Conditional probability with choosing two cards from a deck
$begingroup$
Two cards are picked randomly from a deck. What is the probability that if the first card is Spades, the second card will be a Queen?
What I have so far:
Let $A$ be the event the first card is Spades.
Let $B$ be the event the second card is a Queen
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(Acap B)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(A)P(B|A)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{frac{13}{52}P(B|A)}{frac{13}{52}}$$
But now i get confused for $P(B|A)$ since its the problem im trying to solve in the first place... I know that $A$ and $B$ are dependent events since if a spade is drawn it could be the Queen spade.
So we we remove that possibility, which would make the probability of drawing the second queen be $3/51$. But, if that $P(B|A) = 3/51$ wouldnt that be the solution to the question in the first place? What happend to the $13/52$ parts?Also, if the first card is not a queen then shouldn't we consider that case as well?
statistics conditional-probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two cards are picked randomly from a deck. What is the probability that if the first card is Spades, the second card will be a Queen?
What I have so far:
Let $A$ be the event the first card is Spades.
Let $B$ be the event the second card is a Queen
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(Acap B)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(A)P(B|A)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{frac{13}{52}P(B|A)}{frac{13}{52}}$$
But now i get confused for $P(B|A)$ since its the problem im trying to solve in the first place... I know that $A$ and $B$ are dependent events since if a spade is drawn it could be the Queen spade.
So we we remove that possibility, which would make the probability of drawing the second queen be $3/51$. But, if that $P(B|A) = 3/51$ wouldnt that be the solution to the question in the first place? What happend to the $13/52$ parts?Also, if the first card is not a queen then shouldn't we consider that case as well?
statistics conditional-probability
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two cards are picked randomly from a deck. What is the probability that if the first card is Spades, the second card will be a Queen?
What I have so far:
Let $A$ be the event the first card is Spades.
Let $B$ be the event the second card is a Queen
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(Acap B)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(A)P(B|A)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{frac{13}{52}P(B|A)}{frac{13}{52}}$$
But now i get confused for $P(B|A)$ since its the problem im trying to solve in the first place... I know that $A$ and $B$ are dependent events since if a spade is drawn it could be the Queen spade.
So we we remove that possibility, which would make the probability of drawing the second queen be $3/51$. But, if that $P(B|A) = 3/51$ wouldnt that be the solution to the question in the first place? What happend to the $13/52$ parts?Also, if the first card is not a queen then shouldn't we consider that case as well?
statistics conditional-probability
$endgroup$
Two cards are picked randomly from a deck. What is the probability that if the first card is Spades, the second card will be a Queen?
What I have so far:
Let $A$ be the event the first card is Spades.
Let $B$ be the event the second card is a Queen
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(Acap B)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{P(A)P(B|A)}{P(A)}$$
$$P(B|A) = frac{frac{13}{52}P(B|A)}{frac{13}{52}}$$
But now i get confused for $P(B|A)$ since its the problem im trying to solve in the first place... I know that $A$ and $B$ are dependent events since if a spade is drawn it could be the Queen spade.
So we we remove that possibility, which would make the probability of drawing the second queen be $3/51$. But, if that $P(B|A) = 3/51$ wouldnt that be the solution to the question in the first place? What happend to the $13/52$ parts?Also, if the first card is not a queen then shouldn't we consider that case as well?
statistics conditional-probability
statistics conditional-probability
edited Jan 10 at 0:05
David G. Stork
11k41432
11k41432
asked Jan 9 at 23:57
shockwave88shockwave88
122
122
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the first card is a spade, there are two relevant cases: either the first card is the queen of spades (probability ${1 over 13}$), or it is a different spade (probability ${12 over 13}$).
In the first case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${3 over 51}$. In the second case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${4 over 51}$. Hence:
$$P({rm queen}|{rm spade}) = {1 over 13}{3 over 51}+ {12 over 13}{4 over 51} = {1 over 13}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068080%2fconditional-probability-with-choosing-two-cards-from-a-deck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the first card is a spade, there are two relevant cases: either the first card is the queen of spades (probability ${1 over 13}$), or it is a different spade (probability ${12 over 13}$).
In the first case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${3 over 51}$. In the second case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${4 over 51}$. Hence:
$$P({rm queen}|{rm spade}) = {1 over 13}{3 over 51}+ {12 over 13}{4 over 51} = {1 over 13}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the first card is a spade, there are two relevant cases: either the first card is the queen of spades (probability ${1 over 13}$), or it is a different spade (probability ${12 over 13}$).
In the first case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${3 over 51}$. In the second case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${4 over 51}$. Hence:
$$P({rm queen}|{rm spade}) = {1 over 13}{3 over 51}+ {12 over 13}{4 over 51} = {1 over 13}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the first card is a spade, there are two relevant cases: either the first card is the queen of spades (probability ${1 over 13}$), or it is a different spade (probability ${12 over 13}$).
In the first case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${3 over 51}$. In the second case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${4 over 51}$. Hence:
$$P({rm queen}|{rm spade}) = {1 over 13}{3 over 51}+ {12 over 13}{4 over 51} = {1 over 13}$$
$endgroup$
Given the first card is a spade, there are two relevant cases: either the first card is the queen of spades (probability ${1 over 13}$), or it is a different spade (probability ${12 over 13}$).
In the first case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${3 over 51}$. In the second case, the probability the second card is a queen is ${4 over 51}$. Hence:
$$P({rm queen}|{rm spade}) = {1 over 13}{3 over 51}+ {12 over 13}{4 over 51} = {1 over 13}$$
answered Jan 10 at 0:10
David G. StorkDavid G. Stork
11k41432
11k41432
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
Intuitively your answer makes perfect sense to me. However, in terms of the defined probability equation, i dont understand why it isnt $frac{frac{1}{13}frac{3}{51}}{frac{1}{13}}frac{frac{12}{13}frac{4}{51}}{frac{12}{13}} $
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:08
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
@shockwave88: Why it isn't what?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 10 at 1:11
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
$begingroup$
I updated the answer, if u dont mind answering it. I think its that way because of the denominator in the conditional probabilty equation.
$endgroup$
– shockwave88
Jan 10 at 1:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068080%2fconditional-probability-with-choosing-two-cards-from-a-deck%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown