How to resolve “Segmentation fault (core dumped)”












9















I am using Ubuntu 14.04.



After installing some applications I faced a segmentation fault (core dumped) error.



What does it mean ? How can I resolve this issue ?



For example:



After installing chrome-stable, when I launch it from terminal I experience this error.










share|improve this question

























  • Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

    – Kwaadpepper
    Oct 27 '15 at 12:12








  • 1





    See what is a segmentation fault?

    – agold
    Nov 19 '15 at 13:59






  • 1





    As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:03






  • 1





    Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

    – Ravan
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:05






  • 1





    Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:58
















9















I am using Ubuntu 14.04.



After installing some applications I faced a segmentation fault (core dumped) error.



What does it mean ? How can I resolve this issue ?



For example:



After installing chrome-stable, when I launch it from terminal I experience this error.










share|improve this question

























  • Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

    – Kwaadpepper
    Oct 27 '15 at 12:12








  • 1





    See what is a segmentation fault?

    – agold
    Nov 19 '15 at 13:59






  • 1





    As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:03






  • 1





    Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

    – Ravan
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:05






  • 1





    Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:58














9












9








9


6






I am using Ubuntu 14.04.



After installing some applications I faced a segmentation fault (core dumped) error.



What does it mean ? How can I resolve this issue ?



For example:



After installing chrome-stable, when I launch it from terminal I experience this error.










share|improve this question
















I am using Ubuntu 14.04.



After installing some applications I faced a segmentation fault (core dumped) error.



What does it mean ? How can I resolve this issue ?



For example:



After installing chrome-stable, when I launch it from terminal I experience this error.







14.04






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Oct 27 '15 at 12:24









cl-netbox

25.8k572113




25.8k572113










asked Oct 27 '15 at 11:44









RavanRavan

5,678154476




5,678154476













  • Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

    – Kwaadpepper
    Oct 27 '15 at 12:12








  • 1





    See what is a segmentation fault?

    – agold
    Nov 19 '15 at 13:59






  • 1





    As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:03






  • 1





    Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

    – Ravan
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:05






  • 1





    Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:58



















  • Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

    – Kwaadpepper
    Oct 27 '15 at 12:12








  • 1





    See what is a segmentation fault?

    – agold
    Nov 19 '15 at 13:59






  • 1





    As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:03






  • 1





    Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

    – Ravan
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:05






  • 1





    Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

    – user.dz
    Nov 21 '15 at 12:58

















Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

– Kwaadpepper
Oct 27 '15 at 12:12







Some binary program crashed, but this is very specific to the program that crashed, so you may need to tell us which program produced this, also you could try to update it.

– Kwaadpepper
Oct 27 '15 at 12:12






1




1





See what is a segmentation fault?

– agold
Nov 19 '15 at 13:59





See what is a segmentation fault?

– agold
Nov 19 '15 at 13:59




1




1





As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

– user.dz
Nov 21 '15 at 12:03





As it is a closed source, you better raise a bug report to uncle GooGle!

– user.dz
Nov 21 '15 at 12:03




1




1





Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

– Ravan
Nov 21 '15 at 12:05





Good SH :) I will ask uncle ;P

– Ravan
Nov 21 '15 at 12:05




1




1





Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

– user.dz
Nov 21 '15 at 12:58





Try remove it's preferences & cache, sudo rm -rf ~/.config/google-chrome ~/.cache/google-chrome . Then run it is incognito mode google-chrome --incognito

– user.dz
Nov 21 '15 at 12:58










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9














What does it mean?



See AU: What is a segmentation fault? and also this which have some examples how reproduce it, SO: What is segmentation fault?. the simplest description I can come with (may be not the perfect):




The program tried to access a memory area out side its own section. OS blocks it.




Some cases: Reading value with initialized pointer, Going out of range in an array, Function call (when backward compatibility not maintained), ...



However it is not always easy find the cause with large programs or those which relay on other project lib's. And most cases end up with a bug report, either for target program or one if its dependencies (either upstream project or downstream distribution package).



How can I resolve this issue?



If you didn't make any custom configuration/setup and you all updates installed. Fire a bug report, see How do I report a bug?



If open source supported by Ubuntu use ubuntu-bug (apport-bug). For 3rd party closed source, check their help pages how report bugs and collect related data.





Note: If you you have even a little programming background, it is recommended that you try your best to resolve it yourself. There many bug reports out there inactive for years. Or at least collect enough debug data to resolve the issue before reporting it.



Some Useful Tools for Debugging






  1. apport-bug logs / core dump / backtrace



    If you don't have an error message before segmentation fault. Run it with --save option and look for back-trace log:



    apport-bug program-cmd --save bug-report_output.txt




  2. gdb backtrace / debuging source code



    If it didn't work, use gdb:



    $ gdb program-cmd
    (gdb) run
    (gdb) backtrace


    If you get any error message, check the web, launchpad and in upstream project bug tracker if there any similar cases.



    For some advanced users or who are following a c/c++ learning path, they could download the corresponding -dbg symbols packages. Then you can use gdb to trace program flow through the source and get the exact function/instruction that raise the runtime error.





  3. strace system call tracing



    Another tool that may help is strace, I like it. It's really a powerful tool.



    It presents itself:




    In the simplest case strace runs the specified command until it exits. It intercepts and records the system calls which are called by a
    process and the signals which are received by a process. The name of each system call, its arguments and its return value are printed on
    standard error or to the file specified with the -o option.



    strace is a useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool. System administrators, diagnosticians and trouble-shooters will find it
    invaluable for solving problems with programs for which the source is not readily available since they do not need to be recompiled in
    order to trace them. Students, hackers and the overly-curious will find that a great deal can be learned about a system and its system
    calls by tracing even ordinary programs. And programmers will find that since system calls and signals are events that happen at the
    user/kernel interface, a close examination of this boundary is very useful for bug isolation, sanity checking and attempting to capture
    race conditions.




    Source: man strace





  4. ltrace dynamic library call tracing




    ltrace is a program that simply runs the specified command until
    it
    exits. It intercepts and records the dynamic library calls which are
    called by the executed process and the signals which are received by
    that process. It can also intercept and print the system calls exe‐
    cuted by the program.



    Its use is very similar to strace(1).




    Source: man ltrace








share|improve this answer
























    protected by Community Apr 20 '17 at 8:04



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    9














    What does it mean?



    See AU: What is a segmentation fault? and also this which have some examples how reproduce it, SO: What is segmentation fault?. the simplest description I can come with (may be not the perfect):




    The program tried to access a memory area out side its own section. OS blocks it.




    Some cases: Reading value with initialized pointer, Going out of range in an array, Function call (when backward compatibility not maintained), ...



    However it is not always easy find the cause with large programs or those which relay on other project lib's. And most cases end up with a bug report, either for target program or one if its dependencies (either upstream project or downstream distribution package).



    How can I resolve this issue?



    If you didn't make any custom configuration/setup and you all updates installed. Fire a bug report, see How do I report a bug?



    If open source supported by Ubuntu use ubuntu-bug (apport-bug). For 3rd party closed source, check their help pages how report bugs and collect related data.





    Note: If you you have even a little programming background, it is recommended that you try your best to resolve it yourself. There many bug reports out there inactive for years. Or at least collect enough debug data to resolve the issue before reporting it.



    Some Useful Tools for Debugging






    1. apport-bug logs / core dump / backtrace



      If you don't have an error message before segmentation fault. Run it with --save option and look for back-trace log:



      apport-bug program-cmd --save bug-report_output.txt




    2. gdb backtrace / debuging source code



      If it didn't work, use gdb:



      $ gdb program-cmd
      (gdb) run
      (gdb) backtrace


      If you get any error message, check the web, launchpad and in upstream project bug tracker if there any similar cases.



      For some advanced users or who are following a c/c++ learning path, they could download the corresponding -dbg symbols packages. Then you can use gdb to trace program flow through the source and get the exact function/instruction that raise the runtime error.





    3. strace system call tracing



      Another tool that may help is strace, I like it. It's really a powerful tool.



      It presents itself:




      In the simplest case strace runs the specified command until it exits. It intercepts and records the system calls which are called by a
      process and the signals which are received by a process. The name of each system call, its arguments and its return value are printed on
      standard error or to the file specified with the -o option.



      strace is a useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool. System administrators, diagnosticians and trouble-shooters will find it
      invaluable for solving problems with programs for which the source is not readily available since they do not need to be recompiled in
      order to trace them. Students, hackers and the overly-curious will find that a great deal can be learned about a system and its system
      calls by tracing even ordinary programs. And programmers will find that since system calls and signals are events that happen at the
      user/kernel interface, a close examination of this boundary is very useful for bug isolation, sanity checking and attempting to capture
      race conditions.




      Source: man strace





    4. ltrace dynamic library call tracing




      ltrace is a program that simply runs the specified command until
      it
      exits. It intercepts and records the dynamic library calls which are
      called by the executed process and the signals which are received by
      that process. It can also intercept and print the system calls exe‐
      cuted by the program.



      Its use is very similar to strace(1).




      Source: man ltrace








    share|improve this answer






























      9














      What does it mean?



      See AU: What is a segmentation fault? and also this which have some examples how reproduce it, SO: What is segmentation fault?. the simplest description I can come with (may be not the perfect):




      The program tried to access a memory area out side its own section. OS blocks it.




      Some cases: Reading value with initialized pointer, Going out of range in an array, Function call (when backward compatibility not maintained), ...



      However it is not always easy find the cause with large programs or those which relay on other project lib's. And most cases end up with a bug report, either for target program or one if its dependencies (either upstream project or downstream distribution package).



      How can I resolve this issue?



      If you didn't make any custom configuration/setup and you all updates installed. Fire a bug report, see How do I report a bug?



      If open source supported by Ubuntu use ubuntu-bug (apport-bug). For 3rd party closed source, check their help pages how report bugs and collect related data.





      Note: If you you have even a little programming background, it is recommended that you try your best to resolve it yourself. There many bug reports out there inactive for years. Or at least collect enough debug data to resolve the issue before reporting it.



      Some Useful Tools for Debugging






      1. apport-bug logs / core dump / backtrace



        If you don't have an error message before segmentation fault. Run it with --save option and look for back-trace log:



        apport-bug program-cmd --save bug-report_output.txt




      2. gdb backtrace / debuging source code



        If it didn't work, use gdb:



        $ gdb program-cmd
        (gdb) run
        (gdb) backtrace


        If you get any error message, check the web, launchpad and in upstream project bug tracker if there any similar cases.



        For some advanced users or who are following a c/c++ learning path, they could download the corresponding -dbg symbols packages. Then you can use gdb to trace program flow through the source and get the exact function/instruction that raise the runtime error.





      3. strace system call tracing



        Another tool that may help is strace, I like it. It's really a powerful tool.



        It presents itself:




        In the simplest case strace runs the specified command until it exits. It intercepts and records the system calls which are called by a
        process and the signals which are received by a process. The name of each system call, its arguments and its return value are printed on
        standard error or to the file specified with the -o option.



        strace is a useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool. System administrators, diagnosticians and trouble-shooters will find it
        invaluable for solving problems with programs for which the source is not readily available since they do not need to be recompiled in
        order to trace them. Students, hackers and the overly-curious will find that a great deal can be learned about a system and its system
        calls by tracing even ordinary programs. And programmers will find that since system calls and signals are events that happen at the
        user/kernel interface, a close examination of this boundary is very useful for bug isolation, sanity checking and attempting to capture
        race conditions.




        Source: man strace





      4. ltrace dynamic library call tracing




        ltrace is a program that simply runs the specified command until
        it
        exits. It intercepts and records the dynamic library calls which are
        called by the executed process and the signals which are received by
        that process. It can also intercept and print the system calls exe‐
        cuted by the program.



        Its use is very similar to strace(1).




        Source: man ltrace








      share|improve this answer




























        9












        9








        9







        What does it mean?



        See AU: What is a segmentation fault? and also this which have some examples how reproduce it, SO: What is segmentation fault?. the simplest description I can come with (may be not the perfect):




        The program tried to access a memory area out side its own section. OS blocks it.




        Some cases: Reading value with initialized pointer, Going out of range in an array, Function call (when backward compatibility not maintained), ...



        However it is not always easy find the cause with large programs or those which relay on other project lib's. And most cases end up with a bug report, either for target program or one if its dependencies (either upstream project or downstream distribution package).



        How can I resolve this issue?



        If you didn't make any custom configuration/setup and you all updates installed. Fire a bug report, see How do I report a bug?



        If open source supported by Ubuntu use ubuntu-bug (apport-bug). For 3rd party closed source, check their help pages how report bugs and collect related data.





        Note: If you you have even a little programming background, it is recommended that you try your best to resolve it yourself. There many bug reports out there inactive for years. Or at least collect enough debug data to resolve the issue before reporting it.



        Some Useful Tools for Debugging






        1. apport-bug logs / core dump / backtrace



          If you don't have an error message before segmentation fault. Run it with --save option and look for back-trace log:



          apport-bug program-cmd --save bug-report_output.txt




        2. gdb backtrace / debuging source code



          If it didn't work, use gdb:



          $ gdb program-cmd
          (gdb) run
          (gdb) backtrace


          If you get any error message, check the web, launchpad and in upstream project bug tracker if there any similar cases.



          For some advanced users or who are following a c/c++ learning path, they could download the corresponding -dbg symbols packages. Then you can use gdb to trace program flow through the source and get the exact function/instruction that raise the runtime error.





        3. strace system call tracing



          Another tool that may help is strace, I like it. It's really a powerful tool.



          It presents itself:




          In the simplest case strace runs the specified command until it exits. It intercepts and records the system calls which are called by a
          process and the signals which are received by a process. The name of each system call, its arguments and its return value are printed on
          standard error or to the file specified with the -o option.



          strace is a useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool. System administrators, diagnosticians and trouble-shooters will find it
          invaluable for solving problems with programs for which the source is not readily available since they do not need to be recompiled in
          order to trace them. Students, hackers and the overly-curious will find that a great deal can be learned about a system and its system
          calls by tracing even ordinary programs. And programmers will find that since system calls and signals are events that happen at the
          user/kernel interface, a close examination of this boundary is very useful for bug isolation, sanity checking and attempting to capture
          race conditions.




          Source: man strace





        4. ltrace dynamic library call tracing




          ltrace is a program that simply runs the specified command until
          it
          exits. It intercepts and records the dynamic library calls which are
          called by the executed process and the signals which are received by
          that process. It can also intercept and print the system calls exe‐
          cuted by the program.



          Its use is very similar to strace(1).




          Source: man ltrace








        share|improve this answer















        What does it mean?



        See AU: What is a segmentation fault? and also this which have some examples how reproduce it, SO: What is segmentation fault?. the simplest description I can come with (may be not the perfect):




        The program tried to access a memory area out side its own section. OS blocks it.




        Some cases: Reading value with initialized pointer, Going out of range in an array, Function call (when backward compatibility not maintained), ...



        However it is not always easy find the cause with large programs or those which relay on other project lib's. And most cases end up with a bug report, either for target program or one if its dependencies (either upstream project or downstream distribution package).



        How can I resolve this issue?



        If you didn't make any custom configuration/setup and you all updates installed. Fire a bug report, see How do I report a bug?



        If open source supported by Ubuntu use ubuntu-bug (apport-bug). For 3rd party closed source, check their help pages how report bugs and collect related data.





        Note: If you you have even a little programming background, it is recommended that you try your best to resolve it yourself. There many bug reports out there inactive for years. Or at least collect enough debug data to resolve the issue before reporting it.



        Some Useful Tools for Debugging






        1. apport-bug logs / core dump / backtrace



          If you don't have an error message before segmentation fault. Run it with --save option and look for back-trace log:



          apport-bug program-cmd --save bug-report_output.txt




        2. gdb backtrace / debuging source code



          If it didn't work, use gdb:



          $ gdb program-cmd
          (gdb) run
          (gdb) backtrace


          If you get any error message, check the web, launchpad and in upstream project bug tracker if there any similar cases.



          For some advanced users or who are following a c/c++ learning path, they could download the corresponding -dbg symbols packages. Then you can use gdb to trace program flow through the source and get the exact function/instruction that raise the runtime error.





        3. strace system call tracing



          Another tool that may help is strace, I like it. It's really a powerful tool.



          It presents itself:




          In the simplest case strace runs the specified command until it exits. It intercepts and records the system calls which are called by a
          process and the signals which are received by a process. The name of each system call, its arguments and its return value are printed on
          standard error or to the file specified with the -o option.



          strace is a useful diagnostic, instructional, and debugging tool. System administrators, diagnosticians and trouble-shooters will find it
          invaluable for solving problems with programs for which the source is not readily available since they do not need to be recompiled in
          order to trace them. Students, hackers and the overly-curious will find that a great deal can be learned about a system and its system
          calls by tracing even ordinary programs. And programmers will find that since system calls and signals are events that happen at the
          user/kernel interface, a close examination of this boundary is very useful for bug isolation, sanity checking and attempting to capture
          race conditions.




          Source: man strace





        4. ltrace dynamic library call tracing




          ltrace is a program that simply runs the specified command until
          it
          exits. It intercepts and records the dynamic library calls which are
          called by the executed process and the signals which are received by
          that process. It can also intercept and print the system calls exe‐
          cuted by the program.



          Its use is very similar to strace(1).




          Source: man ltrace









        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 11 '17 at 8:10

























        answered Nov 30 '15 at 0:09









        user.dzuser.dz

        34.6k1190176




        34.6k1190176

















            protected by Community Apr 20 '17 at 8:04



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            Questions related to Moebius Transform of Characteristic Function of the Primes

            Can not write log (Is /dev/pts mounted?) - openpty in Ubuntu-on-Windows?

            List of scandals in India