Do Reflections About Lines in 2-D Preserve Angle Measure for Figures?
I read that reflections preserve angle measure but not distance because they are "flips".
$underline{textbf{Question:}}$ So, is it true that a figure that is reflected about a line preserves angle measure?
I'm going to now explain why I do not think it is true.
I'm sure there is a more succinct way to write this, but $textbf{ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW THIS IS NOT NEEDED TO ANSWER}$
$textbf{THIS QUESTION.}$ I'm just showing my work in case there is an error.
Explanation for Why Not True:
First, I'm going to come up with a valid equation that allows us to reflect a point $P:=(x_o, y_o)$ about a line $g(x):=mx+b$ where $mneq 0$ (see bullet for end result). First, let's consider the figure below.
Since lines $t$ and $g$ are $perp$, we know $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+c$ where $c$ is some constant. Since $t(x_o)=y_o$, we know $-frac{1}{m}x+c=y_oimplies c=y_o+frac{1}{m}$. Thus, $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+(y_o+frac{1}{m})$ substituting $c$ back into our original equation. Now, we know $t(x_1)=g(x_1)implies frac{-1}{m}x_1+(y_o+frac{1}{m})=mx_1+bimplies y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b=(m+frac{1}{m})x_1implies x_1=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{(m+frac{1}{m})}=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}.$ Thus, $g(x_1)=m(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})+b$. Now, we know looking at the midpoint that $(frac{x_o+x'}{2},frac{y_o+y'}{2})=(underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=x_1},underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=y_1})$.
This means $x'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-x_o$ and $y'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-y_o$.
$bullet$ Hence, we know $x'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-x_o$ and $y'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-y_o$ are our last two equations.
As I have now shown how to reflect a point across a given line, I should be able to see the same angles preserved below using the transformation above. However, I do not with this example which is clearly shown in red. 
geometry
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
add a comment |
I read that reflections preserve angle measure but not distance because they are "flips".
$underline{textbf{Question:}}$ So, is it true that a figure that is reflected about a line preserves angle measure?
I'm going to now explain why I do not think it is true.
I'm sure there is a more succinct way to write this, but $textbf{ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW THIS IS NOT NEEDED TO ANSWER}$
$textbf{THIS QUESTION.}$ I'm just showing my work in case there is an error.
Explanation for Why Not True:
First, I'm going to come up with a valid equation that allows us to reflect a point $P:=(x_o, y_o)$ about a line $g(x):=mx+b$ where $mneq 0$ (see bullet for end result). First, let's consider the figure below.
Since lines $t$ and $g$ are $perp$, we know $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+c$ where $c$ is some constant. Since $t(x_o)=y_o$, we know $-frac{1}{m}x+c=y_oimplies c=y_o+frac{1}{m}$. Thus, $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+(y_o+frac{1}{m})$ substituting $c$ back into our original equation. Now, we know $t(x_1)=g(x_1)implies frac{-1}{m}x_1+(y_o+frac{1}{m})=mx_1+bimplies y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b=(m+frac{1}{m})x_1implies x_1=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{(m+frac{1}{m})}=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}.$ Thus, $g(x_1)=m(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})+b$. Now, we know looking at the midpoint that $(frac{x_o+x'}{2},frac{y_o+y'}{2})=(underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=x_1},underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=y_1})$.
This means $x'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-x_o$ and $y'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-y_o$.
$bullet$ Hence, we know $x'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-x_o$ and $y'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-y_o$ are our last two equations.
As I have now shown how to reflect a point across a given line, I should be able to see the same angles preserved below using the transformation above. However, I do not with this example which is clearly shown in red.
geometry
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
add a comment |
I read that reflections preserve angle measure but not distance because they are "flips".
$underline{textbf{Question:}}$ So, is it true that a figure that is reflected about a line preserves angle measure?
I'm going to now explain why I do not think it is true.
I'm sure there is a more succinct way to write this, but $textbf{ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW THIS IS NOT NEEDED TO ANSWER}$
$textbf{THIS QUESTION.}$ I'm just showing my work in case there is an error.
Explanation for Why Not True:
First, I'm going to come up with a valid equation that allows us to reflect a point $P:=(x_o, y_o)$ about a line $g(x):=mx+b$ where $mneq 0$ (see bullet for end result). First, let's consider the figure below.
Since lines $t$ and $g$ are $perp$, we know $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+c$ where $c$ is some constant. Since $t(x_o)=y_o$, we know $-frac{1}{m}x+c=y_oimplies c=y_o+frac{1}{m}$. Thus, $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+(y_o+frac{1}{m})$ substituting $c$ back into our original equation. Now, we know $t(x_1)=g(x_1)implies frac{-1}{m}x_1+(y_o+frac{1}{m})=mx_1+bimplies y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b=(m+frac{1}{m})x_1implies x_1=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{(m+frac{1}{m})}=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}.$ Thus, $g(x_1)=m(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})+b$. Now, we know looking at the midpoint that $(frac{x_o+x'}{2},frac{y_o+y'}{2})=(underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=x_1},underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=y_1})$.
This means $x'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-x_o$ and $y'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-y_o$.
$bullet$ Hence, we know $x'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-x_o$ and $y'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-y_o$ are our last two equations.
As I have now shown how to reflect a point across a given line, I should be able to see the same angles preserved below using the transformation above. However, I do not with this example which is clearly shown in red.
geometry
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
I read that reflections preserve angle measure but not distance because they are "flips".
$underline{textbf{Question:}}$ So, is it true that a figure that is reflected about a line preserves angle measure?
I'm going to now explain why I do not think it is true.
I'm sure there is a more succinct way to write this, but $textbf{ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW THIS IS NOT NEEDED TO ANSWER}$
$textbf{THIS QUESTION.}$ I'm just showing my work in case there is an error.
Explanation for Why Not True:
First, I'm going to come up with a valid equation that allows us to reflect a point $P:=(x_o, y_o)$ about a line $g(x):=mx+b$ where $mneq 0$ (see bullet for end result). First, let's consider the figure below.
Since lines $t$ and $g$ are $perp$, we know $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+c$ where $c$ is some constant. Since $t(x_o)=y_o$, we know $-frac{1}{m}x+c=y_oimplies c=y_o+frac{1}{m}$. Thus, $t(x)=frac{-1}{m}x+(y_o+frac{1}{m})$ substituting $c$ back into our original equation. Now, we know $t(x_1)=g(x_1)implies frac{-1}{m}x_1+(y_o+frac{1}{m})=mx_1+bimplies y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b=(m+frac{1}{m})x_1implies x_1=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{(m+frac{1}{m})}=frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}.$ Thus, $g(x_1)=m(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})+b$. Now, we know looking at the midpoint that $(frac{x_o+x'}{2},frac{y_o+y'}{2})=(underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=x_1},underbrace{frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}}}_{=y_1})$.
This means $x'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-x_o$ and $y'=2(frac{y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b}{frac{m^2+1}{m}})-y_o$.
$bullet$ Hence, we know $x'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-x_o$ and $y'=2cdot (y_o+frac{1}{m}x_o-b)cdot (frac{m}{m^2+1})-y_o$ are our last two equations.
As I have now shown how to reflect a point across a given line, I should be able to see the same angles preserved below using the transformation above. However, I do not with this example which is clearly shown in red.
geometry
geometry
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
edited Dec 28 '18 at 14:31
W. G.
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
asked Dec 28 '18 at 14:26
W. G.W. G.
5641516
5641516
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Reflection across a line is an isometry - a rigid motion. It preserves all distances between points and (therefore) all angles.
You don't really need formulas to see this. Cut a triangle out of cardboard. Now turn it over. All lengths and angles are the same. The only difference is that "clockwise" becomes "counterclockwise".
There must be an error somewhere in your linear algebra - the obtuse triangle can't be a reflection of the acute one.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054939%2fdo-reflections-about-lines-in-2-d-preserve-angle-measure-for-figures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Reflection across a line is an isometry - a rigid motion. It preserves all distances between points and (therefore) all angles.
You don't really need formulas to see this. Cut a triangle out of cardboard. Now turn it over. All lengths and angles are the same. The only difference is that "clockwise" becomes "counterclockwise".
There must be an error somewhere in your linear algebra - the obtuse triangle can't be a reflection of the acute one.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
add a comment |
Reflection across a line is an isometry - a rigid motion. It preserves all distances between points and (therefore) all angles.
You don't really need formulas to see this. Cut a triangle out of cardboard. Now turn it over. All lengths and angles are the same. The only difference is that "clockwise" becomes "counterclockwise".
There must be an error somewhere in your linear algebra - the obtuse triangle can't be a reflection of the acute one.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
add a comment |
Reflection across a line is an isometry - a rigid motion. It preserves all distances between points and (therefore) all angles.
You don't really need formulas to see this. Cut a triangle out of cardboard. Now turn it over. All lengths and angles are the same. The only difference is that "clockwise" becomes "counterclockwise".
There must be an error somewhere in your linear algebra - the obtuse triangle can't be a reflection of the acute one.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
Reflection across a line is an isometry - a rigid motion. It preserves all distances between points and (therefore) all angles.
You don't really need formulas to see this. Cut a triangle out of cardboard. Now turn it over. All lengths and angles are the same. The only difference is that "clockwise" becomes "counterclockwise".
There must be an error somewhere in your linear algebra - the obtuse triangle can't be a reflection of the acute one.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
answered Dec 28 '18 at 14:30
Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker
41.8k547110
41.8k547110
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
add a comment |
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
Thank you! I will check my algebra.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:34
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
I already found an error. This answers my question.
– W. G.
Dec 28 '18 at 14:37
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
Lol love the cardboard explanation, because it’s true.
– Randall
Dec 28 '18 at 14:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054939%2fdo-reflections-about-lines-in-2-d-preserve-angle-measure-for-figures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
