in C }.$$
Proving convexity is straightforward, as is proving $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed when $C$ is open ($i.e.$ every $x in C$ is an interior point). However, I'm not sure how to prove that $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed more generally?
convex-analysis convex-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be a convex subset of $mathbb{R}^{n}$ and let $bar{x} in C$. Then the normal cone $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed and convex. Here, we're defining the normal cone as follows:
$$N_{C}(bar{x}) = {v in mathbb{R}^{n} vert langle v, x - bar{x} rangle le 0, forall x in C }.$$
Proving convexity is straightforward, as is proving $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed when $C$ is open ($i.e.$ every $x in C$ is an interior point). However, I'm not sure how to prove that $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed more generally?
convex-analysis convex-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $C$ be a convex subset of $mathbb{R}^{n}$ and let $bar{x} in C$. Then the normal cone $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed and convex. Here, we're defining the normal cone as follows:
$$N_{C}(bar{x}) = {v in mathbb{R}^{n} vert langle v, x - bar{x} rangle le 0, forall x in C }.$$
Proving convexity is straightforward, as is proving $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed when $C$ is open ($i.e.$ every $x in C$ is an interior point). However, I'm not sure how to prove that $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed more generally?
convex-analysis convex-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $C$ be a convex subset of $mathbb{R}^{n}$ and let $bar{x} in C$. Then the normal cone $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed and convex. Here, we're defining the normal cone as follows:
$$N_{C}(bar{x}) = {v in mathbb{R}^{n} vert langle v, x - bar{x} rangle le 0, forall x in C }.$$
Proving convexity is straightforward, as is proving $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed when $C$ is open ($i.e.$ every $x in C$ is an interior point). However, I'm not sure how to prove that $N_{C}(bar{x})$ is closed more generally?
convex-analysis convex-geometry
convex-analysis convex-geometry
asked Jan 9 at 23:19
StevenAStevenA
755
755
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Write $N_C(bar{x}) = cap_{x in C} {v | langle v, x-bar{x} rangle le 0 }$.
Hence $N_C(bar{x})$ is the intersection of closed hyperplanes which is closed (the
function $v mapsto langle v, x-bar{x} rangle$ is continuous).
This approach also shows that $N_C(bar{x})$ is convex.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068057%2fhow-to-prove-normal-cones-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Write $N_C(bar{x}) = cap_{x in C} {v | langle v, x-bar{x} rangle le 0 }$.
Hence $N_C(bar{x})$ is the intersection of closed hyperplanes which is closed (the
function $v mapsto langle v, x-bar{x} rangle$ is continuous).
This approach also shows that $N_C(bar{x})$ is convex.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Write $N_C(bar{x}) = cap_{x in C} {v | langle v, x-bar{x} rangle le 0 }$.
Hence $N_C(bar{x})$ is the intersection of closed hyperplanes which is closed (the
function $v mapsto langle v, x-bar{x} rangle$ is continuous).
This approach also shows that $N_C(bar{x})$ is convex.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Write $N_C(bar{x}) = cap_{x in C} {v | langle v, x-bar{x} rangle le 0 }$.
Hence $N_C(bar{x})$ is the intersection of closed hyperplanes which is closed (the
function $v mapsto langle v, x-bar{x} rangle$ is continuous).
This approach also shows that $N_C(bar{x})$ is convex.
$endgroup$
Write $N_C(bar{x}) = cap_{x in C} {v | langle v, x-bar{x} rangle le 0 }$.
Hence $N_C(bar{x})$ is the intersection of closed hyperplanes which is closed (the
function $v mapsto langle v, x-bar{x} rangle$ is continuous).
This approach also shows that $N_C(bar{x})$ is convex.
answered Jan 9 at 23:22
copper.hatcopper.hat
127k559160
127k559160
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
1
1
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
....and now I see why this proof has been omitted from so many books that I've looked through. Thanks @copper.hat.
$endgroup$
– StevenA
Jan 9 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
$begingroup$
@StevenA: There are many cute tricks, after a while you will add them to your quiver :-).
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Jan 9 at 23:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068057%2fhow-to-prove-normal-cones-are-closed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown