Obtaining depth to an object of known dimensions from a monocular calibrated camera












0














I am using notation defined in this page: Camera Calibration



In summary:




  1. The standard frame is the frame that has the origin at the projection center and z axis pointed "out" from the lens.

  2. The image frame is the frame onto which the image is projected. This is what we get measurements from. It sits in front of the standard frame.


I know from the derivation on that page that we can convert the image points to coordinates in the standard frame modulo some scaling. That is



$[x_i, y_i]$ in image frame will be $z_s[x_s, y_s, 1]$ in the standard frame, where $z_s$ is unknown or arbitrary. So we can't get depth information.



However, assume that I observe four points in the image, and I know the distance between these four points in the standard frame. So the four points in the image frame are:



$p_i(1)$, $p_i(2)$, $p_i(3)$, and $p_i(4)$,



where each $p_i$ has just $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the image frame and is of the form $[x,y]$. I convert them to the standard frame



$z_1*p_s(1)$, $z_2*p_s(2)$, $z_3*p_s(3)$, $z_4*p_s(4)$,



where each $p_s$ has the $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the standard frame and is of the form $z[x,y,1]$, and $z$ is the unknown scale factor. The question is, does knowing the distance between these points (in the standard frame) help me solve for $z_1$, $z_2$, $z_3$, and $z_4$? Or is there something fundamental I'm missing here?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I am using notation defined in this page: Camera Calibration



    In summary:




    1. The standard frame is the frame that has the origin at the projection center and z axis pointed "out" from the lens.

    2. The image frame is the frame onto which the image is projected. This is what we get measurements from. It sits in front of the standard frame.


    I know from the derivation on that page that we can convert the image points to coordinates in the standard frame modulo some scaling. That is



    $[x_i, y_i]$ in image frame will be $z_s[x_s, y_s, 1]$ in the standard frame, where $z_s$ is unknown or arbitrary. So we can't get depth information.



    However, assume that I observe four points in the image, and I know the distance between these four points in the standard frame. So the four points in the image frame are:



    $p_i(1)$, $p_i(2)$, $p_i(3)$, and $p_i(4)$,



    where each $p_i$ has just $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the image frame and is of the form $[x,y]$. I convert them to the standard frame



    $z_1*p_s(1)$, $z_2*p_s(2)$, $z_3*p_s(3)$, $z_4*p_s(4)$,



    where each $p_s$ has the $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the standard frame and is of the form $z[x,y,1]$, and $z$ is the unknown scale factor. The question is, does knowing the distance between these points (in the standard frame) help me solve for $z_1$, $z_2$, $z_3$, and $z_4$? Or is there something fundamental I'm missing here?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am using notation defined in this page: Camera Calibration



      In summary:




      1. The standard frame is the frame that has the origin at the projection center and z axis pointed "out" from the lens.

      2. The image frame is the frame onto which the image is projected. This is what we get measurements from. It sits in front of the standard frame.


      I know from the derivation on that page that we can convert the image points to coordinates in the standard frame modulo some scaling. That is



      $[x_i, y_i]$ in image frame will be $z_s[x_s, y_s, 1]$ in the standard frame, where $z_s$ is unknown or arbitrary. So we can't get depth information.



      However, assume that I observe four points in the image, and I know the distance between these four points in the standard frame. So the four points in the image frame are:



      $p_i(1)$, $p_i(2)$, $p_i(3)$, and $p_i(4)$,



      where each $p_i$ has just $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the image frame and is of the form $[x,y]$. I convert them to the standard frame



      $z_1*p_s(1)$, $z_2*p_s(2)$, $z_3*p_s(3)$, $z_4*p_s(4)$,



      where each $p_s$ has the $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the standard frame and is of the form $z[x,y,1]$, and $z$ is the unknown scale factor. The question is, does knowing the distance between these points (in the standard frame) help me solve for $z_1$, $z_2$, $z_3$, and $z_4$? Or is there something fundamental I'm missing here?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am using notation defined in this page: Camera Calibration



      In summary:




      1. The standard frame is the frame that has the origin at the projection center and z axis pointed "out" from the lens.

      2. The image frame is the frame onto which the image is projected. This is what we get measurements from. It sits in front of the standard frame.


      I know from the derivation on that page that we can convert the image points to coordinates in the standard frame modulo some scaling. That is



      $[x_i, y_i]$ in image frame will be $z_s[x_s, y_s, 1]$ in the standard frame, where $z_s$ is unknown or arbitrary. So we can't get depth information.



      However, assume that I observe four points in the image, and I know the distance between these four points in the standard frame. So the four points in the image frame are:



      $p_i(1)$, $p_i(2)$, $p_i(3)$, and $p_i(4)$,



      where each $p_i$ has just $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the image frame and is of the form $[x,y]$. I convert them to the standard frame



      $z_1*p_s(1)$, $z_2*p_s(2)$, $z_3*p_s(3)$, $z_4*p_s(4)$,



      where each $p_s$ has the $x$ and $y$ coordinates in the standard frame and is of the form $z[x,y,1]$, and $z$ is the unknown scale factor. The question is, does knowing the distance between these points (in the standard frame) help me solve for $z_1$, $z_2$, $z_3$, and $z_4$? Or is there something fundamental I'm missing here?







      computer-vision






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 0:01









      Mr. Fegur

      517313




      517313






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054459%2fobtaining-depth-to-an-object-of-known-dimensions-from-a-monocular-calibrated-cam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054459%2fobtaining-depth-to-an-object-of-known-dimensions-from-a-monocular-calibrated-cam%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Human spaceflight

          Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

          File:DeusFollowingSea.jpg