Primitive Trinomial for $82589933$?
At Twelve new primitive binary trinomials, $x^{74207281}+x^{9999621}+1$ is shown to be a primitive trinomial in $GF(2)[x]$.
Note that $2^{74207281}-1$ was the largest known (Mersenne) prime before 2018, that is the prime in the exponent of the Mersenne prime gave rise to a trinomial.
In the interim, new Mersenne primes have been found.
Just announced (Dec 2018), $2^{82589933}-1$ is prime, and in Jan 2018, $2^{77232917}-1$ was found to be prime.
Do these also give rise to trinomials?
To be explicit, are there $j$ or $k$ such that $x^{82589933}+x^{j}+1$ or $x^{77232917}+x^{k}+1$ are primitive trinomials in $GF(2)[x]$?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers finite-fields
add a comment |
At Twelve new primitive binary trinomials, $x^{74207281}+x^{9999621}+1$ is shown to be a primitive trinomial in $GF(2)[x]$.
Note that $2^{74207281}-1$ was the largest known (Mersenne) prime before 2018, that is the prime in the exponent of the Mersenne prime gave rise to a trinomial.
In the interim, new Mersenne primes have been found.
Just announced (Dec 2018), $2^{82589933}-1$ is prime, and in Jan 2018, $2^{77232917}-1$ was found to be prime.
Do these also give rise to trinomials?
To be explicit, are there $j$ or $k$ such that $x^{82589933}+x^{j}+1$ or $x^{77232917}+x^{k}+1$ are primitive trinomials in $GF(2)[x]$?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers finite-fields
1
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
2
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
1
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
1
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49
add a comment |
At Twelve new primitive binary trinomials, $x^{74207281}+x^{9999621}+1$ is shown to be a primitive trinomial in $GF(2)[x]$.
Note that $2^{74207281}-1$ was the largest known (Mersenne) prime before 2018, that is the prime in the exponent of the Mersenne prime gave rise to a trinomial.
In the interim, new Mersenne primes have been found.
Just announced (Dec 2018), $2^{82589933}-1$ is prime, and in Jan 2018, $2^{77232917}-1$ was found to be prime.
Do these also give rise to trinomials?
To be explicit, are there $j$ or $k$ such that $x^{82589933}+x^{j}+1$ or $x^{77232917}+x^{k}+1$ are primitive trinomials in $GF(2)[x]$?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers finite-fields
At Twelve new primitive binary trinomials, $x^{74207281}+x^{9999621}+1$ is shown to be a primitive trinomial in $GF(2)[x]$.
Note that $2^{74207281}-1$ was the largest known (Mersenne) prime before 2018, that is the prime in the exponent of the Mersenne prime gave rise to a trinomial.
In the interim, new Mersenne primes have been found.
Just announced (Dec 2018), $2^{82589933}-1$ is prime, and in Jan 2018, $2^{77232917}-1$ was found to be prime.
Do these also give rise to trinomials?
To be explicit, are there $j$ or $k$ such that $x^{82589933}+x^{j}+1$ or $x^{77232917}+x^{k}+1$ are primitive trinomials in $GF(2)[x]$?
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers finite-fields
number-theory polynomials prime-numbers finite-fields
edited Dec 28 '18 at 13:47
quid♦
36.9k95093
36.9k95093
asked Dec 21 '18 at 21:31
Ed PeggEd Pegg
9,77232592
9,77232592
1
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
2
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
1
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
1
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49
add a comment |
1
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
2
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
1
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
1
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49
1
1
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
2
2
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
1
1
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
1
1
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048915%2fprimitive-trinomial-for-82589933%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048915%2fprimitive-trinomial-for-82589933%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I don't understand the votes to put this on hold. There was nothing unclear about the question. Anyway, when $p=2^m-1$ is a Mersenne prime, a polynomial $f(x)$ of degree $m$ is primitive in $Bbb{F}_2[x]$ if and only if it is irreducible if and only if $x^{2^m}equiv xpmod{f(x)}$. That last congruence can be checked with the good ole square-and-multipl if you can spare the CPU time.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:04
2
Having said that, I'm not entirely sure that people here are well placed to answer this. I would guess that the search for such trinomials does take quite a bit of CPU resources even though testing any candidate is relatively straightforward.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 23 '18 at 4:13
1
I want to make it clear that the method I used here to find primitive trinomials of degree $127$ absolutely depended on the coincidence that $127$ is itself also a Mersenne prime. That trick doesn't work here.
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Dec 27 '18 at 17:09
1
I rearranged the question a bit; even the edited version, I found it hard to follow.
– quid♦
Dec 28 '18 at 13:49