$M_n(F)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $d leq n.$
Source of the following Problem:Prob. $19.(b).,$ Section $13.2,$ from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote(Second Edition).
Let $K$ be an extension of $F$ of degree $n.$ Prove that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F),$ so $M_n(F)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $d leq n.$
I proved that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F)$. I stuck in the next part, though from my previous question this it is clear that whenever $d | n$ it is true. But
Is it true if $d<n$ and $d$ does not divide $n.$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory field-theory
add a comment |
Source of the following Problem:Prob. $19.(b).,$ Section $13.2,$ from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote(Second Edition).
Let $K$ be an extension of $F$ of degree $n.$ Prove that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F),$ so $M_n(F)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $d leq n.$
I proved that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F)$. I stuck in the next part, though from my previous question this it is clear that whenever $d | n$ it is true. But
Is it true if $d<n$ and $d$ does not divide $n.$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory field-theory
2
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
1
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
add a comment |
Source of the following Problem:Prob. $19.(b).,$ Section $13.2,$ from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote(Second Edition).
Let $K$ be an extension of $F$ of degree $n.$ Prove that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F),$ so $M_n(F)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $d leq n.$
I proved that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F)$. I stuck in the next part, though from my previous question this it is clear that whenever $d | n$ it is true. But
Is it true if $d<n$ and $d$ does not divide $n.$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory field-theory
Source of the following Problem:Prob. $19.(b).,$ Section $13.2,$ from Abstract Algebra by Dummit and Foote(Second Edition).
Let $K$ be an extension of $F$ of degree $n.$ Prove that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F),$ so $M_n(F)$ contains an isomorphic copy of every extension of $F$ of degree $d leq n.$
I proved that $K$ is isomorphic to a subfield of the ring $M_n(F)$. I stuck in the next part, though from my previous question this it is clear that whenever $d | n$ it is true. But
Is it true if $d<n$ and $d$ does not divide $n.$
linear-algebra abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory field-theory
linear-algebra abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory field-theory
edited Dec 29 '18 at 10:55
jmerry
2,894312
2,894312
asked Dec 29 '18 at 10:40
user371231user371231
756511
756511
2
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
1
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
add a comment |
2
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
1
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
2
2
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
1
1
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
That's simply false, at least if one assumes the identity of $K$ maps
to the identity of $M_n(F)$. For an extension $K/F$ of degree $d$, $K$
can only have
an $F$-embedding in $M_n(F)$ if $dmid n$.
Suppose $K$ embeds in $M_n(F)$. Then the space $C$ of column vectors of
height $n$ is a left $M_n(F)$-module, and so by restriction of scalars becomes a
vector space over $K$. If $dim_K C=m$, then $n=dim_K C=md$. Therefore
$dmid n$.
But if one admits non-unital ring homomorphisms, then $M_d(F)$ embeds
in $M_n(F)$ for $dle n$ by
$$Amapstopmatrix{A&0\0&0}$$
so the answer becomes yes if you accept this.
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055723%2fm-nf-contains-an-isomorphic-copy-of-every-extension-of-f-of-degree-d-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
That's simply false, at least if one assumes the identity of $K$ maps
to the identity of $M_n(F)$. For an extension $K/F$ of degree $d$, $K$
can only have
an $F$-embedding in $M_n(F)$ if $dmid n$.
Suppose $K$ embeds in $M_n(F)$. Then the space $C$ of column vectors of
height $n$ is a left $M_n(F)$-module, and so by restriction of scalars becomes a
vector space over $K$. If $dim_K C=m$, then $n=dim_K C=md$. Therefore
$dmid n$.
But if one admits non-unital ring homomorphisms, then $M_d(F)$ embeds
in $M_n(F)$ for $dle n$ by
$$Amapstopmatrix{A&0\0&0}$$
so the answer becomes yes if you accept this.
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
That's simply false, at least if one assumes the identity of $K$ maps
to the identity of $M_n(F)$. For an extension $K/F$ of degree $d$, $K$
can only have
an $F$-embedding in $M_n(F)$ if $dmid n$.
Suppose $K$ embeds in $M_n(F)$. Then the space $C$ of column vectors of
height $n$ is a left $M_n(F)$-module, and so by restriction of scalars becomes a
vector space over $K$. If $dim_K C=m$, then $n=dim_K C=md$. Therefore
$dmid n$.
But if one admits non-unital ring homomorphisms, then $M_d(F)$ embeds
in $M_n(F)$ for $dle n$ by
$$Amapstopmatrix{A&0\0&0}$$
so the answer becomes yes if you accept this.
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
That's simply false, at least if one assumes the identity of $K$ maps
to the identity of $M_n(F)$. For an extension $K/F$ of degree $d$, $K$
can only have
an $F$-embedding in $M_n(F)$ if $dmid n$.
Suppose $K$ embeds in $M_n(F)$. Then the space $C$ of column vectors of
height $n$ is a left $M_n(F)$-module, and so by restriction of scalars becomes a
vector space over $K$. If $dim_K C=m$, then $n=dim_K C=md$. Therefore
$dmid n$.
But if one admits non-unital ring homomorphisms, then $M_d(F)$ embeds
in $M_n(F)$ for $dle n$ by
$$Amapstopmatrix{A&0\0&0}$$
so the answer becomes yes if you accept this.
That's simply false, at least if one assumes the identity of $K$ maps
to the identity of $M_n(F)$. For an extension $K/F$ of degree $d$, $K$
can only have
an $F$-embedding in $M_n(F)$ if $dmid n$.
Suppose $K$ embeds in $M_n(F)$. Then the space $C$ of column vectors of
height $n$ is a left $M_n(F)$-module, and so by restriction of scalars becomes a
vector space over $K$. If $dim_K C=m$, then $n=dim_K C=md$. Therefore
$dmid n$.
But if one admits non-unital ring homomorphisms, then $M_d(F)$ embeds
in $M_n(F)$ for $dle n$ by
$$Amapstopmatrix{A&0\0&0}$$
so the answer becomes yes if you accept this.
edited Dec 29 '18 at 10:58
answered Dec 29 '18 at 10:54
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
102k959132
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
Amen :-) ${}{}$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:57
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@Lord Shark the Unknown: Can you explain what $C$ is ?
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:26
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@user371231 The space of $1times n$ column vectors over $F$.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 29 '18 at 15:28
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
@Lord Shark the Unknown: $n times 1$ right ? So it is clear to me that $C=F^n$ is a $K$ module. Then you assumed that $text{dim}_{K}C=m.$ I guess it will be $n=text{dim}_{F}C$ and considering the tower we get $n=md.$
– user371231
Dec 29 '18 at 15:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055723%2fm-nf-contains-an-isomorphic-copy-of-every-extension-of-f-of-degree-d-leq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Somebody told me that for Dummit & Foote a ring does not need to have a multiplicative neutral element. Such a heretical view has stopped me from ever reading their tome. But it does save the day here. When your "subring" need not share the neutral element, then you can turn $K$ into a set of $dtimes d$ matrices over $F$. And fill those matrices with a bunch of zeros to turn those $dtimes d$ matrices into upper left corners of $ntimes n$ matrices.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:47
1
On the other hand, if we sensibly assume that rings have a unit, shared by all the subrings, then this is possible only when $d$ is a factor of $n$. Observe that embedding $K$ into $M_n(F)$ in such a way that $1_K$ becomes $I_n$ turns the vector space $F^n$ also into a vector space over $K$. If a vector space $V$ over $K$ has dimension $ell$, then, when viewed as a vector space over $F$, it will have dimension $dell$. So $dell=n$ forcing $d$ to be a factor of $n$.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:52
Unless, of course, Dummit & Foote also drop $1x=x$ from the list of vector space axioms. But in that case all linear algebra gets broken, and nobody would buy their book :-)
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 29 '18 at 10:54