Differential Geometry in Hamiltonian Mechanics












4












$begingroup$


I have following question about the Hamiltonian mechanics from differential geometrical viewpoint:



We start with a physical system parametrized by generalized (position) coordinates $(q^i)$ providing under given restrictions the configuration space $Q$ or more precisely a (smooth) manifold.



The tangent bundle $TQ$ over $Q$ provides for the fixed coordinates $q^i$ the corresponding velocities $dot q ^j$. Geometrically the velocities $dot q ^j$ at $q^i$ belong to the tangent space $TQ_{q_0}$ at fixed point $q_0^i$ of $Q$.



So $q^i$ and $dot q ^j$ provide parameters for the Lagrangian $L[q(t), dot q(t)]$, a function on $TQ$.



On the other hand it's known that the Hamiltionian $H[q(t), p(t)]$ can be interpreted as a function on the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ where for fixed $q_0^i in Q$ the momenta $(p_0)_j$ are living in cotangent space $T^*Q_{q_0}$.



My question is why (mathematically) the phase space spanned by position $q^i$ and momentum coordinates $p_j$ come from the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ while the position $q^i$ and velocity coordinates $dot q_j$ come from tangent bundle ?



Or in other words why the cotangent space $T^*Q_{q}$ corresponds to momenta while the tangent space $TQ_{q}$ to velocities from viewpoint of differential geometry?



Remark: I know that elemenary physical approach always associates the velocity to the tangent space of the position but this doesn't answer concretely why the momenta spaces should belong exactly to the cotangents.



Intuitively I guess that the velocities and momenta should behave differently under transformations in sense of co- and contravariant coordinates but I'm not sure if this is the real reason for the problem above...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 10 at 3:16
















4












$begingroup$


I have following question about the Hamiltonian mechanics from differential geometrical viewpoint:



We start with a physical system parametrized by generalized (position) coordinates $(q^i)$ providing under given restrictions the configuration space $Q$ or more precisely a (smooth) manifold.



The tangent bundle $TQ$ over $Q$ provides for the fixed coordinates $q^i$ the corresponding velocities $dot q ^j$. Geometrically the velocities $dot q ^j$ at $q^i$ belong to the tangent space $TQ_{q_0}$ at fixed point $q_0^i$ of $Q$.



So $q^i$ and $dot q ^j$ provide parameters for the Lagrangian $L[q(t), dot q(t)]$, a function on $TQ$.



On the other hand it's known that the Hamiltionian $H[q(t), p(t)]$ can be interpreted as a function on the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ where for fixed $q_0^i in Q$ the momenta $(p_0)_j$ are living in cotangent space $T^*Q_{q_0}$.



My question is why (mathematically) the phase space spanned by position $q^i$ and momentum coordinates $p_j$ come from the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ while the position $q^i$ and velocity coordinates $dot q_j$ come from tangent bundle ?



Or in other words why the cotangent space $T^*Q_{q}$ corresponds to momenta while the tangent space $TQ_{q}$ to velocities from viewpoint of differential geometry?



Remark: I know that elemenary physical approach always associates the velocity to the tangent space of the position but this doesn't answer concretely why the momenta spaces should belong exactly to the cotangents.



Intuitively I guess that the velocities and momenta should behave differently under transformations in sense of co- and contravariant coordinates but I'm not sure if this is the real reason for the problem above...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 10 at 3:16














4












4








4


2



$begingroup$


I have following question about the Hamiltonian mechanics from differential geometrical viewpoint:



We start with a physical system parametrized by generalized (position) coordinates $(q^i)$ providing under given restrictions the configuration space $Q$ or more precisely a (smooth) manifold.



The tangent bundle $TQ$ over $Q$ provides for the fixed coordinates $q^i$ the corresponding velocities $dot q ^j$. Geometrically the velocities $dot q ^j$ at $q^i$ belong to the tangent space $TQ_{q_0}$ at fixed point $q_0^i$ of $Q$.



So $q^i$ and $dot q ^j$ provide parameters for the Lagrangian $L[q(t), dot q(t)]$, a function on $TQ$.



On the other hand it's known that the Hamiltionian $H[q(t), p(t)]$ can be interpreted as a function on the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ where for fixed $q_0^i in Q$ the momenta $(p_0)_j$ are living in cotangent space $T^*Q_{q_0}$.



My question is why (mathematically) the phase space spanned by position $q^i$ and momentum coordinates $p_j$ come from the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ while the position $q^i$ and velocity coordinates $dot q_j$ come from tangent bundle ?



Or in other words why the cotangent space $T^*Q_{q}$ corresponds to momenta while the tangent space $TQ_{q}$ to velocities from viewpoint of differential geometry?



Remark: I know that elemenary physical approach always associates the velocity to the tangent space of the position but this doesn't answer concretely why the momenta spaces should belong exactly to the cotangents.



Intuitively I guess that the velocities and momenta should behave differently under transformations in sense of co- and contravariant coordinates but I'm not sure if this is the real reason for the problem above...










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have following question about the Hamiltonian mechanics from differential geometrical viewpoint:



We start with a physical system parametrized by generalized (position) coordinates $(q^i)$ providing under given restrictions the configuration space $Q$ or more precisely a (smooth) manifold.



The tangent bundle $TQ$ over $Q$ provides for the fixed coordinates $q^i$ the corresponding velocities $dot q ^j$. Geometrically the velocities $dot q ^j$ at $q^i$ belong to the tangent space $TQ_{q_0}$ at fixed point $q_0^i$ of $Q$.



So $q^i$ and $dot q ^j$ provide parameters for the Lagrangian $L[q(t), dot q(t)]$, a function on $TQ$.



On the other hand it's known that the Hamiltionian $H[q(t), p(t)]$ can be interpreted as a function on the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ where for fixed $q_0^i in Q$ the momenta $(p_0)_j$ are living in cotangent space $T^*Q_{q_0}$.



My question is why (mathematically) the phase space spanned by position $q^i$ and momentum coordinates $p_j$ come from the cotangent bundle $T^*Q$ while the position $q^i$ and velocity coordinates $dot q_j$ come from tangent bundle ?



Or in other words why the cotangent space $T^*Q_{q}$ corresponds to momenta while the tangent space $TQ_{q}$ to velocities from viewpoint of differential geometry?



Remark: I know that elemenary physical approach always associates the velocity to the tangent space of the position but this doesn't answer concretely why the momenta spaces should belong exactly to the cotangents.



Intuitively I guess that the velocities and momenta should behave differently under transformations in sense of co- and contravariant coordinates but I'm not sure if this is the real reason for the problem above...







differential-geometry mathematical-physics hamilton-jacobi-equation






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 9 at 23:02









KarlPeterKarlPeter

3541315




3541315












  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 10 at 3:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
    $endgroup$
    – hypernova
    Jan 10 at 3:16
















$begingroup$
Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 10 at 3:16




$begingroup$
Perhaps this answer could be helpful for you.
$endgroup$
– hypernova
Jan 10 at 3:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $T(q, dot q)$ denote the kinetic energy of the system at configuration $q$ and velocity $dot q$. On the tangent plane of some fixed point $q_0$, the kinetic energy induces a norm $frac{1}{2}|dot q|^2 = T(q_0, dot q)$ on tangent vectors, which can be extended to an inner product via the polarization identity, and from there to a kinetic energy metric $g_T$ on the entire tangent bundle $TQ$. In this way kinetic energy gives $Q$ its geometric structure.



Momenta live on the cotangent space because they are dual to velocities, in the sense of the musical isomorphisms: a configurational velocity $dot q$ and its corresponding momentum $p = dot q^{flat}$ satisfy, for any other tangent vector $v$,
$$pv = langle dot q, vrangle_{g_T}$$
and in particular, $pdot q = 2T(q,dot q).$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068049%2fdifferential-geometry-in-hamiltonian-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $T(q, dot q)$ denote the kinetic energy of the system at configuration $q$ and velocity $dot q$. On the tangent plane of some fixed point $q_0$, the kinetic energy induces a norm $frac{1}{2}|dot q|^2 = T(q_0, dot q)$ on tangent vectors, which can be extended to an inner product via the polarization identity, and from there to a kinetic energy metric $g_T$ on the entire tangent bundle $TQ$. In this way kinetic energy gives $Q$ its geometric structure.



    Momenta live on the cotangent space because they are dual to velocities, in the sense of the musical isomorphisms: a configurational velocity $dot q$ and its corresponding momentum $p = dot q^{flat}$ satisfy, for any other tangent vector $v$,
    $$pv = langle dot q, vrangle_{g_T}$$
    and in particular, $pdot q = 2T(q,dot q).$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $T(q, dot q)$ denote the kinetic energy of the system at configuration $q$ and velocity $dot q$. On the tangent plane of some fixed point $q_0$, the kinetic energy induces a norm $frac{1}{2}|dot q|^2 = T(q_0, dot q)$ on tangent vectors, which can be extended to an inner product via the polarization identity, and from there to a kinetic energy metric $g_T$ on the entire tangent bundle $TQ$. In this way kinetic energy gives $Q$ its geometric structure.



      Momenta live on the cotangent space because they are dual to velocities, in the sense of the musical isomorphisms: a configurational velocity $dot q$ and its corresponding momentum $p = dot q^{flat}$ satisfy, for any other tangent vector $v$,
      $$pv = langle dot q, vrangle_{g_T}$$
      and in particular, $pdot q = 2T(q,dot q).$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let $T(q, dot q)$ denote the kinetic energy of the system at configuration $q$ and velocity $dot q$. On the tangent plane of some fixed point $q_0$, the kinetic energy induces a norm $frac{1}{2}|dot q|^2 = T(q_0, dot q)$ on tangent vectors, which can be extended to an inner product via the polarization identity, and from there to a kinetic energy metric $g_T$ on the entire tangent bundle $TQ$. In this way kinetic energy gives $Q$ its geometric structure.



        Momenta live on the cotangent space because they are dual to velocities, in the sense of the musical isomorphisms: a configurational velocity $dot q$ and its corresponding momentum $p = dot q^{flat}$ satisfy, for any other tangent vector $v$,
        $$pv = langle dot q, vrangle_{g_T}$$
        and in particular, $pdot q = 2T(q,dot q).$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let $T(q, dot q)$ denote the kinetic energy of the system at configuration $q$ and velocity $dot q$. On the tangent plane of some fixed point $q_0$, the kinetic energy induces a norm $frac{1}{2}|dot q|^2 = T(q_0, dot q)$ on tangent vectors, which can be extended to an inner product via the polarization identity, and from there to a kinetic energy metric $g_T$ on the entire tangent bundle $TQ$. In this way kinetic energy gives $Q$ its geometric structure.



        Momenta live on the cotangent space because they are dual to velocities, in the sense of the musical isomorphisms: a configurational velocity $dot q$ and its corresponding momentum $p = dot q^{flat}$ satisfy, for any other tangent vector $v$,
        $$pv = langle dot q, vrangle_{g_T}$$
        and in particular, $pdot q = 2T(q,dot q).$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 10 at 1:51









        user7530user7530

        34.9k760113




        34.9k760113






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068049%2fdifferential-geometry-in-hamiltonian-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Human spaceflight

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg