Show that the Limit of ODE Solutions Tends to $0$
I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.
We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-equations
add a comment |
I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.
We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-equations
add a comment |
I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.
We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-equations
I am revising some exercises from a course on ODE's that I have not managed to do. This exercise asks the reader to show that any solution to an ODE of the following form goes to $0$ as $trightarrowinfty$: $$y'+a(t)y=f(t)$$
with $a(t)$ and $f(t)$ continuous, $a(t) geq c>0$ and $limlimits_{trightarrowinfty}f(t)=0$.
We can find an integrating factor for this ODE, namely $mu(t)=e^{int a(t)}$, so that we find that any solution looks like $$y = e^{-int a(t)}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$ and from the property that $a(t) geq c>0$ we can conclude that $$|y| leq e^{-ct}int f(t)e^{int a(t)}$$
however I don't know how to continue from here. Any help would be appreciated.
differential-equations
differential-equations
edited Dec 28 '18 at 3:14
dmtri
1,4321521
1,4321521
asked Dec 27 '18 at 22:52
Jelle Dijkstra
525
525
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
$$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
add a comment |
Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
$$
and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
$$
Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
$$
w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
$$
and therefore
$$
z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
$$
Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.
Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.
This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054422%2fshow-that-the-limit-of-ode-solutions-tends-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
$$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
add a comment |
Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
$$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
add a comment |
Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
$$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.
Let $A(t) = int_0^t a(s), ds$. By method of integrating factors,
$$y(t) = e^{-A(t)}y(0) + e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds$$ For $t ge 0$, the exponential $e^{-A(t)}$ is bounded by $e^{-ct}$, so the term $e^{-At}y(0)to 0$ as $t to infty$. Now $$e^{-A(t)}int_0^t e^{A(s)}f(s), ds = int_0^t f(s)e^{-int_s^t a(u), du}, ds$$ is bounded by $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$, which we'll show tends to $0$ as well. Fix a positive number $varepsilon$. Using the condition $limlimits_{tto infty} f(t) = 0$, we may choose a positive number $M$ such that for all $t ge M$, $lvert f(s)rvert < varepsilon$. For $t > M$, $$int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds = int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds + int_M^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le Ce^{-ct} + frac{varepsilon}{c}left[1-e^{-c(t-M)}right]$$ where $C$ is the constant $int_0^M lvert f(s)rvert e^{cs}, ds$. Taking the limit superior as $t to infty$ results in $$limsup_{tto infty} int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds le frac{varepsilon}{c}$$ As $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $int_0^t lvert f(s)rvert e^{-c(t-s)}, ds$ tends to $0$ as $tto infty$, as desired.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 0:31
kobe
34.7k22247
34.7k22247
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
add a comment |
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
It seems the key to solving it was realizing I could write $A(s)-A(t)$ as an integral and then use the fact that $a(t)geq c>0$.
– Jelle Dijkstra
Dec 28 '18 at 8:15
add a comment |
Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
$$
and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
$$
Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
$$
w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
$$
and therefore
$$
z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
$$
Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.
Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.
This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
$$
and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
$$
Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
$$
w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
$$
and therefore
$$
z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
$$
Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.
Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.
This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
$$
and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
$$
Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
$$
w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
$$
and therefore
$$
z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
$$
Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.
Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.
This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.
Let $0 < varepsilon le 2$, let $T > 0$ be such that $|f(t)| le varepsilon$ for $t ge T$, and set $z(t) = |y(t)|^2$. Then for $t ge T$
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) = - 2a(t) z(t) + |f(t)y(t)| le -2cz(t) + varepsilon sqrt{z(t)}
le - 2 c z(t) +varepsilon (frac{1}{2c} + frac{c}{2} z(t))
$$
and therefore
$$
frac{d}{dt} z(t) le - cz(t) + frac{varepsilon}{2c} ,
$$
Now set $w(t) = e^{ct}z(t)$, then $frac{d}{dt} w(t) le frac{varepsilon e^{ct}}{2c}$.
Integrating this inequality from $T$ to $t > T$, it follows that
$$
w(t) le w(T) + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}(e^{c(t-T)}-1)
$$
and therefore
$$
z(t) le e^{-ct}cdot const. + frac{varepsilon}{2c^2} ,
$$
Consequently $limsup_{t to infty} z(t) le frac{varepsilon}{2c^2}$.
Since $varepsilon$ was arbitrary, it follows that $y(t) to 0$.
This argument also works for vector valued differential equations, even nonlinear ones. An integrating factor for the equation is not needed.
edited Dec 28 '18 at 2:59
answered Dec 28 '18 at 2:19
Hans Engler
10.1k11836
10.1k11836
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Why is $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Shouldn't it be $-2a(t)z(t) + lvert f(t)y(t)rvert le -2color{red}{c}z(t) + varepsilonsqrt{z(t)}$? Also, in solving the differential inequality for $z(t)$, it seems you have implicitly used the integrating factor method, multiplying by $e^{ct}$.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 2:49
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Thanks for finding the typo - I fixed it. I used a very simple version of the integrating factor technique, but did not rely on finding one for the original equation,
– Hans Engler
Dec 28 '18 at 2:58
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
Sure, no problem. Nice argument.
– kobe
Dec 28 '18 at 3:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054422%2fshow-that-the-limit-of-ode-solutions-tends-to-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown