Show that the Limit of ODE Solutions Tends to $0$












6














I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.



We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question





























    6














    I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
    with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.



    We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
    however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      6












      6








      6


      1





      I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
      with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.



      We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
      however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
      with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.



      We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
      however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 28 '18 at 3:14









      dmtri

      1,4321521




      1,4321521










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 22:52









      Jelle Dijkstra

      525




      525






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
          $$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
            – Jelle Dijkstra
            Dec 28 '18 at 8:15



















          3














          Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
          le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
          $$

          Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
          Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
          $$
          w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
          $$

          Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.



          Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.



          This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:49










          • Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
            – Hans Engler
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:58










          • Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:00













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054422%2fshow-that-the-limit-of-ode-solutions-tends-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
          $$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
            – Jelle Dijkstra
            Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
















          3














          Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
          $$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
            – Jelle Dijkstra
            Dec 28 '18 at 8:15














          3












          3








          3






          Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
          $$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
          $$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 28 '18 at 0:31









          kobe

          34.7k22247




          34.7k22247












          • It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
            – Jelle Dijkstra
            Dec 28 '18 at 8:15


















          • It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
            – Jelle Dijkstra
            Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
















          It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
          – Jelle Dijkstra
          Dec 28 '18 at 8:15




          It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
          – Jelle Dijkstra
          Dec 28 '18 at 8:15











          3














          Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
          le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
          $$

          Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
          Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
          $$
          w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
          $$

          Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.



          Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.



          This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:49










          • Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
            – Hans Engler
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:58










          • Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:00


















          3














          Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
          le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
          $$

          Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
          Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
          $$
          w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
          $$

          Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.



          Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.



          This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:49










          • Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
            – Hans Engler
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:58










          • Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
















          3












          3








          3






          Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
          le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
          $$

          Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
          Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
          $$
          w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
          $$

          Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.



          Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.



          This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
          le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
          $$

          Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
          Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
          $$
          w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
          $$

          and therefore
          $$
          z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
          $$

          Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.



          Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.



          This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:59

























          answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:19









          Hans Engler

          10.1k11836




          10.1k11836












          • Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:49










          • Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
            – Hans Engler
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:58










          • Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:00




















          • Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:49










          • Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
            – Hans Engler
            Dec 28 '18 at 2:58










          • Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
            – kobe
            Dec 28 '18 at 3:00


















          Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
          – kobe
          Dec 28 '18 at 2:49




          Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
          – kobe
          Dec 28 '18 at 2:49












          Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
          – Hans Engler
          Dec 28 '18 at 2:58




          Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
          – Hans Engler
          Dec 28 '18 at 2:58












          Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
          – kobe
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:00






          Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
          – kobe
          Dec 28 '18 at 3:00




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054422%2fshow-that-the-limit-of-ode-solutions-tends-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

          List of scandals in India

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?