Probability of getting 6 heads in a row from 200 flips and intuition about this high value
A few days ago i had an argument with a friend about this question :
What is the probability of getting 6 heads in a row from 200 flips ?
I argued it is high probability (significantly bigger than half) while he argued it is low probability.
When i tried to give exact formula i failed so we checked the web were the answer was about 84%, yet he is still not convinced so from this i have two questions:
1) What is the exact formula for $k$ Heads in a row (consecutive) out of $n$ coin flips?
2) (Not a mathematical) How to convince my friend that 6 in a row have high probability ? meaning what is the intuition behind the question ?
probability intuition
|
show 2 more comments
A few days ago i had an argument with a friend about this question :
What is the probability of getting 6 heads in a row from 200 flips ?
I argued it is high probability (significantly bigger than half) while he argued it is low probability.
When i tried to give exact formula i failed so we checked the web were the answer was about 84%, yet he is still not convinced so from this i have two questions:
1) What is the exact formula for $k$ Heads in a row (consecutive) out of $n$ coin flips?
2) (Not a mathematical) How to convince my friend that 6 in a row have high probability ? meaning what is the intuition behind the question ?
probability intuition
1
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
3
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
3
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
1
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16
|
show 2 more comments
A few days ago i had an argument with a friend about this question :
What is the probability of getting 6 heads in a row from 200 flips ?
I argued it is high probability (significantly bigger than half) while he argued it is low probability.
When i tried to give exact formula i failed so we checked the web were the answer was about 84%, yet he is still not convinced so from this i have two questions:
1) What is the exact formula for $k$ Heads in a row (consecutive) out of $n$ coin flips?
2) (Not a mathematical) How to convince my friend that 6 in a row have high probability ? meaning what is the intuition behind the question ?
probability intuition
A few days ago i had an argument with a friend about this question :
What is the probability of getting 6 heads in a row from 200 flips ?
I argued it is high probability (significantly bigger than half) while he argued it is low probability.
When i tried to give exact formula i failed so we checked the web were the answer was about 84%, yet he is still not convinced so from this i have two questions:
1) What is the exact formula for $k$ Heads in a row (consecutive) out of $n$ coin flips?
2) (Not a mathematical) How to convince my friend that 6 in a row have high probability ? meaning what is the intuition behind the question ?
probability intuition
probability intuition
edited Dec 29 '18 at 10:58
Did
246k23221456
246k23221456
asked Dec 29 '18 at 9:57
AhmadAhmad
2,5461625
2,5461625
1
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
3
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
3
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
1
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16
|
show 2 more comments
1
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
3
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
3
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
1
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16
1
1
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
3
3
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
3
3
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
1
1
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055695%2fprobability-of-getting-6-heads-in-a-row-from-200-flips-and-intuition-about-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055695%2fprobability-of-getting-6-heads-in-a-row-from-200-flips-and-intuition-about-this%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Maybe a computer simulation would help convince him.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:02
3
There is a video of numberphile which came out recently which makes the point about how runs of large length seem improbable to people because they don't seem like a "random" enough permutation. Maybe make him watch that and then you could talk about misguided intuitions. numberphile.com/videos/randomness-is-random
– Uday Khanna
Dec 29 '18 at 10:06
3
Here's one thought. If you flip a coin 6 times in a row, your chance of "success" (that is, heads on all six tosses) is $p = 1/64$. If you do 33 independent trials of this experiment (for a total of 198 tosses), the probability of failing all 33 trials is $(1 - p)^{33} approx 0.6$. So, $0.4$ is clearly a lower bound on your probability of getting 6 heads in a row at least once when flipping a coin 200 times. It's not a very good lower bound, but it might already be larger than what your friend had in mind.
– littleO
Dec 29 '18 at 10:11
@UdayKhanna i watched it, because of that i said it have high probability
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:13
1
@littleO great thinking, i do agree that he thinks the chances are almost zero so $0.4$ is great deal, thanks
– Ahmad
Dec 29 '18 at 10:16